Loading...

PPT – Data Mining Classification: Basic Concepts, Decision Trees, and Model Evaluation PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 79ecfd-YjNhN

The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Data Mining Classification Basic Concepts,

Decision Trees, and Model Evaluation

- Lecture Notes for Chapter 4
- Introduction to Data Mining
- by
- Tan, Steinbach, Kumar

Classification Definition

- Given a collection of records (training set )
- Each record contains a set of attributes, one of

the attributes is the class. - Find a model for class attribute as a function

of the values of other attributes. - Goal previously unseen records should be

assigned a class as accurately as possible. - A test set is used to determine the accuracy of

the model. Usually, the given data set is divided

into training and test sets, with training set

used to build the model and test set used to

validate it.

Illustrating Classification Task

Examples of Classification Task

- Predicting tumor cells as benign or malignant
- Classifying credit card transactions as

legitimate or fraudulent - Classifying secondary structures of protein as

alpha-helix, beta-sheet, or random coil - Categorizing news stories as finance, weather,

entertainment, sports, etc

Classification Techniques

- Decision Tree based Methods
- Rule-based Methods
- Memory based reasoning
- Neural Networks
- Naïve Bayes and Bayesian Belief Networks
- Support Vector Machines

Example of a Decision Tree

Splitting Attributes

Refund

Yes

No

MarSt

NO

Married

Single, Divorced

TaxInc

NO

lt 80K

gt 80K

YES

NO

Model Decision Tree

Training Data

Another Example of Decision Tree

categorical

categorical

continuous

class

Single, Divorced

MarSt

Married

Refund

NO

No

Yes

TaxInc

lt 80K

gt 80K

YES

NO

There could be more than one tree that fits the

same data!

Decision Tree Classification Task

Decision Tree

Apply Model to Test Data

Test Data

Start from the root of tree.

Apply Model to Test Data

Test Data

Apply Model to Test Data

Test Data

Refund

Yes

No

MarSt

NO

Married

Single, Divorced

TaxInc

NO

lt 80K

gt 80K

YES

NO

Apply Model to Test Data

Test Data

Refund

Yes

No

MarSt

NO

Married

Single, Divorced

TaxInc

NO

lt 80K

gt 80K

YES

NO

Apply Model to Test Data

Test Data

Refund

Yes

No

MarSt

NO

Married

Single, Divorced

TaxInc

NO

lt 80K

gt 80K

YES

NO

Apply Model to Test Data

Test Data

Refund

Yes

No

MarSt

NO

Assign Cheat to No

Married

Single, Divorced

TaxInc

NO

lt 80K

gt 80K

YES

NO

Decision Tree Classification Task

Decision Tree

Decision Tree Induction

- Many Algorithms
- Hunts Algorithm (one of the earliest)
- CART
- ID3, C4.5
- SLIQ,SPRINT

General Structure of Hunts Algorithm

- Let Dt be the set of training records that reach

a node t - General Procedure
- If Dt contains records that belong the same class

yt, then t is a leaf node labeled as yt - If Dt is an empty set, then t is a leaf node

labeled by the default class, yd - If Dt contains records that belong to more than

one class, use an attribute test to split the

data into smaller subsets. Recursively apply the

procedure to each subset.

Dt

?

Hunts Algorithm

Dont Cheat

Tree Induction

- Greedy strategy.
- Split the records based on an attribute test that

optimizes certain criterion. - Issues
- Determine how to split the records
- How to specify the attribute test condition?
- How to determine the best split?
- Determine when to stop splitting

Tree Induction

- Greedy strategy.
- Split the records based on an attribute test that

optimizes certain criterion. - Issues
- Determine how to split the records
- How to specify the attribute test condition?
- How to determine the best split?
- Determine when to stop splitting

How to Specify Test Condition?

- Depends on attribute types
- Nominal
- Ordinal
- Continuous
- Depends on number of ways to split
- 2-way split
- Multi-way split

Splitting Based on Nominal Attributes

- Multi-way split Use as many partitions as

distinct values. - Binary split Divides values into two subsets.

Need to find optimal partitioning.

OR

Splitting Based on Ordinal Attributes

- Multi-way split Use as many partitions as

distinct values. - Binary split Divides values into two subsets.

Need to find optimal partitioning. - What about this split?

