Emotion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 66
About This Presentation
Title:

Emotion

Description:

Title: Emotion_Theory_and_Topics Author: DMessinger Last modified by: Daniel Messinger Created Date: 10/3/1999 10:05:16 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: DMe89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Emotion


1
Emotion
2
Class
  • What are key tenets (propositions) of discrete
    emotion theory?
  • What evidence suggests infant emotion is discrete
    what evidence suggests it is not?
  • What is the main finding of the Oster studied
    reviewed by Camras and presented in the PPT?
    (Provide examples of two emotion).
  • Do you think infants can have emotions without
    being reflectively aware of what they are
    feeling?
  • Provide links to the best video you can (e.g.
    youtube) showing an infant expressing a discrete
    negative emotion that is not distress (e.g.
    anger, sadness, or disgust).
  • What do you think this infant was feeling?
  • Find a theory you agree with or disagree with
    (discrete, functional, dynamic). Does the video
    indicate that a particular emotion theory is
    incorrect or does it support the theory?
  • Extra questions
  • What evidence suggests that emotions are not
    discrete and may be more dynamic and functional?
  • Describe a study distinguishing between emotion
    and facial expression.
  • When do people smile?

3
Emotions
  • Organize action, physiology, cognition, and
    perception to meet ever-changing environmental
    and internal demands
  • In patterns constituting core aspects of
    temperament/personality functioning
  • Motivate action and thought, creating value in
    lifeand impacting wellness and sickness

4
History
  • Emotions dont exist (or cant be studied)
  • Behaviorism, 50s - 60s
  • Emotional expressions are infinitely malleable
  • Some anthropological accounts
  • Emotions are things structural accounts
  • Discrete/Differential theory, 70s 80s
  • Cross-cultural recognition of expressions
  • Demonstrates hard-wiring of universal emotions?
  • Emotions are processes and have functions
  • Functionalist, dynamic systems, emotion
    regulation, constuctivist 90s 10s

5
Universality
6
What emotions do you see here?
Cohn
7
The Universality hypothesis
  • Are facial expressions of emotion universal
    cross-culturally?
  • If universal,
  • are they innate and genetically determined?
  • or could there be species-constant learning
    experiences?

8
Postulate
  • There are some facial expressions of emotion
    that are universal.
  • why do we not press our lips tightly together
    when happy and curve the corners up when angry,
    rather than the reverse?
  • (Ekman, 1973, p. 219)
  • facial affect program
  • p. 220

9
Whos friends came to visit
From Cohn
10
Pre-literate culture study
  • Read an emotion-situation story.
  • Shown three photos and asked to choose one
  • A high correctly identified (p. 212)
  • Why is expression identification in pre-literate
    cultures important?

11
Critique
  • Are identified expressions posed or spontaneous
  • Emblematic denotative expressions caricatures?
  • Verbal identification of posed expressions
  • Relevant to of expression recognition
  • Not to universality of expression production
  • Or their innateness

12
What about development?
13
Infant emotions
  • Core elements of infant behavior
  • Quickly motivate behavior
  • Hunger-Distress-Cry
  • Interest-Attentive face
  • Engaging playful other joy - smile
  • Organize action, physiology, cognition, and
    perception
  • To meet environmental and internal demands
  • Patterns constitute core aspects of
    temperament/personality functioning

14
Infant emotional development
  • Distress is present at birth
  • Interest and joy emerge in the first 2 mos.
  • joy developing through at least 6 mos.
  • Anger, sadness, fear differentiate after 4 m.
  • Pride and shame develop between 1 2 years

15
1 to 3 months
  • Disgust
  • Dropped lower lip, raised upper lip and nose
    screwed up
  • Spitting out the disliked food/object
  • Defensive reflex since no hand-mouth/grasping
    coordination
  • Joy
  • To familiar events, persons or objects
  • (Smile) and wide-open bright eyes
  • Sadness??
  • Brows are raised at the center but dropped at the
    sides and mouth corners are drawn back and down
  • Crying usually intensifies the expression
  • As a result of withdrawal or loss of a desired
    object/person

16
Newborns
  • Bipolar emotional life (Bridges, 1932)
  • Distress and Pleasure
  • Tripartite division (Lewis, 2007)
  • Distress, Pleasure, and Interest
  • Precursor emotions (see Holodinsky)
  • Triggered by physical stimulus threshold not by
    any attribution of meaning, reflex-like
  • Distress, disgust, fright, interest and pleasure

