Performance%20shocks,%20turnaround%20strategies%20and%20corporate%20recovery:%20Evidence%20from%20Australia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Performance%20shocks,%20turnaround%20strategies%20and%20corporate%20recovery:%20Evidence%20from%20Australia

Description:

Performance shocks, turnaround strategies and corporate recovery: ... Employee layoffs (Inverson and Pullman, 2000; Chen et al 2001, Denis and Kruse, 2000) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:319
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Performance%20shocks,%20turnaround%20strategies%20and%20corporate%20recovery:%20Evidence%20from%20Australia


1
Performance shocks, turnaround strategies and
corporate recovery Evidence from Australia
  • Alfred Yawson
  • The University New South Wales

2
Motivation
  • Firms are expected to adopt turnaround (financial
    and corporate) strategies when they experience
    performance shocks.
  • Turnaround actions include
  • Financial strategies
  • Corporate restructuring strategies

3
Motivation
  • Do firms adopt turnaround strategies to deal with
    performance shocks?
  • Do turnaround strategies result in performance
    improvement? (contemporaneous and/or lagged)
  • Is there any interaction effect of turnaround
    actions on firm performance?

4
Related literature
  • Firms review their financial strategies following
    performance declines (Slatter, 1984 Ofek, 1993
    Chowdhury and Lang, 1996).
  • Financial leverage (Ofek, 1993, Kahl, 2002)
  • Operating expense (Slatter, 1984)
  • Revenue growth (Pant, 1987)
  • Dividend payment (Ofek, 1993 Grullon et al,
    2002 Lie, 2004)
  • Working Capital (Slater, 1984)

5
Related literature
  • Firms adopt Corporate restructuring strategies
    following performance shocks (Ofek, 1993 Kang
    and Shivdasani, 1997 Denis and Kruse, 2000).
  • Change of management (Denis and Kruse, 2000,
    Warner et al., 1988 Ofek, 1993)
  • Employee layoffs (Inverson and Pullman, 2000
    Chen et al 2001, Denis and Kruse, 2000)
  • Asset sales (Kang and Shivdasani, 1997)
  • Divestitures (John and Ofek, 1995, Denis and
    Shome, 2004, Denis and Kruse, 2000)

6
Data
  • Financial data sourced from FinAnalysis database
    restructuring data from SDC and Signal G
    announcements.
  • Firm performance higher than industry average in
    one year but fall below the industry average the
    following year (Kang and Shivdasani, 1997, Denis
    and Kruse, 2000)
  • Identify 415 Australian firms that experienced
    performance shocks from 1992 to 2000.
  • Eliminate 17 firms because they experienced
    financial distress prior to shock (Ofek, 1993) .
  • Checked the impact of new CEOs on performance
    shocks (Pourciau, 1993)
  • Final sample Year 0 399, 1 395 firms, Year
    2, 388, Year 3, 367 firms

7
Analysis of firm performance
8
Financial strategies following performance shocks
9
Impact of financial strategies
10
Corporate restructuring activities following
performance shocks
11
Determinants of corporate restructuring
activities following performance shocks
12
Impact of corporate restructuring strategies
13
Complementary impact of restructuring
strategies/robustness checks
14
Interaction effects
15
Conclusions/Implications
  • Efficiency gained through proper adjustment to
    financial policies (eg., financial leverage and
    operating expenses) result in a negative
    contemporaneous effect on firm performance
  • Corporate restructuring activities (eg. Layoffs
    and divestitures) have lagged impact on
    performance improvement
  • The interaction of financial and restructuring
    activities may result in an incremental impact on
    firm performance
  • Performance shocks are reversible but through
    proper use of financial and corporate
    restructuring strategies
  • Management can use the analysis as a guide to
    designing turnaround actions to deal with
    performance shocks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com