Agenda

1
(No Transcript)
2
Agenda

• Overview of CJCC
• Overview of JUSTIS
• Overview of CSOSA
• Case Study How CSOSA participates in Data
  Sharing
• Goal
• Objectives
• Solution
• Security Privacy
• Benefits
• Next Steps
• Questions and Answers

3
CJCC History

• The D.C. Appropriations Act, 2000 (P.L. 106-113,
  113 Stat.1501,1532 (1999) mandated that the US
  Government Accounting Office (GAO) study and
  report on the DC criminal justice system
• In March 2001 the GAO released the report,
  entitled DC Criminal Justice System, Better
  Coordination Needed Among Participating Agencies,
  which recommended the Criminal Justice
  Coordinating Council as a necessary venue for the
  District's criminal justice agencies to identify
  and address interagency public safety issues

3
4
CJCC History Contd..

• In 2001, the DC Council implemented this
  recommendation by enacting DC Code 22-4232 which
  created the CJCC as an independent agency of the
  District of Columbia. The statute designated the
  Mayor as the chair of the CJCC and listed the
  agencies under the District Government that
  should participate
• Congress passed legislation (PL 107-180) the
  following year authorizing a federal payment and
  authorizing the heads of federal agencies to
  participate as members

5
Who is CJCC?

• CJCC is dedicated to continually improving the
  administration and execution of public safety and
  criminal justice in the District of Columbia. The
  agency provides a federal/district partnership,
  which is united in resolving concerns of our
  citizens about crime and justice.

5
6
CJCC MISSION

• The mission of the CJCC is to serve as the forum
  for identifying issues and their solutions,
  proposing actions, and facilitating cooperation
  that will improve public safety and the related
  criminal and juvenile justice services for
  District of Columbia residents, visitors,
  victims, and offenders.

7
Participating Agencies

• FEDERAL AGENCIES
• D.C. Court Services and Offender Supervision
  Agency (CSOSA)
• U.S. Probation Office (USPO)
• U.S. Attorneys Office (USAO)
• High Intensity Drug Trafficking Agency (HIDTA)
• U.S. Parole Commission (USPC)
• U.S. Secret Service (USSS)
• U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)
• U.S. Marshals Service (USMS)
• U.S. Alcohol and Tobacco and Firearms (ATF)
• D.C. Office of Unified Communications (OUC)

7
8
Participating Agencies Contd..

• DISTRICT AGENCIES
• D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)
• D.C. Superior Court (DCSC)
• D.C. Pretrial Services Agency (PSA)
• D.C. Office of Attorney General (OAG)
• D.C. Public Defender Service (PDS)
• D.C. Child Family Services Agency (CFSA)
• D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services
  (DYRS)
• D.C. Department of Corrections (DCDC)
• Bureau of Election and Ethics (BEE)
• D.C. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)

9
JUSTIS Overview
JUSTICE Information System (JUSTIS) of the
District of Columbia

• A joint, regional project of local, and
  federal law enforcement agencies to share
  criminal justice data across and within the
  region.

Increase crime fighting capabilities that support
defense of our communities and the Homeland.
10
JUSTIS Overview Contd..

• A common interface to retrieve information
  securely from various agencies
• Provides search capabilities with sub second
  responses

• One stop solution Agencies now have a one
  stop
• solution to view information and data from
  various
• Criminal Information Systems
• Intuitive interface satisfying performance,
  visual,
• security, data, privacy, and information
  requirements

11
JUSTIS Overview Contd..

• Provide Infrastructure to securely transfer
  information between agencies to support business
  processes
• A way to promote system integration and
  information sharing at an enterprise level

• A mechanism to implement inter-agency
  relationships and processes
• A way to align business processes and services
  with IT infrastructure and services

Source US Department of Homeland Security
it.ojp.gov
12
JUSTIS Results

• Availability of information from multiple
  disparate systems in seconds
• Criminal justice practitioners can make faster
  and better informed decisionsFor example, Police
  Officer and Detectives have multiple mug shots
  available to see how the offenders appearance
  has evolved over time
• Provides immediate capabilities for
• Tactical Line Officer
• Investigative Detective
• Analytical Crime Analysts

13
JUSTIS ResultsContd..

• Easy plug-n-play interface for agencies to
  contribute and share data, thereby substantially
  reducing local implementation costs and improving
  the value of your Tax Dollars
• Standards based implementation (GJXDM, NIEM, SOA)
  resulting in long term viability of solution and
  easy integration at regional and national level
• Utilizes existing agencies systems and
  infrastructure
• 2007 Excellence.Gov Award by American Council of
  Technology

14
Who is CSOSA?
CSOSA is an independent federal agency created by
the National Capital Revitalization and
Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 CSOSA
has the operational responsibilities for
Probation, Parole, and Supervised Release within
the District of Columbia
15
CSOSA MISSION
The mission of CSOSA is to increase public
safety, prevent crime, reduce recidivism, and
support the fair administration of justice in
close collaboration with the community
16
Case Study CSOSA Data Sharing using Web Services

• Goal
• Provide the officers in the field and the rest of
  the criminal justice practitioners via JUSTIS the
  most up-to-date information from CSOSA Case
  Management System (SMART)
• Objectives
• Provide the following information / data for an
  offender
• Parole, Probation, and Supervised Release
  information
• Aliases
• Home and Employment Address
• Supervision information

17
Case Study Objectives Contd..

• Mug Shots
• Release conditions and stay away orders on
  different cases
• Build one single reusable secure interface
• Provide information / data to external partners
• In near Real Time
• Encrypted / Securely
• Using XML and later upgrade it to be NIEM
  compliant
• Based on long term Service Oriented Architecture
  (SOA)approach

18
Case Study Solution

• Develop Secure Web Services (WS) for information
  sharing
• WSs can be discovered through JUSTIS
• JUSTIS can apply necessary security, content
  transformation, and content routing services

19
Case Study Solution Contd..
20
Case Study Solution Contd..
21
Case Study Security
22
Case Study Security Contd..

• WS-Security Specification
• 128 bit AES Data Encryption using Symmetric key
• 256 Bit Encryption of Symmetric key using Public
  key of Requesting Agency
• Encrypted Data and Key passed over to Requesting
  Agency for Decryption
• IP Restriction to CJCC Domain
• Firewalls
• 128 Bit SSL certificate over HTTP
• Audit trail of requesting agencies users and data
  access details
• Error reporting
• Validation Module Usage

23
Case Study JUSTIS Screenshot
24
Case Study Benefits

• Improves business process efficiency by reducing
  cost and particularly time to connect
  applications
• Increases the feasibility of real time, remote
  access to core source of information
  (owner-CSOSA) which provides current information
  to JUSTIS
• Makes it easier to change or add partners
• Provides a fundamental platform to CSOSA to
  easily integrate its SMART application
  functionality with other pieces of
  software/system like JUSTIS

25
CSOSANext Steps

• Develop complementary services to automate a key
  business process
• Utilize NIEM standard and map exchanges to
  corresponding Information Exchange Packet
  Documents (IEPD)
• Identify additional business practices and
  processes for information exchange and process
  automation
• Deploy Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) to enable
  enterprise wide SOA

26
JUSTIS Looking Ahead
District of Columbia
27
Questions / Comments ?