17
4 to 9 months
  • Anger
  • 4 and 6 months
  • Mouth open with a squarish shape and angled
    downward to the back of the mouth, wide open
    eyes, intense gaze and lowered brows
  • Whenever a child gets frustrated
  • Demonstrated as young as 2 months (Lewis, 2007)
  • Fear
  • Might not be developed until 18 months but
    present earlier at about 6-8 months (Lewis,
    2007), not before 10 months (Fogel, 2001)
  • Raised and furrowed brows, mouth corners are
    retracted straight back
  • Reasons vary widely

18
4 to 9 months
  • Surprise
  • During the first 6 months
  • Whenever there is violation of what is expected
    or as a response to discovery (aha effect)
  • Mouth is open and the eyes are focused

19
12 to 24 months
  • Embarrassment
  • Blushing face and gaze down
  • Shame
  • Wish to disappear or hide is reflected in
    expression
  • Children seem to shrink and hunch over so that
    the arms and hands will hide the face
  • Guilt
  • Moves in space as if trying to repair the action
  • Pride

20
Developmental patterns
  • Socialization
  • Emotion displays become more restricted
  • Full-face to partial face - miniaturization
  • Cognitive input
  • shame, guilt, contempt emerge
  • involve rudimentary appraisal of self vis-à-vis
    other
  • dynamic systems

21
Theories
22
Cole Moore (2015)
  • Are infants biologically prepared to express
    certain emotions?
  • Izard says yes, developed Differential Emotions
    Theory (DET) and focused on distress, enjoyment,
    and interest.
  • Emotion expressions are innate and shaped by
    interaction with caregiver in order to
    effectively communicate current goal states

23
Evidence for DET
  • Specific emotional responses to paradigm
    situations in infants
  • Cross-cultural evidence in adults
  • Infants have mature facial musculature
  • Expressions in fetuses are similar to human
    children and primates.
  • People blind from birth produce discrete emotion
    expressions.

24
Criticism
  • Infant facial expression is often ambiguous,
    could depend more on integrated systems than
    changes in goal states
  • Response facial babbling is a precursor to
    functional movements feedback allows infant to
    tailor emotion expressions to its environment.
    Furthermore, success in this can facilitate
    attachment.

25
Response
  • (innate ? no environment input required).
  • Developmental constraints will constrain
    optimality (learning and maturation of visual
    system is necessary)
  • Natural selection will constrain infinite
    variation. Open systems are adaptive when
    cultural variation affects whether the system
    leads to an adaptive outcome. Mapping cultural
    variation to different adaptive outcomes would be
    a good future direction.

26
The Structuralist View
  • Many models assume that each emotion kind is
    characterized by a distinctive syndrome of
    hormonal, muscular, and autonomic responses that
    are coordinated in time and correlated in
    intensity
  • p. 30 Barrett, 2006

27
Discrete Emotions Theory (DET) Natural Kind
View
  • Emotion composed of
  • Neurochemical processes
  • Expressive behavior
  • Subjective feeling
  • Many models assume that each emotion is
    characterized by a distinctive syndrome of
    hormonal, muscular, and autonomic responses that
    are coordinated in time and correlated in
    intensity. Barrett, 2006
  • Social environment elicits emotion but is not a
    constituent of emotion

28
Neurochemical processes
29
Emotional brain - Limbic system
  • Border between primitive brain stem and cortex
  • Lower portions - visceral (bodily) feelings
  • Developed at birth
  • Limbic cortex awareness of feeling

30
Damasios theory
  • Emotion is a neurochemical process
  • Feeling is our sensation of that process

31
Limbic system in context
32
Limbic system
33
Amygdala
  • Transforms sensory stimuli to emotion elicitors
  • Not mediated by neocortex
  • Input rapid, automatic appraisal of relevance
  • Output Expression and Experience
  • Reactivity of amygdala determines temperament

34
Limbic cortex
  • Anterior cingulate gyrus
  • Motivation
  • Orbitofrontal cortex
  • Inhibition, social control
  • Feeds back to amygdala, other subcortical
    structures
  • Neural development evident 6 24 months
  • Pruning continues into adolescence

