National Case Studies of Environmental Reporting in Asia and the Pacific - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

National Case Studies of Environmental Reporting in Asia and the Pacific

Description:

Environmental assessment in Asia and the Pacific. National state of environment (SoE) reporting process in 11 countries: China, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: ar9995
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: National Case Studies of Environmental Reporting in Asia and the Pacific


1
National Case Studies of Environmental Reporting
in Asia and the Pacific
  • Angkana Rawichutiwan
  • Thailand Environment Institute (TEI)
  • 9 September 2008

2
Outline
  • Regional overview
  • National case studies
  • China
  • Thailand
  • Pakistan

3
Regional Overview
  • Environmental assessment in Asia and the Pacific.
  • National state of environment (SoE) reporting
    process in 11 countries China, Japan, Thailand,
    Vietnam, Pakistan, Bhutan, Kazakhstan,
    Turkmenistan, Australia, New Zealand, and Samoa.

4
Key areas
  • The legal basis and historical background
  • The scope, content, and conceptual framework
  • The uses and constraints of SoE reporting in
    public communication and policy making

5
Regional Overview
  • The diversity of the result reflects
  • the institutional agreements within the
    countries
  • the difference in legislative or policy
    requirements and
  • the various constraints each country faces

6
1. Assessment and reporting frameworks
  • Legal basis
  • Required by national environmental legislation
    China, Japan, Thailand, Vietnam, Pakistan,
    Bhutan, and Australia
  • General obligation Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and
    Samoa
  • No specific legislation New Zealand
  • The 1998 Aarhus Convention parties Kazakhstan
    and Turkmenistan

7
1. Assessment and reporting frameworks (cont.)
  • History of reporting
  • Japan 1972
  • Australia 1986
  • Most countries 1990s
  • Frequency of reporting
  • Every 5 years Australia and New Zealand
  • Every year China, Japan, Thailand, and Vietnam
  • One report Pakistan (in 2005)

8
2. Coverage and dissemination
  • Thematic and issue-based reporting
  • Theme-based China, Pakistan, Bhutan, Kazakhstan,
    Turkmenistan, Australia, and New Zealand.
  • Issue-based Japan
  • Both Thailand, Vietnam, and Samoa.

9
2. Coverage and dissemination (cont.)
  • Conceptual frameworks and indicators
  • Pressure-State-Response (PSR) framework.
  • Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR)
    framework.
  • No explicit framework or adapted framework.
  • Language
  • Dissemination

10
3. Uses
  • SoE reports do not contain any recommendations
    China, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and New Zealand.
  • SoE reports contain recommendations Thailand,
    Vietnam, Pakistan, Bhutan, Australia, and Samoa.

11
4. Constraints
  • In preparing the reports
  • Financial and technical weakness.
  • A lack of accurate, national consistent
    environmental data.
  • A lack of an agreed set of national environmental
    indicators.
  • Limited human and financial resources.

12
4. Constraints (cont.)
  • In response to the recommendations and findings
  • Inconsistencies in environmental laws and
    application
  • Weak monitoring and enforcement
  • A lack of proper economic incentives
  • The integration of environmental concerns into
    wider sectoral policies is incomplete.

13
The examples of national case studies of
environmental reporting
  • 1. China
  • 2. Thailand
  • 3. Pakistan

14
China (Northeast Asia)
  • Assessment and reporting framework
  • Article 11 of Chinas Environmental Protection
    Law.
  • Since 1991, the Ministry of Environmental
    Protection (MEP) has published SoE reports
    yearly.
  • SoE reports are structured on the
    Stress-Status-Response conceptual framework and
    are available on the internet.

15
China (cont.)
  • 2. Findings and recommendations
  • Chinas SoE report of 2006, released in 2007.
  • The overall environmental quality has remained
    stable.
  • The report does not contain any recommendations.

16
China (cont.)
  • 3. Policy responses
  • Limited use as a decision-making tools.
  • 4. Constraints
  • Responsibilities for data collection, management,
    and dissemination are scattered.
  • The level of integration of different information
    sources is still weak.

17
Thailand (Southeast Asia)
  • Assessment and reporting framework
  • It is required by environmental legislation that
    SoE report be submitted at least once a year.
  • SoE reports are theme-based and structured on
    Pressure-State-Response framework.
  • The reports are available on the internet.

18
Thailand (cont.)
  • 2. Findings and recommendations
  • SoE report of 2006 states overall decline in
    Thailands environment and makes numerous
    recommendations.
  • 3. Policy responses
  • Framed by the National Environmental Quality
    Management Plan (EQMP) for 2007 2011.

19
Thailand (cont.)
  • 4. Constraints
  • A lack of financial and technical capacity in
    data organizing, processing, and reporting.
  • A lack of continuity and clear goals in
    government policies.

20
Pakistan (South Asia)
  • 1. Assessment and reporting framework
  • An annual national SoE report is required to be
    prepared and published by the 1997 Pakistan
    Environmental Protection Act.
  • Only one SoE report is produced in 2005 due to
    resource constraints.
  • The report is theme-based and structured on the
    Pressure-State-Impact-Response (PSIR) framework.

21
Pakistan (cont.)
  • 2. Findings and recommendations
  • SoE report of 2005 identifies key environmental
    issues of concern water quality and
    availability and air quality.
  • The report makes a series of recommendations
    focusing on the resource, capacity, and knowledge
    constraints.

22
Pakistan (cont.)
  • 3. Policy responses
  • Framed by the National Environmental Policy (NEP)
    for 2005-2015.
  • 4. Constraints
  • Gaps in institutional design the regulatory
    framework and incentives and accountability.
  • Capacity limitations.

23
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com