Title: Social Analysis in Transport Projects
1Social Analysis in Transport Ethiopia, February
2003 Reidar KvamLead Social Scientist, The World
Bank
2Part 1
3Challenge Bring the people into focus
What is the development objective of transport
projects?
- Transport projects can contribute positively not
only to economic growth, but to poverty reduction
and benefits for local communities. - Social analysis contributes to poverty reduction
and sustainability of benefits.
4Social Issues in Transport
- High transport costs, in rural and urban areas,
reduce peoples ability to perform more
economically valuable activities - Traditional analysis of economic and financial
rates of return generally favors projects with
high standards of construction but more
labor-intensive technologies might do more to
reduce poverty and reach poor and vulnerable
groups - Different types of transport infrastructure
projects have differing social impacts - Transport projects have increasingly embraced
cross-cutting thematic areas that include
social issues in particular, identifying
opportunities for poverty reduction
5Social Dimensions of Poverty Reduction
- Social Inclusion
- The removal of institutional barriers and the
enhancement of incentives to increase the access
of diverse individuals and groups to assets and
development opportunities - Empowerment
- The enhancement of the assets and capabilities of
diverse individuals to engage, influence and hold
accountable the institutions that affect them - Security
- The protection from vulnerability and social
risks arising out of a project, including adverse
impacts such as physical or economic
displacement. Vulnerability is susceptibility to
conflict, violence or economic shocks.
6Issues addressed through Social Analysis
- Examines the social opportunities, constraints,
likely impacts, and social risks relevant to a
project - Access of the poor to markets and public services
- Mitigation of adverse impacts
- Addressing social tensions and conflict
- Enhancing accountability to the poor of
institutions - Framework for dialogue on development priorities,
and strengthening of commitment of key
stakeholders - Helps identify and monitor the projects expected
social development outcomes
7Core Elements of Social Analysis
Social Diversity and Gender
Institutions,rules and behavior
Stakeholders
Participation
Social risks
8Social Diversity and Gender
9Social Diversity and Gender
Ascribed Mixed Achieved
Age Language Citizen/Migrant
Caste Native/ Immigrant Education
Ethnicity/Race Religion Ideology
Gender Location Land-ownership
Sexual Orientation Disability Occupation/ Livelihood
Political Affiliation
Unionization
Urban/Rural
10Institutions, Rules and Behavior
- What are institutions? What are organizations?
- Why do we care?
- What is the range we need to look at?
- How do rules, behaviors affect poverty?
- How do they affect the project and its outcomes?
- Are there different rules or organizational
models for men and women? Different ethnic
groups? Formal and traditional rules?
11Institutions, Rules and Behavior
- Value systems and norms that govern behavior and
relationships may be very different from the
formal organizational structures. - Relationships count for more than formal
regulations. Personal loyalties are valued more
highly than formal rules.
- These relationships are frequently characterized
by hierarchy and inequality, male dominance,
patronage and informal obligations.
12Stakeholders
- Who are the stakeholders?
- Why is it important to identify them?
- What makes a person a stakeholder? An
organization?
- What is the range for our identification of them?
- Where can we find them?
- What are the key things to know about them?
13Overall Stakeholder Analysis Matrix (SAM)
Stakeholder Category Relevant Stakeholders Characteristics (social, location, size, organizational capability) Interests (degree of commitment to status quo openness to change) Influence (HHigh, MMedium, LLow)
Government policymakers - Parliament and political leadership -- Administration at different levels -- Courts -- Supportive of improved transport conditions, but may oppose governance measures -- Largely supportive -- Neutral H H M
Implementing agency staff MRPW, various departments
Intended beneficiaries
Adversely Affected Persons
Organized Interest Groups (e.g., business associations, trade unions)
Civil Society (e.g., NGOs, CBOs, religious organizations)
Donors
Other External/ Intl stakeholders
14Stakeholder analysis in transport
- Description of different interest groups that may
live in a defined geographic area Business
owners who need transport and logistics, elite
groups who are chauffeured, pedestrians, elected
local officials, etc. - Which stakeholders a transport project
benefitsinfluential ones, poor and marginalized
ones, or bothis both a social and an engineering
question - Stakeholders may be adversely impacted, and
stakeholder interests and concerns may change
over the course of a project - All of which emphasizes the need for stakeholder
analysis, feedback and consultation, during both
project preparation and implementation
15Consultation and Participation
Effective participation includes participation of
beneficiaries in project design and
implementation as well as participation in the
opportunities created by the project.
