Food Defense in the 21st Century: How USDA APHIS Protects our Food Supply - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Food Defense in the 21st Century: How USDA APHIS Protects our Food Supply

Description:

USDA APHIS would continue to lead the response specific to animal health concerns ... Prospective members fill out an application on the USAJOBS web site. 21 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: christinea8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Food Defense in the 21st Century: How USDA APHIS Protects our Food Supply


1
Food Defense in the 21st CenturyHow USDA APHIS
Protects our Food Supply
  • Third International Symposium on Agroterrorism
  • April 24, 2008

John R. Clifford, D.V.M.Deputy Administrator,
Veterinary Services (VS) Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA)
2
Agriculture is a Possible Target
3
Economic Importance of Agriculture
  • Food and fiber contributed 1.25 trillion dollars
    to the U.S. Gross Domestic Product in 2006
  • About 24 million Americans are employed in some
    aspect of agriculture
  • Agriculture is heavily tied to other industries
    and sectors
  • A disease outbreak would indirectly impact other
    industries, such as transportation and tourism

4
Impact of Agroterrorism
  • Disruption of the agricultural economy
  • Engendering fear and decreasing consumer
    confidence in the U.S. food supply
  • Disabling our ability to export U.S. products
  • In 2007 almost 82 billion exported in
    agricultural commodities (up from 51 billion in
    2000)

5
Recognition of Agroterrorism
  • Clustering of morbidity or mortality
  • Large numbers of animals
  • Overwhelming mortality
  • Normally healthy populations affected
  • Unusual symptoms
  • Additional concurrent outbreaks
  • Attempts to trace the disease agent are
    unsuccessful

6
If Agroterrorism is Suspected
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation Joint Terrorism
    Task Force would lead the investigative efforts
  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would
    coordinate the Federal response
  • USDA APHIS would continue to lead the response
    specific to animal health concerns

7
Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) as a Bioterrorism
Agent
  • Disease eradicated from United States in 1929
  • Easy to obtain, spreads quickly, and is difficult
    to control
  • Introduction would have significant psychological
    impact on consumers
  • Economic impact on livestock industry would be
    devastating
  • FMD is widely considered the number one
    agricultural threat to the United States

8
FMD Potential Impact
  • Animals at risk in the United States
  • 100 million cattle
  • 60 million swine
  • 7 million sheep
  • 40 million wildlife
  • Horses not at risk
  • FMD is not readily
  • transmissible to humans

9
FMD Economic Impact
  • Economic impact can be substantial
  • Losses from export
  • High morbidity and mortality
  • FMD outbreak in Taiwan in 1997
  • 184,000 swine depopulated
  • 4 million swine depopulated as part of the
    eradication program
  • FMD outbreak in United Kingdom in 2001
  • 10 million animals depopulated
  • Secondary losses (such as tourism)
  • 2001 FMD outbreak in the United Kingdom cost
    about 17.4 billion (in U.S. dollars)

10
Is it Agroterrorism?
  • APHIS laboratories may be the first to detect a
    deliberately introduced disease organism
  • In the first hours/days a deliberate
    introduction may clinically appear accidental
  • An incident which involves multiple locations or
    numerous species might indicate an agroterrorism
    attack

11
USDA Leadership Role in Animal Disease
  • Secretary of Agriculture has statutory authority
    and leadership role to protect American
    agriculture and animal health
  • APHIS carries out the authorities of the Animal
    Health Protection Act on behalf of the Secretary
    of Agriculture
  • Broad authorities to prevent, detect, control and
    eradicate the outbreak of animal diseases and
    foreign animal diseases (FAD) in the United
    States
  • APHIS is the designated lead agency for animal
    health concerns

12
APHIS Safeguards Agriculture
  • Exclusion
  • Trade restrictions
  • Anti-smuggling programs
  • International efforts
  • Diagnostic capacity building and capability
  • Surveillance
  • Targeted surveillance
  • Active and passive surveillance
  • Diagnostic capacity and capability

13
APHIS Safeguards Agriculture (cont.)
  • Preparedness and Communication
  • Cooperative planning with States, Federal,
    Industry, and Tribal partners
  • Outreach and education
  • Communication plans and risk management
  • Exercises, assessments, and evaluations
  • Response
  • Integrated and synchronized
  • National Incident Management System (NIMS) and
    National Response Framework (NRF) compliant
  • Science based veterinary countermeasures

14
APHIS VS Response to a Disease Outbreak
  • National Animal Health Emergency Management
    System Guidelines
  • Controlled eradication
  • Cleaning and disinfection
  • Availability of first responders
  • Adequate resources to support response
  • Vaccines (to be used only upon approval by the
    USDA and the applicable State Veterinarian)

