Accountability of aid: making cash transfer programmes work for donors and recipients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Accountability of aid: making cash transfer programmes work for donors and recipients

Description:

Diverse use of grants: livestock, sewing machines, road-building ... community level a cardboard ATM machine introduced people to accessing their ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: rosiej
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accountability of aid: making cash transfer programmes work for donors and recipients


1
Accountability of aid making cash transfer
programmes work for donors and recipients
  • ECHO partner meeting 9th 10th December -
    Brussels

2
Why now?
  • Recent ECHO evaluation No evidence was found of
    erroneous decisions about the use of cash, of
    objectives not having been achieved, or of
    negative impact
  • Development of ECHO policy on cash programming
  • Cash based programming moving from theory in to
    action
  • ECHO existing commitment to aid effectiveness
    GHD
  • Insufficient breadth of donors accepting wide
    scale use of cash programming

3
Why use cash in emergencies?
  • Principles
  • Choice
  • Dignity
  • Empowerment
  • Practically
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Flexibility
  • Multiplier effects / economic recovery
  • Effective in linking relief activities to
    recovery and longer term development programming
    (LRRD)
  • BUT these strengths can also be weaknesses,
    highlighting the
  • need for Case-by-case feasibility studies!

4
Assumed risks
  • Misuse of cash
  • Will money be spent wisely?
  • How can we avoid money being spent on beer, wine
    and women?
  • Diversion of cash
  • Will the cash reach the correct beneficiaries?
  • Will it benefit the most vulnerable in the
    community / household?
  • Inflation
  • Will the project have an inflationary affect on
    local markets?
  • What if food prices surpass the value of the
    transfer?
  • Accountability
  • How can we account for the money?
  • How do we know what the money is spent on?

5
Feasibility assessment
  • Scale of need and other interventions within the
    area
  • Partner plans and capacity and coherence of
    intended programme with other response activities
  • Suitability of cash vs. vouchers
  • implications on community and social structures.
    Community capacity to manage programme
  • Financial infrastructure in country
  • Availability of secure transfer system, i.e.
    banking systems, mobile banking and post offices.
    In country security
  • Market analysis
  • Capacity / experience of in country team
  • Number of programme and finance staff in country
    team with specific cash based programming
    experience. Level of technical / finance staff
    available
  • Organisational technical capacity
  • Technical support available / needed from head
    office or the region for specific country /
    project

6
Project Design
  • Modality of transfer (i.e. open cheque, bank
    accounts, direct transfer)
  • Security and level of NGO engagement in transfer
    modality strength, experience and reputation of
    distribution partner cost effectiveness of
    different modalities.
  • Number, frequency and value of transfer
  • Suitability of available transfer systems to
    deliver over proposed period, with limited set up
    where necessary possibilities to streamline
    processes
  • Scale of intervention
  • Number of beneficiaries period of time
    geographical area
  • Inflation
  • Inflation rate trends in country over the
    previous years / months. Trend forecast country /
    region
  • Availability of experienced management staff
  • Speed of recruitment / deployment of technical
    and skilled staff

7
Market-Led Livelihoods Recovery, Kashmir (SC and
Oxfam)
  • Cash grants to facilitate recovery of 5,100
    households
  • Cash to support 375 traders re-establish business
  • Markets not seen as exogenous
  • Diverse use of grants livestock, sewing
    machines, road-building
  • Peer support via workshops helped minimise misuse

8
Cash transfers in Drought Response Swaziland
(SC)
  • Monthly cash grants to 7,500 households through
    private bank accounts
  • Monthly transfer value based on market value of
    essential food and non food items
  • Money was used by households to purchase many
    items including food (ave. 75 of expenditure),
    hygiene items, transport, education healthcare
  • Increase access to financial services for poor
    illiterate rural population

9
WV-Lesotho Cash Food Transfer Programme
  • Monthly cash to 4.100 households cash and food
    to 2.400 households through G4S
  • Monthly transfer value based on market value of
    essential food items, increase after 4 months due
    to price increases
  • Almost all (94 ) of cash only and 66 of cash
    food households bought staple food
  • Increase flexibility for other priority needs
    (grocery, healthcare, education, etc.)

