Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Transport of Active and Passive Scalars above Urban Heat Island in Stably Stratified Environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Transport of Active and Passive Scalars above Urban Heat Island in Stably Stratified Environment

Description:

Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Transport of Active and Passive Scalars above Urban Heat Island in Stably Stratified Environment Albert F. Kurbatskii – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Transport of Active and Passive Scalars above Urban Heat Island in Stably Stratified Environment


1
Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Transport of
Active and Passive Scalars above Urban Heat
Island in Stably Stratified Environment
  • Albert F. Kurbatskii
  • Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of
    Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch
  • Russia, Novosibirsk

2
Introduction
  • ?For stratified atmospheric flows the LES models
    and third-order closure models should be
    considered as fundamental research tools because
    of their large computer demands.
  • ?A growing need for detailed simulations of
    turbulent structures of stably stratified flows
    motivates the development and verification of
    computationally less expensive closure models for
    applied research in order to reduce computational
    demands to a minimum.

3
Objectives
  • ?The principal aim of this investigation is the
    development of turbulent transport model for the
    simulation of the urban-heat-island structure and
    pollutant dispersion in the stably stratified
    environment.

4
Objectives
  • ?The algebraic modeling techniques can be used in
    order to obtain for buoyant flows the fully
    explicit algebraic model for turbulent fluxes of
    the momentum, heat and mass.
  • ? The principal object of this work is the
    development of three-four-parametric
  • turbulence model minimizes difficulties in
    simulating the turbulent transport in stably
    stratified environment and reduces efforts needed
    for the numerical implementation of model.

5
The mathematical model of the urban heat-island
  • ? The penetrative turbulent convection is induced
    by the constant heat flux H0 from the surface of
    a plate with diameter D. It simulates a prototype
    of an urban heat island with the low-aspect-ratio
    plume (zi / D 1) under near calm conditions and
    stably stratified atmosphere.

6
The mathematical model of the urban heat-island
  • ?The mixing height, zi , is defined as a height
    where the maximum negative difference between the
    temperature in the center of the plume and the
    ambient temperature Ta is achieved.

7
The mathematical model of the urban heat-island
?The problem of the development and evolution
turbulent circulation above a heat island is
assumed to be axisymmetric. ? At the initial
moment the medium is at rest and it is stably
stratified.
8
Limitations of Laboratory Measurements for
Full-scale Simulation
  • There are important limitations utilized in the
    laboratory experiment and simulation of the real
    urban heat-island in the nighttime atmosphere
  • ?Very large heat fluxes from the heater surfaces
  • ?Very strong temperature gradients that required
    to obtain the low aspect ratios (zi/D) and small
    Froude numbers.

9
Governing Equations
  • Governing equations describing the
    turbulent circulation above a heat island can be
    written in the hydrostatic approximation at
    absence of the Coriolis force and radiation with
    use a Boussinesq approximation.

10
Governing Equations in RANS-approach
11
  • Transport Equations
  • for heat and mass fluxes

12
Explicit Algebraic Expressions for Turbulent
Fluxes
  • ?The explicit algebraic models for the
    turbulent heat flux vector and turbulent mass
    vector were derived by truncation of the closed
    transport equations for turbulent fluxes of heat
    and concentration by assuming weak equilibrium,
    but retaining all major flux production terms.
  • ? For turbulent stresses we applied eddy
    viscosity expression.

13
  • CLOSURE full explicit turbulent fluxes models
    for active (heat) and passive (mass) scalars

14
Three-Equation ModelE - ?- ??2?
  • ?The closure of expressions for the turbulent
    stresses and heat flux vector is achieved by
    solving the equations for turbulent kinetic
    energy, its dissipation rate and temperature
    variance, resulting in three-equation model
    E-?-??2? ?

15
  • CLOSURE three-equation model
  • for active (heat) scalar
    field

16
Four-equation modelE - ?- ??2? - ?c??
  • ?For the closure of expression for turbulent flux
    vector of a passive scalar is involved the
    equation for covariance concentration
    temperature.  
  •  Thus, for the description of a concentration
    field is formulated the four-equation model
    E-?-??2?-?c?? ?
  •  
  •  
  •  

17
  • CLOSURE four-equation model
  • for passive scalar
    field

18
Boundary Conditions
  • The domain of integration is a cylinder of a
    given height H. The heated circular disc of
    diameter D is located at the center of the
    cylinder bottom.

19
HEAT TRANSFER BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
  • Domain of integration
  • is a cylinder

z
  • ?At the plume axis and at its outer boundary
  • symmetric conditions
  • (??/?r) (??/?r) (??/?r) (???2?/?r) 0
    are prescribed.
  • (Ur0 at r 0 and at r 1.8R)
  • ?At the top boundary
  • the zero-flux condition
  • ?V/?z ??/?z ??/?z
  • ???2?/?z 0 is enforced.

