Transparency , Information Content and Order Placement Strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Transparency , Information Content and Order Placement Strategy

Description:

Increasing pre-trade transparency in Taiwan Stock Exchange ... strategies [e.g., Cao, Hansh and Wang (2003) and Pascual and Veredas (2003) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Mat139
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transparency , Information Content and Order Placement Strategy


1
Transparency , Information Content and Order
Placement Strategy
  • Tai Ma, Yaling Lin, Hsiu-Kuei Cheng
  • Department of Finance, National Sun Yat-sen
    University

2
Introduction
  • Increasing pre-trade transparency in Taiwan
    Stock Exchange
  • Before July 1st, 2002 only the best price is
    disclosed.
  • Since July 1st, 2002 the volume of best bid/ask
    is disclosed additionally.
  • Beginning in 2003 both the price and volume of
    the best five unexecuted orders are disclosed

3
Introduction
  • How much additional information is valuable after
    grater transparency?
  • How does additional information influence order
    strategies of individual and institutional
    investors?

4
Related Research
  • Traders choices between market and limit orders
  • limit orders are not as informative as market
    orders e.g., Glosten, 1994Angel, 1994Rock,
    1996 Harris, 1998 .
  • informed traders would prefer to submit limit
    orders rather than market orders e.g.,
    Bloomfield, Ohara and Saar(2005)and Kaniel and
    Liu(2006).

5
Related Research
  • LOB information affects traders behavior
  • the state of LOB will influences the forthcoming
    order flow e.g., Handa and Schwartz(1996),
    Parlour(1998)and Foucault(1999), Coppejans and
    Domowitz (2002) , Biais et al.(1995),Griffiths
    et al.(2000),Hollifield et al.(2003), and Ranaldo
    (2004) .
  • the impact of LOB information beyond its first
    step on investors strategies e.g., Cao, Hansh
    and Wang (2003) and Pascual and Veredas (2003) .

6
Related Research
  • Comment
  • none of these studies has measured the
    information content of the book beyond its first
    step for different types of investors .They do
    not connect the information content and order
    placement strategy with transparency
    enhancement.

7
Contribution
  • The first one to combine the issues of LOB
    information content, investors order strategies
    and transparency.
  • Exploring information content of the best quote
    and the quote beyond the best for different kinds
    of traders.
  • Investigating the transparency impact on
    different types of traders order placement
    strategies.

8
Sample Period
  • 1st stage
  • least transparent Feb-02?Jun-02
  • 2nd stage
  • partially transparent Jul-02?Dec-02
  • 3rd stage
  • most transparent Mar-03?Jun-03

9
Samples and subsamples
  • 50 stocks listed in the Taiwan Stock Exchange.

10
Samples and sub-samples
  • Time Series for Analysis (Information content)
  • In the second stage
  • In the third stage

11
Methodology
  • Information share of LOB
  • VAR (vector autoregressive model)
  • Partial transparent period
  • 1?model1 2?model2
  • The most transparent period
  • 1?model3 2?model4

12
The Information content of LOB
  • Vector Autoregressive Model
  • Information content
  • the percentage of variation in trading prices
    (volume) due to posted bid/ask price (bid/ask
    volume).
  • Model 1 (2nd stage ) (back)

13
The Information content of limit order book
  • Model 2 (2nd stage ) (back)

14
The Information content of limit order book
  • Model 3 (3rd stage ) (back)

15
The Information content of limit order book
  • Model 4 (3rd stage ) (back)

16
Methodology
  • Order Strategies
  • (aggressiveness of buyers)
  • C1 bid price maximum price limit
  • C2 best ask lt bid price lt maximum price limit
  • C3 best bid lt bid price lt best ask
  • C4 bid price best bid
  • C5 best bid minus two ticks lt bid price lt best
    bid
  • C6 minimum price limit lt bid price lt best bid
    minus two ticks

17
Methodology
  • Order Strategies
  • (aggressiveness of sellers)
  • C1 ask price minimum price limit
  • C2 minimum price limit lt ask price lt best bid
  • C3 best bid lt ask price lt best ask
  • C4 ask price best ask
  • C5 best ask lt ask price lt best ask add two
    ticks
  • C6 best ask add two ticks lt ask price lt
    maximum price limit

18
Methodology
  • Order Probit Model
  • Aggressiveness index (C1 to C6)
  • Explanatory variables
  • LOB first step information
  • DS1(DO1)The best quote depth on the
    same(opposite)side
  • LOB information beyond the first step
  • DS25(DO25) The accumulative quote depth from
    step2 to step5 on the same (opposite) side.
  • LS12(LO12)The distance between the best and
    second best quote on the same (opposite) side.
  • LS25(LO25)The distance between the second and
    fifth best quoteon on the same (opposite)
    side..