- What are the mechanisms used for consultation and
participation in the project? - What are the main outcomes and recommendations of
the consultation process? - How are these recommendations to be incorporated
into the project?
16Social Risk
- Risks from the project
- Vulnerability risks Increase in exposure to
stress or shocks - Risks to the project
- Country risks Conflict and violence, political
instability, ethnic and religious tension - Political economy risks Capture of benefits,
opposition or distortion of project by
influential stakeholders - Institutional risks Poor governance, limited
technical and administrative capacity, design
complexity - Exogenous risks Terms of trade, regional
conflict, climate effects - Key questions for social analysis
- How do poor people cope with risk?
- What actions can be taken to reduce or mitigate
risk?
17Actions Arising Out of Risk Assessment
High R R MP K
Substantial R R MP MP
Moderate I R T T
Low I R T T
Low Moderate Substantial High
Probability of risk
Importance of risk
K Killer assumption. Scratch the design and
start over, because risk is unacceptably high. MP
Modify plan. Take action to anticipate likely
risk by changing design or introducing
complementary measures. T Triggers.
Establish measurable indicators that, upon being
reached, trigger changes in design or measures to
address distribution, compensation, adverse
impacts, etc. R Review and reconsider I
Ignore
18Part 2
19Involuntary Resettlement as aVulnerability
RiskPrinciples and objectives
- Minimize displacement
- Treat resettlement as a development program
- Provide affected people with opportunities for
participation - Assist displaced persons in their efforts to
improve their incomes and standards of living, or
at least to restore them - Assist displaced people regardless of legality of
tenure - Pay compensation for affected assets at
replacement cost
20Involuntary ResettlementCoverage of the Policy
In addition to World Bank funded activities, the
policy on involuntary resettlement applies to
- All project activities, including those that may
not be financed by the Bank - Activities outside the Bank project, if they are
- Necessary to achieve project objectives,
- Are directly and significantly related to the
Bank-assisted project, and - Are carried out, or planned to be carried out,
contemporaneously with the project
21Categories of Displaced Persons
- Three categories of displaced persons based on
legality of tenure with respect to affected land - Those who have formal, legal rights to affected
land (including customary and traditional rights
recognized under the countrys laws) - Those who do not have formal legal rights but
have a claim that is recognized under the laws of
the country - Those who have no recognizable legal right or
claim to the land they are occupying
22Building blocks of support
DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES
IMPACTS ON GROUPS AND COMMUNITIES
IMPACTS ON GROUPS AND COMMUNITIES
LOSS OF LIVELIHOOD
LOSS OF LIVELIHOOD
NON-VULNERABLE GROUPS
VULNERABLE GROUPS
VULNERABLE GROUPS
LOSS OF ASSETS
LAND OCCUPANTS WITHOUT LEGALOWNERSHIP
RECOGNIZED LAND OWNERS
LAND OCCUPANTS WITHOUT LEGAL OWNERSHIP
23Loss of land and other assets
- Examples
- Agricultural land
- Non-agricultural land
- Homes and other structures
- Wells, trees, etc.
- Compensation based on replacement cost
- Who determines value? Who pays for it? When is
it decided?
24When is a squatter not a squatter?