35
But where are specific emotions?
36
Key brain regions implicated in emotion-related
processing.
37
Where is joy located?
One possibility is that anterior cingulate
cortex, is associated with joyful responses,
whereas basal ganglia are involved in related
action tendencies.
Greater left than right cerebral activation
(Duchenne smiles, tail wagging, etc)
38
Facial affect programs?
  • Current evidence
  • Relevant linked brain systems
  • But not distinct affect programs
  • Fear may be exception
  • Panskepp and current animal work

39
Qualia Affective-cognitive schema
  • Emotion feeling linked to cognitions
  • produces thoughts and actions
  • i.e. self-appraisals
  • Emotion-cognition does not transform feeling
  • Feeling never changes
  • but feeling linked to different images and
    thoughts
  • In development, modular systems - emotion,
    cognition, motor - become less insular and more
    integrated

40
Is there emotional feeling without knowledge of
feeling?
  • Infantile memory
  • Strong emotional associations
  • Without explicit knowledge of associations
  • Makes associations inaccessible to reflection and
    difficult to change
  • Memories of smells, movements, even abuse

41
For DET, Feeling is a
  • Quality of consciousness
  • Not defined by cognitions
  • Hence, babies have them!
  • But by action-tendencies and readiness
  • Inherently adaptive
  • Maladaptive when linked to wrong cognitions

42
Role of cognition
  • DET
  • Emotions are quality of consciousness
  • If emotion feeling, cognition not necessary
  • Hence, babies have them!
  • For Barrett, emotion knowledge necessary.
  • If emotion is about something, some degree of
    cognition is involved
  • No emotions for babies?

43
Discrete (independent) emotions
  • Become conscious rapidly and automatically,
    influencing perception and cognition
  • Joy, interest, sadness, anger, fear, surprise,
    and disgust
  • Emotions are discrete, distinguishable, and
    stable
  • correlations.2 - .5 for anger and sadness 2 - 18
    months
  • activation thresholds differ among individuals,
    defining temperament.

44
Discreteness
  • Each emotion has different, distinguishable
    facial movements
  • No display rules in early infancy
  • Thus, infant emotion can be inferred by facial
    expression
  • In infancy, as discrete emotions arise, they
    should be accompanied by discrete facial
    expressions of those emotions (read-outs)

45
Discrete Emotions Theory (DET) Hypotheses
  • Emotion-specific programs unite expressive,
    physiological, and phenomenological processes
  • As the CNS matures, basic emotions emerge as
    structured wholes
  • dont come together developmentally
  • There are no display rules operating in infancy
  • In infancy, as discrete emotions arise, they
    should be accompanied by discrete facial
    expressions of those emotions (read-outs)

46
Expressive behavior
47
Discrete infant emotions
48
Expressive behavior
  • Relating posture and gesture to face
  • 4 distinct affective configurations Social
    Engagement, Object Engagement, Passive
    Withdrawal, and Active Protest (Weinberg
    Tronick, 1994)

49
Debate
  • Debatable
  • Camras Global negative affect reflected in cry
    face
  • Cohn Matias High proportion of blend
    expression blends
  • Affex training film, lab film
  • Sad?distress http//www.youtube.com/watch?vakPVt
    ObBUOkfeaturerelated

50
Assumptions about Categorization
  • The form of infant expressions matches the adult
    form
  • MAX is based on adult infant configurations
  • But few of these correspond with adult (FACS)
    configurations
  • Adults can identify and respond to discrete
    emotional expression
  • In a forced choice paradigm they pick the right
    MAX configuration more
  • But accuracy is low and results are mixed for
    negative
  • But not with free choice

51
Adults expressions seen as discrete
(Oster et al., 1992)
52
Infant negative expressions rated as distress
(Oster et al., 1992)
53
Situational appropriateness Production studies
  • Premise
  • In response to an appropriate elicitor
    (situation), hypothesized emotional expression
    should occur significantly more than other
    expressions

54
Specifying Specificity Facial Expressions at 4
Months
  • evidence for a family of frustrating,
    goal-blocking events that elicited expressions
    and cortisol responses indicative of anger at 4
    months.
  • Yet situations also elicited expressions and
    cortisol changes indicative of sadness.

