Foundations of Competitive Strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Foundations of Competitive Strategy

Description:

Industry competitors: The impact that the rivalry among existing firms has on a ... Recouping industry-specific initial investments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: benjamine1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Foundations of Competitive Strategy


1
Foundations of Competitive Strategy
  • Industry Analysis

2
Strategy Flowchart

Where do we want to be?
Where are we now?
Mission, Vision, Target Setting
Industry Organizational Analysis
How do we get there?
Competitive Organizational Actions
3
Where are we now?
Organizational Analysis
Environmental/Industry Analysis
Strengths
Opportunities
Weaknesses
Threats
VRIO
Porter Forces Model
4
Industry Analysis
  • As the Cramer case showed, it is critical to
    understand your industry.
  • Cronin had the wrong model of what his industry
    was about.
  • Industry analysis is about
  • Where are we now?
  • What are our opportunities?
  • What are our threats?
  • Who is in position to capture the value that we
    create?

5
Value
  • The value of (surplus from) an activity is the
    difference between its benefit and its cost.
  • Cost recall is defined in terms of economic cost.
  • economic cost ignores sunk expenditures (i.e.,
    expenses that cannot be affected by decisions
    over the relevant decision-making horizon)
  • economic cost pays attention to imputed costs
    (e.g., an opportunity to utilize a resource in a
    different way).

6
The Value of Trade
  • When a good or service is traded, the value or
    surplus from that transaction is the difference
    between the buyers benefit and the sellers
    cost.
  • Two issues
  • Efficiency a transaction should take place if
    and only if the buyers benefit is not less than
    the sellers cost.
  • Capture of surplus how is the surplus (value
    created) divided between buyer and seller?

7
An Experiment
  • Six people will write their value of a candy bar
    on a 3x5 card (and their names).
  • Three pairs will be formed at random.
  • One player in each pair will be assigned to be
    the buyer and one the seller.
  • Trade will take place under rules to be defined
    however, the rules will prevent you from making
    or refusing a trade inconsistent with your stated
    value for the candy bar.

8
Notes on Experiment
9
Division of Surplus
Buyers power increasing
p
p
p
Sellers power increasing
10
Profits
  • Profits are revenue minus costs (economic costs,
    of course).
  • Profits go up when revenue goes up or costs go
    down or both.
  • Hence, profits a function of
  • Total surplus
  • Power of firm to capture surplus
  • More power as seller (revenues go up)
  • More power as an input buyer (costs go down)

11
Traditional Industry Taxonomies
  • Monopoly is when there is only one producer.
  • Oligopoly is when there are only a few producers,
    each of whom can be expected to react to the
    actions of the others.
  • A competitive market is one in which there are
    many producers, none of whom can be expected to
    react to the actions of the others.

12
Porter Forces Model
13
Porter
  • Industry competitors The impact that the rivalry
    among existing firms has on a firm's competitive
    strategy.
  • Potential entrants The impact that potential
    entry by new firms has on a firm's strategy.
  • Substitutes The impact that substitute products
    have on a firm's competitive strategy.

14
Porter
  • Complements networks For some products,
    complements or network externalities (or both)
    have important effects on what its producer can
    do.
  • Suppliers The behavior of suppliers has an
    impact on strategy.
  • Customers The behavior of customers can have an
    impact on strategy.

15
Porter
  • Government All firms operate in an environment
    affected by the laws, rules, and practices of
    government.

16
Issues with Suppliers
  • What is the bargaining power of suppliers?
  • The more bargaining power they have, the more
    surplus they capture.
  • The suppliers bargaining power is a function of
    their market structure.
  • The potential for vertical integration and being
    locked out.
  • Vertical integration can be way to protect
    yourself against changes in supplier structure
  • Vertical integration can sometimes increase the
    pie.

17
The Issue with Customers
  • Customers bargaining power, which is a function
    of
  • their costs of switching to competitors or
    substitute products
  • the size of a single customer as a proportion of
    all your customers.
  • market structure of customers (if you sell an
    intermediate good or service).
  • Generally, like a competitive market downstream
    a competitive market maximizes value and
    multitude of competitors shifts market power to
    you.