OR

Splitting Based on Continuous Attributes

- Different ways of handling
- Discretization to form an ordinal categorical

attribute - Static discretize once at the beginning
- Dynamic ranges can be found by equal interval

bucketing, equal frequency bucketing (percenti

les), or clustering. - Binary Decision (A lt v) or (A ? v)
- consider all possible splits and finds the best

cut - can be more compute intensive

Splitting Based on Continuous Attributes

Tree Induction

- Greedy strategy.
- Split the records based on an attribute test that

optimizes certain criterion. - Issues
- Determine how to split the records
- How to specify the attribute test condition?
- How to determine the best split?
- Determine when to stop splitting

How to determine the Best Split

Before Splitting 10 records of class 0, 10

records of class 1

Which test condition is the best?

How to determine the Best Split

- Greedy approach
- Nodes with homogeneous class distribution are

preferred - Need a measure of node impurity

Non-homogeneous, High degree of impurity

Homogeneous, Low degree of impurity

Measures of Node Impurity

- Gini Index
- Entropy
- Misclassification error

How to Find the Best Split

Before Splitting

A?

B?

Yes

No

Yes

No

Node N1

Node N2

Node N3

Node N4

Gain M0 M12 vs M0 M34

Measure of Impurity GINI

- Gini Index for a given node t
- (NOTE p( j t) is the relative frequency of

class j at node t). - Maximum (1 - 1/nc) when records are equally

distributed among all classes, implying least

interesting information - Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one

class, implying most interesting information

Examples for computing GINI

P(C1) 0/6 0 P(C2) 6/6 1 Gini 1

P(C1)2 P(C2)2 1 0 1 0

P(C1) 1/6 P(C2) 5/6 Gini 1

(1/6)2 (5/6)2 0.278

P(C1) 2/6 P(C2) 4/6 Gini 1

(2/6)2 (4/6)2 0.444

Splitting Based on GINI

- Used in CART, SLIQ, SPRINT.
- When a node p is split into k partitions

(children), the quality of split is computed as, - where, ni number of records at child i,
- n number of records at node p.

Binary Attributes Computing GINI Index

- Splits into two partitions
- Effect of Weighing partitions
- Larger and Purer Partitions are sought for.

B?

Yes

No

Node N1

Node N2

Gini(N1) 1 (5/7)2 (2/7)2 0.408 Gini(N2)

1 (1/5)2 (4/5)2 0.320

Gini(Children) 7/12 0.408 5/12

0.320 0.371

Categorical Attributes Computing Gini Index

- For each distinct value, gather counts for each

class in the dataset - Use the count matrix to make decisions

Multi-way split

Two-way split (find best partition of values)

Continuous Attributes Computing Gini Index

- Use Binary Decisions based on one value
- Several Choices for the splitting value
- Number of possible splitting values Number of

distinct values - Each splitting value has a count matrix

associated with it - Class counts in each of the partitions, A lt v and

A ? v - Simple method to choose best v
- For each v, scan the database to gather count

matrix and compute its Gini index - Computationally Inefficient! Repetition of work.

Continuous Attributes Computing Gini Index...

- For efficient computation for each attribute,
- Sort the attribute on values
- Linearly scan these values, each time updating

the count matrix and computing gini index - Choose the split position that has the least gini

index

Alternative Splitting Criteria based on INFO

- Entropy at a given node t
- (NOTE p( j t) is the relative frequency of

class j at node t). - Measures homogeneity of a node.
- Maximum (log nc) when records are equally

distributed among all classes implying least

information - Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one

class, implying most information - Entropy based computations are similar to the

GINI index computations

Examples for computing Entropy

P(C1) 0/6 0 P(C2) 6/6 1 Entropy 0

log 0 1 log 1 0 0 0

P(C1) 1/6 P(C2) 5/6 Entropy

(1/6) log2 (1/6) (5/6) log2 (1/6) 0.65

P(C1) 2/6 P(C2) 4/6 Entropy

(2/6) log2 (2/6) (4/6) log2 (4/6) 0.92

Splitting Based on INFO...

- Information Gain
- Parent Node, p is split into k partitions
- ni is number of records in partition i
- Measures Reduction in Entropy achieved because of

the split. Choose the split that achieves most

reduction (maximizes GAIN) - Used in ID3 and C4.5
- Disadvantage Tends to prefer splits that result

in large number of partitions, each being small

but pure.

Splitting Based on INFO...

