Principles of Effective Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Principles of Effective Evaluation

Description:

Principles of Effective Evaluation Prof Keithia Wilson Academic Leader Student Success & Retention Importance of Evaluation Results in evidence-based practice Helps ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: edua2210
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Principles of Effective Evaluation


1
Principles of Effective Evaluation
  • Prof Keithia Wilson
  • Academic Leader Student Success Retention

2
Importance of Evaluation
  • Results in evidence-based practice
  • Helps us to identify the most effective
    strategic interventions (make a difference or add
    value)
  • Leads to sustainable enjoyable practice
  • Provides accountability to School Group
    leadership
  • Contributes to scholarship of the FYE

3
Kirkpatrick (1994) Model of Evaluation - Overview
  • 4 levels of outcome evaluation
  • Level 1 Reaction
  • Level 2 Learning
  • Level 3 Behaviour
  • Level 4 Results

4
Level 1 - Reaction
  • Measures participants reactions to the training
    program, including
  • reactions to the overall program (outcomes) e.g.,
  • To what extent did you find the Orientation
    program useful?
  • reactions to specific components of the program
    (processes) e.g.,
  • What aspects of Orientation did you MOST
    APPRECIATE and found USEFUL?
  • What aspects of Orientation did you LEAST
    APPRECIATE and feel is MOST IN NEED OF
    IMPROVEMENT?

5
Level 1 - Reaction
  • Important to include closed-ended items including
    rating scales e.g.,
  • How effective was the Orientation program
    overall in helping you to make a transition to
    university?
  • not at all effective
    very effective
  • 1 2
    3 4 5 6 7
  • How useful was the initial information
    session on the predictors of success in first
    year?
  • not at all useful
    very useful
  • 1 2
    3 4 5 6 7
  • As well as open-ended items
  • What else would you have liked included in the
    Orientation program today?

6
Level 1 - Reaction
  • Some FYE examples
  • Starting_at_Griffith Survey questions on Orientation
    (retrospective student survey)
  • School specific Orientation Program evaluation at
    the end of O-Day the Common Time (ongoing
    Orientation Program) student surveys, focus
    groups
  • Peer Mentoring Program final evaluation by
    mentors mentees

7
Level 2 - Learning
  • Measures what participants have learned from
    involvement in the program
  • What is measured needs to relate to what was
    covered in the program viz. learning objectives
  • Typically covers knowledge, skills, or attitudes
  • Needs to include both rating scales open-ended
    questions
  • Can include self-report tests of actual
    knowledge

8
Level 2 - Learning
  • Some examples
  • Student self-report
  • I feel confident that I know what to
    do to be successful academically
  • this semester
  • not at all confident
    very confident
  • 1 2 3
    4 5 6
    7
  • What have you learned about the
    transitions you will need to make as
  • a commencing student in order to be
    successful?
  • 2. Student knowledge
  • I know the name of my First Year
    Advisor yes no (circle one)
  • I know the difference between a
    lecture and a tutorial (circle one)
  • Strongly Disagree Disagree
    Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

9
Level 2 - Learning
  • Some FYE examples
  • Starting_at_Griffith Survey data evaluates learning
    outcomes in terms of knowledge attitudes (e.g.,
    knowing where to go to get help perceptions of
    good teaching)
  • Outcome evaluation for Peer Mentees (What are
    your 3 most important learnings from your
    participation in the Peer Mentoring Program?)
  • First-Assessment-First-Feedback amber alert
    intervention (What have you learned as a result
    of your participation?)

10
Level 3 - Behaviour
  • Measures the transfer of knowledge, skills
    attitudes from the training context to in vivo or
    real-life contexts (the classroom study).
  • Evaluate both before after the program if
    practical
  • Use survey, focus groups, interviews with
    students, mentors, staff (convenors, sessionals)
  • Starting_at_Griffith Survey (Did you attend
    Orientation? How much time are you spending on
    study?)

11
Level 3 - Behaviour
  • Some FYE examples
  • Starting_at_Griffith survey data
  • Attendance at E-Day, O-Day Common Time/ASP
    Program
  • Attendance at lectures tutes
  • Assessment submission rates in courses

12
Level 4 - Results
  • Measures return-on-investment, or the extent to
    which the program has produced results.
  • Some FYE examples include
  • Hard student outcomes such as -
  • pass rates in courses for assessment items
  • GPA in semester 1, 2 FY overall
  • student retention into year 2
  • Soft student outcomes such as
  • student satisfaction

13
Evaluation
  • Key question What difference do our FYOE
    interventions (e.g., Orientation, Peer Mentoring,
    Attendance, First Assessment Intervention etc.)
    make overall?
  • Program/Intervention?1 Reactions?2 Learning? 3
    Behaviour? 4 Overall Productivity/Result
  • Program/Intervention?Feel?Know?Do?what is the
    result or difference overall?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com