FRM: Nitrogen System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

FRM: Nitrogen System

Description:

FAA Fire Safety Research developed prototype OBIGGS to demonstrate it's ... filters, and a ventilated containment shroud to ensure safety of flight operations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:168
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: fires9
Category:
Tags: frm | nitrogen | shroud | system

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FRM: Nitrogen System


1
FRM Nitrogen System Validation
AAR-440 Fire Safety BranchWm. J. Hughes
Technical CenterFederal Aviation Administration
2
Background
  • FAA Fire Safety Research developed prototype
    OBIGGS to demonstrate its potential for fuel
    tank ullage flammability reduction to support FRM
    rulemaking
  • Built and tested inerting system based on the two
    flow concept
  • Validated system operation during ground and
    flight testing
  • Developed instrumentation and methods to validate
    both inerting system operation and FRM
    effectiveness
  • Measured inerting system parameters during
    aircraft operation and compared data with
    existing static performance data
  • Developed instrumentation system to measure
    oxygen concentration during flight testing

3
Prototype Installation Ground Testing
  • System installed in a Boeing 747SP with fully
    functioning systems and ground service equipment
  • Decommissioned from airline service and purchased
    by the FAA for Ground Testing Only
  • All major systems fully operational
  • Has independent power for test equipment and
    instrumentation
  • System installed between two structural members
    in empty pack bay as designed
  • Completely Instrumented
  • Oxygen sampling, pressure taps, and thermocouples
    on FRM to measure performance
  • Thermocouples in Pack Bay
  • Some Weather Data Available

4
Measured Results Ground Testing
  • Ground tested the inerting system on the 747SP
    test article
  • Operated inerting system with static conditions
    (best as possible) for the purposes of validating
    the system performance
  • Focused on the volume flow of 5 and 11 NEA that
    could be generated with varying ASM pressure at
    sea level
  • Testing Illustrated
  • Stable system performance is difficult to achieve
    in a dynamic aircraft environment
  • Inerting system has potential of being used as a
    flammability reduction method (FRM)

5
Prototype Installation In-Flight Demonstration
  • Installed FAA prototype inerting system on Airbus
  • System was installed on a cargo pallet and
    mounted in the aft cargo bay of an Airbus A320
    used for the purpose of flight test
  • System and aircraft fully instrumented with
    extensive DAS capabilities
  • System modified to use only 1 ASM to match size
    to aircraft
  • Operated out of Airbus, France Flight Test
    Toulouse
  • Measured both system performance and ullage O2
  • Testing validated concept of using a simplified
    inerting system as an FRM

6
Measured Results In-Flight Demonstration
  • Compared dynamic ASM performance with static
    measurements
  • Operated on A320 flight test and compared to
    static lab data
  • Data comparison generally good with some big
    discrepancies

Single ASM Test
  • Illustrates the difficulty in obtaining stable
    conditions during flight test
  • Obtaining 180 degree F air temperature inlet
    problematic
  • This makes model validation difficult

7
Measured Results In-Flight Demonstration
  • Observed oxygen concentration progression and
    distribution for typical short flight with a
    rapid descent
  • Need to show ullage oxygen concentration stays
    below 12 under flight cycle scenarios deemed
    important by engineering analysis
  • Data illustrated the effectiveness of NEA and
    reducing ullage flammability
  • Inert gas distributed easily with no mixing
    devices
  • Ullage behavior consistent with perfect mixing
    (easy to model)

8
Prototype Installation Total System Installation
  • Installed system in highly modified Boeing
    747-100
  • Modified and operated by NASA for the purposes of
    carrying a Space Shuttle Orbiter for operations
    and maintenance
  • Fully operational, standard, fuel system with
    unmodified pack bay
  • Standard 747 Multiple-bay / compartmentalized
    center-wing tank
  • Operated by excellent test pilots/crew and
    dedicated maintenance group
  • System Installed in pack bay as would be in fleet
    aircraft
  • Instrumentation
  • Aircraft is Fully Instrumented
  • Oxygen sampling, pressure taps, and thermocouples
    on system for OBIGGS performance
  • Thermocouples in Pack Bay Area
  • Pressure altitude measured

