Title: The Impact of FTI on Aid Effectiveness in the Education Sector in Rwanda
1The Impact of FTI on Aid Effectiveness in the
Education Sector in Rwanda
Presented by Mathias Harebamungu, PS MINEDUC
and Richard Arden DFID Rwanda
2THE AID EFFECTIVENESS CONTEXT IN RWANDA
- Aid Policy 2006 Set out the application of key
Paris OECD-DAC partnership and harmonisation
principles in Rwanda particularly common review
and reporting mechanisms - EDPRS Common Reporting Framework 2008
- Structure of Working Groups for budget and
performance reviews, - Common Performance Assessment Framework
(CPAF) - Common Guidelines and Reporting Formats 2009
- Common Structure and Content of Annual Sector
Reviews - Common Budget Execution and Reporting Formats
- Re-structured Joint Budget Sector Reviews
3Government/Development Partner Co-ordination and
Alignment in Rwanda Education Sector
- MoU Partnership Principles 2006
- One Joint Annual Review and Joint Aide Memoire
- All domestic and external resources on-plan,
on-budget - Preferred modalities general and sector
budget support - MINEDUC/ DP Co-ordination Structure
- Lead Partner Regular policy meetings with
PS/Director of Planning on behalf of partners - Education Cluster Meetings Bi-monthly meetings
of all key Ministry depts. and partners
co-chaired by PS and Lead Partner - Technical Working Groups Set up as necessary
e.g. TVET working group ( GTZ) and Education
Quality Group (UNICEF) division of labour - Education Donor Group Agrees common agenda and
views for Cluster meetings (Also NGO Forum
clustered )
4MINEDUC/DP Co-ordination Structure
5Impact of FTI on Strengthening Alignment in
Education
- General and Sector Budget Support 2006
- Aligned to Education Sector Strategic Plan
and Long-Term Strategic Financing Framework - Originally just UK, Belgium and Sweden
- Modality of FTI disbursement
- Almost unique in channelling funds through SBS
account in Treasury - Largest single contribution to Sector Budget
Support - Encouraged new partners such as Netherlands,
African Development Bank and CIDA to join SBS and
other partners such as JICA and GTZ to sign
common MoU -
6Impact of FTI on Mobilising Silent Partnerships
and Additional Domestic/External Resources
- Delegated Partnerships and Secondments
- Netherlands, Sweden and Canada all developed
different forms of delegated partnerships with
DFID - Belgium seconded adviser to work in DFID
office - New partnerships now being formed with Global
Education Alliance and USAID - Mobilising increased domestic and external
resources - From 2005 -2008, the proportion of SBS has
risen from 0 to 90 of total external funding to
education. It is estimated that since 2006 about
176 million has been leveraged externally from
SBS and projects.. - Domestic funding has also increased
significantly
7(No Transcript)
8Additional ways in which FTI has impacted on Aid
Effectiveness in the Rwanda Education Sector
- Improved predictability over medium term
- Joint development GoR/partner endorsements of FTI
Progress Reports and Bridging Grant application - Audit of Sector Budget Account for FTI purposes
benefits all SBS partners - Improved collaboration between MINEDUC and
partners in terms of analytical sector studies
and reviews - Greater rigour in planning and budgeting for
future.
9Impact of FTI on Resources for achieving
Education for All
- Consistency in allocations to basic education
(63 on average) - Improved disbursements to capitation grants and
excellent budget execution performance (98).
Capitation grants increased from RwF 3000 in 2004
to RwF 7,300 in 2008. - Financing of quality improvements in terms of
teacher education, infrastructure and textbooks
10(No Transcript)
11Impact of FTI on Aid Effectiveness in Rwanda
Education Sector