- Gain Ratio
- Parent Node, p is split into k partitions
- ni is the number of records in partition i
- Adjusts Information Gain by the entropy of the

partitioning (SplitINFO). Higher entropy

partitioning (large number of small partitions)

is penalized! - Used in C4.5
- Designed to overcome the disadvantage of

Information Gain

Splitting Criteria based on Classification Error

- Classification error at a node t
- Measures misclassification error made by a node.
- Maximum (1 - 1/nc) when records are equally

distributed among all classes, implying least

interesting information - Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one

class, implying most interesting information

Examples for Computing Error

P(C1) 0/6 0 P(C2) 6/6 1 Error 1

max (0, 1) 1 1 0

P(C1) 1/6 P(C2) 5/6 Error 1 max

(1/6, 5/6) 1 5/6 1/6

P(C1) 2/6 P(C2) 4/6 Error 1 max

(2/6, 4/6) 1 4/6 1/3

Comparison among Splitting Criteria

For a 2-class problem

Misclassification Error vs Gini

A?

Yes

No

Node N1

Node N2

Gini(N1) 1 (3/3)2 (0/3)2 0 Gini(N2)

1 (4/7)2 (3/7)2 0.489

Gini(Children) 3/10 0 7/10 0.489

0.342 Gini improves !!

Tree Induction

- Greedy strategy.
- Split the records based on an attribute test that

optimizes certain criterion. - Issues
- Determine how to split the records
- How to specify the attribute test condition?
- How to determine the best split?
- Determine when to stop splitting

Stopping Criteria for Tree Induction

- Stop expanding a node when all the records belong

to the same class - Stop expanding a node when all the records have

similar attribute values - Early termination (pre-pruning)

Decision Tree Based Classification

- Advantages
- Inexpensive to construct
- Extremely fast at classifying unknown records
- Easy to interpret for small-sized trees
- Accuracy is comparable to other classification

techniques for many simple data sets

Example C4.5

- Simple depth-first construction.
- Uses Information Gain
- Sorts Continuous Attributes at each node.
- Needs entire data to fit in memory.
- Unsuitable for Large Datasets.
- Needs out-of-core sorting.

Practical Issues of Classification

- Underfitting and Overfitting
- Missing Values
- Costs of Classification

Underfitting and Overfitting (Example)

500 circular and 500 triangular data

points. Circular points 0.5 ? sqrt(x12x22) ?

1 Triangular points sqrt(x12x22) gt 0.5

or sqrt(x12x22) lt 1

Underfitting and Overfitting

Overfitting

Underfitting when model is too simple, both

training and test errors are large

Overfitting due to Noise

Decision boundary is distorted by noise point

Overfitting due to Insufficient Examples

Lack of data points in the lower half of the

diagram makes it difficult to predict correctly

the class labels of that region - Insufficient

number of training records in the region causes

the decision tree to predict the test examples

using other training records that are irrelevant

to the classification task

Notes on Overfitting

- Overfitting results in decision trees that are

more complex than necessary - Training error no longer provides a good estimate

of how well the tree will perform on previously

unseen records - Need new ways for estimating errors

Estimating Generalization Errors

- Re-substitution errors error on training (? e(t)

) - Generalization errors error on testing (? e(t))
- Methods for estimating generalization errors
- Optimistic approach e(t) e(t)
- Pessimistic approach
- For each leaf node e(t) (e(t)0.5)
- Total errors e(T) e(T) N ? 0.5 (N number

of leaf nodes) - For a tree with 30 leaf nodes and 10 errors on

training (out of 1000 instances)

Training error 10/1000 1 - Generalization error (10

30?0.5)/1000 2.5 - Reduced error pruning (REP)
- uses validation data set to estimate

generalization error

Occams Razor

- Given two models of similar generalization

errors, one should prefer the simpler model over

the more complex model - For complex models, there is a greater chance

that it was fitted accidentally by errors in data - Therefore, one should include model complexity

when evaluating a model

Minimum Description Length (MDL)

- Cost(Model,Data) Cost(DataModel) Cost(Model)
- Cost is the number of bits needed for encoding.
- Search for the least costly model.
- Cost(DataModel) encodes the misclassification

errors. - Cost(Model) uses node encoding (number of

children) plus splitting condition encoding.

How to Address Overfitting

- Pre-Pruning (Early Stopping Rule)
- Stop the algorithm before it becomes a

fully-grown tree - Typical stopping conditions for a node
- Stop if all instances belong to the same class
- Stop if all the attribute values are the same
- More restrictive conditions
- Stop if number of instances is less than some

user-specified threshold - Stop if class distribution of instances are

independent of the available features (e.g.,

using ? 2 test) - Stop if expanding the current node does not

improve impurity measures (e.g., Gini or

information gain).