- Traditional rights where the State never legally
acquired land
- Local recognition based on taxes and other fees
de facto ownership - Tribal groups
- Promises of land regularization by politicians
- Inconsistent application of policies court
reversals
25Impacts on Livelihoods
- Example Agricultural land has a market value
(requires compensation), but it is also the basis
for livelihood and future earning capacity
(requires rehabilitation) - A household may have multiple providers of
income, requiring intra-household analysis and
gender analysis - Important to determine criteria for vulnerability
in different situations e.g. - Below Poverty Line
- Women headed households
- Children and elderly
26Consultation about impacts and opportunities
- Public disclosure
- Information in local languages
- Options and choices
- Explanation of risks and benefits
- Adequate time to make informed judgments
- Joint verification of impacts and entitlements
- Registration and ID cards computerized database
27Transport and Impactson Communities
- Roadside use for collecting firewood and water,
drying cowdung, etc.
Traffic safety
- Traffic safety
- Health concerns
- Child labor
28Traffic Safety
- Car accidents kill 1.2 million per year in the
world - Affect the poor disproportionately
- Are growing rapidly from the 9th to the 3d cause
of adult death (2015). - Transport related pollution causes an additional
800,000 deaths per year worldwide, - Has become a health issue in a number of African
cities, where gas is not lead free. - In Kenya about 2,800 people are killed and 9,
500 seriously injured annually
29Entitlements of displaced persons in different
categories
- Compensation paid to
- Those who have legal rights on affected lands,
and - Those who have claims that can be regularized
- Resettlement assistance provided to
- Those who have no recognizable legal right or
claim to affected land but who occupy the land
before the cut-off date - No assistance provided to
- Those who occupy the land after the cut-off date
- Locally established cut-off dates acceptable
under certain conditions
30Consultation and disclosure
- As a condition of project appraisal,
- The Borrower provides the Bank with a draft
resettlement instrument - Makes it available at a place accessible to
displaced persons and local NGOs - The Bank makes it available to the public through
its InfoShop - Upon approval of the final resettlement
instrument by the Bank, - The Borrower again makes it available at a place
accessible to displaced persons and local NGOs - The Bank again makes it available to the public
through the InfoShop
31Right of Way management
Old road to be upgraded
- Inside Corridor of Impact Individual support
to Project Affected Persons (PAPs)
- Outside Corridor of Impact Group oriented
support targeted at poor and vulnerable people
32Examples of good designs
33Census and cut-off date
- Registration and documentation of potentially
affected population - should cover all categories, including people
without legal title to land or assets - basic household demographics
- registration and verification of assets
- Determination of cut-off date for eligibility to
support under the project
34Phasing of resettlement work
- Screening, census, sample survey, initial
consultations, cut-off date - Entitlement framework, consultations with
stakeholders - Detailed baseline surveywithin project impact
area following final designs - Completion of RAP
- Project appraisal and approval
- Implementation of resettlement program
- Start of civil works
35Supervision, Completion and Beyond
- The policy prescribes
- An early review of implementation
- Earlier than the mid-term review for the project
- A project is not considered complete and Bank
supervision continues until the agreed
resettlement measures have been implemented - A follow up socio-economic survey at project
completion - To assess the extent to which the objectives of
the resettlement program have been achieved - Based on the baseline socioeconomic survey and
periodic monitoring reports - If the assessment reveals that objectives may not
be realized, the borrower should propose follow
up measures - Bank supervision may continue beyond project
completion, if considered necessary by the Bank
36Part 3
- Social and Public Accountability
37What is Accountability?
Accountability is about power about people
having not just a say in official decisions but
also the right to hold their rulers to
account. - Human Development Report,
UNDP,2002
Accountability is the ability to call public
officials, private employers, or service
providers to account, requiring that they be
answerable for their policies, actions and use of
funds. - Empowerment and Poverty Reduction
Sourcebook, WB, 2002
38What is Social Public Accountability?
- Accountability is Social when it deals with the
accountability of agents towards society as a
whole, and is exacted by multiple stakeholders - Accountability is Public when instead of being
an internal process, it is transparent and in the
public domain
Social and public accountability mechanisms refer
to the range of methods, tools and choices to
ensure greater accounting to citizens for public
actions and outcomes. They involve demand side
approaches to public policy reform.
