Title: Food Defense in the 21st Century: How USDA APHIS Protects our Food Supply
1Food Defense in the 21st CenturyHow USDA APHIS
Protects our Food Supply
- Third International Symposium on Agroterrorism
- April 24, 2008
John R. Clifford, D.V.M.Deputy Administrator,
Veterinary Services (VS) Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA)
2Agriculture is a Possible Target
3Economic Importance of Agriculture
- Food and fiber contributed 1.25 trillion dollars
to the U.S. Gross Domestic Product in 2006 - About 24 million Americans are employed in some
aspect of agriculture - Agriculture is heavily tied to other industries
and sectors - A disease outbreak would indirectly impact other
industries, such as transportation and tourism
4Impact of Agroterrorism
- Disruption of the agricultural economy
- Engendering fear and decreasing consumer
confidence in the U.S. food supply - Disabling our ability to export U.S. products
- In 2007 almost 82 billion exported in
agricultural commodities (up from 51 billion in
2000)
5Recognition of Agroterrorism
- Clustering of morbidity or mortality
- Large numbers of animals
- Overwhelming mortality
- Normally healthy populations affected
- Unusual symptoms
- Additional concurrent outbreaks
- Attempts to trace the disease agent are
unsuccessful
6If Agroterrorism is Suspected
- Federal Bureau of Investigation Joint Terrorism
Task Force would lead the investigative efforts - Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would
coordinate the Federal response - USDA APHIS would continue to lead the response
specific to animal health concerns
7Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) as a Bioterrorism
Agent
- Disease eradicated from United States in 1929
- Easy to obtain, spreads quickly, and is difficult
to control - Introduction would have significant psychological
impact on consumers - Economic impact on livestock industry would be
devastating - FMD is widely considered the number one
agricultural threat to the United States
8FMD Potential Impact
- Animals at risk in the United States
- 100 million cattle
- 60 million swine
- 7 million sheep
- 40 million wildlife
- Horses not at risk
- FMD is not readily
- transmissible to humans
9FMD Economic Impact
- Economic impact can be substantial
- Losses from export
- High morbidity and mortality
- FMD outbreak in Taiwan in 1997
- 184,000 swine depopulated
- 4 million swine depopulated as part of the
eradication program - FMD outbreak in United Kingdom in 2001
- 10 million animals depopulated
- Secondary losses (such as tourism)
- 2001 FMD outbreak in the United Kingdom cost
about 17.4 billion (in U.S. dollars)
10Is it Agroterrorism?
- APHIS laboratories may be the first to detect a
deliberately introduced disease organism - In the first hours/days a deliberate
introduction may clinically appear accidental - An incident which involves multiple locations or
numerous species might indicate an agroterrorism
attack
11USDA Leadership Role in Animal Disease
- Secretary of Agriculture has statutory authority
and leadership role to protect American
agriculture and animal health - APHIS carries out the authorities of the Animal
Health Protection Act on behalf of the Secretary
of Agriculture - Broad authorities to prevent, detect, control and
eradicate the outbreak of animal diseases and
foreign animal diseases (FAD) in the United
States - APHIS is the designated lead agency for animal
health concerns
12APHIS Safeguards Agriculture
- Exclusion
- Trade restrictions
- Anti-smuggling programs
- International efforts
- Diagnostic capacity building and capability
- Surveillance
- Targeted surveillance
- Active and passive surveillance
- Diagnostic capacity and capability
13APHIS Safeguards Agriculture (cont.)