How to Address Overfitting

- Post-pruning
- Grow decision tree to its entirety
- Trim the nodes of the decision tree in a

bottom-up fashion - If generalization error improves after trimming,

replace sub-tree by a leaf node. - Class label of leaf node is determined from

majority class of instances in the sub-tree

Example of Post-Pruning

Training Error (Before splitting)

10/30 Pessimistic error (10 0.5)/30

10.5/30 Training Error (After splitting)

9/30 Pessimistic error (After splitting) (9

4 ? 0.5)/30 11/30 PRUNE!

Class Yes 20

Class No 10

Error 10/30 Error 10/30

Class Yes 8

Class No 4

Class Yes 3

Class No 4

Class Yes 4

Class No 1

Class Yes 5

Class No 1

Examples of Post-pruning

- Optimistic error?
- Pessimistic error?
- Reduced error pruning?

Case 1

Dont prune for both cases

Dont prune case 1, prune case 2

Case 2

Depends on validation set

Handling Missing Attribute Values

- Missing values affect decision tree construction

in three different ways - Affects how impurity measures are computed
- Affects how to distribute instance with missing

value to child nodes - Affects how a test instance with missing value is

classified

Computing Impurity Measure

Before Splitting Entropy(Parent) -0.3

log(0.3)-(0.7)log(0.7) 0.8813

Split on Refund Entropy(RefundYes) 0

Entropy(RefundNo) -(2/6)log(2/6)

(4/6)log(4/6) 0.9183 Entropy(Children)

0.3 (0) 0.6 (0.9183) 0.551 Gain 0.9 ?

(0.8813 0.551) 0.3303

Missing value

Distribute Instances

Refund

Yes

No

Probability that RefundYes is 3/9 Probability

that RefundNo is 6/9 Assign record to the left

child with weight 3/9 and to the right child

with weight 6/9

Refund

Yes

No

Classify Instances

New record

Married Single Divorced Total

ClassNo 3 1 0 4

ClassYes 0 16/9 1 2.67

Total 3 2.67 1 6.67

Refund

Yes

No

MarSt

NO

Single, Divorced

Married

Probability that Marital Status Married is

3/6.67 Probability that Marital Status

Single,Divorced is 3.67/6.67

TaxInc

NO

lt 80K

gt 80K

YES

NO

Search Strategy

- Finding an optimal decision tree is NP-hard
- The algorithm presented so far uses a greedy,

top-down, recursive partitioning strategy to

induce a reasonable solution - Other strategies?
- Bottom-up (CART)
- Bi-directional

Decision Boundary

- Border line between two neighboring regions of

different classes is known as decision boundary - Decision boundary is parallel to axes because

test condition involves a single attribute

at-a-time

Oblique Decision Trees

- Test condition may involve multiple attributes
- More expressive representation
- Finding optimal test condition is

computationally expensive

Tree Replication

- Same subtree appears in multiple branches

Model Evaluation

- Metrics for Performance Evaluation
- How to evaluate the performance of a model?
- Methods for Performance Evaluation
- How to obtain reliable estimates?
- Methods for Model Comparison
- How to compare the relative performance among

competing models?

Model Evaluation

- Metrics for Performance Evaluation
- How to evaluate the performance of a model?
- Methods for Performance Evaluation
- How to obtain reliable estimates?
- Methods for Model Comparison
- How to compare the relative performance among

competing models?

Metrics for Performance Evaluation

- Focus on the predictive capability of a model
- Rather than how fast it takes to classify or

build models, scalability, etc. - Confusion Matrix

PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes ClassNo

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes a b

ACTUALCLASS ClassNo c d

a TP (true positive) b FN (false negative) c

FP (false positive) d TN (true negative)

Metrics for Performance Evaluation

- Most widely-used metric

PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes ClassNo

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes a(TP) b(FN)

ACTUALCLASS ClassNo c(FP) d(TN)

Limitation of Accuracy

- Consider a 2-class problem
- Number of Class 0 examples 9990
- Number of Class 1 examples 10
- If model predicts everything to be class 0,

accuracy is 9990/10000 99.9 - Accuracy is misleading because model does not

detect any class 1 example

Cost Matrix

PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS

ACTUALCLASS C(ij) ClassYes ClassNo

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes C(YesYes) C(NoYes)

