The New Accountability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation

The New Accountability


Part 1: Contractor s Accounting and Tax Update James C. Lundy, CPA Partner Davidson, Golden & Lundy Charlie Woodman, CPA Risk Finance Advisory Willis National ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: koe97


Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The New Accountability

  • The New Accountability
  • Part 1 Contractors Accounting and Tax Update
  • James C. Lundy, CPA
  • Partner
  • Davidson, Golden Lundy
  • Charlie Woodman, CPA
  • Risk Finance Advisory
  • Willis National Construction
  • 2011 Willis Construction Risk Management
  • April 21, 2011

Construction Industry - Current Trends and
  • The recession is not over
  • Certain sectors hit harder than others
    residential, retail, commercial building,
    hotel/motel, churches
  • Certain sectors have held steady healthcare,
    infrastructure, education, utility
  • Its not just a recession, its a correction.
  • Concern about construction materials price
    volatility and inflation fuel, asphalt, PVC,
    steel, cement, aggregates, copper, etc.
  • Escalator clauses are becoming more common
  • How strong is the guarantee behind your price
  • Supply bonds
  • Lower profit margins
  • 30 to 100 reductions
  • Increase in bidders and bid spreads

Construction Industry - Current Trends and
  • Increase in mergers and acquisitions
  • Strategic acquisitions
  • Buyers market - Steals - not Deals
  • Increase in self performed work
  • Too many contractors
  • Construction period or Gap financing
  • Extended period warranties
  • Overbilling vs. warranty reserve
  • Reporting issues
  • Generally, survivors are winners - construction
    fortunes have been made by being aggressive
    during recessions
  • Bankers and sureties are concerned

Overview of Financial Reporting for Contractors
  • Financial reporting is the responsibility of
    Owners, CFOs, Management, Controllers and
    Independent CPAs - all share the risk
  • Economic crisis has resulted in more reliance on
  • More scrutiny and analysis on financial reporting
    than prior years
  • Management, CPAs and Controllers have personal
    liability if intentionally misleading
  • Reliance by various users on financial
  • Sureties
  • Banks and finance companies
  • Regulatory boards - licensing
  • Owner and prime contractor prequalification
  • Suppliers
  • Stockholders (owners)
  • Joint venture partners
  • Unique methods and disclosures
  • Real world suggestions
  • Timeliness - delaying year end statements longer
    than 75 days is unacceptable monthly and
    quarterly reporting - 30 days
  • Honest communication is key
  • Surprises damage credibility job fade, claims,
  • The surety and bank are your Partners

Revenue Recognition
  • Commandments of Construction Reporting
  • Underbillings are bad
  • Unrecognized loss (fade) of poor cash flow
  • Historical support for underbilling recognition
  • Dumb or dishonest?
  • Professional skepticism
  • Overbillings are good, but should be in the bank
  • Positive ratio of non-borrowed cash to
  • Current Accounting Under SOP 81-1 Percentage of
    completion method is required
  • Cost to cost unless another method is more
  • No gross profit estimates in excess of historical
    without tangible documentation
  • Soft fade/gain analysis type of work, location,
  • Use caution when segregating and combining
  • Accurate phase coding is required

FASB / IASB Preliminary Document on Revenue
  • Exposure Draft issued June 24, 2010 (Topic
    605-35) final statement due in 2011 (replaces
    SOP 81-1 after 30 years)
  • Revenue recognition FASB proposes major changes
    to the way contractors account for revenue
    recognition. Under the proposal, contractors
    would be required to adopt new financial
    reporting techniques that may be more subjective
    compared to the current method, percentage of
    completion (POC).
  • Purpose Recognize revenue to depict the
    transfer of goods and services in an amount that
    reflects the consideration expected to be
    received for those goods and services.
  • A balance sheet approach that emphasizes
  • Unconditional obligation to pay
  • Legal title
  • Physical possession

Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard
  Current StandardRevenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts ASC 605-35 (Formerly SOP 81-1) Current StandardRevenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts ASC 605-35 (Formerly SOP 81-1) Proposed StandardRevenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers Topic 605 Proposed StandardRevenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers Topic 605
  Sub paragraph   Sub paragraph  
Profit Center 25-3 Basic presumption is that each contract is the profit center for revenue recognition, cost accumulation, and income measurement. Segmented is allowed under certain strict conditions. 12-16 Evaluate distinct performance obligations within each contract for separate revenue, cost accumulation, and income measurement. Combined obligations are allowed when activities are interdependent.
Method of Recording Revenue 25-51 Recognize income as work on a contract progresses. Incurred costs in relation to total estimated costs or other such measure of progress toward completion. Presumes ability to estimate total contract costs. 25 Recognize income when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service to a customer. The transfer occurs when the customer obtains control of that good or service.
Variable Contract Prices 25-60 Use most conservative estimate of revenue that is assured and likely to occur. When in doubt, use lowest probably level of profit until results can be estimated more precisely. 41 If the transaction price cannot be reasonably estimated, do not recognize revenue. If transaction can be reasonably estimated, recognize revenue from satisfied performance obligations when it can be estimated. Recommended to use weighted probability measures to determine transaction if entity has sufficient history of similar transactions.
Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard
  Current StandardRevenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts ASC 605-35 (Formerly SOP 81-1) Current StandardRevenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts ASC 605-35 (Formerly SOP 81-1) Proposed StandardRevenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers Topic 605 Proposed StandardRevenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers Topic 605
  Sub paragraph   Sub paragraph  
Contract Costs 25-34 Accumulated in same manner as inventory and charged to operations as related revenue from contracts is recognized. Includes direct and indirect costs. 58 Same as current standard with exceptions for procurement, mobilization, and inefficiency
    Procurement    Costs 25-39 Costs should be expensed unless they are recoverable under an active contract 59 Costs of obtaining a contract, including bid and proposals, and negotiations are expensed when incurred.
    Mobilization    Costs 25-41 Costs may be deferred and included in contract costs on receipt of anticipated contract. 57 Recognize these costs as an asset when they related directly to a contract, generate or enhance resources used for satisfying performance obligations, and are expected to be recovered. Amortize this asset ratably over the duration of the project.
Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard Comparison of Key Features of the Proposed Standard vs. Current Standard
  Current StandardRevenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts ASC 605-35 (Formerly SOP 81-1) Current StandardRevenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts ASC 605-35 (Formerly SOP 81-1) Proposed StandardRevenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers Topic 605 Proposed StandardRevenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers Topic 605
  Sub paragraph   Sub paragraph  
Change Orders        
    Approved 25-25 Contract Price Adjusted, cumulative catch up of revenue 17-19 Contract Price Adjusted, cumulative catch up of revenue
    Unpriced 25-87 If recovery probable (events necessary for recovery likely to occur), recognize revenue to extent of cost until approved. If changes are in dispute, evaluate as a claim. 41 Evaluated as variable consideration
    Claims 25-31 Reorganization appropriate only if probable that the claim will be sustained and amount can be reliably estimated. Record only to the extent of contract costs. In practice, not typically recorded until amounts have been received or awarded. May record as adjustment to contract if realization is beyond a reasonable doubt. 41 Evaluated as variable consideration
  • Why convergence with IFRS / US GAAP better
    information for users
  • A new focus on control and separation during the
    earnings process
  • But
  • Is the contract a continuous transfer of
    assets? Confusion over what satisfies
    performance obligations
  • Has the customer gained control of the work in
    process? If yes, percentage of completion
    method will be required
  • Interpretation that title of control does not
    transfer until contract completion, will require
    revenue recognition on the completed contract
  • Possible split of the revenue recognition model
    between goods (transfer upon sale of product),
    and services (continuous transfer through
    performance of tasks or series of tasks).
  • Leading to a new definition of construction
    contracts as a continuous delivery or process?

Other Issues
  • Specialized assets completed contracts progress
    billing percentage of completion (and Work In
  • Warranty costs result in revenue deferral vs.
    cost accrual
  • Warranties are an emerging issues
  • Change from cost to cost to units / labor hours
  • Uninstalled materials and timing
  • Unpriced change orders recognize profits?
  • Performance bonuses estimated at reporting date
  • Acceptance by sureties? A sometimes skittish
  • Tax?

  • New proposals to retain the current accounting
    principle SOP 81-1 for measuring revenue during
    the progress of a contract
  • Continue to pursue a carve out provision for
    revenue recognition with FASB for the
    construction industry
  • FASB wants to understand how the proposal will
    impact contractors income tax reporting
  • At this point FASB still plans to issue the new
    revenue recognition accounting standard in the
    second or third quarter of 2011, but admits
    significant issues on the proposal still exist.

