Risk Mitigation in Agriculture: Are we asking the right questions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Risk Mitigation in Agriculture: Are we asking the right questions

Description:

Risk Mitigation in Agriculture: Are we asking the right questions – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Sart3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Risk Mitigation in Agriculture: Are we asking the right questions


1
Risk Mitigation in Agriculture Are we asking
the right questions?
  • Sarthak Gaurav, Ph.D. Scholar, IGIDR
  • Risk Mitigation in Agriculture
  • 11th Aug, 2009, Ahmedabad

2
Returns from Farm and Off-farm Activity 2002-03
Source Calculated from unit level data NSS, 59th
Round, Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers
3
Monthly Per Capita Income and Consumption by
Size-Class of Holding Cash-Flow Crisis
4
Agrarian Crisis
  • Deceleration in production and productivity
  • Waning profitability and poor returns
  • Limited off-farm opportunities
  • Marginalization of land holdings
  • Decline of public investment in irrigation and
    other infrastructure
  • Indebtedness to informal credit sources
  • Failure of research and extension

5
Agenda
  • Do agricultural risks affect the risk averse
    farmers and farm households resource allocation
    welfare?
  • Are the effects of risk and its management
    strategies heterogeneous?
  • Impact on decision making and behaviour?
  • Is variability of yield and prices a significant
    source of income risk ?

6
Green Revolution Blues
  • Crop production became more sensitive to weather
    (rainfall) and price changes since mid 60s
  • gt 90 of increase in production variance at
    national level due to changes in inter-district
    production covariance (Walker 1989)
  • Area shifts to HYVs led allocation of riskier
    and inferior land to other riskier crops where
    CV is high (also population pressure)

7
Growth and Instability
  • HYV/fertilizer/modern purchased input intensive
    farming
  • Higher income risk for the farmer
  • Increase in Yield Variance (high CV)
  • Increase in Covariance of yields of different
    crops and regions
  • Decrease in area-yield correlation

8
People Respond to Incentives..Do Farmers?
  • Weaker supply response in last 50 years
  • Non-price factors dominate over price factors
  • Rabi crops respond better to P increases than
    Kharif
  • Adjustments by varying non-land inputs
  • Acreage shifts from food grains to non-food
    grains
  • High Regional Variations in Irrigation and Yield

9
Yield Risk- Price Risk Affair
  • Stage 1 farmers allocate land based on Pe
  • Stage 2 yield is determined on basis of other
    inputs, agro-climatic variables, bio-physical
    factors and farmer characteristics, given acreage
  • Yield depends on Price (inputs and output)
  • Negative Correlation b/w Yield and Price makes
    reduction in revenue variance difficult

10
Yield Risk, Price Risk and Income in ICRISAT
Villages (1975/76-1983/84)
Source Anderson and Hazell 1989
11
Evidence on Yield Risk
  • Yield Variability gt Price Variability by 4
  • Yield Variability Main Reason for Income
    Instability
  • In 49 out of 59 un-irrigated districts yield
    variation exceeds price variation (1956-1974
    data) Walker and Ryan (1990)
  • Credit Market Imperfections interact with land
    and labour market imperfections

12
True Welfare Effects
  • Impact on Consumption (direct and indirect)
  • Non-separability of production and consumption
    decisions
  • Different impact on different categories of rural
    households- landless agricultural labourers and
    deficit farmers are worst off

13
The Risk Averse Homo economicus
  • Low income farmers are Risk Averse
  • This leads to inefficiency of resource use (MVPgt
    Factor Price) sub-optimal decisions
  • Cropping Patterns to safeguard family security.
    Forget Profits safety-expected profit tradeoff
  • Reduction of input levels (risky output, certain
    Input costs)
  • Laggards, Delays in Innovation and Adoption of
    New Tech

14
Measuring Risk Attitudes
  • Risk Aversion (Moscardi and de Janvry 1977,
    Dillon and Scandizzo 1978, Rosenzweig and
    Binswanger1993, Townsend 1994, Morduch 1995, )
  • Direct Elicitation Methods/Experimental Gambling
    (Binswanger 1980,)Disaster Avoidance (Roumasset
    1976)
  • How close to real farming real losses?
  • Do we factor in the constraints interlinks?

15
Contingent Markets are Imperfect Public Policy?
  • traditional Informal mechanisms fail in case of
    covariate shocks and disastrous losses
  • impose costs in terms of equity and
    sustainability
  • natural disasters/cats may trigger involuntary
    defaults

16
Innovations can add to the Risk!
  • increased input costs might depress net farm
    income
  • worst-case gross output might go up, while
    worst-case net farm income falls vis-à-vis
    traditional scenario e.g. Bt Cotton Seeds
  • profitability, land tenure and info asymmetry
    matters
  • changing technology and market conditions can add
    to uncertainties in product factor markets
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com