Pan American Health Organization April 24, 2002 III Pan American Conference on Drug Regulatory Harmo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Pan American Health Organization April 24, 2002 III Pan American Conference on Drug Regulatory Harmo

Description:

The Parties shall ensure that their technical regulations are not prepared, ... Parties have a right to establish standards and technical regulations to achieve ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: horton1
Learn more at: http://www1.paho.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pan American Health Organization April 24, 2002 III Pan American Conference on Drug Regulatory Harmo


1
Pan American Health OrganizationApril 24,
2002III Pan American Conference on Drug
Regulatory Harmonization
  • Linda R. Horton
  • Law Offices of Hogan Hartson, LLP
  • Washington D.C.
  • lrhorton_at_hhlaw.com

2
Effects of Regional Integration on Pharmaceutical
Regulation
  • THE FREE TRADE AREA OF THE AMERICAS
  • AREA LIBRE DE LAS AMERICAS

3
The FTAA and Regulations
  • What are issues in the Technical Barriers to
    Trade negotiation that affect regulations.
  • The provisions are general, covering many
    products, and not only pharmaceuticals.
  • What the FTAA is.and is not!

4
What trade agreements require of regulators.
  • World Trade Organization (WTO) Technical Barriers
    to Trade (TBT) Agreement

5
Core discipline of TBT
  • The Parties shall ensure that their technical
    regulations are not prepared, adopted or applied
    with a view to or with the effect of creating
    unnecessary barriers to international trade. For
    this purpose, technical regulations shall not be
    more trade- restrictive than necessary to fulfil
    a legitimate objective, taking account of the
    risks non-fulfilment would create.
  • TBT Article 2.2

6
Parties have a right to Regulate...
  • Parties have a right to establish standards and
    technical regulations to achieve legitimate
    objectives, such as the protection of human,
    animal or plant life or health protection of the
    environment or prevention of practices that may
    mislead or deceive the consumer.

7
  • But Not to Have Unnecessary Technical Barriers to
    Trade
  • But what is unnecessary?
  • And who decides?

8
What should be included in FTAA?
  • FREE TRADE AREA OF THE AMERICAS
  • DRAFT of July 3, 2001
  • downloaded from
  • http//www.ftaa-alca.org

9
CHAPTER ON STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO
TRADE
  • Area of Application
  • 1.1 The provisions of this Chapter apply to
    standards -related measures activities,
    of the Parties, in other words standards,
    technical regulations, conformity assessment
    authorization procedures and metrology
    ,accreditation technical regulations,
    conformity assessment procedures, metrology
    measures activities (scientific, industrial
    and legal) of the Parties, as well as to
    measures related to these that could directly or
    indirectly affect trade in goods or services
    between the Parties.

10
The FTAA is still being negotiated!
  • The draft is full of square brackets, indicating
    that many similar ideas are in play but there is
    little agreement yet.
  • The final text could be very simple.or it could
    be very complicated.
  • Here is what a simple FTAA TBT could be

11
Simple TBT Agreement
  • 1. Each Party shall make every effort to fully
    implement and abide by the WTO TBT Agreement
  • 2. In order to assist the less developed Parties,
    the more developed Parties will make all
    reasonable efforts to provide technical
    assistance
  • 3. The Parties hereby establish a Committee on
    Technical Barriers to Trade.

12
The agreement could repeat theTBT...
  • The Parties could recognize the rights and
    obligations in the WTO TBT Agreement, and agree
    to abide by its principles of
  • transparency,
  • most-favored-nation treatment,
  • non-discriminationNondiscrimination treating
    other Parties goods no less favorably than like
    goods of domestic origin or of any other
    country.

13
Or the Agreement could add more details or
obligations...
  • What should the language be on
  • Harmonization?
  • Equivalence?
  • Mutual recognition?

14
International Standards and Participation in
International Fora
  • Common themes Parties shall
  • strive to use international standards.
  • encourage their adoption.
  • urge their standardizing bodies to participate
    fully in international standardizing bodies.
  • seek to coordinate positions.

15
Definitions
  • International Standard a standard, or other
    guide or recommendation, adopted by an
    international standardizing body and made
    available to the public.
  • International Standardization Body would
    include WHO/PAHO.

16
Examples of language on harmonization
  • the Parties shall make efforts to harmonize,
    whenever possible, the standards-related
    activities referred to in 1.1, as well as the
    guidelines and practices established by related
    international technical fora.

17
Example on equivalence
  • 4.6 The Parties shall give favorable
    consideration to the possibility of accepting
    equivalent technical regulations of other
    Parties, even if these regulations differ from
    their own, provided they are satisfied that these
    regulations appropriately fulfil the objectives
    of their own regulations.
  • Issues Who has burden of proof?
  • If a request is denied, should there be a written
    explanation?
  • Should the Parties adopt common criteria on on
    equivalence determinations?

18
On mutual recognition
  • Examples of language being discussed
  • 5.11 The Parties are encouraged, at the request
    of other Parties, to be willing to enter into
    negotiations for the mutual recognition of the
    results of each others conformity assessment
    procedures.
  • 5.13 Parties shall support cooperation among
    testing laboratoriesand inspection bodies to
    promote mutual acceptance of conformity
    assessments and ensuing results.

19
Other Issues
  • Risk Assessment Include provisions similar to
    those for in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary
    Measures Agreement?
  • Transparency Include notification of new
    requirements? Inquiry points?
  • Technical Cooperation and Assistance bilateral
    international organizations
  • Special and Differential Treatment? For example
    more developed parties shall make all reasonable
    efforts to provide technical assistanceto...less
    developed parties

20
Consultations and Dispute Settlement
  • 11.1 In the event of a dispute between parties
    regarding the TBT provisions, the Party affected
    may have recourse to
  • the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, or
  • the dispute settlement mechanism under this
    agreement.
  • Parties may not seek remedies
  • through both avenues
  • simultaneously.

21
What the FTAA is...
  • A trade negotiation
  • in which countries agree to reduce or eliminate
  • tariffs and
  • other barriers to trade
  • And we do not yet
  • know what it will say.

22
What the FTAA is not...
  • The FTAA is not FORCING regulators of the
    Americas to harmonize their requirements for
    pharmaceuticals or other products, but
  • But it is STRONGLY ENCOURAGING harmonization.

23
What the FTAA is for participants in this PAHO
conference...
  • The FTAA is an inspiration
  • The FTAA is motivation
  • The FTAA is an opportunity
  • The FTAA is an incentive

24
FTAA as an inspiration
  • Trade officials in our governments are
    negotiating the FTAA.
  • The pharmaceutical regulators, convened by PAHO,
    can harmonize requirements and cooperate with
    each other to eliminate duplication.
  • Harmonization is good for public health as well
    as trade.

25
Harmonization saves money and improves compliance
  • When requirements are similar, compliance is
    easier. Example ICH adverse events reporting
  • Upward harmonization possible
  • Reduced industry costs mean...
  • Reduced consumer costs (consumers pay for drugs
    from their pockets or through taxes or insurance)
  • Products reach patients sooner

26
Harmonizationa win-win-winfor industry, users,
governments!
  • So regulatory cooperation is not part of trade
    negotiation, but is a desirable parallel
    activity, that also reduces expenditures on
    unproductive costs.
  • Armonizacion es un ganar-ganar-ganar!

27
Thank you! Muchas gracias! Obrigado! Et Merci!
Linda Horton, Hogan Hartson, LLP 202-637-5795
lrhorton_at_hhlaw.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com