Welcome Back Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Welcome Back Students

Description:

Regular exercise - 20 minutes, 3 x/week. Regular daily intake of proper servings of 4 main food groups - Canada's food guide. Regular rest & relaxation/ leisure ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:236
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: thames2
Category:
Tags: back | students | welcome

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welcome Back Students


1
Welcome Back Students!
  • HEALTH PROMOTION/PROTECTION DISEASE PREVENTION
  • Week 1 63-173

2
Importance of Illness and Injury Prevention
(Statistics Reported in Sept. 2006)
  • There were more than 4,000 deaths and 570,000
    injuries. In other words, every hour of every
    day, 65 people in Ontario are injured and roughly
    11 people die from their injuries each day
  • The total costs of intentional and unintentional
    injuries in Ontario amounted to more than 5.7
    billion annually. These include direct costs such
    as health care and indirect costs including lost
    productivity
  • Falls were the most costly unintentional injury,
    totalling more than 1.9 billion. Motor vehicle
    collisions were the second most costly, at more
    than 1.1 billion http//www.smartrisk.ca/Content
    Director.aspx?tp4044

3
Importance of Illness and Injury Prevention
(contd)
  • Of the total cost of intentional injuries,
    suicide and self-inflicted injury accounted for
    nearly 886 million, while interpersonal violence
    represented 230 million
  • Alcohol-related injuries had a total cost of 440
    million for the four leading causes of injury
  • Injuries resulting from physical activity cost
    655 million http//www.smartrisk.ca/ContentDirect
    or.aspx?tp4044

4
Importance of Illness and Injury Prevention
(contd)
  • The rates and economic burden of injury vary
    widely across Ontario. For example, residents of
    northwestern Ontario experience the highest
    death, hospitalization and injury rates, along
    with the highest per capita injury costs. The
    lowest death rates and per capita injury costs
    were found in the Mississaugua-Halton area
    http//www.smartrisk.ca/ContentDirector.aspx?tp40
    44

5
At Risk Populations
  • 40 in pre-contemplation
  • 40 in contemplation
  • 20 in preparation
  • Example of High Risk Populations
  • University/College students Drug and Alcohol
    Use, Drinking and Driving
  • Children high risk population for falls,
    poisoning, suffocation, drowning and obesity
  • Teenage Pregnancies
  • Elder Falls
  • Depression/Suicide in Aboriginal populations

6
Human Potential for Change
  • Individuals/groups have tremendous potential for
    change
  • Have capacity for self-knowledge,
    self-regulation, decision-making and creative
    problem solving 
  • Willingly undertake to achieve self-selected goals

7
Human Potential for Change
  • Nurses create/promote positive environments, may
    serve as catalyst and assist with various steps
    of change process
  • Promote behavioural change by having positive
    regard for culture and and socioeconomic
    conditions
  • Health behaviours with cultural fit more likely
    to be maintained over time as an integral aspect
    of lifestyle

8
Use of Multidisciplinary Theories
  • Successful approaches to behaviour change address
    multiple levels of influence on the behaviour and
    their interaction/influence across all levels of
    care
  • Ecological approach uses intrapersonal,
    interpersonal, institutional, community and
    public policy factors which all represent levels
    of influence on human health behaviour

9
A Model of Health Protection The Health Belief
Model (HBM)
  • Viewed as potentially useful to predict those
    individuals who would/would not use preventive
    measures and to suggest interventions that might
    increase predisposition of resistant individuals
    to engage in health-protecting behaviours

10
A Model of Health Protection The Health Belief
Model (HBM) (contd)
  • Main variables perceived threat to personal
    health and the conviction that the benefits of
    taking action to protect health outweigh the
    barriers that will be encountered

11
Health Belief Model


Individual Perceptions

Modifying Factors

Likelihood of Action





Demographic variables
(age, sex,

race,
ethnicity, etc.)





Perceived benefits
o
f
Sociopsychological variables


preventive action

(personality, social class, peer

minus

reference group pressure, etc.)



Perceived barriers
to


preventive action

Structural variables
(knowledge


about the disease, prior contact

Perceived susceptibility
to
with the disease, etc.)


disease X





Perceived
seriousness

Likelihood of taking

Perceived threat
recommended preventive

(severity) of disease X

of disease X


health action




Cues to action



Mass media campaigns


Advice from others


Reminder postcard from


physician or dentist

Illness of family member or
friend

Newspaper/magazine article

12
Focused areas of criticism about the HBM
  • Perception of threat is the only time modifying
    factors (demographics, social, psychological and
    structural variables) are addressed in the model
    and only indirectly
  • Health Belief Model model for disease
    preventing behavior but is clearly an
    inappropriate as a model for health promoting
    behavior (Pender et al, 2006)

13
Explaining or Predicting Preventive Behavior
  • Research suggests that perceived barriers is the
    most powerful dimension in explaining or
    predicting various preventive behaviors.
  • Perceived susceptibility important
  • Perceived benefits of taking action and perceived
    severity of illness lacked power to explain or
    predict preventive behavior