Bennett, David S. Bendersky, Margaret Lewis, Mic
haelInfancy. Vol 6(3), 2004, 425-429
55
Negative emotional expressions are not
situationally specific
  • Through 2 months, Justine
  • shows distress to bathing, being moved,
    pacifier removal (inoculation and hunger)
  • After 2 months, anger and, to a much lesser
    degree, sadness are most common reaction to all
    negative elicitors
  • infants cry, not a specific reaction
  • Camras, 1992

56
Examples
  • Sad ? distress?smile
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vakPVtObBUOkfeature
    related
  • Sad?disress https//www.youtube.com/watch?vl7oD9
    WX-1CU
  • Fear/orient?distress http//www.youtube.com/watch
    ?NR1featurefvwpvQiBrPkGoqFM
  • Fear?distress http//www.youtube.com/watch?vfASp
    42ZvjIMfeaturefvwrel,
  • Distress
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?featurefvwpNR1vH
    -1me_wsuyk (alligator bite)
  • Sad http//www.youtube.com/watch?vszLjXta0Szw,
    dad singing http//www.youtube.com/watch?vdAzLsnY
    vdYofeaturerelated (lower lip in response to
    rasberries)
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vNS8rZb79-Asfeature
    related

Examples (Slides 3-10 are pictures)
http//www.slideserve.com/marilu/emotions
57
Maze gameScarychildren
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vZGd5NqP6qd4
  • Slow-motion http//www.youtube.com/watch?vLC5qPv
    TQUdo
  • Compendium http//www.youtube.com/watch?vcypeLuC
    IrU0
  • Long http//www.youtube.com/watch?vq9kNCBGEyfk
    055-107, 145-230

58
Dynamic blends
  • Discrete emotionspattern of facial action.
  • When patterns from different emotion expressions
    occur together, a blend occurs.
  • Matias Cohn found that negative blends were as
    frequent as negative discrete emotions.
  • Positive discrete gt positive blends

59
Summary
  • Some negative facial expressions
  • are not recognizably expressions of discrete
    emotions
  • do not always occur in response to appropriate
    elicitors
  • nor do they occur discretely in time

60
Assumptions about Concordance
  • Correlation between infant expression and emotion
    eliciting events
  • Some expressions appear in other circumstances
    and without a matched event
  • Brow changing with head movement
  • Cycles of expression during cry bouts
  • Need for inter- and intra-situational specificity
  • Correlation between infant facial expression and
    non-facial emotion behaviors
  • Arm pulling during anger, cortisol in sadness
    provide evidence
  • Links from children to adults more limited

61
Beyond DET Structuralism
  • Alternate Views

62
Functional and dynamic views
  • Emotion is not inside you.
  • Emotions are process of changing (or maintaining)
    relations with environment significant to the
    individual.
  • Emotions influence situation.

63
Alternative views
  • Functional
  • Insight Recognition of function of emotions and
    their flexibility in functioning
  • Regulating emotion to achieve goals
  • Difficulty Use goals to interpret behavior but
    use behavior to infer goals
  • Dynamic
  • Insight Recognition of interfacing role of
    multiple components in emotional process
  • Difficulty Specifying process

64
Functionalist theory
  • Emotion is the persons attempt or readiness to
    establish, maintain, or change the relation
    between the person and the environment on
    matters of significance to that person (Saarni et
    al., 1998).
  • Emotion is associated with goal-attainment,
    social relationships, situational appraisals,
    action tendencies, self-understanding, self
    regulation, etc.

65
Emotion (cont)
  • Structuralist vs. functional perspectives on
    emotion (cont)
  • Functionalist
  • Emotions serve to establish, maintain, or change
    relation between person and environment on
    matters of significance to person

66
Functions
  • Interest
  • Fear
  • Anger
  • Joy
  • Sadness
  • Disgust
  • Surprise
  • Orienting/exploration
  • Avoidance/flight
  • Goal removal
  • Approach/continuation
  • Withdrawal
  • Expulsion
  • Orienting

67
Functionalist emotion elicitors
68
Other cues
69
Dynamic systems
  • Development, interaction, and (emotional)
    behavior are complex
  • involving multiple interfacing/interacting
    constituents
  • which produce patterns we see as pre-designed
    regularities
  • A bottom-up approach
  • Discrete emotions as preferred states formed from
    the interface of multiple constituents

70
Dynamic systems theory
  • Emotions and facial expressions occur in time
  • How do we study this?
  • like a facial expression or vocalization driving
    the emotion process
  • or a look at the situation
  • or following out a thought
  • or all of these combining together in the emotion
    process

71
Dynamic phenomena
  • The raised brow of interest occurs with raising
    the head
  • There are different interest expressions
  • Problems with top-down approaches
  • Duchenne smiling as a muscular dynamic
  • Joy appears to develop in time
  • Neonatal (Duchenne) smile may emerge before
    happiness
  • Importance?

