Non%20invasive%20fibrosis%20markers%20%20%20and/or%20liver%20biopsy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Non%20invasive%20fibrosis%20markers%20%20%20and/or%20liver%20biopsy

Description:

Non invasive fibrosis markers and/or liver biopsy Pierre Bedossa Department of Pathology, H pital Beaujon, Paris-Denis Diderot University FRANCE – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:157
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Utilis97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Non%20invasive%20fibrosis%20markers%20%20%20and/or%20liver%20biopsy


1
Non invasive fibrosis markers and/orliver
biopsy
  • Pierre Bedossa
  • Department of Pathology, Hôpital Beaujon,
  • Paris-Denis Diderot University
  • FRANCE

2
FIBROSIS IN HEPATITIS C
From Z. Goodman
  • Physiopathology the hallmark of an unresolved
    chronic inflammatory disease
  • Pathologist extracellular matrix deposit in
    association with architectural change
  • Hepatologist A major endpoint for treatment of
    patient and assessing prognosis

3
Several tools for assessing liver fibrosis
  • Physical examination
  • Liver Biopsy the gold standard
  • Imaging (ultrasound, MRI)
  • Serum markers
  • Stiffness (US, MRI)

4
Liver biopsy
  • Evaluation of fibrosis Staging
    systems
  • Amount of fibrosis
  • Location of fibrosis
  • Architectural changes
  • Stage of fibrosis is more complex than fibrosis
    amount

5
Staging of fibrosis with biopsy has clinical
relevance
Histological stage of fibrosis predict
progression to cirrhosis
Cumulative rate of progression to cirrhosis over
time according to stage of fibrosis on initial
biopsy M. Yano et al. The long-term
pathological evolution of chronic hepatitis C.
Hepatology 1996 231334-1340
6
Staging of fibrosis with biopsy has clinical
relevance
Histological stage of fibrosis predict
liver-related complications liver related
death
Survival to liver-related complications according
to liver fibrosis stage on initial biopsy
Survival to liver transplantation or
liver-related death according to liver fibrosis
stage on initial biopsy
  • MH. Khan et al. Which patients with hepatitis C
    develop liver complications? Hepatology 2000
    31513-520

7
Staging of fibrosis with biopsy has therapeutic
relevance
  • Histological stage of fibrosis predicts response
    to bitherapy in HCV
  • Retreatment in non responder and relapser (EPIC
    study)EPIC study, AASLD 2007)

Sustained Virologic Response Rates by METAVIR
score Overall and Among Patients with
Undetectable HCV-RNA at Treatment Week 12.
8
Liver biopsy the best not the gold standard
  • Observer variation
  • Sampling error

9
Liver biopsy a reliable procedure
  • Interobserver variation
  • Histologic scoring systems increases reliability
    of evaluation
  • Specialized liver pathologists insure low
    interobserver variation
  • Sampling error
  • Biopsy of adequate length reduces risk of
    sampling error
  • Metavir, Hepatology 1994, Goldin et al, J
    Hepatol, 1996, Westin et al, Liver 2004
  • MC Rousselet et al. Hepatology 2005
  • Coloredo et al J Hepatol 2005, Guido et al
    Semin Liv Diseases, 2004, Bedossa et al.
    Hepatology 2004

10
Fibrosis is homogeneously distributed in viral
hepatitis
F1 F2
F4
Size AUROC F01 vs F234 AUROC F0 to F1 AUROC F1 to F2
5mm 0.81 0.70 0.72
10mm 0.92 0.78 0.78
15mm 0.95 0.80 0.83
of accurate staging
Biopsy length (mm)
Hepatology. 2003 Dec38(6)1449-57.
11
Liver biopsy adverse events
  • The risks
  • The tricks
  • Bleeding
  • Pain, anxiety, discomfort
  • Vaso-vagal episode
  • Biliary peritonitis, pneumothorax
  • (death)
  • Ultrasound guidance
  • Transjugular route
  • Follow-up in day care unit
  • Experienced physician
  • Reduced number of passes

Gained informations Risks of an provided by
the LB invasive procedure
12
A NEED FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TO LIVER BIOPSY
1- Non invasive, simple, reproducible
2- Staging as accurate as liver biopsy
3- Providing other histopath. informations than
fibrosis, relevant for patient management
13
FIBROSCAN
  • Vibration transmitted toward the liver produces
    elastic shear wave
  • Measurement of the velocity of wave propagation
    with ultrasound.
  • Assessment of stiffness (2.5 75 kPa)
  • Hypothesis Fibrosis // stiffness

