Learning Styles and Gender: The Implications for Online Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Learning Styles and Gender: The Implications for Online Learning

Description:

Assimilating: ... Assimilating: Online (cont.) The instructor should function as an expert for ... Ability to assimilate disparate observations into an integrated, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: valuedg535
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Learning Styles and Gender: The Implications for Online Learning


1
Learning Styles and Gender The Implications for
Online Learning
  • Dr. Diana Garland
  • Dr. Barbara Martin
  • Southwest Missouri State University

2
Research Purpose
  • Determine if gender is a factor in the
    relationship between learning style and level of
    engagement.

3
Population and Sample
  • Nonprobability sample
  • 5 online courses
  • Advanced Tax Accounting
  • The Causes of Crime and Delinquency
  • Technology Administration and Management
  • Strategic Management and Policy
  • Administration, Organizational and Operations
    Concepts for Managers

4
Sample (N91)
  • 61 completed
  • Return rate 67
  • Mean age 28.75
  • 35 Females
  • 26 Males

5
Data Collection
  • Online Kolb LSI 3 (1999)
  • University Records
  • 4 Blackboard Statistics
  • Communication
  • Main Content
  • Group
  • Student

6
Communication Area
  • Asynchronous and synchronous dialogue and the use
    of collaboration tools are displayed.
  • Tools may include threaded discussion boards,
    shared documents as discussion board attachments,
    or virtual office hours through real time chat.
  • Male mean (240) - Female mean (228)
  • (N26) (N35)

7
Main Content Area
  • The instructor posts the non-interactive course
    material.
  • This might include such things as course
    information, course documents, assignments,
    books, and external links.
  • Male mean (298) - Female mean (242)
  • (N26) (N35)

8
Group Area
  • Group pages are areas set up by the instructor
    only accessible to specific groups of students.
  • Groups may have their own discussion board,
    virtual classroom and file exchange.
  • Male mean (1.23) - Female mean (3.29)
  • (N26) (N35)

9
Students Area
  • The student areas include tools to help the
    student manage class work.
  • These tools may include a digital drop box, a
    homepage editing screen, personal information, a
    calendar, information on the students personal
    course grade, tasks, and an address book.
  • Male mean (85) - Female mean (101)
  • (N26) (N35)

10
Kolbs Cycle of Learning
11
Kolb Learning-Style Inventory
  • When I learn
  • I like to deal with my feelings.
  • I like to think about ideas.
  • I like to be doing things.
  • I like to watch and listen.

12
Kolb Learning Mode Means
  • Concrete Experience (CE)
  • 23.49
  • Reflective Observation (RO)
  • 28.92
  • Active Experimentation (AE)
  • 34.43
  • Abstract Conceptualization (AC)
  • 32.66

13
Assimilating Online
  • Dominant learning abilities of Reflective
    Observation (RO) and Abstract Conceptualization
    (AC)
  • Want theory to be precise and logically sound.
  • Less concerned with people and more concerned
    with the ideas and abstract concepts.
  • The question associated with this style is
    What?
  • (Kolb 2000, 1984). (Felder, 1996).

14
Assimilating Online (cont.)
  • The instructor should function as an expert for
    these students.
  • Takes in new information abstractly and processes
    or transforms it reflectively.
  • Ability to assimilate disparate observations into
    an integrated, rational explanation.
  • Excels at inductive reasoning and the creation of
    models and theories, and is a goal setter and a
    systematic planner.
  • (Kolb 2000, 1984). (Felder, 1996)

15
Assimilating Online (cont.)
  • Strengths include the planning, creating models
    and theories and inductive reasoning.
  • (Kolb 2000, 1984). (Felder, 1996)

16
Data Analysis
  • Bivariate analysis (Pearson r)
  • Relationship between learning style mode and
    level of engagement
  • No Significant Correlation at .05 level

17
Second Data Analysis
  • Data divided by gender
  • Two bivariate analyses (Pearson r)
  • Relationship between learning style and level of
    engagement

18
  • No significant correlations for females between
    Kolb learning modes and Blackboard access (N35)
  • One significant correlation for males between
    Kolb learning modes and Blackboard access (N26)

19
Analysis Implications
  • A relationship for Males was confirmed for the
    Kolb abstract conceptualization learning mode
    which indicates a preference for theory readings
    study time alone clear, well-structured
    presentation of ideas view the facilitator or
    instructor as communicator of information.

20
Study Implications
  • Confirmation regarding the relationship among
    gender, learning style, and student engagement
  • Supports the need for gender equity in building
    and designing courses and programs

21
Gender Issue Literature Review Findings
  • Male and female differ in communication style
    online.
  • Group or chat assignments welcome by both male
    and female students.
  • Some females intimidated by required postings.

22
Gender Issue Literature Review Findings
  • Male students view the computer as a tool to gain
    power, speed, infinite wisdom and the ability to
    control.
  • Females view the computer as a tool for connected
    learning, emphasizing relationships, empathy, and
    cooperation.

23
Diverging(Concrete Experience Reflective
Observation)
  • Male Female
  • (N3) (N3)
  • Communication 4 147
  • Main Content 19 186
  • Group 1 14
  • Student 3 129

24
Assimilating(Reflective Observation Abstract
Conceptualization)
  • Male Female
  • (N7) (N13)
  • Communication 319 232
  • Main Content 284 256
  • Group 0 1
  • Student 79 105

25
Converging(Abstract Conceptualization Active
Experimentation)
  • Male Female
  • (N10) (N10)
  • Communication 243 211
  • Main Content 227 242
  • Group 0 2
  • Student 88 112

26
Accommodating(Active Experimentation Concrete
Experience)
  • Male Female
  • (N3) (N8)
  • Communication 277 283
  • Main Content 582 242
  • Group 2 3
  • Student 98 82

27
Balanced
  • Male Female
  • (N3) (N1)
  • Communication 277 166
  • Main Content 582 214
  • Group 2 6
  • Student 98 18

28
Conclusions
  • While this investigation did not find a
    relationship between learning style and student
    engagement, a relationship was found between
    learning style and student engagement when the
    data was divided by gender.
  •  

29
  • Designing and administering online classes
    should consider all learner characteristics
    including learning style and gender.
  • Further research on these characteristics is
    recommended.

30
Diana Garland, MBA, EdD
  • WEB Page http//www.staff.smsu.edu/d/dkg988t/
  • EMAIL dianagarland_at_smsu.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com