The NEASC Accreditation Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

The NEASC Accreditation Process

Description:

Follow-Up Phase (5 years) ... Follow-up. School efforts to. Address valid. Evaluation report. recommendations. Two-Year Report ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:486
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: EWB7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The NEASC Accreditation Process


1
The NEASC AccreditationProcess
  • Self-Study
  • 2007 - 2008

2
What Does Accreditation Mean?
  • Adherence to Standards established by member
    schools regarding the systems, processes, and
    practices of school personnel
  • Demonstration of school improvement based on
    steps taken to address evaluation report findings
  • Adherence to Commission procedures and policies

3
Major Phases of the Accreditation Cycle
  • Self-Study Phase (1 year) 2007 - 2008
  • An in-depth, reflective examination of the
    schools educational programs and services based
    on the Standards
  • Hosting a Visit (4 days) Projected Fall - 2008
  • A visiting committee of peers will meet with
    representatives from all school constituencies
    and write an evaluation report
  • Follow-Up Phase (5 years)
  • The action phase of the process during which time
    the school is responsible for implementing the
    evaluation report

4
The Accreditation Ten Year Cycle
5
How Will the NEASC Process Improve Student
Learning?
  • Assists administrators and teachers in working
    toward school improvement
  • Assures students that their needs are being met
    through a quality educational program
  • Affirms that school board educational policies
    are sound
  • Assures the local citizen that tax dollars are
    supporting quality school programs and quality
    facility

6
How Will the NEASC Process Improve Student
Learning?
  • Improved instruction
  • Improved organizational effectiveness and
    long-term planning
  • Enables schools to identify strengths and
    weaknesses
  • Fosters teamwork and collegiality
  • Improves professional development
  • Improves school resources
  • Provides effective system for ensuring school
    accountability
  • Offers teachers buy in to use the report findings
    as a tool for continued school improvement

7
How Will the NEASC Process Improve Student
Learning?
  • Provides exposure to new learning trends and
    innovations
  • Increased parental and community support for
    school initiatives and involvement
  • Increased continuity and consistency in best
    practices
  • Leads to better staffing decisions
  • Provides exposure to peer evaluators

8
Emphasis on Standards
  • Accountability for essential learning for all
    students
  • A reflective school culture
  • Professional development tied to teaching and
    learning needs based on best practice
  • Strong instructional leadership and resources
  • Personalization
  • Formative Assessment
  • Equity Failure is not an Option

9
Overreaching Concepts of NEASC
10
Long Term Accreditation Goals
  • Engage the professional staff in using the
    Standards to impact teaching and learning
  • Use the accreditation process as a foundation to
    effect changes/initiatives to benefit students,
    professional staff, parents and community
  • Infuse the Mission and Expectations into the
    daily life of the school
  • Use the Mission and Expectations to guide
    decision making processes

11
The Essential Question
  • To what extent does our school adhere to each of
    the indicators in each Standard?

12
Required Tasks to Complete Self-Study
  • All faculty are organized into 7 committee
    teams, representing a team for each standard
  • Each committee is responsible for gathering
    evidence, conducting surveys and questionnaires,
    analyzing current practices and writing
    reflective essays in response to specific
    questions.
  • Each team must collect and organize artifacts for
    the site visit.

13
06-07 Timeline to Address EWHSFocus on Teaching
and Learning
  • Goal
  • To evaluate the structure of how we organize and
    deliver instruction to produce the graduate we
    envision.
  • Activities
  • Fall 06 - High School Reform Framework shared
    with ATM, HS Leadership, HS Staff
  • Fall/Winter 06-07 - Development of HS Scheduling
    Committee
  • Ongoing Meetings
  • Staff Survey
  • Research Best Practices
  • Visitation to South Windsor
  • Collaboration with Union

14
Next Steps
  • July 07
  • Run Mock Schedules on Rediker
  • Analyze Strengths and Challenges of Each Mock
    Schedule
  • Fall 07
  • Discuss with Union, Faculty and all
    Administration
  • Present Findings and Recommendations to BOE
  • Pilot/Implement Recommendations in 08-09

15
Proposed One Year Alternative Schedule
  • Monthly Two Hour Delayed Opening
  • Second Thursday of Each Month
  • September 6
  • October 11
  • November 8
  • December 13
  • January 10
  • February 14
  • March 13
  • April 10
  • May 8
  • June 5 (1st Thursday)
  • Two Hour Delayed Rotation Schedule
  • A 930 1007
  • B C Periods Eliminated
  • D 1011 1057
  • E 1101 1225
  • F 1229 115
  • G - 1 19 205

16
Scheduling Advantages
  • Instructional time remains within DRG and state
    average
  • Product of the time spent by teachers will result
    in an increase of rigor in instruction for our
    students
  • Research supports a later opening for teens
  • Union Support
  • Change does not impact contract
  • Older siblings will be home with younger siblings
    to help with AM bussing
  • Adequate time to accomplish NEASC requirements

17
Scheduling Disadvantages
  • Decrease of a maximum of 20 hours of
    instructional time
  • Possible parental inconvenience
  • Scheduling of Busses
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com