9
Measured Results Total System Installation
  • Dynamic performance during takeoff/ascent and
    descent/landing portion of flight was analyzed
  • Each flight different, with a range of varying
    system performance
  • These variations in performance had a small but
    measurable effect on the resulting average oxygen
    concentration observed in the ullage at the end
    of the flight cycle (at touch down)
  • System undersized for this aircraft
  • Average ullage oxygen concentration behavior very
    typical of previous observations
  • Peak average ullage oxygen concentrations around
    12
  • Peak forward bay (vented bay) oxygen
    concentrations were well above 12 on descent

10
Comparison of System Performance During Takeoff
11
Comparison of System Performance During Landing
12
Comparison of System Performance During Takeoff
13
Measured Results Multi-Bay NEA Distribution
  • Inert gas distribution with single point deposit
    more problematic during flight test than in scale
    tests in lab
  • Observations illustrate inert gas should be
    distributed differently on descent to keep peak
    oxygen concentrations below 12 in forward tank
    vent bays
  • Distribution models duplicate acquired data
    poorly
  • Inert gas flow did not split from bay to bay IAW
    bay wall areas
  • Some bays do not illustrate perfect mixing (hard
    to model)

14
Background - Measuring Oxygen Concentration
  • To demonstrate the potential for flammability
    reduction, Fire Safety developed an in-flight
    oxygen concentration measurement system
  • FAA (OBOAS) used during several flight tests to
    validate that the OBIGGS did reduce the
    flammability of the fuel tank ullage
  • FAA has studied the different methods of
    measuring oxygen concentration and has garnered
    many lessons
  • There are many ways to measure oxygen
    concentration
  • Many different sensors available on the market
  • Reactive/soluable (Galvanic, Zirconium Oxide
  • Non-consumable (Paramagnetic, Light Absorption)
  • Many different ways to apply an oxygen sensor
  • Continuous gas sample (regulated or unregulated)
  • Discrete gas sample
  • In situ sensor placement

15
Block Diagrams of Continuous Gas Sampling Methods
16
Vacuum Bottle Gas Sample Assembly for Flight Test
17
On-board Oxygen Analysis System Development
  • Wanted to apply a traditional oxygen
    sensor/analyzer used in lab for a flight test
    application
  • Must provide constant condition
    (pressure/temperature) gas sample
  • Developed a gas sample system that can do this
    from 0-40,000 feet for a wide range of ullage
    temperatures
  • Used powerful diaphragm pumps with active
    pressure controllers to provide a constant
    pressure and stable temperature gas sample
  • Integrated with remote flow through galvanic cell
    sensors
  • System used flash arrestors, liquid traps,
    desiccating filters, and a ventilated containment
    shroud to ensure safety of flight operations
  • Results from test series were published in DOT
    reports
  • Data lag significant, loud, heavy, sample train
    not reliable
  • With some refinement, was easy to calibrate and
    gave good repeatable, results and filled an
    otherwise empty niche

18
FAA Oxygen Concentration Measurement Method
Fuel Tank Vapor Fuel Tank Liquid Pressurized
Air Electrical Power Electronic Signals
19
OBOAS Validation Data from Airbus Flight Test
20
The Trouble with Accurate Measurements . . .
  • Your measurement can be very accurate, but if
    your gas sample location is not representative of
    the volume you are measuring, all is for naught
  • Observed steep (1-3 O2) vertical gradients in
    fuel tank bay for extended periods of time (½ - 1
    hour)
  • OBIGGS flow tends to take care of the horizontal
    mixing whether it be one large bay or multiple
    partitions in the tank
  • Only observed steep gradients in a few isolated
    ground inerting cases where the fuel tank was
    otherwise quiescent
  • Multiple-bay tanks pose a challenge to determine
    what ullage areas will act as one area and what
    areas will not
  • Can always add more sample locations, but where?
  • Ideally applicant will use a system of modeling
    in advance with flight test validation to
    illustrate inert gas distribution

21
Good and Poor Mixing Data from Ground Inerting
Test
22
New Inovations Light Absorption with TLD
  • Oxygen concentration can be measured by examining
    the amount of light absorbed in a photo cell
    filled with the gas
  • This methodology has been around for years but
    was made more practical with the advent of
    tunable laser diodes (TLDs)
  • Recently developed instrument for flight test
  • Unit acquires an unregulated gas sample and
    passes it through a cell
  • System has elaborate calibration to compensate
    for sample pressure and temperature
  • Technology has been applied in-situ
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com