ACTUALCLASS ClassNo C(YesNo) C(NoNo)

C(ij) Cost of misclassifying class j example as

class i

Computing Cost of Classification

Cost Matrix PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS

ACTUALCLASS C(ij) -

ACTUALCLASS -1 100

ACTUALCLASS - 1 0

Model M1 PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS

ACTUALCLASS -

ACTUALCLASS 150 40

ACTUALCLASS - 60 250

Model M2 PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS

ACTUALCLASS -

ACTUALCLASS 250 45

ACTUALCLASS - 5 200

Accuracy 80 Cost 3910

Accuracy 90 Cost 4255

Cost vs Accuracy

Count PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes ClassNo

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes a b

ACTUALCLASS ClassNo c d

Cost PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS PREDICTED CLASS

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes ClassNo

ACTUALCLASS ClassYes p q

ACTUALCLASS ClassNo q p

Cost-Sensitive Measures

- Precision is biased towards C(YesYes)

C(YesNo) - Recall is biased towards C(YesYes) C(NoYes)
- F-measure is biased towards all except C(NoNo)

Model Evaluation

- Metrics for Performance Evaluation
- How to evaluate the performance of a model?
- Methods for Performance Evaluation
- How to obtain reliable estimates?
- Methods for Model Comparison
- How to compare the relative performance among

competing models?

Methods for Performance Evaluation

- How to obtain a reliable estimate of performance?
- Performance of a model may depend on other

factors besides the learning algorithm - Class distribution
- Cost of misclassification
- Size of training and test sets

Learning Curve

- Learning curve shows how accuracy changes with

varying sample size - Requires a sampling schedule for creating

learning curve - Arithmetic sampling(Langley, et al)
- Geometric sampling(Provost et al)
- Effect of small sample size
- Bias in the estimate
- Variance of estimate

Methods of Estimation

- Holdout
- Reserve 2/3 for training and 1/3 for testing
- Random subsampling
- Repeated holdout
- Cross validation
- Partition data into k disjoint subsets
- k-fold train on k-1 partitions, test on the

remaining one - Leave-one-out kn
- Bootstrap
- Sampling with replacement

Model Evaluation

- Metrics for Performance Evaluation
- How to evaluate the performance of a model?
- Methods for Performance Evaluation
- How to obtain reliable estimates?
- Methods for Model Comparison
- How to compare the relative performance among

competing models?

ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic)

- Developed in 1950s for signal detection theory to

analyze noisy signals - Characterize the trade-off between positive hits

and false alarms - ROC curve plots TPRate (on the y-axis) against

FPRate (on the x-axis) - Performance of each classifier represented as a

point on the ROC curve - changing the threshold of algorithm, sample

distribution or cost matrix changes the location

of the point

ROC Curve

- (TPRate,FPRate)
- (0,0) declare everything to be

negative class - (1,1) declare everything to be positive

class - (1,0) ideal
- Diagonal line
- Random guessing
- Below diagonal line
- prediction is opposite of the true class

Using ROC for Model Comparison

- No model consistently outperform the other
- M1 is better for small FPR
- M2 is better for large FPR
- Area Under the ROC curve
- Ideal
- Area 1
- Random guess
- Area 0.5

How to Construct an ROC curve

- Use classifier that produces posterior

probability for each test instance P(A) - Sort the instances according to P(A) in

decreasing order - Apply threshold at each unique value of P(A)
- Count the number of TP, FP, TN, FN at each

threshold - TP rate, TPR TP/(TPFN)
- FP rate, FPR FP/(FP TN)

Instance P(A) True Class

1 0.95

2 0.93

3 0.87 -

4 0.85 -

5 0.85 -

6 0.85

7 0.76 -

8 0.53

9 0.43 -

10 0.25

How to construct an ROC curve

Threshold gt

ROC Curve

Rule-Based Classifier

- Classify records by using a collection of

ifthen rules - Rule (Condition) ? y
- where
- Condition is a conjunctions of attributes
- y is the class label
- LHS rule antecedent or condition
- RHS rule consequent
- Examples of classification rules
- (Blood TypeWarm) ? (Lay EggsYes) ? Birds
- (Taxable Income lt 50K) ? (RefundYes) ? EvadeNo

Rule-based Classifier (Example)

- R1 (Give Birth no) ? (Can Fly yes) ? Birds
- R2 (Give Birth no) ? (Live in Water yes) ?