15
APHIS VS History of Disease Response
  • 1983 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI)
  • 1998 Screwworm (in a pet dog)
  • 1999 West Nile Virus
  • 2000-01 Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease (RHD)
  • 2001 Foot-and-Mouth Disease (United Kingdom)
  • 2002 Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC)
  • 2002 Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza
  • 2002-03 Exotic Newcastle Disease
  • 2003 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)
  • 2004 HPAI, RHD, SVC
  • 2005 BSE, RHD, SVC
  • 2006 BSE, Contagious Equine Metritis, Viral
    Hemorrhagic Septicemia
  • 2007 Screwworm (2 separate incidents in pet
    dogs), Notifiable Avian influenza (NAI)
  • 2008 NAI, Malignant Catarrhal Fever

16
National Veterinary Stockpile (NVS)
  • NVS is the nations repository of critical
    veterinary supplies, equipment, and services
  • NVS has the ability to deploy massive quantities
    of veterinary supplies within 24 hours against
    the 17 most dangerous animal disease threats
  • Current goals include working with States prior
    to an emergency on how to request, receive,
    process, and accept delivery of NVS supplies

17
NVS Current Capabilities
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Antivirals
  • AI vaccines and field test kits
  • Portable satellite voice and data communication
    equipment
  • Disinfectants
  • Commercial partnerships to provide States with
    depopulation, disposal, and decontamination (3D)
    support

18
NVS Future Capabilities
  • Supply chain management system to coordinate
    inventory and deployments
  • Vaccines and field test kits for additional
    disease agents
  • Animal handling and depopulation equipment for
    all threats
  • Coastal logistics centers to provide greater
    proximity to outbreaks
  • Fully-trained 3D commercial partners
  • Emergencies 24/7 call 800-940-6524
  • Questions nvs_at_aphis.usda.gov

19
Veterinarians and Food Defense
  • Veterinarians are often the first to see and
    report suspect situations to State Veterinarians
    or APHIS
  • Foreign Animal Disease Diagnosticians initiate an
    investigation within 8 hours of a report of a
    suspected foreign animal disease

20
NAHERC Reserve Corps of Personnel
  • In 2001 APHIS started the National Animal Health
    Emergency Response Corps (NAHERC)
  • NAHERC is a reserve corps of veterinarians and
    animal health technicians who can assist Federal
    or State responders during an animal health
    emergency
  • NAHERC volunteers provide a valuable interface
    between the Federal government and farmers
  • Prospective members fill out an application on
    the USAJOBS web site

21
International Animal Health Emergency Reserve
(IAHER)
  • In May 2004, six countries (Australia, Canada,
    Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and United
    States) established the IAHER
  • IAHER provides veterinary support and assistance
    to member countries in response to an animal
    disease outbreak emergency

22
National Approach to Incident Coordination
  • The Homeland Security Act of 2002 and Homeland
    Security Presidential Directive-5 require a
    comprehensive national approach to domestic
    incident management
  • This is accomplished through the development of
    the National Incident Management System (NIMS)
    and National Response Framework (NRF)

23
National Response Framework Emergency Support
Functions
ESF 8 Public Health/ Medical Services
ESF 1 Transportation
ESF 9 Urban Search/Rescue
ESF 2 Communications
ESF 10 Oil/Hazardous Materials Response
ESF 3 Public Works/Engineering
ESF 4 Firefighting
ESF 11 Agriculture/Natural Resources (USDA/DOI)
ESF 5 Emergency Management
ESF 12 Energy
ESF 6 Mass Care/Emergency Assistance/Housing/ H
uman Services
ESF 13 Public Safety/Security
ESF 14 Long-Term Community Recovery
ESF 7 Logistics Management/Resource Support
ESF 15 External Affairs
24
Goals of Food Defense
  • To identify threats
  • To prevent an attack
  • To respond rapidly and efficiently
  • To recover quickly and help restore confidence in
    the food supply

25
Food and Agriculture Defense Initiative
  • Coordination between USDA agencies (Food Safety
    and Inspection Service FSIS APHIS
    Agricultural Research Service and the
    Cooperative State Research, Education, and
    Extension Service)
  • USDA 2009 budget proposes 264 million for the
    initiative (an 81 million increase)
  • 14 million to enhance research related to
    protecting the U.S. food supply
  • 20 million for research to improve animal
    vaccines and diagnostic tests
  • 47 million to enhance surveillance, strengthen
    response capabilities, and improve animal
    identification efforts

26
VS Food Defense Action Items
  • Ensure FSIS, APHIS, State, and industry disaster
    preparedness plans are consistent
  • Provide guidelines and protocols for isolating
    animals prior to FAD investigations
  • Provide plans and protocols for humane handling,
    sampling, and slaughter or depopulation