Changes to Lease Accounting Could Impact
Contractors Finances
  • On August 17, 2010 FASB and IASB (Topic 840)
    draft accounting standard on lease accounting
    which attempts to ensure assets and liabilities
    arising from lease transactions are recognized in
    the statement of financial position (Balance
  • Currently (FASB 13)leases accounted under one of
    two ways operating lease or capital lease.
  • Capital (or financing) leases transfer
    substantially all of the risks and benefits of
    ownership to the lessee as if the lessee borrowed
    the money to purchase the property. Capital
    leases are treated similarly to a purchase of the
    underlying asset. On Balance Sheet Recognition
  • Operating leases are all other leases that are
    not classified as capital leases and are
    generally treated as rental of property, and the
    effects are recorded as rent expense over a
    straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
    Off Balance Sheet, with disclosure
  • A lease is deemed to be financing if
  • Ownership transfer
  • Bargain purchase options
  • Lease term gt than 75 of assets useful life
  • NPV of future lease payments is gt 90 of FMV of

New Lease FASB Discussion Paper (Topic 840)
  • FASB is going to fix SFAS 13, and make it more
    like IAS 17. Once again a balance sheet emphasis.
  • The preliminary conclusions of the board are
  • A lessee obtains the right-to-use an asset
  • The lessee creates a corresponding liability
  • Lease options do not require separate accounting.
    These include
  • ? Renewal options
  • ? Contingent rental arrangements
  • ? Guaranteed residual value requirements
  • The results of these preliminary conclusions will
    result in leases
  • - All being treated uniformly
  • - Not being capital versus operating leases
  • - Being treated as a single transaction
  • - Being treated as purchases of the asset
  • ?

New Lease FASB Discussion Paper (Topic 840)
  • The Accounting
  • A liability is recorded
  • - Based on the present value of the lease
  • - Payments reduce liability to zero
  • A corresponding asset is recorded
  • At cost (present value of lease payments)
  • Identified separately from owned assets
  • Amortized over the shorter of
  • - The lease term
  • - The economic life of the asset

New Lease FASB Discussion Paper (Topic 840)
  • Changes can affect liability and asset
  • Option to buy
  • Option price is included in liability
  • Exclusion of asset from owned assets not required
  • Topics not addressed in this opinion paper are
  • Impact on exploration and use of natural
    resources agreements
  • Treatment for non-core assets (such as airplanes
    for non-airlines)
  • Short-term lease contracts
  • In summary, the discussion paper indicates FASB
    is working to treat virtually all leases
  • under the existing capital lease rules, and
    significantly reduce off-balance sheet financing
    by operating leases.

Changes to Lease Accounting Impact
  • These changes could have a significant impact on
    construction entities that do a lot of financing
    through operating leases.
  • Due to the impact of the lease accounting
    changes, we will likely see lessees desire
    shorter term leases to reduce both the increased
    leverage and the impact of the increase in
    first-year lease costs. Lessors may be inclined
    to charge a higher price on leases to offset the
    additional risk they would be subjected to with
    shorter term leases.
  • These changes likely will not become effective
    until 2012. There are some actions that can be
    taken now to quantify and possibly reduce the
  • Determine if this is going to have a major impact
    on your business. If you lease a significant
    amount of assets, this accounting change is
    likely to have a larger impact on your
  • Quantify the impact of the proposed changes by
    considering all existing and potential future
    operating leases.
  • Review and analyze how your corporate agreements
    (e.g. loan documents, compensation agreements,
    etc.) are affected and if the agreements can and
    should be amended to take into consideration the
    changes solely due to the changes in lease

  • The AGC issued a formal comment letter to FASB
    detailing its concerns. These issues may be hard
    to resolve in this short time frame.
  • Accounting for lease transactions Under FASBs
    proposed model, all operating leases would be
    classified as capital, which could redefine the
    underwriting processes and covenants in the
    banking and surety industry. This will have a
    significant impact on contractors balance
    sheets, working capital, and leverage
  • No real effect to cash flow or existing tax law
  • May change job costing due to depreciation and
    capital cost charges
  • Operating ratios EBITDA
  • Proposing differentiation between equipment
    leases and real estate leases
  • How this impacts accounting for services such as
    cranes, scaffolding, and other sub-contractor
  • The need to separately address short-term rental
    arrangements or leases with terms less than a
    year or an operating cycle
  • Other ramifications
  • FAR Rents are allowed but interest and financing
    charges are disallowed
  • Sales taxcapital lease vs. rent classification
    creates sales tax consequences

FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48)
  • FIN 48- FASBs latest pronouncement in accounting
    for income taxes.
  • Released July 13, 2006 / Effective Date for Years
    Beginning on or After December 15, 2006
  • FIN 48 interprets FAS 109
  • Intent is to decrease the diversity in accounting
    for uncertainty in income tax financial statement
  • Prior to recognizing the benefit of a tax
    position for financial reporting purposes, the
    tax position must be more-likely-than-not (MLTN)
    of being sustained solely on its technical merits
    (excluding detection risk)
  • Tax positions recognized are reported at the
    largest amount that is MLTN to be sustained

FIN 48 As Applied
  • Evaluate each position for recognition. In order
    to recognize any amount of the benefit, the
    position must be MLTN of being sustained
  • The position will be examined
  • The examiner will have full knowledge of all
    relevant info
  • Evaluation based solely on technical merits
  • No offset or aggregation of positions
  • Should assume resolution in the court of last
  • May Not Take Into Account Audit Risk or The
    Likelihood of Being Audited
  • Sage Input
  • Overblown reaction by CPA profession?
  • Is it a reasonable method with substantial
    authority or frivolous?
  • Is it more likely than not (gt50) that the IRS
    will disallow?

Surety analyst email statement
  • There has been some discussion about FIN 48
    recently and I wanted to let everyone know how we
    see it affecting us as a Surety. First, keep in
    mind that a FIN is an interpretation and
    clarification of pre-existing GAAP CPAs were
    already required to disclose these issues.
    Simply stated, FIN 48 states that if an entity
    takes a tax position that is more likely than
    not to fail a tax examination, they must book a
    liability and include a disclosure reflecting
    such. Second, I think it is a good rule for the
    Surety, as users of the financial statements. It
    forces entities with whom we do business to
    disclose and quantify unreasonable tax positions,
    which will assist in our underwriting. A far
    more important issue is the necessity to disclose
    off balance sheet tax liabilities of pass through
    S-Corporations and LLCs.

Other Financial Reporting Items
  • Going Concern Opinion
  • Losses, significant debt and significant backlog
  • SAS 59 - Exposure draft issued to enhance - FASB
    issued Project Update on 10/21/09
  • Look forward 12 months or longer
  • FASB 165 Subsequent Events
  • Establishes cutoff date for evaluation of
    subsequent events
  • Recognized and unrecognized events
  • Concerns and issues with holding financial
    statements liability to CPAs if delay results
    in damages to user

Most Commonly Missed Disclosures and Format Errors
  • Will the disclosure affect the conclusions of the
  • Formatting errors
  • Balance sheet segregation and disclosure of
  • Retainage receivable and payable
  • Claims receivable and payable
  • Unbilled receivables
  • POC adjustments
  • Loss contract accrual
  • FIN 46 consolidation
  • Joint venture partial consolidation results in
    correct working capital recognition
  • Would the consolidation affect the users

Most Commonly Missed Disclosures and Format Errors
  • Accrual for self-insurance deductibles /
  • Accounts receivable
  • Aged receivable issue (over 90 days)
  • Claims and unapproved change orders (recognition
    of income to cost incurred)
  • Detailed and comprehensive disclosure of claims
    and unapproved C/Os
  • Facts and basis for the claim
  • Revenue recognized, if any
  • Detailed calculations, discounts and assumptions
  • Arbitration or court dates
  • Separate line item reporting on contract schedule
    to prevent POC cost to cost recognition

Most Commonly Missed Disclosures and Format Errors
  • Significant changes in contract estimates
  • SOP 94-6 disclosures for current and cumulative
    impact to revenue and gross profit
  • Loss contract accrual calculation
  • Backlog
  • Key consideration in going concern determination
  • Backlog gross profit calculation on contract
  • Backlog subcontracted - bonded?
  • FIN 45 off balance sheet guarantees
  • Surety bonds issued and outstanding

Most Commonly Missed Disclosures and Format Errors
  • Equity with characteristics of liabilities (FAS
  • Mandatory buy sell liability
  • Callable preferred stock
  • Subordination agreements
  • Tax liabilities of pass through entities (S-Corp
  • Not in SOP 81-1, but
  • Current and deferred liabilities
  • Management intention to distribute cash
  • Consideration of accrued distribution

Tax Update on Rent-A-Captives / Segregated Cell
  • Sponsored Facilities
  • Rent-A-Captives
  • Agency Captives
  • Carrier Captives
  • Key Insureds and Captive Owners are usually
    unrelated entities.