18
The Main Issues with Competitors
  • Loosely, more competitors mean customers have
    more choice more choice means you have less
    market power hence
  • competition ? ? sellers share of surplus ?
  • But also fierceness and discipline among
    competitors affects whether industry retains
    market power or it shifts to customers.
  • air service experiment
  • Electronic components
  • Distributors dont
  • Active component sellers do
  • Coke Pepsi

19
Issues with Competitors
  • Intensity of competition
  • the more intense the competition, the lower
    profits will be.
  • The number of competitors
  • the more competitors there are, the lower profits
    will be if only because pie divided among more.
  • Relative size of competitors
  • large, dominant firm can often impose discipline
  • similarly sized firms usually compete more
    fiercely.

20
Rivalry among existing firms
  • The dimensions along which firms compete and the
    fierceness of that competition.
  • Firms compete on many dimensions.
  • The most important of which is price.
  • Why? Because its the dimension firms most want to
    avoid competing on.
  • Going head-to-head on price is bad news for
    firms! Recall the Bertrand Trap!

21
The Fundamental Rule of Competitive Strategy
  • Competitive strategy is like driving, not
    football Head-on collisions are to be avoided.

22
Key issue Fierceness of price competition
  • Homogeneity of product. More homogenous, fiercer
    price comp.
  • Customers knowledge of prices. More know,
    fiercer.
  • Customers switching costs. Lower costs, fiercer.
  • Firm production capacities. More capacity,
    fiercer
  • Number of firms. More, fiercer
  • Frequency of interaction non-myopic play
  • Variability in demand. More variable, fiercer
  • Barriers to exit. More barriers, fiercer

23
The Issues with Potential Entrants
  • If potential entrants enter, they are new
    competitors.
  • Deterring potential entrants from entering is a
    strategic issue that affects your competitive
    strategy.

24
Threat of Entry
  • An entrant is a potential competitor
  • Entry is bad because
  • can result in more intense price pressure (lower
    margins)
  • can result in smaller mkt. share even if prices
    not much affected
  • or both!
  • Principal issue Is entry deterred? Can it be
    deterred?

25
Inherent Barriers to Entry
  • Protections on intellectual property
  • Legal or regulatory restrictions
  • High consumer switching costs
  • High supplier switching costs
  • Recouping industry-specific initial investments
  • Text in red can also be strategic barriers to
    entrya topic for later. Can sometimes leverage
    non-red items strategically to deter entry (also
    a topic for later).

26
The Issue with Substitutes and Complements
  • Pricing and availability of substitutes and
    complements affects demand for your product.
  • Availability of complements affects competition
    among rivals (e.g., lack of software for OS/2 vs.
    abundance of software for Windows).
  • As you saw in MBA 201A, demand for your product
    shifts with the prices of complements
    substitutes.

27
Substitute goods services
  • Recall what substitute
  • goods are.
  • example air vs. rail
  • Issues w/ substitutes
  • how close substitutes are
  • level of price competition in substitute mkt.

28
Complements Networks
  • Recall complementary goods (e.g., cars
    gasoline)
  • Strategic success can depend on what happens in
    complementary market
  • prices
  • standards
  • Network externalities

29
Network Externalities
  • An externality, recall, is an effect that one
    entitys action has on another that the first
    entity does not consider in deciding what action
    to take.
  • Air pollution ?
  • Painting your house ?
  • Getting a telephone ?
  • Getting a credit card ?
  • Using a Linux-based computer ??
  • Buying a DVD player ??
  • The ones in red are network externalities. The
    last two (with 2 thumbs) exhibit positive
    negative network externalities.

30
Consequences of Network Externalities
  • on pricing
  • Need to establish an installed base can require
    low introductory pricing
  • Issues in how price to different parts of market
    for incentive reasons
  • Who should pay for a phone call?
  • How should fees be set for credit cards?
  • work directly with complements providers
  • Encourage development
  • Deal with ancillary concerns (e.g., IP)
  • effect on market structure
  • Natural monopoly generation

31
Standards
  • An issue in many network industries is standards
    setting
  • Proprietary standards affect market power
  • Can create monopoly
  • But can hinder growth, particularly if theres a
    standards war
  • Common standards generally
  • good for software producers
  • good for consumers (except for market power
    concerns)
  • mixed for hardware producers
  • negative if fosters competition
  • positive if foster software production
  • positive if increase network size

32
A Seventh Force
  • The government
  • antitrust law and its enforcement
  • regulation
  • infrastructure (complement)
  • intellectual property law
  • differences in these factors across governmental
    jurisdictions.
  • trade policy
  • lobbying competition
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com