Fishes - R3 (Give Birth yes) ? (Blood Type warm) ?

Mammals - R4 (Give Birth no) ? (Can Fly no) ? Reptiles
- R5 (Live in Water sometimes) ? Amphibians

Application of Rule-Based Classifier

- A rule r covers an instance x if the attributes

of the instance satisfy the condition of the rule

R1 (Give Birth no) ? (Can Fly yes) ?

Birds R2 (Give Birth no) ? (Live in Water

yes) ? Fishes R3 (Give Birth yes) ? (Blood

Type warm) ? Mammals R4 (Give Birth no) ?

(Can Fly no) ? Reptiles R5 (Live in Water

sometimes) ? Amphibians

The rule R1 covers a hawk gt Bird The rule R3

covers the grizzly bear gt Mammal

Rule Coverage and Accuracy

- Coverage of a rule
- Fraction of records that satisfy the antecedent

of a rule - Accuracy of a rule
- Fraction of records that satisfy both the

antecedent and consequent of a rule

(StatusSingle) ? No Coverage 40,

Accuracy 50

How does Rule-based Classifier Work?

R1 (Give Birth no) ? (Can Fly yes) ?

Birds R2 (Give Birth no) ? (Live in Water

yes) ? Fishes R3 (Give Birth yes) ? (Blood

Type warm) ? Mammals R4 (Give Birth no) ?

(Can Fly no) ? Reptiles R5 (Live in Water

sometimes) ? Amphibians

A lemur triggers rule R3, so it is classified as

a mammal A turtle triggers both R4 and R5 A

dogfish shark triggers none of the rules

Characteristics of Rule-Based Classifier

- Mutually exclusive rules
- Classifier contains mutually exclusive rules if

the rules are independent of each other - Every record is covered by at most one rule
- Exhaustive rules
- Classifier has exhaustive coverage if it accounts

for every possible combination of attribute

values - Each record is covered by at least one rule

From Decision Trees To Rules

Rules are mutually exclusive and exhaustive Rule

set contains as much information as the tree

Rules Can Be Simplified

Initial Rule (RefundNo) ?

(StatusMarried) ? No Simplified Rule

(StatusMarried) ? No

Effect of Rule Simplification

- Rules are no longer mutually exclusive
- A record may trigger more than one rule
- Solution?
- Ordered rule set
- Unordered rule set use voting schemes
- Rules are no longer exhaustive
- A record may not trigger any rules
- Solution?
- Use a default class

Ordered Rule Set

- Rules are rank ordered according to their

priority - An ordered rule set is known as a decision list
- When a test record is presented to the classifier

- It is assigned to the class label of the highest

ranked rule it has triggered - If none of the rules fired, it is assigned to the

default class

R1 (Give Birth no) ? (Can Fly yes) ?

Birds R2 (Give Birth no) ? (Live in Water

yes) ? Fishes R3 (Give Birth yes) ? (Blood

Type warm) ? Mammals R4 (Give Birth no) ?

(Can Fly no) ? Reptiles R5 (Live in Water

sometimes) ? Amphibians

Rule Ordering Schemes

- Rule-based ordering
- Individual rules are ranked based on their

quality - Class-based ordering
- Rules that belong to the same class appear

together

Building Classification Rules

- Direct Method
- Extract rules directly from data
- e.g. RIPPER, CN2, Holtes 1R
- Indirect Method
- Extract rules from other classification models

(e.g. decision trees, neural networks, etc). - e.g C4.5rules

Direct Method Sequential Covering

- Start from an empty rule
- Grow a rule using the Learn-One-Rule function
- Remove training records covered by the rule
- Repeat Step (2) and (3) until stopping criterion

is met

Example of Sequential Covering

Example of Sequential Covering

Aspects of Sequential Covering

- Rule Growing
- Instance Elimination
- Rule Evaluation
- Stopping Criterion
- Rule Pruning

Rule Growing

- Two common strategies

Rule Growing (Examples)

- CN2 Algorithm
- Start from an empty conjunct
- Add conjuncts that minimizes the entropy measure

A, A,B, - Determine the rule consequent by taking majority

class of instances covered by the rule - RIPPER Algorithm
- Start from an empty rule gt class
- Add conjuncts that maximizes FOILs information

gain measure - R0 gt class (initial rule)
- R1 A gt class (rule after adding conjunct)
- Gain(R0, R1) t log (p1/(p1n1)) log