IRS View of Cell Taxation
  • In 2005, the IRS asked the industry how cell
    captives should be taxed and the industry
  • In 2008, the IRS stated how it would test the
    presence of insurance and the deductibility of
    the premium by the insured. It advised how it
    was considering treating the cell for tax
    purposes, but asked for comments before it made a
    final decision
  • Rev. Rul. 2008-8 insurance is determined on a
    cell-by-cell basis if there is insurance, the
    insured can deduct it.
  • Notice 2008-19 the IRS currently intends to
    treat each cell as its own insurance company and
    all elections will be made on a cell-by-cell
    basis but, the IRS is seeking comments before it
    makes its final decision. The final rules will
    not go into effect until the first taxable year
    beginning more than 12 months after the date the
    final decision is published.
  • The Notice does not state how the cells will be
    taxed in the interim.

Cell Rent Session / 28
Proposed Treasury Regs (9/14/2010)
  • A Domestic Cell (or series in a series LLC) will
    be taxed as a separate entity.
  • The same applies to a Foreign Cell (or series),
    if the Cell (series) would be an insurance
  • Each cell gets its own EIN and files its own
  • Each cell makes its own elections.
  • Effective when regulations are finalized.

Cell Rent Session / 29
Grandfather Rule in Proposed Treasury Regs
(9/14/2010) if all below are met
  • There is a grandfather rule if all tests are
  • The cell company was established before September
    14, 2010
  • The cell conducted business (if a foreign cell,
    more than half its business was insurance) before
    September 14, 2010
  • If foreign, the cell classification is relevant
    technical requirement
  • No cell owner treats the cells as a separate
    entity for any taxable year
  • The cell and cell company had a reasonable basis
    for their historic treatment
  • Neither the cell, cell company, nor owner was
    under audit for the cell treatment on or before
    September 14, 2010
  • Grandfathering ceases if 50 or more of the vote
    or value of the cell company or cell is owned by
    those other than those who owned them on
    September 14, 2010

Cell Rent Session / 30
  • Foreign Bank Account Reporting
  • New amnesty
  • Not as generous as last years
  • Signal for aggressive enforcement in the future
  • Tax treaty partners

  • The New Accountability
  • Part 2 Compliance and Audit Discussion
  • James C. Lundy, CPA
  • Partner
  • Davidson, Golden Lundy
  • Charlie Woodman, CPA
  • Risk Finance Advisory
  • Willis National Construction
  • 2011 Willis Construction Risk Management
  • April 21, 2011

Why Cost Accounting is So Important
  • It Helps In
  • Bidding
  • Determining problem projects
  • Supporting change order pricing
  • Claims process
  • Reconciling job costs to financial reports
  • Making better decisions
  • Making expansion less frightening
  • Todays focus Supporting Audits
  • Commercial
  • Governmental
  • Tax

What is a Contract Compliance Audit
  • Compares costs billed to costs incurred
  • Compares costs billed to allowable costs
  • Compares fees (formula and rates) to contract
  • Confirms contract procedures were followed
  • Confirms owners administrative procedures were
  • Assures that owner is not overpaying especially
    on reimbursable costs
  • Keeps contractor accounting staffs on edge
  • Keeps forensic accountants and the DCAA (and like
    kind agencies) employed

If Youre Not Prepared What Can A Contract
Compliance Audit Do
  • Create tension
  • Cause ill will and jeopardize relationships
  • Distract employees and incur significant cost
  • Highlight contract vagaries
  • Lead to penalties and fines
  • Cause future contract / bid disqualification or
  • The biggest failures
  • disorganization
  • poor contract negotiation or understanding of
    terms and conditions
  • inability to support or defend cost allowability,
    cost determination, and information / data

Success Strategies
  • Adhere to planned project procedures and document
    any deviations, including source, reasoning and
    resulting impacts
  • Know all contract terms conditions prior to
    start, reconcile any provisions that are vague /
    use, where practical, hard rate terms especially
    for reimbursable items
  • Maintain and keep accessible records and files
    throughout the project
  • Conduct cash to cost to projection reconciliation
    regularly and anticipate audit issues preemptively