393 Pillars of Social and Public Accountability
Bureaucratic Action
Political Action
Citizen Action
40What mechanisms to promote Social and public
accountability do
- is change the way information is disseminated
and used in these three pillars
41A focus on local communities, social groupsand
relationships
- Inclusive and pro-poor institutions based on
partnership and mutual accountability - Equity in access to services and development
opportunities
Private Sector
Civil society
42Macro micro linkages
43Why are these things important The Service
Delivery Problem
- Services do not benefit the poorest
- Resources not delivering results
- Increasing resources is not the only solution
Need to improve the efficiency and effectiveness
of public expenditure
44The Thinking of the WDR 2004
WDR2004 Making Services Work for Poor People
- Possible Roots of Problem
- Governments spend on the wrong goods and people
Budget Allocation Problem - Resources fail to reach service providers or
users - Expenditure Tracking
Problem - Weak incentives for effective service delivery
- Problem of Monitoring/Accountability - Demand-side constraints
- - Problem of Participation/Awareness
45Unbundling Service Delivery the WDR 2004
Approach
46The Nature of Empowerment
- The expansion of assets and capabilities of poor
people to participate in, negotiate with,
influence, control, and hold accountable
institutions that affect their lives. - Access to information
- Inclusion and participation
- Accountability
- Local organizational capacity
- Empowerment is as much about institutional
reform as it is about individual benefits
47The Swa-Shakti Model
- Public / private partnerships Government, NGOs,
and private sector - Bottom up approach Womens empowerment
- combined with a focus on inclusion sensitize
and strengthen institutional capacity of support
agencies to address womens needs - Rather than providing direct financial support,
the project aims to act as a catalyst, to access
and leverage resources from different sources. - More sustainable
- Avoidance of duplication
- Better potential for partnerships, linkages
including with local elected government
48In Transport Sector
Policy Makers Transport and other Ministries
Elections/Feedback
Resource Allocation
Contract
Voice
Providers Regional Road Authorities, Contractors
Clients communities, transport companies
Service
Road construction and Maintenance
49Questions for group work
- Identify a maximum of four stakeholder groups
(one or two is fine) - What are the key services, contractual
arrangements, or other relationships between
these groups? - What are the means of interaction between them
- How do customers express needs?
- How do service providers learn about customer
needs - What are the mechanisms of public and social
accountability between them, and how can they be
made better? - There will be a prize for the group that acts out
its answers as role play!
50Part 4
- Social Analysis in the Project Cycle
51Social AssessmentSA A P O
- Analysis identify key stakeholders,understand
social issues, social risks, and key social
impacts - Participation identify needs and priorities of
key stakeholders, obtain their views enable
active involvement, transparency and capacity
building - Operationalization incorporate findings of
social analysis and participation through - explicit social development outcomes
- appropriate institutional arrangements
- systems for ME of SD outcomes
52Social AssessmentSample Terms of Reference
- Introduction
- Background
- Proposed project
- Purpose of social analysis
- Scope of work
- Description of the socio-cultural, institutional,
historical and political context - Social issues and desired outcomes
- Strategy to achieve social development outcomes
53Social AssessmentSample Terms of Reference
(contd.)
- Scope of work (contd)
- Analysis of alternatives
- Recommendations for implementation arrangements
- Proposed indicators
- Monitoring plan
- Description of tasks
- Data collection and research methods
- Reporting
- Skills requirements and team composition
- Schedule
54Social Analysis Approach in World Bank Investment
Projects-- the recommended approach
Borrower and Consultants Social Assessment
Dialogue and technical assistance
Bank SocialAnalysis
55Implementation Plan
- Time frame and budget
- Implementation mechanisms
- Organizational capacity and commitment
- Training needs
- Overall coordination and linkage with other
project components - Monitoring and evaluation
- Contributions to policy and practice?