Top boundary
Heat Flux, H0
r
s o u r c e
20
HEAT TRANSFER BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Z
  • ?The surface heat source is placed on the bottom
    (z 0) has the size 0 ? r / D ? 0.5.
  • ?Boundary conditions at the bottom are specified
    as
  • ?heat flux H0 is prescribed
  • ?values of E, ? and ??2? at
  • the first level above surface are chosen
    according to Kurbatskii
  • (JAM, 2001, vol.40, No.10)
  • Domain of integration
  • is a cylinder

Top boundary
Heat Flux, H0
0
r
s o u r c e
21
MASS TRANSFER BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
  • ?At the plume axis and at outer boundary,
  • (?C/?r) (??c??/?r) 0.
  • ?At the top,
  • ? Constant flux of mass,
  • is prescribed inside a source.
  • ?At the bottom and outside of a source

Z
  • Domain of integration
  • is a cylinder

Top boundary
L 0.5 D
r
mass source
22
MASS TRANSFER BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Z
Domain of integration is a cylinder
Top boundary
?The same boundary conditions are used for source
of small length located at the center of a heat
island.
L0.1D
r
mass source
23
MASS TRANSFER BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Z
Domain of integration is a cylinder
Top boundary
?and the same boundary conditions are used for
source of small length located at the periphery
of a heat island.
L 0.1D
r
mass source
24
Numerical Method
Fr , Fz turbulent fluxes of momentum, heat and
mass
Semi-implicit alternating direction scheme
25
Numerical Procedure
  • ?The numerical method uses a staggered mesh.
  • ?The difference equations are solved by the
    three-diagonal-matrix algorithm.
  • Staggered mesh
  • ? ? ?
  • ? ? ?
  • ? ? ?

z
?r
?r/2
?z
?z/2
r
0
Ur
Uz
?E, ?, T, lt?2gt, C, ltc?gt
26
Main Results of Simulation
  • ?The results of simulation correspond to a
    quasi-steady state of circulation over an area
    heat source in stable stratified environment.
  • ? Figure (c) shadowgraph picture at t 240 sec
    when the full circulation is established.

27
(No Transcript)
28
Calculation of Normal Turbulent Stresses
  • In this problem a simple gradient transport
    model preserves certain anisotropy of the normal
    turbulent stresses

is turbulent viscosity.
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
RESULTS Temperature profiles
   
  • ?Calculated temperature profiles inside the
    plume have characteristic swelling
  • the temperature inside the plume is lower
    than the temperature outside at the same height
    creating an area of negative buoyancy due to the
    overshooting of the plume at the center.
  • ?This behavior indicates that the plume has a
    dome-shaped upper part in the form of a hat.  



32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Pollutant Dispersion
  • Investigation of buoyancy effects on
    distribution of mean concentration in mixing and
    inversion layers of urban heat island was the
    main goal in modeling and simulation of pollutant
    dispersion from a continuous surface source.

35
Pollutant Dispersion
  • ?Experimental measurements were not available
    for the quantitative validation of simulation
    data.
  • ?Instead, we present some preliminary results
    that illustrate interesting properties of
    pollutant dispersion from a continuous source
    located inside the urban heat island and on its
    periphery.

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
Pollutant Dispersion
  • ?One characteristic feature is observed in all
    three cases. The contaminant penetrates not only
    into the inversion layer but even higher beyond
    its boundary.
  • ?This behavior was recently reproduced in the
    laboratory experiment of Snyder et al. (BLM,2002,
    vol.102, 335-413.). These experimental data
    clearly show penetration of the continuous
    buoyant plumes into inversion above the
    convective boundary layer.

40
Difference in Turbulent Diffusion Between
Active and Passive Scalars 1
  • ?Sometimes assumed that in the stratified
    atmospheric boundary layer the eddy diffusivity
    of heat (KH) is equal to the eddy diffusivity of
    contaminant (KC). However, the stratification
    causes a larger difference in the eddy
    diffusivities between active heat and passive
    mass.
  • ?Indeed, for the ratio of the vertical eddy
    diffusivities of heat and mass can be written the
    following expression ?

41
Difference in Turbulent Diffusion Between Active
and Passive Scalars 2
  • 1-D1bg ltcqgt (?C/?z)-1
    1-D2 bg
    ltq2gt (?Q/?z)-1
  • ?If both mass and heat are passive additives
    (the buoyancy terms in this expression are
    negligible) then it is evident from this
    expression that KCKH.
  • ? It appears that cases for which the largest
    deflection of KC/ KH from unit will occur are
    when either T or C is acting as a passive
    additive.
  • ? In our case the mass is acting as a passive
    additive.
  •  

42
Turbulent Fluxes of Active and Passive Scalars
43
Ratio of Eddy Diffusivities of Passive Mass to
that Active Heat
44
CONCLUSIONS 1
  • ?The three-equation model of turbulent transport
    of heat reproduces structural features of the
    penetrative turbulent convection over the heat
    island in a stably stratified environment.
  • ?This model minimizes difficulties in describing
    the non-homogeneous turbulence in a stably
    stratified environment and reduces computational
    resources required for the numerical simulation.

45
CONCLUSIONS 2
  • ?The four-equation model for the description of
    pollutant dispersion in the stable stratified
    atmospheric boundary layer is formulated.
  • ?Favorable comparison the numerical results of
    pollution dispersion from the continuous surface
    source above the urban heat island with
    laboratory measurements in the convective
    boundary layer showing penetration of the
    continuous buoyant plumes into inversion above
    the convective boundary layer is found.

46
The friction velocity u?(r) / wD
  • The friction velocity on the underlying
    surface can be obtained on the calculated mean
    velocity as u? (r) ? ( ?Ur / ?z ).

47
Turbulent Velocity Scale
  • Turbulent velocity scale Uf was estimated as 1/30
    of a mean wind velocity velocity scale wD
    of the mean inflow velocity Uf ? 1/30?wD. This
    value was used as characteristic scale of the
    turbulent velocity for boundary conditions for
    E1 and e1 at the first level of a grid above an
    underlying surface.

48
Numerical Procedure
  • ?It took about 2.8104 time steps to drive the
    numerical solution to a quasi-steady state.
  • ? Computations were performed on a mesh with 25
    (and 50) points in radial direction.
  • ? In vertical direction 116 (and 232) mesh points
    were used.
  • ? The time step was chosen so that the numerical
    accuracy was preserved.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com