19
Empirical Results
  • 1.Information contents
  • 1.1 Summary Statistics for Information share
  • Disclosing bid price and volume have more
    information content than ask price and volume,
    especially in the most transparent period.
  • Table 2 (stage 2) Table 3 (stage 3)

20
Empirical Results (BACK)
  • 1.2 Test results of information content
  • In the partial transparent market , the best
    quote price has more information content than the
    best quote volume when we decompose the trading
    price. Table4 (stage 2)
  • Institutional traders unmatched orders provide
    more information content than individual traders.
    Table4 (stage 2)
  • Table5(stage 3)

21
Empirical Results
  • The best quote price and the average step2 to
    step5 quote price
  • Individual traders best bid/ask of unexecuted
    orders always has more information content than
    the average of step2 to step5 quote price
    Table5
  • Institutional investors average of step2 to
    step5 quote price contains the same information
    as the best unexecuted orders at least. Table5

22
Empirical Results
  • Orderplacement strategies
  • 2.1 Summary Statistics for Orderplacement
    strategies
  • orders are distributed evenly among all
    aggressive categories except the sub-aggressive
    category(C2) Table6

23
Empirical Results
  • 2.2 Transparency and orderplacement strategies
  • stage 1 into stage 2 or 3 both institutional and
    individual investors reduce the most aggressive
    orders(C1), and C3 as well as C4 increase
    instead.
  • stage 2 into stage 3 the increasing tendency in
    C3 is more striking for institutional investors
    buy orders .
  • Table7

24
Empirical Results
  • 2.3 Probit model the determinants of order
    aggressiveness.
  • the order aggressiveness of all sub-samples
    performs significant positive first-order
    autocorrelation.
  • The sign of the margin trading dummy is positive
    ,especially for individual traders
  • When the spread widens, the order aggressiveness
    will decline , especially for individual traders
    and sell orders.
  • Table8 Table9

25
Empirical Results
  • 2.3 Probit model the determinants of order
    aggressiveness.
  • The order submission depends mostly on the best
    quote and corresponding depth, the disclosures
    beyond step 1 still have explanatory power.
  • Quote depth
  • The aggressiveness is positive(negative)with
    the book depth on the same(opposite)side .This
    trend is more evident for the best quote than
    the quote beyond the first.
  • The accumulated depth at step2 to 5 has more
    significant effect on individual strategies.
  • The aggressiveness of buyers is affected more
    by opposite-side depth, while the sellers are
    more concerned about the same side depth
  • Table8 Table9

26
Empirical Results
  • 2.3 Probit model the determinants of order
    aggressiveness.
  • Quote price
  • Investors become more aggressive with smaller
    quote distance on the same side or with larger
    quote distance on the opposite side.
  • This trend is more evident for the best quote
    than the step2 to step5 quote price,
    institutional buy orders are only exception.
  • Order submissions are affected by the quote
    distance of the same side rather than the
    opposite side.

27
Conclusion--Informaiton content
  • The LOB information content of buy orders is
    more than that of sell orders.
  • the quote price is more informative than the
    quote volume.
  • Institutional traders unmatched orders provide
    more information content than individual traders.

28
Conclusion--Informaiton content
  • the individual traders best quote always has
    more information content than the average 2nd to
    5th quote, while it is not true for institutional
    investors.

29
ConclusionOrder placement strategy
  • Higher transparency makes all investors reduce
    unnecessarily costly orders.
  • The competition among institutional traders is
    stronger than individual traders as transparency
    increases.
  • Investors not only utilize the best quote and
    depth to make decisions but also use the
    information beyond step 1 of the book.

30
ConclusionOrder placement strategy
  • Investors are more aggressive as the same side of
    the book is more crowded and the opposite side of
    the book is more disperse.
  • the depth of limit order book has quite
    diversified effects on order submission for the
    buyers, sellers, institutional and individual
    investors .

31
Table 2 Summary Statistics for Information
share in the partially transparent market (stage
2) (BACK)
  • The number in the cell is the percentage of
    information share. We list the results for buy
    and sell orders
  • separately. Investors are classified into
    informed (institutional) and uninformed(individual
    )traders.
  • Moreover, "bid1" is the best bid, "bidq1" is the
    volume of best bid, "ask1" is the best ask and
    "askq1" is the volume of best ask.

32
Table 3 Summary Statistics for Information
share in the most transparent market (stage 3)
(BACK)
  • "bid1" is the best bid, "bid25" is the average
    of step 2 to step 5 bid price, "bidq1" is the
    volume of best
  • bid, "bidq25" is the average of step 2 to step 5
    bid volume, "ask1" is the best ask, "ask25" is
    the average
  • of step 2 to step 5 ask price, "askq1" is the
    volume of best ask and "askq25" is the average of
    step 2 to
  • step 5 ask volume.

33
Table 4 Difference in the information share of
trading price and volume in the partial
transparent market (stage 2) (BACK)
34
Table 5 Difference in the information share of
trading price and volume in the most transparent
market (stage 3) (BACK1) (BACk2)
35
Table 6 Distribution of order types by
institutional and individual investorsBACK
36
Table 7 Differences in order aggressiveness
between stages of various transparency levels
Back
37
Table 8 Ordered Probit Model of Order Choice
for Institutional Investors

Back1 Back2
38
Table 9 Order Probit Model of Order Choice for
Individual Investors

Back1 Bacl2
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com