Contract Terms for Focus
  • Audit scope and processes
  • Recordkeeping requirements and data support
  • Reporting requirements, timing and content
  • Pre-established costs for specific project
  • General conditions pricing
  • Self-performed work rates or equipment usage
  • Approved mark-up rates
  • Change order minimum rates
  • Acceptable cost support documentation especial
    for cost-plus or reimbursement
  • Disclose related party transactions
  • Address rebates and cost caps
  • Specific measureables (e.g., efficacy) and
  • Guarantees and warranties
  • Cost sharing

The Federal Government and Insurance Costs
  • So what
  • Insurance costs are generally recoverable under
    government awards, but can be long tail
  • Establishing well-defined processes and proper
    accounting are key practices to achieve recovery
    of insurance costs
  • Certain practices EC contractors employ for
    commercial contracts (e.g. lump sum) may be
    questioned by government auditors
  • Government regulations may require a different
  • Government auditor may believe a different
    practice is necessary
  • Typical existing practices
  • Measuring cost of self-insurance based on losses
    incurred rather than a projected average loss
  • Self-insurance charges not in accordance with
    accepted actuarial principles
  • Insurance costs based on premiums charged from
    captive insurers or companies under common
    control of contractor
  • Insurance programs have not been approved

  • Key regulation for accounting for insurance
  • Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 416, Accounting
    for Insurance Costs
  • Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 403, Accounting
    for Home Office Costs
  • FAR 31.205-19, Insurance and Indemnification
  • FAR 31.201-5, Credits
  • FAR 28.3, Insurance
  • When to evaluate your current accounting
    practices for insurance costs?
  • Contracts will be CAS covered
  • Contracts subject to Federal Acquisition
    Regulation 31.205-19, Insurance and
  • Full text of FAR clauses can be found at
  • Full text of Cost Accounting Standards can be
    found at http//

Identifying CAS and FAR in contracts
  • Typically, CAS and FAR requirements are disclosed
  • Contract and subcontract solicitation documents
  • Draft contract terms and conditions
  • Solicitation representations and certifications
  • Draft contract clauses to be incorporated by
    reference in the awarded contract
  • FAR cost principles may apply in other
    circumstances where the original contract did not
    require application of FAR cost principles
  • Change order proposals
  • Cost reimbursement or progress payment requests
  • Equitable adjustment claims
  • Termination clauses

CAS Coverage
  • The CAS are governed by the CAS Board and
    currently consists of 19 separate standards.
  • The CAS can be imposed on a contractor under the
    following circumstances
  • By reference by the Federal Acquisition
    Regulation (FAR)
  • Modified CAS coverage Single federal contract or
    subcontract greater than 7.5 million but less
    than 50 million
  • Full CAS Coverage Federal contracts or
    subcontracts greater than 50 million or Net
    Federal CAS-covered contracts received by the
    contractor totaling 50 million or more during
    the preceding cost accounting period

FAR Cost Principles
  • FAR Part 31 Applicability
  • Cost reimbursable contracts
  • Fixed price contracts priced based on submission
    of certified cost or pricing data
  • Cost principles in effect when contract awarded
    applicable for life of contract, with certain
  • Allowable costs limited by FAR Part 31 and CAS
  • Includes FAR 31.205-19, Insurance and

Basic CAS Insurance Accounting Concepts
  • CAS includes an express requirement that the
    amount of insurance cost assigned to a period is
    the projected average loss for that period plus
    insurance administration expense
  • Because CAS requires a projected average loss,
    measuring insurance costs based on actual losses
    is limited to circumstances where actual losses
    will not vary significantly from a projected
    average loss
  • Under the CAS 416 concept, a risk of loss is
    covered by either purchased insurance, payments
    to a trusteed fund or self-insurance
  • Applied
  • Projected average loss means the estimated
    long-term average loss per period for periods of
    comparable exposure to risk of loss.
  • Self-insurance means the assumption or retention
    of the risk of loss by the contractor, whether
    voluntarily or involuntarily. This includes the
    deductible portion of purchased insurance.
  • Self-insurance charge means a cost which
    represents the projected average loss under a
    self-insurance plan. Because CAS requires a
    projected average loss, measuring insurance costs
    based on actual losses is limited to
    circumstances where actual losses will not vary
    significantly from a projected average loss .

