In what ways has the House of Lords been reformed in recent years - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

In what ways has the House of Lords been reformed in recent years

Description:

... support the House of Lords as the remaining relic' of Britain's feudal system ... representative group of peers could better reflect the peers of society ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Mich911
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: In what ways has the House of Lords been reformed in recent years


1
In what ways has the House of Lords been reformed
in recent years?
2
Timeline Lords Reform
  • 1911 Parliament Act the first major
    restrictions on the Lords power, all money bills
    passed by the commons will become law without the
    Lords consent if passed by the Commons
  • 1949 Parliament Act limits the delaying powers
    of the Lords still further, to 2 sessions and 1
    year
  • 1970s-80s Labour party policy advocates total
    abolition of the House of Lords
  • 1992 labour manifesto abandons abolition in
    favour of reform
  • 1999 Blair abolishes the right of all but 92
    hereditary peers to sit and vote in Lords

3
Timeline Lords Reform
  • 1999 this meant 600 hereditary peers lost their
    place in the Lords
  • The 92 remaining peers were allowed to carry on
    after been elected by their colleagues
  • 2001 white paper published outlining next reforms

4
Timeline Lords Reform
  • The white paper promised a directly elected
    element of 20 in the new chamber
  • However no-one was satisfied with these proposals
    and the government had to start again
  • In 2005 the government announced it wanted to
    remove the remaining hereditaries and allow MPs a
    free vote on the Houses composition
  • A joint committee is to be set up to review the
    conventions e.g. whether peers refrain from
    opposing manifesto commitments of the government

5
Timeline Lords Reform
  • Previous attempts at reform collapsed when MPs
    and peers failed to agree on any of 7 options
    from an all-appointed to a fully-elected second
    chamber

6
Wakeham Commission
  • As Westminister debated the governments plans to
    abolish hereditary peers, Lord Wakehams
    Commission got to grips with the alternatives
  • The result A House for the future published in
    2000

7
Proposals for change
  • It ducked the question of what to call a new
    upper chamber and proposed to leave the current
    balance of power between the gov, Commons and new
    upper house
  • But it did acknowledge the following
  • Statutory minimum proportion (30) female members
    are currently about 7, fair representation of
    ethnic minorities/religious representation,
    regional members and commission to appoint
    peers rather than PM

8
Scrapped or Reformed?
  • Monarchs role in decision making has disappeared
    many therefore support the House of Lords as the
    remaining relic of Britains feudal system

9
Scrapped or Reformed? opposing views
  • Democracy means rule by the majority, the commons
    is elected and therefore legitimate chamber
  • Therefore the unelected HOL is illegitimate and
    should be abolished entirely
  • Democracy is about a countrys whole political
    system, this means not every institution needs to
    be elected
  • As long as the elected chamber HOC which is more
    powerful is democratic and the whole system
  • HOL should be retained as a balance to the Commons

10
Balance of power
  • At the moment the Lords has limited powers and
    the government would like it to stay that way
  • They argue a balance of power would cause
    legislative gridlock
  • We can expect debate to continue

11
Arguments for a directly elected second chamber
  • If a different party is in control of the 2nd
    chamber it will oblige parties to enter into
    productive discussions
  • people should decide who there representatives are
  • Could be based on PR to act as a moderating
    influence on the HOC
  • mid term elections could take account of public
    opinion on a more regular basis

12
Arguments against a directly elected second
chamber
  • Turnout for elections have been low, why elect
    more?
  • Public have local councillors, MPs, MEPs MSPs
    why confuse people?
  • An appointed representative group of peers could
    better reflect the peers of society
  • mid term elections could bring US style
    gridlock to the country

13
Power of House of Lords steadily eroded
  • It can be argued this is an attempt to bring
    government closer to the people
  • However it is also claimed that the influence of
    Parliament has declined as power has shifted to
    the PM and senior members of government
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com