(p0/(p0 n0)) - where t number of positive instances covered

by both R0 and R1 - p0 number of positive instances covered by R0
- n0 number of negative instances covered by R0
- p1 number of positive instances covered by R1
- n1 number of negative instances covered by R1

Instance Elimination

- Why do we need to eliminate instances?
- Otherwise, the next rule is identical to previous

rule - Why do we remove positive instances?
- Ensure that the next rule is different
- Why do we remove negative instances?
- Prevent underestimating accuracy of rule
- Compare rules R2 and R3 in the diagram

Rule Evaluation

- Metrics
- Accuracy
- Laplace
- M-estimate

n Number of instances covered by rule nc

Number of positive instances covered by rule k

Number of classes p Prior probability

Stopping Criterion and Rule Pruning

- Stopping criterion
- Compute the gain
- If gain is not significant, discard the new rule
- Rule Pruning
- Similar to post-pruning of decision trees
- Reduced Error Pruning
- Remove one of the conjuncts in the rule
- Compare error rate on validation set before and

after pruning - If error improves, prune the conjunct

Summary of Direct Method

- Grow a single rule
- Remove Instances from rule
- Prune the rule (if necessary)
- Add rule to Current Rule Set
- Repeat

Direct Method RIPPER

- For 2-class problem, choose one of the classes as

positive class, and the other as negative class - Learn rules for positive class
- Negative class will be default class
- For multi-class problem
- Order the classes according to increasing class

prevalence (fraction of instances that belong to

a particular class) - Learn the rule set for smallest class first,

treat the rest as negative class - Repeat with next smallest class as positive class

Direct Method RIPPER

- Growing a rule
- Start from empty rule
- Add conjuncts as long as they improve FOILs

information gain - Stop when rule no longer covers negative examples
- Prune the rule immediately using incremental

reduced error pruning - Measure for pruning v (p-n)/(pn)
- p number of positive examples covered by the

rule in the validation set - n number of negative examples covered by the

rule in the validation set - Pruning method delete any final sequence of

conditions that maximizes v

Direct Method RIPPER

- Building a Rule Set
- Use sequential covering algorithm
- Finds the best rule that covers the current set

of positive examples - Eliminate both positive and negative examples

covered by the rule - Each time a rule is added to the rule set,

compute the new description length - stop adding new rules when the new description

length is d bits longer than the smallest

description length obtained so far

Direct Method RIPPER

- Optimize the rule set
- For each rule r in the rule set R
- Consider 2 alternative rules
- Replacement rule (r) grow new rule from scratch
- Revised rule(r) add conjuncts to extend the

rule r - Compare the rule set for r against the rule set

for r and r - Choose rule set that minimizes MDL principle
- Repeat rule generation and rule optimization for

the remaining positive examples

Indirect Methods

Indirect Method C4.5rules

- Extract rules from an unpruned decision tree
- For each rule, r A ? y,
- consider an alternative rule r A ? y where A

is obtained by removing one of the conjuncts in A - Compare the pessimistic error rate for r against

all rs - Prune if one of the rs has lower pessimistic

error rate - Repeat until we can no longer improve

generalization error

Indirect Method C4.5rules

- Instead of ordering the rules, order subsets of

rules (class ordering) - Each subset is a collection of rules with the

same rule consequent (class) - Compute description length of each subset
- Description length L(error) g L(model)
- g is a parameter that takes into account the

presence of redundant attributes in a rule set

(default value 0.5)

Example

C4.5 versus C4.5rules versus RIPPER

C4.5rules (Give BirthNo, Can FlyYes) ?

Birds (Give BirthNo, Live in WaterYes) ?

Fishes (Give BirthYes) ? Mammals (Give BirthNo,

Can FlyNo, Live in WaterNo) ? Reptiles ( ) ?

Amphibians

RIPPER (Live in WaterYes) ? Fishes (Have

LegsNo) ? Reptiles (Give BirthNo, Can FlyNo,

Live In WaterNo) ? Reptiles (Can FlyYes,Give

BirthNo) ? Birds () ? Mammals

C4.5 versus C4.5rules versus RIPPER

C4.5 and C4.5rules

RIPPER

Advantages of Rule-Based Classifiers

- As highly expressive as decision trees
- Easy to interpret
- Easy to generate
- Can classify new instances rapidly
- Performance comparable to decision trees