FAR Part 31, Cost Principles Allowability
  • Factors for determining allowability A cost is
    allowable only when the cost complies with all of
    the following requirements
  • Reasonableness Allocability
  • Cost accounting standards, or otherwise generally
    accepted accounting principles and practices
    appropriate to the circumstances
  • Terms of the contract
  • FAR subpart 31.2 limitations
  • Costs of insurance required by contract are
  • Costs of general insurance are allowable if
    reasonable and measured, assigned and allocated
    in accordance with the requirements of CAS 416
  • Costs of business interruption insurance must
    exclude coverage for lost profits
  • Self-insurance program approval is required when
  • 50 or gt of the self-insurance costs allocable to
    negotiated government contracts
  • Self-insurance costs for the fiscal year are
    anticipated gt200k

Purchased Insurance Premiums
  • The projected average loss (PAL) starts with the
    premium cost
  • If covers more than one cost accounting period,
    pro rate costs over the period covered (prepaid
    insurance account)
  • If insurance is purchased specifically for and
    directly allocated to a single cost objective
    (e.g. job), do not need to pro rate
  • The applicable portion of any income, rebate,
    allowance, or other credit relating to any
    allowable cost and received by or accruing to the
    contractor shall be credited to the Government
    either as a cost reduction or by cash refund.
  • Includes refunds, dividends or additional
  • Must be recognized as an adjustment to the pro
    rata premium costs in the earliest period in
    which it is actually or constructively received

Insurance Reserves
  • IBNR (Incurred But Not Reported)
  • Reasonable reserves for IBNR should not be
    considered deposits and related premiums reflect
    insurance costs
  • While generally understood by Government
    reviewers to be a common feature, may be concern
    that reserves are too large
  • If Government reviewer considers reserve
    unreasonably large, may question a portion of the
    reserve and the related insurance cost
  • To lessen risk of issues with purchased insurance
    reserves, contractors and insurance carriers
    should be prepared to demonstrate that reserves
    are reasonable based on
  • Exposure to loss
  • Actual loss experience
  • Loss Trending and / or Inflation
  • Loss development experience or lag studies
  • Discounting reserves not expressly required by
    CAS 416, but DCAA guidance suggests reserves may
    be subject to present value discounting

FAR 31.205-19(b) Captive Insurance
  • Mistake to account for payments to a captive as
    purchased insurance
  • Exception when able to demonstrate that captive
    sells insurance to general public in substantial
    quantities and insurance charges reflect market
  • Contractor should plan to measure captive
    insurance as self-insurance, unless Captive
    sells the coverage commercially and premiums paid
    by the contractor can be demonstrated to be based
    on market prices
  • Must treat Government as a Favored Insured
  • Group Captives will generally be treated as
    purchased insurance with limitations for
    deductible or A-Layer accounts.

Measurement of Self-insurance Charges
  • With significant self-insurance, typical
    practices for recovering insurance costs are
    establishing methods for
  • 1.Estimating annual projected average losses
  • 2.Allocating self-insurance charges to segments
    and cost objectives (jobs)
  • Under CAS 416, three ways to measure projected
    average loss (PAL)
  • 1.Actual Losses actual amount of losses (where
    actual losses not expected to differ
    significantly from PAL)
  • 2.Comparable Purchased Insurance Estimate of the
    PAL based on the cost of insurance that could be
    purchased for the self-insured risk
  • 3.Actuarial Measurement self-insurance charge
    based on the contractors or industry experience
    and anticipated conditions in accordance with
    generally accepted actuarial principles
  • The total of self-insured charges plus insurance
    charges must not exceed guaranteed cost insurance
    for the same exposures

Measurement of Self-insurance Charges
  • However, when the self-insurance charge is not
    based on actual losses or the cost of comparable
    purchased insurance, CAS 416 indicates
  • Insurance charge must take relevant experience
    and expected conditions into account
  • Must be in accordance with accepted actuarial
  • Outside quotes / broker indications are allowable
  • May lessen risk of Government challenge if
    estimate is performed by an actuary and true
    ups are made (though not expressly required by
    CAS, the DCAA
  • CAS Board and DCAAs position appear inconsistent
  • Contractors should be aware of DCAAs
    interpretation and recognize risk that DCAA may
    challenge self-insurance accounting practice that
    does not include true up adjustments
  • Contractors may use DCAAs favored practice to
    lessen potential disagreement
  • Should clearly document practice in CAS
    Disclosure Statement or other document
  • Consider agreements with the Contracting Officer
    on cost measurement, e.g. through a Memorandum of

