PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF HIGH FDG UPTAKES ON F18 FDG PET IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER : MULTIVARIATE AN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF HIGH FDG UPTAKES ON F18 FDG PET IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER : MULTIVARIATE AN

Description:

SUV represents the degree of glucose uptake of lesion and this is known to be ... Maximal SUV of primary lesion on pretreatment PET was measured. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: larrygije
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF HIGH FDG UPTAKES ON F18 FDG PET IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER : MULTIVARIATE AN


1
1388

PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF HIGH FDG UPTAKES ON
F-18 FDG PET IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSISBC Lee,1 BI Kim,2 GJ
Cheon,2 CW Choi,2 YS Lee,1 SM Lim,2 SW Hong2
Departments of 1Head and Neck Surgery and
2Nuclear Medicine, Korea Institute Radiological
And Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
Introduction
  • Then, we performed Cox regression test (by
    forwardlikelhood-ratio method) with same
    parameters. SUV as cut-off 8 is significant to
    prognosis at step 1, other step is not
    progressed.
  • Up to date, known important prognostic factors
    of head and neck cancer are the stage at
    diagnosis, recurrence after treatment. But, we
    sometimes have experienced a patient who has low
    stage cancer has poor result because of
    progressive nature of tumor, or another patient
    who has advanced stage has cured due to mild
    nature of tumor. The stage at initial diagnosis
    is not enough to explain the result of the
    patient. We have to find out another prognostic
    factor.
  • 18F FDG PET scan (PET) is useful tool of finding
    out concealed tumor or metastatic lesion. The
    same time, attenuation corrected standardized
    uptake value (SUV) of lesion is taken from PET
    scan. SUV represents the degree of glucose uptake
    of lesion and this is known to be related the
    degree of malignancy, growing velocity and
    biological nature of tumor. Previously, a report
    that SUV is related to prognosis of lung cancer
    is published, and we expect that SUV in head and
    neck cancer will be a valuable prognostic factor.
  • Correlation of SUV with some variables was
    calculated.
  • SUV is correlated with Stage.

Materials and Methods
  • Thirty patients with head and neck cancer were
    performed 18F FDG PET before defined treatment.
  • Male Female 255, mean age 65.
  • Pathologic diagnosis were all squamous cell
    carcinoma
  • Disease free survival time was determined by
    follow up study till 14 months after treatment.
  • Maximal SUV of primary lesion on pretreatment PET
    was measured. Optimal cut-off value of SUV for
    disease free survival time was determined by
    log-rank test.
  • To determine which has prognostic significance,
    SUV of primary lesion, age, tumor size, degree of
    differentiation, pretreatment stage, treatment
    method were analyzed by Cox regression test.
  • The software used in this study was SPSS version
    11.

Comparison of disease free survival curve by SUV
(cut off 8)
( P0.015)
Conclusion
Results
  • SUV is higher than 8, prognosis is poorer.
  • SUV is related to stage of disease.
  • SUV is possible prognostic factor in head and
    neck cancer.
  • It is suspected that the tumor with high SUV at
    primary site is tend to grow more aggressively
    than low SUV tumor.
  • When we met a patients with high SUV tumor, more
    close observation is necessary after treatment.
  • The mean SUV was 7.5 , median SUV was 6.5
    (minimum 0.23, maximum 17.1).
  • To find out optimum cut-off value of SUV, we
    repeated log-rank test. We found that when
    cut-off value is 8, prognosis is differed most
    remarkably(table 1).

Reference
  • Then, we performed log-rank test for each
    parameters ( pathologic differentiation, tumor
    size, age, stage, treatment modality, and SUV as
    cut-off 8). SUV as cut-off 8 is only significant
    to prognosis (disease free survival), others are
    not significant.
  • Anzai Y, Carroll WR, Quint DJ, Bradford CR,
    Minoshima S, Wolf GT, et al. Recurrence of head
    and neck cancer after surgery or irradiation
    Prospective comparison of 2-deoxy-2-F-18
    flouoro-D-glucose PET and MR imaging diagnoses.
    Radiology 1996200135-41
  • Rege S. Maass A, Chaiken L, Hoh CK, Choi Y,
    Lufkin R, et al. Use of positron emission
    tomography with extracranial head and neck
    cancers. Cancer 1994733047-58
  • Patz EF Jr, Connoly J, Herndon J. Prognostic
    value of thoracic FDG PET imaging After treatment
    for non-small cell lung cancer. AJR
    2000174769-74
  • Brun E, Ohlsson T, Erlandsson K, et al. Early
    prediction of treatment outcome in head and neck
    cancer with 2-18FDG PET. Acta Oncol
    199736741-747
  • Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, De
    Leyn PR, et al. Prognostic importance of the
    standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-
    glucose-positron emission tomography scan in
    non-small-cell lung cancer An analysis of 125
    cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol
    1999173201-6
  • Minn H, Lapela M, Klemi PJ, Grenman R, et al.
    Prediction of survival with fluorine-18-fluoro-deo
    xyglucose and PET in head and neck cancer. J Nucl
    Med 1997381907-11
  • Kitagawa Y, Sadato N, Azuma H, Ogasawara T, et
    al. FDG PET to evaluate combined intra-arterial
    chemotherapy and radiotherapy of head and neck
    neoplasms. J Nucl Med 1999401132-7

Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical
Sciences
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com