14
Criticisms of the Health Belief Model
  • Only two component variables in the model are
    supported by research
  • This is relevant to designing preventive
    interventions ( Pender et al, 2006)
  • HBM Model was to be applied to one time behaviors
    (i.e. immunization)
  • Application to more complex behavioral risks
    i.e. smoking, unsafe sexual practices
    necessitates attending to the individual
    perceptions of competence or self efficacy to
    repeatedly engage in preventive behaviors over a
    long period of time. (Pender et al, 2006)

15
Health Promotion Model (HPM) Pender, N.,
Murdaugh, C. Parsons, M. (2006). Health
promotion in nursing practice. 5th ed. Upper
Saddle River, N.J Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Focuses on promotion of healthy behaviours, not
    on disease prevention  
  • Competence or approach-oriented model does not
    include fear of threat as a source of motivation
    for health behaviour 
  • Potentially applicable across the lifespan

16
Theoretical Basis for HPM
  • Attempt to depict multidimensional nature of
    persons interacting with their interpersonal and
    physical environments as they pursue health 
  • Integrates constructs from
  • Expectancy-Value Theory - Behaviour is rational
    and economical
  • Social Cognitive Theory - Interactive dynamic
    model of causation, environmental events,
    personal factors, affect, cognitions and
    behaviours themselves interact to influence and
    cause each other

17
Health Promotion Model
18
Research Evidence for the HPM
  • Variables that were significant in highest of
    previous studies were perceived self-efficacy,
    perceived barriers and prior behaviour 
  • Demographic characteristics, perceived benefits,
    interpersonal and situational influences and
    perceived health status were significant in
    majority of studies 
  • Better measures of interpersonal and situational
    influences are needed to provide more rigorous
    test of their explanatory and predictive value
    for health-promoting behaviour

19
Role of the Professional andSelf Care
  • The nurse helps the client shape a positive
    behavioral history for the future by focusing on
    the benefits of a behavior, teaching clients how
    to overcome hurdles to carrying out the behavior
    and engendering high levels of efficacy and
    positive affect through successful performance
    experience and positive feed back. ( Pender et
    al, 2006)

20
Usefulness of the HBM and the HPM
  • Models provide a coherent and organized framework
    for intervening with clients to increase health
    protection and health promotion behaviours
  • HBM for use in examining health protection
    behaviours

21
  • HPM e.g.s
  • Regular exercise - 20 minutes, 3 x/week
  • Regular daily intake of proper servings of 4 main
    food groups - Canadas food guide
  • Regular rest relaxation/ leisure activities
  • Maintenance of wt within suggested parameters
    based on Ht age.
  • HBM e.g.s
  • Monthly BSE for early detection of breast cancer
  • Smoking cessation to reduce risk of lung cancer
  • Intake of sufficient dietary fibre to reduce risk
    of stomach cancer
  • Regular use of seatbelts to minimize serious
    injury in car accident

22
Transtheoretical Model of Change
  • Prochaska and Diclemente
  • Provides a framework for understanding the
    process of how people change
  • Recognizes that different stages require
    different types of interventions in order to make
    the change process relevant to the client

23
The Transtheoretical Model
  • Health behavior change involves progress through
    six stages of change
  • 1. Pre-contemplation Not intending to make a
    change
  • 2. Contemplation Seriously considering next 6
    months
  • 3. Preparation Next 30 days
  • 4. Action Involved in the behavioral
    change for 6 months
  • 5. Maintenance Works to prevent reverting- 6
    months after action has started and
    continuing indefinitely.
  • 6. Termination Integrated change behaviors
    into ADLs- activities of daily living

24
(No Transcript)
25
Spiral of Change
26
What Helps People Change?
  • Processes of Change
  • Decisional balance
  • Self-efficacy

27
Processes of ChangeRole of Professional and Self
Care Facilitated Change
  • Experiential Process
  • Consciousness Raising
  • Self reevaluation
  • Environmental Re-evaluation
  • Self- re-evaluation
  • Social Liberation
  • Behavioral Process
  • Counterconditioning
  • Helping relationships
  • Reinforcement Management
  • Self Liberation
  • Stimulus Control

28
Role of the NurseStage Matched
InterventionsProchaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C.,
Norcross, J.C. (1992). In search of how people
change Applications to addictive behaviors.
American Psychologist. 47(9)1102-1114.
Pre contemplation Contemplation Preparation
Action Maintenance Termination
Consciousness raising Dramatic relief Environmenta
l Re evaluation
Self-liberation
Reinforcement management Helping
relationships Counter conditioning Stimulus
Control
Self- Re-evaluation
29
Decisional Balance Across the Stages of Change
30
Self-efficacy
  • Represents a persons confidence in their ability
    to change a behavior
  • Confidence to resist temptations varies across
    the stages of change. It is lowest in the
    pre-contemplation and highest in the maintenance
    stage

31
Application of Change Theories
  • Ten minutes Group Activity
  • In groups of 3
  • Using TTM
  • Develop 3 questions that would assist you, the
    nurse, in ascertaining the stage of a clients
    readiness for behavioral change
  • Choose a spokes person to present your questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com