Lessons Learned using the Classroom Experience Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Lessons Learned using the Classroom Experience Project

Description:

Better interactivity through ink on PPT. What we hoped to achieve ... No connection if the bits don't get through, there is no class. Interruptions short failures ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: jaybeavers
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lessons Learned using the Classroom Experience Project


1
Lessons Learned using the Classroom Experience
Project
  • How to fail at video conferenced teaching

2
UW Professional Master's Program
  • Five year old program with established distance
    courses.
  • One course per quarter video conferenced between
    UW and Microsoft.
  • One evening per week
  • Commuting distance

3
Before ClassroomXP technology
  • ISDN Based video conferencing
  • Netmeeting for PowerPoint distribution
  • Electronic white board
  • Lecture archive
  • Continual improvement in quality
  • Lighting, microphones, audio processing, camera
    management, etc.

4
How to fail at video conferencing, Jim Gemmel
  • Voice quality must be competitive with telephony
  • Video should increase, not decrease presence
  • Starting up a video conference should be as easy
    as making a telephone call
  • Video conferencing must be ubiquitous

5
Potential advantages for using ConferenceXP
  • Higher quality video and audio
  • Ease of setup and installation
  • Address some known problems
  • Whiteboard

6
Friendly Environment for ClassroomXP trials
  • Substantial resources on both sides
  • Established program
  • Near-located
  • Existing relationship
  • Experiment
  • Is higher quality video better
  • Better interactivity through ink on PPT

7
What we hoped to achieve
  • Increased interaction between sites
  • Ability of remote students to interact with the
    instructor
  • Ability of instructor to engage remote students
  • Student interaction across sites
  • No degradation of experience of local students
  • No System Administrator

8
What happened
  • Week 1
  • Used old system (for comparison)
  • Weeks 2-4
  • Bad patch cable caused 30 packet loss, maiming
    Conferencing app
  • Weeks 5-9
  • Router incompatibilities caused intermittent
    multicast failure (15 minutes between failure)
  • Weeks 10-12
  • Worked as expected

9
How to fail at a distance course
  • Transmission failures
  • Production quality
  • Lighting, room noise, camera management
  • Structured presentations limit activity
  • Classroom issues
  • Table layout, overhead positionning
  • Attitudes

10
Transmission failures
  • No connection if the bits dont get through,
    there is no class
  • Interruptions short failures
  • Degradation of performance (audio, video, signal
    and latency)

11
Production quality
  • Microphones
  • Not picking up sound
  • Picking up too much
  • Lighting
  • Camera quality
  • Field of view
  • Distance

12
Presentation
  • Restrictions imposed by technology
  • Limitations on materials
  • Loss of fidelity of transmitted materials

13
Classroom issues
  • Placement of projectors
  • Dispersal of audience
  • Student seating
  • Conference rooms versus lecture hall

14
Attitudes
  • Resentment of technology
  • Not attempting to engage other site
  • Instructor not encouraging questions
  • Students not asking questions

15
Multicast
  • Lack of reliability
  • Vender incompatibility issues
  • Substantial time to localize problems
  • Intermittent failures

16
Multicast test tools
  • Details on what is needed it would be great to
    create interest in this

17
Room Configuration
Screen 1
Screen 2
18
Content Issues
  • Sound issues difficulty of room(s).
  • Value of picking up background noise (sense of
    presence).
  • Camera issues in remote room
  • Configuration required students to sit at
    distance
  • Some students avoided sitting in field of view

19
Student Reactions I
  • Repeated failures reduced students attempt to
    interact across sites
  • Even intermittent failures had significant
    psychological impact
  • Students recognized that we were attempting to do
    a good job (we were present in the remote
    classroom, and shared their pain)

20
Student Reactions II
  • With our workarounds (high latency video,
    conference phone) students did not participate.
  • In spite of technical difficulties many students
    chose to attend the remote site (commuting 15
    miles in traffic being an alternative)
  • Local students complained of intrusiveness of
    interruptions. Had little sympathy for remote
    students.

21
Faculty Reaction
  • With technological difficulties, taught primarily
    to local class
  • Presentation tools readily accepted

22
Take 2
  • Network diagnostics testing
  • 7x24 test agents
  • Long term statistics gathering web reporting
  • Concept of Administrative Console
  • Diagnostics to quickly determine fault
  • Over 20 points of potential failure in I cant
    hear the professor
  • Non-invasive reset, diagnostics, configuration
    change
  • Rooms dedicated to distance classes
  • Lighting, wall color, ceiling mikes, projector
    A/C noise, projector positioning, table layout
  • Ease of startup shutdown

23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com