Model Impaired Driving Records Information System Promoting and Planning an Impaired Driving Records - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Model Impaired Driving Records Information System Promoting and Planning an Impaired Driving Records

Description:

... in the field through adjudication, intervention, and ultimately compilation of ... or benchmarking of citation/adjudication components of a state traffic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: nhtsa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Model Impaired Driving Records Information System Promoting and Planning an Impaired Driving Records


1
Model Impaired Driving Records Information
SystemPromoting and Planning an Impaired
Driving Records System in Your State
2
Data Dictionary Development Project
  • Background Milestones
  • 1997 DWI Tracking Guideline Report
  • Demonstration Grants
  • Federal Register Guidelines (2006)
  • SAFETEA-LU Requirements
  • NHTSA shall provide guidelines types and
    formats of data
  • Data Dictionary Effort (2008-2009)

09/09/2009
3
What is MIDRIS?
  • Model Impaired Driving Records Information System
    (MIDRIS)
  • A starting point for the establishment of a
    statewide data system containing information on
    impaired drivers from the point of issuing a
    traffic citation in the field through
    adjudication, intervention, and ultimately
    compilation of information within the driver
    history.

4
What is MIDRIS?
  • A starting point for the process of design and
    implementation and / or benchmarking of
    citation/adjudication components of a state
    traffic records system.
  • Although focused upon impaired drivers, these
    references will also support the larger citation
    / adjudication planning process.

5
MIDRIS Development Project
  • Project Web Site
  • www.nhtsa-tsis.net/MIDRIS
  • Reference Documents
  • 1997 Report (3 volumes)
  • Federal Register entry
  • List of data elements
  • Data element details
  • Example data model
  • Data element inventory worksheet
  • MMUCC, NIEM, Citation IEPD, CDLIS

6
MIDRIS Development Project
  • Built upon 1997 Federal Report
  • Built upon Federal Register Guideline
  • Based upon input from the Traffic Records
    community
  • Intended as a starting point for design
    development of a state system
  • NOT a mandate or requirement

7
Data Dictionary Development Process
  • Compiled existing standards and guidelines into a
    database of data elements (data fields) and
    attributes (code tables).
  • Hosted a working group in Chicago to set focus,
    scope, and direction.
  • Presented initial version at the 2008 Traffic
    Records Forum.

8
Data Dictionary Development Process
  • Solicited input / suggestions from Forum
    attendees and traffic records community.
  • Compiled comments suggestions into an updated
    data dictionary.
  • Built some tools to assist in inventorying state
    systems and to picture a potential system.

9
Data Dictionary Development Process
  • Presented final (almost) version at the 2009
    Traffic Records Forum
  • Initiated discussions with NIEM Team relative to
    selecting suitable IEPDs to support MIDRIS.
  • Published final version of documents at project
    web site
  • www.nhtsa-tsis.net/MIDRIS

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
07/11/09
14
07/11/09
15
(No Transcript)
16
Implementation Issues / Challenges
  • State system components must exist as
    comprehensive electronic databases before they
    can be integrated into a MIDRIS.
  • Implementation of MIDRIS is not a trivial task,
    nor an inexpensive one.
  • The documents and references at the web site are
    intended, and MUST be treated as starting points
    for discussions and planning at the state level.
    NOT as a solution

17
Implementation Issues / Challenges
  • MIDRIS is a prime example of one size does not
    fit all.
  • Some states may start from scratch.
  • Some states may elect to integrate existing
    systems.
  • Some states may build a central data warehouse
    containing everyones data.
  • Some states may set up pointer systems with data
    retained in the owner systems.

18
Implementation Issues / Challenges
  • MIDRIS is a prime example of one size does not
    fit all.
  • A very few states will have everything found in
    MIDRIS.
  • Most states will start with what they have and
    then look toward improving expanding over time.

19
Implementation Issues / Challenges
  • To effectively implement MIDRIS in a state there
    must be
  • A champion
  • A commitment by data owners to share their data
  • Top level commitment to the effort
  • A realistic set of expectations, timelines and
    budget estimate
  • Constant, open communications between stakeholders

20
Implementation in Your State Where to Start?
  • Start by taking inventory of existing systems in
    your state.
  • What systems are involved?
  • Who owns the systems?
  • What data elements are in these systems?
  • What are the sharing/privacy issues?
  • What agency will be the likely holder of the
    impaired driver system?

21
Citation / Incident Report
  • Need for electronic systems timely data is
    crucial.
  • Electronic capabilities should be widely
    available to police officers.

22
Court System
  • A unified court system will be easier to
    integrate than a fragmented system.
  • Court system must be able to accept and export
    data electronically to the citation system and
    driver licensing agency.

23
Driver Licensing System
  • Must be able to accept electronic dispositions /
    convictions from the courts!!!!

24
Treatment Centers
  • Treatment centers, probation, and community
    service
  • Necessary to track if an offender completed the
    sentence.
  • Used to track recidivism rates and data on what
    methods of punishment are most effective.

25
Getting the Players to Play
  • How do we get everyone on board and make this
    effort a priority?
  • Discuss how it will benefit each stakeholder.
  • Not letting offenders fall through the cracks
    cannot be measured.

26
Where do we go from here?
  • Support efforts currently under discussion
  • Outreach effort to inform and educate Region Data
    Managers about MIDRIS.
  • Outreach to State staff that are engaged in
    citation / impaired driving / data warehouse
    efforts to ensure they know about MIDRIS.
  • Periodic review of MIDRIS to reflect new issues
    and developments.

27
Where do we go from here?
  • Support efforts currently under discussion
  • An on-going forum for exchange of information
    about State efforts in this area.
  • A review of how MIDRIS might influence the
    Alcohol Assessment process.
  • Follow-up with States that have implemented
    various versions of MIDRIS to document how it
    impacts Impaired Driver Programs at the State
    level.

28
Contact www.nhtsa-tsis.net/MIDRIS
  • De Carlo CiccelContract ManagerBehavioral
    Research DivisionNational Highway Traffic Safety
    Administration1220 New Jersey Avenue, SE
    NTI-131Washington, DC  20590
  • Phone (202) 366-1694FAX   (202)
    366-2766Email decarlo.ciccel_at_dot.gov

29
So Whats next for your State?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com