Title: Memory: Retention and Retrieval
1Memory Retention and Retrieval
- Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D.
- 2001
2What Is Memory?
- Some claim it is the exact neurological trace,
even though it may not be obtained on attempts at
recall - Penfield (1959) has been cited for this view
- Provided electric stimulation directly to the
brain while an individual was conscious
3What Is Memory?
- Penfield
- Reports of relatively vivid, clear experiences
- Doubtful if this is truly memory, however
4What Is Memory?
- Nelson (1971)
- While later material may be lost to recall, there
appears to be a large gain in re-acquiring the
information
5Retention Functions
- Retention functions are highly predictable and
orderly - Dates back to Ebbinghaus studies
- Negatively accelerated curve
6Retention Functions
- Wickelgren (1975) described a d function
- Measure of memory strength
7Retention Functions
- Where T is time
- Can be transformed to linear curve
8Retention Functions
- Where T is still time, and C is a constant
- C10a
9Retention Functions
Most recall is represented by this type of curve,
a negatively accelerated effect
D
Time
10Retention Functions
These curves represent a power function, and the
pattern is described as the power law of
forgetting
Logof D
Log of Time
11Retention Functions
- Wickelgren (1975) and associates demonstrated
this effect - Forgetting appears to be highly predictable and
orderly - Why should this be so?
12Retention Functions
- Bahrick (1975) demonstrated a similar effect for
long-term retention - Also noted the impact of increased exposure
- Claimed later higher levels of drop off was
related to physiological deterioration in old age
13Does Forgetting Exist?
- While it appears obvious that forgetting exists,
it is not clear how forgetting occurs - What is the process of forgetting?
- 1. A decay of memory?
- 2. A failure of retrieval?
- 3. Problems in interference?
14Examples of Hypermnesia
- Short story - Borges (1964) Funes the memorious
- Could not forget anything - memory like a garbage
heap
15Examples of Hypermnesia
- Luria (1968) described the case of S
- Remembered everything - but on tests of
intelligence, did not do well, because he was
often distracted by rich details of memory
16Theoretical Accounts of Forgetting
- I. Decay theory
- With the passage of time, memories fade or erode
- II. Inference theory
- Memories fade due to competing effects
17Decay Theory
- Testing the decay theory
- Of course, memory for remote events is weak
relative to recent events - Not a unique effect of decay however
18Decay Theory
- Testing the decay theory
- It is also possible the reduction of remote
memory is due to interference as well - In most studies (usually classical conditioning),
the mere passive of time is a poor predictor of
forgetting
19Decay Theory
- Testing the decay theory
- Classical study by Jenkins and Dallenbach (1924)
- Compared retention intervals under sleep and
waking conditions, with intervals of 1, 2, 4, 8
hours - Nonsense syllable learning
20Decay Theory
Sleep
Syllables Recalled
Waking
Hours
21Decay Theory
- Braddeley and Hitch (1977)
- Tested inference theory on rugby players recall
of meaningful material (i.e. team names)
22Decay Theory
Percent Recall
Number of intervening games
23Decay Theory
- With the passage of time, memories fade or erode
- Cells may die
- Networks may evolve
24Decay Process
- Depends on a frequency effect
- Testing the decay notion
- Contrast with the notion of interference
- Forgetting occurs because new learning works
against older learning - Actual passage of time is a poor predictor of
forgetting
25Forgetting With Time Asleep
Sleep
Retent
Wake
Hours
26II. Interference Notion
- It is hypothesized that competing cognitive
demands account for forgetting
27Interference Evidence
- Interference paradigm
- List learning inference
- Learn A-B
- Learn A-D
- Test A-B
- List learning control
- Learn A-B
- Learn C-D
- Test A-B
28Interference Evidence
- Interference paradigm
- Results
- Non-interference yields better learning
29Interference Notion - Types
- Proactive interference
- Learning that has come before can impact
negatively if similar - Retroactive interference
- Learning that has come latter can impact
negatively as well
30Why Does Interference Occur?
- Mechanisms
- 1. Response competition
- It does not appear that only intrusion errors
account for interference - May instead be an interference or error in effort
- 2. Unlearning must also occur
- Similar to extinction
31Evidence Against Interference
- It was thought that interference could explain
most or all forgetting - However, some efforts questioned that idea
- Cued recall versus free recall
32Cueing Eliminates Interference
Cued Recall
Recall
Free Recall
Number of Lists
33III. Alternatives to Interference Theory
- Network theories may explain results better
- Activation of nodes or associative links
- There is evidence of elaboration and inferential
reconstruction - Tends to demonstrate semantically significant
material
34Repression
- Freuds theory claimed that the conscious mind
was denied access, but that the memories were not
erased - Forgetting is thought to be selective in the
service of the psyche - Slips, or returns when dreaming, or fatigued
35Repression
- There have been some experimental demonstration
of repression phenomenon - Other explanations may be possible, however
- Some individuals have demonstrated later (a few
days) superior recall of material thought to be
subject to repression
36Repression
- Parkin, Lewinsohn Folkard (1982)
- Tested recall to neutral words (window, cow,
tree) - Tested recall to emotional words (quarrel, angry,
fear) - Superior memory on immediate recall for neutral
words, but better delayed (7 days) recall of
emotional words
37Repression
- Parkin, Lewinsohn Folkard (1982)
Immediate Delayed Emotional 24.1 Emotional
21.1 Neutral 27.6 Neutral 18.3
38Repression
- Processed by defenses as
- 1. Displacement
- 2. Sublimation
- 3. Projection
- From this view, it is thought memories can be
recovered - Hypermnesia can be demonstrated experimentally
39Hypnosis
- There is considerable research on hypnosis,
mostly focused on therapeutic aspects - Described as a relaxed state of narrowed
awareness, with increased suggestibility - Eg. Reading an interesting book
40Hypnosis
- No evidence that hypnosis can enhance memory,
although there may be a state dependent effect,
and relaxed recall may also be helpful - However, individuals are also more suggestible in
this state - Rate recall as more certain, but doubtful
increase in accuracy
41Repression
- There is dispute and controversy about repression
and recovered memories in therapy - Recovered memories remain controversial
42Emotions and Memory
- We may expect to not remember unpleasant
emotional events, but in fact we tend to recall
dramatic experiences well - Flashbulb effects - clarity about highly
significant events - Even so, memory is far from perfect
43Emotions and Memory
- It has been hypothesized that there is a
narrowing of memory and attention during
emotionally charged events - Called the Easterbrook (1959) phenomenon
- For example, a witness to a crime may only recall
the gun
44Emotion and Memory
- Emotion appears to have multiple effects on
memory - Emotional arousal may disorganize early memory
and recall, although some elements may be very
vivid - Later recall may be enhanced by emotional arousal