First Results from PISA 2000

1
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and
DevelopmentBildung im internationalen
WettbewerbNach PISA und IGLU
Gesamtschulkongress, Köln, 1. Mai 2003 Andreas
Schleicher Head, Indicators and Analysis
Division Directorate for Education
2
Über die Fähigkeit junger Erwachsener, kreativ
und effizient mit schriftlicher Information
umzugehen
Analysieren, vergleichen, und bewerten
Kreativ mit Information umgehen
PISA Literacy
Wissen in realitätsnahen Bezügen anwenden
Gedankengänge und Ideen wirkungsvoll mitteilen
3
Prozentsatz der Schüler pro Kompetenzstufe
Lesekompetenz
Stufe 5
Stufe 4
1
64-9
83-10
1511-16
2119-24
2221-25
1610-20
31
1111-16
12 11-16
Stufe 3
Stufe 2
Stufe 1
Unter Stufe 1
4
Leistungsunterschiede lediglich Folge
natürlicher Intelligenz?
1
64-9
2221-25
10 9-11
1111-16
83-10
75-9
2119-24
1610-20
30
5
Leistungsunterschiede lediglich Folge
natürlicher Intelligenz?
1
64-9
2221-25
10 9-11
1111-16
83-10
75-9
2119-24
1610-20
30
6
Leistungsunterschiede lediglich Folge
natürlicher Intelligenz?
Leistungsunterschiede innerhalb der Schulen
Leistungsunterschiede zwischen den Schulen
1
64-9
2221-25
10 9-11
1111-16
83-10
75-9
2119-24
1610-20
30
7
Leistungsunterschiede lediglich Folge
natürlicher Intelligenz?
Leistungsunterschiede innerhalb der Schulen
Leistungsunterschiede zwischen den Schulen
Unterschiedliche Schulformen
1
64-9
2221-25
10 9-11
1111-16
83-10
75-9
2119-24
1610-20
30
8
HighPerformance
High performance Low social equity
High performance High social equity
?
UK
Low Social equity
HighSocial equity
?
Italy
Low performance Low social equity
Low performance High social equity
Low Performance
9
HighPerformance
High performance Low social equity
High performance High social equity
Low Social equity
HighSocial equity
Low performance Low social equity
Low performance High social equity
Low Performance
.
10
PISA
IGLU
!
?
?
?
Bildungsergebnisse und Verankerung effektiver
Lernstrategien
?
?
Leistungsgefälle zwischen Schülern und Schulen
?
?
Chancengleichheit
11
The expansion of upper secondary
educationPercentage of the population that has
attained at least upper secondary education, by
age group
12
8
1
5
15
22
18
15
21
13
24
4
12
The expansion of university education Percentage
of the population that has attained Tertiary Type
A education, by age group
24
12
13
Entry rates to tertiary educationSum of net
entry rates over single years of age in
tertiary-type A and tertiary-type B education
14
Private rate of return to tertiary education

• Ergebnis für Männer in D
• -1.5 Höhere Steuern (OECD -1.3)
• -0.3 Gebühren (OECD -1.5)
• 7.1 Studiendauer (OECD 11.4)
• 1.1 Verringerte Arbeitslosigkeit (OECD 0.7)
• 2.6 Staatl. Unterstützung (OECD 2.5)
• 8.5 Jährlicher Gesamtertrag (OECD 11.8)

15
die Konsequenzen ... Ein Beispiel
Bildungsbeteiligung und Wirtschaftswachstum
16
Strategische Bildungsziele
Outputs and OutcomesImpact of Learning
Policy LeversThat shape Outcomes
Antecedentsthat contextualise or constrain policy
Overall outcomes of education
System-wide structures, resources and policies
National educational, social and economic context
Country or system
1
5
9
Community and school characteristics
Output of institutions and institutional
performance
The learning environment at school
Schools and other institutions
2
6
10
Teaching and learning practices and classroom
climate
Student learning conditions and teacher working
conditions
Quality of instructional delivery
Instructional settings
3
7
11
Individual learner
Quality and distribution of knowledge and skills
Individual attitudes, engagement and behaviour
Background of the learners
12
4
8
17
HighPerformance
Student engagement in reading Highest
engagement Lowest engagement
Low Social equity
HighSocial equity
Low Performance
.
18
HighPerformance
E.g. Learning environment and course
offering High degree of autonomy Low degree of
autonomy Variance between schools
11
20
9
76
7
Low Social equity
HighSocial equity
75
71
r.51
Low Performance
.
19
HighPerformance
Early selection and institutional
stratification Low degree of stratification Hig
h degree of stratification
Low Social equity
HighSocial equity
Low Performance
.
20
Effects of students and schools socio-economic
background on student performance(Effects
associated with half a standard deviation on the
socio-economic index)
21
Weitere Informationen

• www.oecd.org
• www.pisa.oecd.org
• email pisa_at_oecd.org
• Andreas.Schleicher_at_OECD.org
• and remember
• Without data, you are just another person with
  an opinion