56Practical lessons learned
- Terms of Reference
- Continuity ongoing involvement of social
development specialists - Coordination social analysis is not an isolated
set of studies, but tightly integrated with
designs, implementation mechanisms, civil works - Transition mechanisms from planning to
implementation - Build capacity to coordinate and manage these
issues as part of the preparation process
57PCD / PAD QUESTIONS
- 6.1 Summarize key social issues arising out of
project objectives, and the project's planned
social development outcomes. If the issues are
still to be determined, describe current or
planned efforts to do so. - 6.2 Participatory Approach How will key
stakeholders participate in the project? - 6.3 How does the project involve consultations or
collaboration with NGOs or other civil society
organizations? - 6.4 What institutional arrangements are planned
to ensure the project achieves its social
development outcomes? - 6.5 What mechanisms are proposed to monitor and
measure project performance in terms of social
development outcomes? If unknown at this stage,
please indicate TBD. - 7.1 Do any of the following safeguard policies
apply to the project?
58What do we need to appraise?
- Policy framework
- Agreement on basic principles, objectives,
entitlement framework, etc. - Formal endorsement by responsible authorities
- Analysis and Documentation
- Census and surveys as required
- Analysis of social groups with a focus on risk,
vulnerability and opportunity - Meaningful participation process
- Documentation of consultation process and
implications for project design and
implementation mechanisms - Transparency and feedback mechanisms
- Development Action Plans
- Action plans integrated and coordinated with
other project components - Budget provision and clear responsibilities
- Supervision, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms
established - Implementation Mechanisms
- Realism and implementability of plans
- Responsible institutions and agencies identified
- Institutional capacity and commitment
59Policy
Laws and policies are not always adequate but
policies are just the tip of the iceberg.
Implementation mechanisms institutional capacity
and commitment
Strategies andAction plans
Analysis and Documentation
Meaningful consultation and disclosure
60Part 5
61ResearchMethodology for Social Analysis
62Depth versus breadth
Many
Social surveys
Focus group discussions
Number of persons studied or interviewed
Structured interviews
Unstructured interviews
Observation
Few
Participant observation
Many researchers, low personal involvement
Few researchers, high personal involvement
Researcher requirements
63Key principles ofqualitative research
- Reliability The need for careful design
- Reduction of bias, improved trustworthiness of
data - Consistency the same questions are asked in the
same way of all respondents - Validity Asking the right questions
- Measures and indicators reflect and inform
relevant issues and hypotheses - Triangulation Studying the issue from different
perspectives and data sources - Different methods and tools
- Cross-checking of information
- Multiple indicators Studying complex issues
- The need for multiple indicators in studying for
example empowerment
64Some interview principles
- Go from the general to the specific
- Be clear and concise
- Initially, use open ended questions that do not
convey the expected answer to the respondent - Probe and ask follow up questions
- Go off the beaten track, be innovative in finding
your respondents - Interview representatives of different
stakeholder groups - Cross-check your findings through triangulation
- When you have a clearer sense of what the issues
are, you can start using more structured
questions - This can form the basis of systematic surveys
later on, to test hypotheses and get a larger
number of respondents, to get more reliable and
representative data
65Sampling techniques
- Time sampling
- Need to understand differences over time
seasons, days of the week, times of day, etc. - Place sampling
- Activities and organizations have different
elements taking place in different locations - Event sampling
- Routine
- Special
- Unexpected
- Status, role and relationship sampling
- Different levels of personnel in an organization
- Different roles
66Data Collectionand Fieldwork Techniques
- Collection of secondary material
- Key informant interviews
- Direct observation of processes and behavior
- Participant observation of processes and behavior
- Diagramming
- Community mapping
- Production / livelihood diagramming
- Gender analysis
- Socio-economic surveys
- Full census
- Community information and consensus-building
- Project design techniques Needs assessment and
identification of risks
67Overview of methods (1)
- Collection of secondary material
- Content analysis of published reports
- Written records, histories, reports from NGOs,
academics, missionaries, etc. - Published research reports (books, articles,
discussion/technical papers, etc. - Available statistics
- Key informant interviews
- Checklist format using key informants
- Informal, consensus building techniques for group
discussions - Formal meetings, stakeholder consultations
- Life histories of elders and knowledgeable
sources
68Overview of methods (2)
- Direct observation of processes and behavior
- One-time, rapid appraisal with site visit (less
than two weeks) - Two or more short term visits (each visit two
weeks with follow-up observations - One medium term site visit (at least one month)
- Participant observation of processes and behavior
- Observers as part of community activities (at
least one month) - Local resident as observer, using records,
diaries, or other media such as tapes, films, and
photographs (recording of events, feasts,
meetings, etc.)