10
Appropriate staffing
  • Projects dedicated finance manager skills
    appropriate to scale and nature of intervention
    i.e. specific banking skills if accounts will be
    used, etc.
  • Monitoring staff with finance experience
  • Careful and sufficient resourcing and realistic
    time planning to avoid overburdening
    inexperienced staff and early training

SWAZILAND Drought Response SCUK
DFID Recruitment of a financial manager with
previous corporate experience was crucial for
appropriately managing the partnership with
Standard Bank Partnership Agreement Working
relationship and shared lesson learning
11
Segregation of duty
  • Clear scheme of delegation, roles and
    responsibilities of team
  • Assignment of different staff for identification
    of beneficiaries and delivery of cash
  • Double checking of all financial transactions and
    counting

Kashmir Earthquake Response Staff who registered
and identified beneficiary households were not
involved in monitoring or transferring
funds Roles and responsibilities were shared with
the community Community committees assisted in
the handling of complaints / enquiries
12
Financial monitoring / verification
  • Onsite monitoring of transfers
  • Regular control of partner capacity
  • Monitoring of household expenditure
  • Community / beneficiary involvement in monitoring
  • South Lebanon vouchers to 1.500 most vulnerable
    families after the Israeli withdrawal (WV)
  • Vouchers for food (42,- ), for hygienic items
    (37,- ) and for cooking gas (10,- ) per family
    and month through local traders
  • Biweekly reports and reimbursement of stores
    according to vouchers obtained
  • Complete files kept on each store and village
  • Complete report on finances (as required by
    donor) and family data compiled monthly
  • Random visits to families to report changes in
    needs, and discover and eliminate irregularities
    at stores

13
Market and commodity tracking
  • Budgeting to account for increase in costs over
    time (inflation, food price rises)
  • Careful and systematic monitoring / tracking of
    market prices and reviewing transfer value

LESOTHO World Vision 6500 households received
monthly payments over 6 months through direct
cash delivery Prices of a basket of commodities
was monitored over the 6 month period. When
prices rose over 20 of their original cost the
payment was amended
14
Quality programming
  • Sufficient investment in community training and
    mobilising, careful targeting, community
    involvement in project monitoring and development
  • Encourage appropriate use of funds through
    detailed needs assessment prior to targeting and
    ongoing visible monitoring
  • Financial literacy training to vulnerable
    households

SWAZILAND Drought Response cash transfers
through bank accounts A detailed needs assessment
carried out nationally defined targeting criteria
existing community structures were used to
target beneficiary households and SC verification
supported this. Financial Literacy training was
carried out at community level a cardboard ATM
machine introduced people to accessing their
funds through the bank
15
Internal Audit
  • Adequate documentation of processes critical,
    e.g. in WV Lesotho there was an operational audit
    and a financial audit that covered the project
    life
  • WV FPMG has set Audit guidelines and a standing
    Audit team
  • Cash transfers systems were adapted from the food
    systems, this gave the project a head start while
    building on established controls
  • Monthly Financial reports to track cash-flows
    were produced and reviewed by at least 3 senior
    staff

16
How do we move forward?
  • Greater sharing of learning amongst donors and
    agencies on accounting for cash based programming
    and controlling risks
  • Stronger Monitoring and evaluation
  • Getting targeting right for humanitarian
    efficiency.
  • Minimum Standards feasibility study, clear
    beneficiary information (including basic
    financial literacy as part of awareness and
    preparedness)
  • NGO / partner capacity building appropriate
    investment
  • Clear and consistent donor policies and practices
  • Country level preparedness
  • Advance joined up work in areas prone to rapid
    onset or chronic onset strengthens
    appropriateness / timeliness of response /
    capacity

17
Resume
  • Cash and Voucher programs should be seen as two
    options among a number of options each of which
    are appropriate in different contexts. The
    tendency to think of cash and vouchers as
    distinct and special has distracted attention
    from an efficient way of helping households meet
    their needs in a given context
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com