72
Dynamic systems alternative
  • Distress-pain, anger, sadness often seen
    together during crying
  • Perhaps negative emotion in infancy differs in
    intensity - phases of crying - distress anger,
    with sadness reflecting a weakening of intensity
  • Camras

73
Surprise expressions as coordinative motor
structures
  • Results indicate that MO is selectively
    associated with raised brows
  • Brow raises occurred after the onset of the MO
    movement, further suggesting that MO recruits
    raised brows.
  • Facial criteria may be inappropriate for
    identifying "surprise" expressions in infants.
  • Camras, L. A., Lambrecht, L., Michel, G. F.
    (1996). Infant "surprise" expressions as
    coordinative motor structures. Journal of
    Nonverbal Behavior, 20(3), 183-195.

74
Interest expressions as coordinative motor
structures
  • Opening the mouth is accompanied by brow raising
    in infants, thus producing "surprise expressions
    in non-surprise situations.
  • Raised-brow movements significantly co-occurred
    with head-up and/or eyes-up movements for both
    ages.
  • Knit-brows co-occurred with eyes-down at 5 mo and
    head-down at 7 mo
  • Michel, G. F., Camras, L. A., Sullivan, J.
    (1992). Infant interest expressions as
    coordinative motor structures. Infant Behavior
    and Development, 15(3), 347-358.

75
Surprise! Its not in the face
Covert toy switch
Camras, et al. doi http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528
-3542.2.2.179
76
Surprise examples
  • Expression on demand http//www.youtube.com/watch
    ?v8DaKcKqVheENR1
  • Coordinative structure? http//www.youtube.com/wat
    ch?vcOvtNPljtv0featurerelated
  • Posed adult http//www.youtube.com/watch?vf4Ayfr
    M8Q2o
  • Girl and Dad 105140. http//www.youtube.com/wat
    ch?vq5HXl_zJ5po ad preceding

77
Criticism
  • Infant facial expression is often ambiguous,
    could depend more on integrated systems than
    changes in goal states
  • Response facial babbling is a precursor to
    functional movements feedback allows infant to
    tailor emotion expressions to its environment.
    Furthermore, success in this can facilitate
    attachment.

78
Response
  • (innate ? no environment input required).
  • Developmental constraints will constrain
    optimality (learning and maturation of visual
    system is necessary)
  • Natural selection will constrain infinite
    variation. Open systems are adaptive when
    cultural variation affects whether the system
    leads to an adaptive outcome. Mapping cultural
    variation to different adaptive outcomes would be
    a good future direction.

79
Feedback loops
  • Internal Proprioceptive
  • External Social
  • "I take smiling to be a social signal," Messinger
    says. "I really think that babies are learning
    what joy is by sharing it with someone else." In
    other words, smiling might not be so much an
    expression of a preexisting state as a path we
    take to get to that state.
  • Why do babies smile? - Slate Magazine, Jul 1,
    2010

80
Mirror Neuron System
  • Neural basis for apperception of others
    experience
  • What you see is what you feel
  • Research limitations
  • Inter-species generalization, imaging
    constraints, etc
  • But potential source of ASD affective deficits

81
Relative reduced activity of pars opercularis of
inferior frontal gyrus to facial expressions
RH LH Figure 1 Reliable activity during imitation
of emotional expressions. (a,b) Activity in
bilateral pars opercularis (stronger in the
right) of the inferior frontal gyrus is seen in
the typically developing group (a) but not in the
ASD group (b). A between-group comparison (c)
revealed that this difference was significant (t
4 1.83, P o 0.05, corrected for multiple
comparisons at the cluster level). RH, right
hemisphere LH, left hemisphere.
82
Relative reduced activity of pars opercularis of
inferior frontal gyrusto facial expressions
(Typical ASD)
Observation
Imitation
Dapretto et al., 2006, Nature Neuroscience
83
Holodynski Friedlmeier (2010). The Development
of Emotions and Emotion Regulation.
84
Sign-mediated emotion system
  • Build up differentiated emotion systems mediated
    by expressive reactions (frustration, anger,
    sadness, joy.)
  • Coping actions
  • Interpersonal regulation optimizes
  • emotion components appraisal, expression, body
    reaction, feeling
  • Interplay of emotion components
  • ? Emergence of differentiated, sign-mediated
    emotion systems in infants

