Writing Quality Specifications July 9, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Writing Quality Specifications July 9, 2004

Description:

TGDC Meeting Writing Quality Specifications July 9, 2004 Mark Skall Acting Director, Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: lynnero6
Learn more at: https://www.nist.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Writing Quality Specifications July 9, 2004


1
Writing Quality SpecificationsJuly 9, 2004
TGDC Meeting
  • Mark Skall
  • Acting Director, Information Technology
    Laboratory
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • mark.skall_at_nist.gov

2
Background
  • NIST works with industry and Federal agencies to
    develop standards and tests to improve the
    quality of software and achieve interoperable
    solutions
  • NIST has many years experience with
  • Formal standards organizations and Consortia
    (W3C, OASIS, ANSI, ISO, IEEE, HL7)
  • Helping to develop good specifications
  • Developing conformance test suites, tools,
    reference implementations
  • Developing validation and certification testing
    programs

3
Moving Towards Trust and Confidence
Specification
Requirements
Implementation
Conformance
Testing activities
4
Good Specifications are the Key
  • Goal is correct, reliable software
  • Requirements are captured in a specification
  • Spec must use appropriate language to designate
    requirements
  • Spec must be precise, unambiguous, and testable
  • Spec must contain a conformance clause
  • Ideal spec would be defined in a formal language
    not English

5
Specs Must Use Appropriate Language to Designate
Requirements
  • MUST, MUST NOT, SHALL, SHALL NOT are
    examples of mandatory requirements
  • SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, MAY, RECOMMEND are
    not mandatory, but are often used. If used, they
    have no bearing on conformance
  • Good enough, Do the best you can is not
    appropriate language. They are not precise, and
    cant be tested

6
Specifications Must Be Precise
  • A requirement is precise if one can determine if
    the requirement has been fulfilled
  • An imprecise requirement
  • Systems shall guard against viruses, trojan
    horses, and worms.
  • A precise requirement
  • An anti-virus program (from an approved list)
    shall be installed on ones system and anti-virus
    software checks and live updates shall be run
    daily.

7
Specifications Must Be Unambiguous
  • The girl touched the cat with a feather
  • Meaning
  • (a) The girl touched (the cat with a feather) or

  • (b) (The girl touched the cat) with a feather
  • Does the girl or the cat have
    a feather?

8
Specs Must Be Testable
  • If a requirement cannot be tested (i.e., a method
    cannot be devised to determine whether a
    particular requirement is met) one cannot verify
    that it has been satisfied
  • Reformulate it so it can be tested or
  • Eliminate the requirement from the standard
  • Testable assertions will be derived from
    normative statements in the specification
    (must, must not, shall, shall not...)
  • Unspecified, ambiguous, or imprecise requirements
    cannot be tested

9
Conformance Clause
  • Conformance is the fulfillment of a product,
    process, or service of specified requirements
  • A conformance clause is a high-level description
    of what is required of implementers and
    application developers. Its a section of a
    specification that states all the requirements or
    criteria that must be satisfied to claim
    conformance to the specification.
  • Who (what types of entities) may conform
  • How - What must they do to conform?
  • It may, for conformance purposes, refer to
    functional subsets, such as profiles, levels, or
    other structures.
  • Additionally it should specify the permissibility
    of extensions, options, and alternative
    approaches and how they are to be handled.

10
What Makes a Good Spec
  • NIST is working with W3C to define how a spec
    should be written
  • Addresses what a spec should contain with respect
    to conformance and testability
  • Addresses
  • How to define conformance
  • How to sub-divide a spec
  • Discretionary items
  • Extensions
  • Test assertions

11
Relevant NIST Efforts
  • Guidance on writing better specifications
  • W3C Quality Assurance effort
  • OASIS Conformance Requirements for Specs document
  • Conformance advisory
  • Test methods and techniques
  • Automatic Test Generation from formal
    specification
  • Automatic Test Generation using XML Technologies
  • Software Component Integration Testing
  • Adaptable Conformance Test Method
  • Develop XML conformance tests
  • National Software Reference Library (NSRL) to
    determine whether software has been altered

12
Contact
  • For more information, please contact
  • Mark Skall
  • mark.skall_at_nist.gov
  • 301-975-3262
  • http//www.itl.nist.gov/div897/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com