- Preparedness and Communication
- Cooperative planning with States, Federal,
Industry, and Tribal partners - Outreach and education
- Communication plans and risk management
- Exercises, assessments, and evaluations
- Response
- Integrated and synchronized
- National Incident Management System (NIMS) and
National Response Framework (NRF) compliant - Science based veterinary countermeasures
14APHIS VS Response to a Disease Outbreak
- National Animal Health Emergency Management
System Guidelines - Controlled eradication
- Cleaning and disinfection
- Availability of first responders
- Adequate resources to support response
- Vaccines (to be used only upon approval by the
USDA and the applicable State Veterinarian)
15APHIS VS History of Disease Response
- 1983 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI)
- 1998 Screwworm (in a pet dog)
- 1999 West Nile Virus
- 2000-01 Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease (RHD)
- 2001 Foot-and-Mouth Disease (United Kingdom)
- 2002 Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC)
- 2002 Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza
- 2002-03 Exotic Newcastle Disease
- 2003 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)
- 2004 HPAI, RHD, SVC
- 2005 BSE, RHD, SVC
- 2006 BSE, Contagious Equine Metritis, Viral
Hemorrhagic Septicemia - 2007 Screwworm (2 separate incidents in pet
dogs), Notifiable Avian influenza (NAI) - 2008 NAI, Malignant Catarrhal Fever
16National Veterinary Stockpile (NVS)
- NVS is the nations repository of critical
veterinary supplies, equipment, and services - NVS has the ability to deploy massive quantities
of veterinary supplies within 24 hours against
the 17 most dangerous animal disease threats - Current goals include working with States prior
to an emergency on how to request, receive,
process, and accept delivery of NVS supplies
17NVS Current Capabilities
- Personal protective equipment
- Antivirals
- AI vaccines and field test kits
- Portable satellite voice and data communication
equipment - Disinfectants
- Commercial partnerships to provide States with
depopulation, disposal, and decontamination (3D)
support
18NVS Future Capabilities
- Supply chain management system to coordinate
inventory and deployments - Vaccines and field test kits for additional
disease agents - Animal handling and depopulation equipment for
all threats - Coastal logistics centers to provide greater
proximity to outbreaks - Fully-trained 3D commercial partners
- Emergencies 24/7 call 800-940-6524
- Questions nvs_at_aphis.usda.gov
19Veterinarians and Food Defense
- Veterinarians are often the first to see and
report suspect situations to State Veterinarians
or APHIS - Foreign Animal Disease Diagnosticians initiate an
investigation within 8 hours of a report of a
suspected foreign animal disease
20NAHERC Reserve Corps of Personnel
- In 2001 APHIS started the National Animal Health
Emergency Response Corps (NAHERC) - NAHERC is a reserve corps of veterinarians and
animal health technicians who can assist Federal
or State responders during an animal health
emergency - NAHERC volunteers provide a valuable interface
between the Federal government and farmers - Prospective members fill out an application on
the USAJOBS web site
21International Animal Health Emergency Reserve
(IAHER)
- In May 2004, six countries (Australia, Canada,
Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and United
States) established the IAHER - IAHER provides veterinary support and assistance
to member countries in response to an animal
disease outbreak emergency
22National Approach to Incident Coordination
- The Homeland Security Act of 2002 and Homeland
Security Presidential Directive-5 require a
comprehensive national approach to domestic
incident management - This is accomplished through the development of
the National Incident Management System (NIMS)
and National Response Framework (NRF)
23National Response Framework Emergency Support
Functions
ESF 8 Public Health/ Medical Services
ESF 1 Transportation
ESF 9 Urban Search/Rescue
ESF 2 Communications
ESF 10 Oil/Hazardous Materials Response
ESF 3 Public Works/Engineering
ESF 4 Firefighting
ESF 11 Agriculture/Natural Resources (USDA/DOI)
ESF 5 Emergency Management
ESF 12 Energy
ESF 6 Mass Care/Emergency Assistance/Housing/ H
uman Services
ESF 13 Public Safety/Security
ESF 14 Long-Term Community Recovery
ESF 7 Logistics Management/Resource Support
ESF 15 External Affairs
24Goals of Food Defense
- To identify threats
- To prevent an attack
- To respond rapidly and efficiently
- To recover quickly and help restore confidence in
the food supply
25Food and Agriculture Defense Initiative
- Coordination between USDA agencies (Food Safety
and Inspection Service FSIS APHIS
Agricultural Research Service and the
Cooperative State Research, Education, and
Extension Service) - USDA 2009 budget proposes 264 million for the
initiative (an 81 million increase) - 14 million to enhance research related to
protecting the U.S. food supply - 20 million for research to improve animal
vaccines and diagnostic tests - 47 million to enhance surveillance, strengthen
response capabilities, and improve animal
identification efforts
26VS Food Defense Action Items
- Ensure FSIS, APHIS, State, and industry disaster
preparedness plans are consistent - Provide guidelines and protocols for isolating
animals prior to FAD investigations - Provide plans and protocols for humane handling,
sampling, and slaughter or depopulation
27VS Food Defense Action Items (cont.)