85
Internalization model
  • Three postulates describing the mechanisms
    involved in the development of the emotion
    components
  • The processes that differentiate the appraisal
    and expression components are interdependent
  • Expression signs can be used symbolically
  • Body sensations accompanying emotions are
    transformed into conscious feeling

Holodynski Friedlmeier (2010). The Development
of Emotions and Emotion Regulation
86
1a. Differentiation of the Expressive Reactions
  • In adults appraisal precedes expression and body
    reactions (cause-effect relation)
  • In infants effects tend to be reciprocal when
    emotions emerge!
  • caregivers talk and smile to their infants to
    provoke a reaction
  • First smile of infant as a result of imitation
  • Caregivers will mark such events contingently by
    increased smiling and talking
  • Infant builds up contingencies and initiate the
    cycle of pleasure (? real smiling)
  • Evidence differences in expressing anger at
    different ages

87
1b. Expression Signs as Mediators between Infant
and Caregiver
  • Coregulation
  • Interdependence of infant and parent behavior
  • Infants emotional experiences are mediated by
    the caregivers interpretation
  • Caregivers respond with actions that are
    coordinated with their interpretation of their
    babys expression (feeding the crying infant)
  • Temporal contingencies will emerge when the
    caregiver acts sensitively, promptly and
    consistently

88
1c. Affect Mirroring and Motor Mimicry
  • Caregivers mirror their infants emotion-specific
    expression signs in their own expressions
  • Infants register the contingent mirroring and
    then anticipate this from their caregivers
  • Infants imitate their caregivers expression
    signs
  • Interplay between caregiver and infants leads to
    synchronization of expression signs, universal
    and individual signs

89
2. Expression signs can be used symbolically
  • Transformation of expressive reactions into
    expression signs
  • Represent generalized emotion specific action
    readiness and subjective feeling state
  • Example mother - infant
  • Smile from the mother as assurance
  • Mothers angry face as avoidance sign
  • Example infant - mother
  • Infant starts crying when a wish is denied, and
    stops immediately when the wish gets fulfilled
  • Crying is used as a symbol not as an expression
    of real distress
  • Facial expression into emotion related expression
    signs through face-to-face interaction between
    mother and infant

90
3. Body sensations accompanying emotions into
conscious feeling
  • Without signs, no consciousness without
    expression signs, no conscious feeling
  • Feeling emerges from interoceptive and
    proprioceptive feedback on body and expressive
    reactions
  • Example feeling state of pleasure
  • Expression sign smiling
  • Feedback associated with pleasure warmth,
    relaxation
  • Feedback not associated with pleasure e.g. itchy
    leg
  • ? Only those relevant will be single out

91
Emotion is not facial expression
  • Happiness alone is not sufficient to produce
    smiles. Rather, happiness produces smiles only
    during social interaction. (Ferenandez-Dols
    Ruiz-Belda, 1995, p. 1114).

92
Behavioral ecologists.
  • Biologically oriented ethologists attempting to
    explain signaling behavior across species within
    a framework of evolution through natural
    selection.
  • Facial expressions do not reflect emotions
  • They occur during social interaction reflect
    social motives and negotiation

93
Behavioral ecology view
  • Facial displays
  • signify our trajectory in a given social
    interaction
  • social tools aiding the negotiation of social
    encounters
  • specific to intent and context

94
Dimensional
  • Emphasizes commonalities between emotions
  • De-emphasizes uniqueness of individual emotions

95
Circumplex Self-reported emotion
96
Critique of dynamic systems
  • The task assembles the behavior
  • Whats the emotional task?
  • Signaling to other signaling/motivating self

97
Structural/Functional synthesis
  • Structural insight.
  • Discrete or no, emotional processes have an
    internal dynamic
  • happiness wanes, frustrated love is not neutral
    sadness loves company
  • Functional insight
  • Emotions are inherently relational.
  • And usually but not always functional
  • Methodological synthesis.
  • Detailed attention to face and other expressive
    modalities, and their perception by others.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com