Water, the Environment, and Californias Agriculture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Water, the Environment, and Californias Agriculture

Description:

The 1988-92 drought led to water bank and CVPIA. New threats: ... Frost in winter barrier to pest movement. Climate change = more pest - Pierce's disease ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: aicUc
Learn more at: https://aic.ucdavis.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Water, the Environment, and Californias Agriculture


1
Water, the Environment, and Californias
Agriculture
  • David Zilberman
  • UC BerkeleyPresented at the
  • Cal-Med Sonoma Workshop
  • October 25, 2007

2
Water in California (Rough Numbers)
  • Annual water supply, 32-35 million acres (MA)
  • Surface water supply,18-21 million acre feet
    (MAF)
  • Groundwater,14 MAF
  • A person consumes 1/3 AF 36 million people, 12
    MHA
  • Agricultural land, 26 MA
  • 38 in farming 9.88 MA
  • 75 irrigated 7.41 MA
  • Water per acre average year, 2.5-2.8 AF
  • Water use varies by crop
  • 1.5 AF/A wheat-7AF/A rice alfalfa
  • Fruits 2.5 MA require 3.2 AF/ac 8 MAF total
  • Veggies 2 MA with double cropping 1 MA require 3
    AF/ac 3 MAF

3
Heterogeneity Revenues Vary by Crop
  • High value crops-keepers
  • Flowers 10-30K/AF golf courses 3-30K
  • Strawberries 9-20K/AF fresh tomatoes 3-5/AF
  • Citrus 2-4/AF
  • Almond 500-800/AF
  • Marginal value crops may be replaced by biofuels
  • --------------------------------------------------
    --------
  • Cotton 200-400/AF Marginal
  • Wheat 75-100/AF
  • Rice 30-40/AF
  • May be inferior to biofuels
  • Top ag priority assure 11 MAF for fruits and
    veggies, then expand those high value crops

4
Modern Water Technologies
  • Highest value crops (strawberries, grapes) use
    advanced irrigation with chemigation
  • Increase yield
  • Save some water and much chemicals
  • Slow adoption of modern irrigation in field
    crops.
  • Slow adoption of optimize scheduling.
  • Studies show there is capital water substitution
  • Improved applications over time (better
    scheduling) during season increase yield and save
    some water.
  • Improved application over space (precision) can
    save much water and chemicals.
  • Impacts vary by location-land quality slope
  • Indications that biotech ( a taboo) may provide
    drought tolerance and water saving.

5
Animal, Ag, and Water
  • Meats and milk are large sectors.
  • Cattle, sheep, etc., are grazed on rain-fed
    areas.
  • Poultry relies heavily on imported feed, probably
    will stay.
  • Recreational horses will pay their way.
  • Dairy consumes locally grown feed
  • Enhances value of alfalfa and other feed products
  • Water shortage may make make these feed products
    less competitive and reduce the industry.
  • Animal waste problems also pose a challenge.
  • The dimension and design of waste disposal
    regulation and facilities are research challenge
  • Need to balance cost of abatement, disposal,
    environmental damage, and value of production and
    also design politically feasible policies.

6
Conflicting VisionsVulnerable Infrastructure
and Incremental Changes
  • Conflicting visions
  • Growth to 50 or 60m requiring 5-8 MHA
  • Desire to restore fisheries and streams
  • Dynamic farming sector identifying new
    opportunities
  • Vulnerable infrastructure
  • The decaying delta built on peat
  • Climate change threats (rising sea levels,
    earlier snowmelt)
  • Incremental changes allow systems to stumble
  • Water bank - CVPIA
  • San Diego - imperial trade
  • Low prices of water for ag, most of the time
  • Gradual improvement of water use efficiency on
    farm

7
Physical Reality Is Less of a Problem than Water
and Other Policies
  • Prior appropriation and other water rights that
    restrict water trading
  • Even with CVPIA, long-term trading is disallowed
  • Restriction on water movement- there is a
    potential to transfer water from east to west in
    addition to north to south
  • Results
  • Under-investment in water conservation among
    farmers with prior appropriation cannot sell
  • Uncertain water rights leading to underinvestment
    in conservation and high value crops among junior
    right owners

8
Physical Reality Is Less of a Problem than
Policies
  • 2. Restriction on construction of canals and
    conveyance facilities- even when they pass
    benefit cost test
  • The peripheral canal seems doomed
  • Water can not be moved to where it is most
    valuable
  • 3. Regulation and de-facto ban on use of purified
    water for drinking and irrigation-
  • Result- reduction of water supply
  • 4. Subsidized electricity rate for farms-for many
    years
  • No monitoring of aquifers in some areas
  • Results- sea water intrusion- heavy restrictions
  • Under investment in conservation Excessive
    depletion

9
Paralyzed Water System
  • Water regulations are weapons in development
    wars
  • Limited water rights main constraint of
    development
  • They may be neglected due to budgetary
    constraints
  • They reflect myopia and lack of trust of
    scientific predictions ( Katrina), by
    policymakers, and voters
  • But crisis triggers change
  • Droughts of 1977-79 and 1988-92 introduced
    conservation
  • The 1988-92 drought led to water bank and CVPIA
  • New threats
  • High energy cost - desalinization is costly
  • The delta levies will crumble - it is an issue of
    time
  • Climate change events are likely to occur

10
Elements of Reform
  • Benefit costs-based project assessment (may need
    new projects)
  • Set the price right or introduce tradable permits
  • Price mar extraction mar externality
    marginal conveyance user cost
  • Control pollution - by market-based incentives

11
Pest Control
  • Relatively, Cal ag does not suffer much from pest
  • That make organics appealing
  • Relatively high rates of adoption of IPM and
    bio-control and reliance on consultants
  • Pesticides registration requirements led to
    introduction of wireless use reporting system and
    increase in automation- porter is right
  • Frost in winter barrier to pest movement
  • Climate change more pest - Pierces disease
  • How to deal with dying bees - payment for
    preservation of wild bees
  • Methyl bromide really valuable - 20/80 rule
    applies
  • Should be taxed not banned

12
Consumers Pest-Control Preferences
  • 20 of consumers will pay 15 for pesticide-free
    food
  • 30 will pay nothing
  • But 10 of them will vote for banning pesticides
  • Food safety pesticides risks are miniscule
  • Worker safety are much higher
  • Environmental health is a problem
  • Organic and other pesticide-free solutions are
    purer not healthier - base for product
    differentiation.
  • Med ag is about taste, quality, and value added
    (not hunger prevention).
  • We sell lifestyle as well as food golf is ag.

13
Environmental Drivers
  • Endangered species litigation affect
    development.
  • Reduce attempts to build on undeveloped hills
    instead replace farmland with housing.
  • The taking provides incentives to kill
    endangered species not to protect them
  • Concern about climate change should lead to
    adaptation not withdrawn from technology
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com