Allocation of insurance costs under CAS 416
Home Office
  • Commonly allocated home office costs
  • Purchased insurance
  • Self-insurance
  • Administrative costs
  • Main allocation concepts
  • 1.Insurance costs and losses allocated directly
    to segments (to maximum extent possible)
  • 2.If not allocated directly to segments,
    allocation base should reflect factors used to
    determine premium or self-insurance charge
  • 3.Material administrative costs are to be
    allocated same as related premium or
    self-insurance charge

DCAA Audit Guidance Allocation of Insurance Costs
  • 1st and most important in determining if
    insurance costs reasonable and/or allocable is to
    review policy coverage
  • If policy provides coverage for general practice,
    allocation of costs to all contracts through GA
    generally acceptable
  • If policy provides unique coverage (e.g. for a
    particular segment), costs should be allocated
    directly to the benefiting cost object
  • Auditors may challenge allocations
  • Auditor may review loss and claims experience to
    challenge a broad-based allocation (GA) if can
    determine policy provides unique coverage (e.g.
    punitive affirmative wrap)

Summary Government Contracts Insurance Costs
  • Insurance accounting under government regulations
    is complex and interpreting regulations can be
  • Insurance costs are generally recoverable under
    government awards
  • Establishing well-defined processes and proper
    accounting are key practices to achieve recovery
    of insurance costs
  • Can be applied directly or conceptually to
    non-Federal work.
  • Grants
  • Cooperative Agreement
  • State and Local Contracting Regulations
  • The Contract itself

Other Construction Issues During the Recession
  • Prequalification of contract owners
  • Verification of project financing
  • Credit verification
  • What entity is signing the contract?
  • Prequalification of subcontractors
  • Bonded subcontractors
  • Credit report and review of financial statement
  • Verification of payment of materials

Other Construction Issues During the Recession
  • Monthly meetings between project management and
  • Bid spread jobs
  • Underbillings
  • Claims or change orders
  • Receivable and retainage collection - cash flow
  • Jobsite and office theft
  • Cost control
  • Labor reporting - daily time sheets
  • Phase code comparisons
  • Re-think every cost and expense

IRS Audits Issues Strategies for Contractors
  • IRS being directed to "greet" many more taxpayers
  • A. Wall Street Journal column states that IRS
    looks to audit 300,000 to 400,000 small to
    mid-size businesses (5 million to 50 million
  • B. Audits can consist of office review of tax
    return (most returns) or full field audit
  • C. Appearance of return, large rounded numbers,
    and confusing terminology can add to odds of full
    field audit
  • D. Don't let the threat of an IRS audit change
    the way you do business but be prepared if one

IRS Audits Issues Strategies for Contractors
  • Intercompany and related party transactions
    attract immediate attention
  • A. Document all related party transactions with
    minutes, invoices, contracts and calculations
  • B. Be specific about intercompany payments. Use
    Office Expense, Accounting Services or Shop
    Costs vs. "Management Fees" or "Consulting
  • C. Calculate exact amounts vs. round numbers
  • D. Make payments monthly, quarterly, etc. vs.
    during year end audit (adjustments at year end
    appear to be manipulating profits)
  • E. Document related party business purpose (rent,
    bond indemnity, loan guarantee, equity, or
    working capital requirements)

IRS Audits Issues Strategies for Contractors
  • Audit technique is to review revenue and "cost of
    goods sold" (direct costs)
  • A. Most auditors do not understand construction
  • B. Make it easy for them. Prepare schedules and
    statements that agree to tax returns. Give them a
    file of documents that they can keep.
  • C. Auditors will review financial statements and
    footnotes for relationships, claims filed and
  • D. IRS will select a sample of contract activity.
    They have been told that contractors use company
    funds to build personal assets!
  • E. Accrued expenses (claims, workers comp.,
    etc.) not paid by March 15 are not deductible.
    Adjust costs to complete contracts instead.
  • F. Prepare look-back tax returns. Form 8697 for
    company (or individual if company is an S
    Corporation or LLC).

IRS Audits Issues Strategies for Contractors
IRS Audits Issues Strategies for Contractors
IRS Audits Issues Strategies for Contractors
  • James C. Lundy, CPA
  • Partner
  • Davidson, Golden Lundy
  • Charlie Woodman, CPA
  • Risk Finance Advisory
  • Willis National Construction
  • 2011 Willis Construction Risk Management
  • April 21, 2011
  • Questions Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)