14
RATIONAL OF FIBROSCAN
Normal liver soft
Cirrhosis hard High viscosity Low
viscosity Slow velocity High
velocity Low stiffness High stiffness
15
FIBROSCAN - Results
Friedreich-Rust et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
2008134960974
16
FIBROSCAN Stage by Stage
From Castera et al. J Hepatol 2008833-847
  • Major overlap between adjacent stages

17
FIBROSCAN - Summary
  • Rational behind
  • Easy and quick to perform
  • Excellent performance to dichotomizing between
    advanced / non advanced fibrosis
  • Overlap between adjacent stages
  • Assess stiffness, not fibrosis
  • Other histopathologic lesions influencing liver
    stiffness steatosis, acute inflammation,
    congestion.
  • Pending questions
  • stiffness // fibrosis ?
  • Stiffness gt fibrosis study with clinical
    end-points needed

18
SERUM MARKERS FOR FIBROSIS
  • Fibrotest (Imbert-Bismuth et al. Lancet 2001)
  • Haptoglobine ?2macro. ApoA1 GGT ALAT
    Bilirubine
  • APRI (Way et al., Hepatology 2003)
    Plaquettes ASAT
  • Forns et al. (Hepatology 2002) Plaquette
    GGT âge cholesterol
  • Fibrometre, Fib 4, Hepascore, SHASTA, Fibrospect,
    Glycomics

19
Building a serum marker for fibrosis
A
C
E
G
I
K
M
B
D
F
H
J
L
LIVER BIOPSY
C
J
G
M
  • Non hypothesis-based research
  • Modelization of histological staging
  • Dependent of liver biopsy performance

20
Fibrotest - Fibrosure
Mild vs significant fibrosis
Poynard et al. BMC gastroenterology 2007
21
SERUM MARKER Summary
  • Non invasive
  • Easily accessible
  • Highly reproducible
  • Performant for distinction between significant
    and non significant fibrosis
  • Not approved for distinction between adjacent
    stages
  • Impacted by limits of the biopsy procedure

22
Liver biopsy and/or non invasive markersWhere
are we now ?
  • Reluctance for biopsy from patients and
    physicians
  • High commercial pressure
  • Biopsy is not any more a mandatory procedure in
    chronic hepatitis C
  • No consensus, actualised official recommendations
    should be useful

23
A biopsy is not useful
  • Obvious cirrhosis, no comorbidity, no macronodule
  • No discussion for treatment
  • Patient belongs to a subgroup with high
    probability of treatment response
  • Treatment is indicated because of extra-hepatic
    manifestation
  • Patients will not be treated because of
    contraindications to the treatment
  • Screening of advanced fibrosis non-invasive
    markers

24
A biopsy is useful
  • A biopsy is needed only when the patient will
    have potential benefit from the informations
    provided by the biopsy
  • Any unclear situation
  • Comorbidity
  • Obesity or overweight, diabetes, metabolic
    syndrom
  • Alcohol consumption
  • Immunosupression.
  • Staging of fibrosis (F0,1,2,3,4) is needed

25
When fibrosis staging (biopsy) is needed ?
  • Patients difficult to treat or to manage staging
    needed for adequate timing of treatment
  • not too early antiviral therapies have adverse
    effects, are costly and only partly efficient
  • not too late decrease SVR if septal fibrosis or
    cirrhosis
  • Accuracy provided by biopsy useful for adequate
    treatment of most patient with CHC to avoiding
    lost chance or unnecessary treatment.
  • Non invasive procedure have not a sufficient
    degree of precision

Heathcote EJ et al. NEJM 2000
26
Liver biopsy and comorbidity in Hepatitis C
CV
PT
Chronic hepatitis C (1b) with metabolic syndrom
(Sirius red staining) Serum marker F4
Elasticity 14 Kpa
27
Liver biopsy and unexpected features in hepatitis
C
  • In the context of the high burden of CHC,
    clinical symptoms or abnormal liver tests can be
    related to unsuspected disease
  • Added diagnosis in CHC 2.3 - 13.9
  • Steatohepatitis (9)
  • Granuloma
  • Auto-immunity
  • Iron overload

Saadeh, Hepatology 2001, Spycher, BMC Gastro
2001 Bedossa P Hepatology 2007
28
Take-home messages
  • Liver biopsy remains the best standard available
    to assess fibrosis
  • Non invasive markers and biopsy have not the same
    accuracy for fibrosis evaluation
  • When only screening for advanced fibrosis is
    required, non-invasive markers or Fibroscan can
    be used
  • When staging of fibrosis is needed, liver biopsy
    is the only tool available
  • Performance of surrogate markers are close each
    others
  • In hepatitis C, liver biopsy can provide other
    clinically relevant informations than an
    histological score of fibrosis

29
American Gastroenterological Association
Technical Review on the Management of Hepatitis
C JL Dienstag, J MacHutchison. GASTROENTEROLOGY
2006130231264
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com