- Partner, research, develop and adopt the best
veterinary science countermeasures and
diagnostics for highly contagious FAD (and other
animal diseases) - Incorporate science based guidelines for
continuity of business, mitigation, and recovery
into USDA policies, procedures, and national
response plans
28Suspected FAD Multi-Agency Response
- In June 2007, animals inspected at a Minnesota
slaughter plant showed signs of an FAD - FSIS, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and
APHIS worked together to determine if a public
health threat existed - FSIS role animal inspection prior to slaughter
- APHIS role determine whether animal movement
could continue determine if products from
affected animals could enter the food supply - Canada role provide information for the
epidemiologic investigation
29Melamine Multi-Agency Response
- In April 2007, FDA determined a shipment of rice
protein imported from China was contaminated with
melamine - The rice protein was used in the production of
pet food and animal feed - FSIS, FDA, and APHIS worked together to determine
if a public health threat existed - FSIS role animal inspection prior to slaughter
and assisting FDA in tracing adulterated feed - FDA role monitoring safety of animal feed
- APHIS role helped States locate, quarantine and
dispose of animals and products if necessary
30Polonium Multi-Agency Response
- In May 2007, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
sampled ground water in Nevada for polonium 210 - Test results showed one aquifer, which supplied
drinking water to livestock at two dairy
operations, contained polonium 210 - FSIS, FDA, and APHIS worked together to determine
if a public health threat existed - FSIS role ensure the safety and wholesomeness of
meat and meat products - FDA role ensure the safety of milk and milk
products - APHIS role helped States locate, quarantine,
sample and dispose of animals and products if
necessary
31Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
- USDA APHIS
- APHIS is provides leadership in ensuring the
health and care of animals and plants. - VS prevents, controls and/or eliminates animal
diseases and monitors and promotes animal health
and productivity - Plant Protection and Quarantine division prevents
the entry, establishment, and spread of plant
pests and diseases
32Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
- USDA FSIS
- Regulates meat, poultry, and egg processors
- Inspects food animals for diseases before and
after slaughter - Responds to meat, poultry, and egg safety (human)
emergencies
33Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
- DHS
- (Border Inspection)
- Detects and prevents the illegal entry of
persons, animals, and food items into the country - Monitors commercial cargo, live animals, and
persons entering the country
34Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
- HHS FDA
- Oversees all domestic and imported food,
including shell eggs (except meat and poultry) - Inspects food production establishments and
warehouses - Monitors safety of animal feed
- HHS CDC
- (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
- Investigates food-borne disease outbreaks
- Maintains a nationwide system of food-borne
disease surveillance - Trains local and State food safety personnel
35Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Oversees drinking water (except bottled)
- Regulates toxic substances and wastes to prevent
adverse environmental impact - DOI USGS
- Monitor wildlife diseases
- Conducts water resources programs
- Department of Defense
- Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
(CBRN) activities
36Agricultural Intelligence Working Group
- Began in 2000
- Informal network of Federal agencies
- Participants are analysts responsible for
analyzing threat information and coordinating/
responding to Food and Agriculture incidents - Facilitates information sharing
37INTERPOL
FDA
NCTC
NSA
DHS
USDA
DoD
AGINT
FSIS
DOE
ARS
CIA
FBI
NORTHCOM
38Foreign Animal Disease Threat (FADT) Subcommittee
- In July 2005, the National Science and Technology
Council invited several Federal agencies to
establish the FADT Subcommittee - Foreign animal disease threats of high economic
consequence (gt 10B) - Diseases capable of temporally and geographically
impacting existing mitigation systems
39FADT Subcommittee (cont.)
- Three working groups
- Foreign Animal Disease Modeling
- Countermeasure Development (vaccines and
diagnostics) - Decontamination and Disposal
- Interagency Cooperation
- Agriculture
- Homeland Security
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Interior
- Health and Human Services
- National Science Foundation
- Defense
- State
- Executive Office of the President
40(No Transcript)
41Food Defense in the 21st Century
- Requires effective communication collaboration
- to identify threats
- to plan for and respond to incidents
- to recover quickly
42