69Overview of methods (3)
- Diagramming
- Genealogies of dominant lineages, clans,
political / power relations - Decision tree diagramming of actors and decision
making using specific problem situations (e.g.
decision to build a health center or a road
planting trees, etc. - Diagram of power structures, actors that
determine allocation and use of resources, social
obligations, local leaders - Institutional linkages diagrams (use of Venn
diagrams) - Community mapping
- Individual farm or household properties
(cadastrals, plot boundaries, conservation and
resource use zones) - Nature and settlement zoning
- Community or village mapping with sketch maps
- Physical features such as mountains, fertile
land, water resources - Poverty mapping
70Overview of methods (4)
- Production / livelihood diagramming
- Production, seasonal calendar, markets
- Time lines and time trends of production and
consumption of resources - Production and labor / employment trends
- Synchronized calendars of labor and resource
cycles - Gender analysis
- Task analysis and role flexibility by gender
- Gender needs assessment
- Womens and mens time management and allocation
- Mapping of womens and mens roles in production,
conservation, decision making, household
activities
71Overview of methods (5)
- Socio-economic surveys
- Non-random sampling of persons interviewed
- Random sampling, based on lists, geographic
location, etc. - Purposive sampling of populations (e.g. focus on
disadvantaged populations, project beneficiaries,
etc.) - Full census
- Enumeration of total population (e.g. displaced
persons) - Basic demographic information, listing of assets,
income
72Overview of methods (6)
- Community information and consensus-building
- Village management planning
- Ranking of problems by social grouping
- Interest group meetings
- Group dynamics, structured discussions, role
playing - Project design techniques Needs assessment and
identification of risks - Risk analysis
- Logical framework
- Systems diagramming and flowcharts
- Objectives oriented planning
- Appreciative Inquiry
- SWOT analysis Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, Threats
73Example from KenyaRapid Context Assessment
Original Development Objective Rehabilitation
and upgrading of Nairobi - Nakuru portion of the
northern corridor
Proposed new Development Objective Enhanced
regional and national integration and development
benefiting all road users, particularly the poor,
as part of Kenya's efforts to improve the
northern transport corridor.
74Kenya exampleSocial Development Outcomes (1)
- Security and Safety
- Improved traffic safety
- Reduction in violence
- Reduction in HIV / AIDS infection and prevalence
rates - Improved security of tenure and opportunities for
the landless and poor - Incomes and livelihoods
- Improved assets and earnings through better
markets and credit opportunities - Inclusion Accountable institutions
- Improved governance
- Reduced corruption
- More transparent and effective methods of
collecting road levies
75Kenya exampleSocial Development Outcomes (2)
- Empowerment
- Effective and meaningful participation of local
communities and other key stakeholders in
transport planning, implementation, monitoring
and evaluation - Greater decentralization and local level decision
making - Promotion and strengthening of transport
associations - Capacity building of transport providers and
users - Minimized risks and adverse impacts of transport
projects - Minimization of physical, social or economic
displacement - Where required, appropriate mitigation and
support to displaced populations - Minimization of adverse impacts on the environment
76Summary Some social issues to consider
- Participation and consultation in projects of
this nature Dispersed population sometimes only
a few people in each community are direct
stakeholders - How to ensure social development concerns
influence project selection and design process - How to determine vulnerability and risk
- How to combine mitigation with development
opportunities for poor and vulnerable groups - How to develop institutional commitment and
capacity in an environment unaccustomed to
addressing these concerns
77Task Prepare forRapid Context Assessment
- Assess opportunities, constraints, likely impacts
and risks arising out of the social context - Identify / re-examine intended social development
outcomes of the project - Make recommendations for a project participation
framework - Consider design implications and recommend
relevant policy and institutional arrangements
for the project - Identify indicators to monitor SD dimensions and
report on the ME plan