27
VS Food Defense Action Items (cont.)
  • Partner, research, develop and adopt the best
    veterinary science countermeasures and
    diagnostics for highly contagious FAD (and other
    animal diseases)
  • Incorporate science based guidelines for
    continuity of business, mitigation, and recovery
    into USDA policies, procedures, and national
    response plans

28
Suspected FAD Multi-Agency Response
  • In June 2007, animals inspected at a Minnesota
    slaughter plant showed signs of an FAD
  • FSIS, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and
    APHIS worked together to determine if a public
    health threat existed
  • FSIS role animal inspection prior to slaughter
  • APHIS role determine whether animal movement
    could continue determine if products from
    affected animals could enter the food supply
  • Canada role provide information for the
    epidemiologic investigation

29
Melamine Multi-Agency Response
  • In April 2007, FDA determined a shipment of rice
    protein imported from China was contaminated with
    melamine
  • The rice protein was used in the production of
    pet food and animal feed
  • FSIS, FDA, and APHIS worked together to determine
    if a public health threat existed
  • FSIS role animal inspection prior to slaughter
    and assisting FDA in tracing adulterated feed
  • FDA role monitoring safety of animal feed
  • APHIS role helped States locate, quarantine and
    dispose of animals and products if necessary

30
Polonium Multi-Agency Response
  • In May 2007, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
    sampled ground water in Nevada for polonium 210
  • Test results showed one aquifer, which supplied
    drinking water to livestock at two dairy
    operations, contained polonium 210
  • FSIS, FDA, and APHIS worked together to determine
    if a public health threat existed
  • FSIS role ensure the safety and wholesomeness of
    meat and meat products
  • FDA role ensure the safety of milk and milk
    products
  • APHIS role helped States locate, quarantine,
    sample and dispose of animals and products if
    necessary

31
Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
  • USDA APHIS
  • APHIS is provides leadership in ensuring the
    health and care of animals and plants.
  • VS prevents, controls and/or eliminates animal
    diseases and monitors and promotes animal health
    and productivity
  • Plant Protection and Quarantine division prevents
    the entry, establishment, and spread of plant
    pests and diseases

32
Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
  • USDA FSIS
  • Regulates meat, poultry, and egg processors
  • Inspects food animals for diseases before and
    after slaughter
  • Responds to meat, poultry, and egg safety (human)
    emergencies

33
Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
  • DHS
  • (Border Inspection)
  • Detects and prevents the illegal entry of
    persons, animals, and food items into the country
  • Monitors commercial cargo, live animals, and
    persons entering the country

34
Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
  • HHS FDA
  • Oversees all domestic and imported food,
    including shell eggs (except meat and poultry)
  • Inspects food production establishments and
    warehouses
  • Monitors safety of animal feed
  • HHS CDC
  • (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
  • Investigates food-borne disease outbreaks
  • Maintains a nationwide system of food-borne
    disease surveillance
  • Trains local and State food safety personnel

35
Food Defense A Multi-Agency Task
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Oversees drinking water (except bottled)
  • Regulates toxic substances and wastes to prevent
    adverse environmental impact
  • DOI USGS
  • Monitor wildlife diseases
  • Conducts water resources programs
  • Department of Defense
  • Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
    (CBRN) activities

36
Agricultural Intelligence Working Group
  • Began in 2000
  • Informal network of Federal agencies
  • Participants are analysts responsible for
    analyzing threat information and coordinating/
    responding to Food and Agriculture incidents
  • Facilitates information sharing

37
INTERPOL
FDA
NCTC
NSA
DHS
USDA
DoD
AGINT
FSIS
DOE
ARS
CIA
FBI
NORTHCOM
38
Foreign Animal Disease Threat (FADT) Subcommittee
  • In July 2005, the National Science and Technology
    Council invited several Federal agencies to
    establish the FADT Subcommittee
  • Foreign animal disease threats of high economic
    consequence (gt 10B)
  • Diseases capable of temporally and geographically
    impacting existing mitigation systems

39
FADT Subcommittee (cont.)
  • Three working groups
  • Foreign Animal Disease Modeling
  • Countermeasure Development (vaccines and
    diagnostics)
  • Decontamination and Disposal
  • Interagency Cooperation
  • Agriculture
  • Homeland Security
  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • Interior
  • Health and Human Services
  • National Science Foundation
  • Defense
  • State
  • Executive Office of the President

40
(No Transcript)
41
Food Defense in the 21st Century
  • Requires effective communication collaboration
  • to identify threats
  • to plan for and respond to incidents
  • to recover quickly

42
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com