Hormonal Replacement Therapy for postmenopausal females: To give or not to give? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Hormonal Replacement Therapy for postmenopausal females: To give or not to give?

Description:

Title: Improving Hospital Care for Older Adults Author: Counsel, Steven R Last modified by: Eugene Chubmkov Created Date: 9/5/1998 3:41:02 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:200
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Counsel2
Learn more at: https://sites.pitt.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hormonal Replacement Therapy for postmenopausal females: To give or not to give?


1
Hormonal Replacement Therapy for postmenopausal
females To give or not to give?
  • Amna B. Buttar, MD, MS
  • Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine
  • Indiana University School of Medicine Scientist,
    Indiana
    University Center for Aging Research

2
Introduction
  • Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT) is one of the
    most commonly prescribed treatments in the USA
  • HRT is also one of the most controversial topics
    in modern history of medicine
  • Increasing use reflects increasing no. of
    postmenopausal women
  • Controversy is due to the balance between
    benefits and risks

3
Clinical Scenario 1
  • 52 years old woman asks you regarding HRT.
  • Irregular menstrual periods for one year
  • Hot flashes
  • Sleep disturbance
  • Emotional lability
  • Otherwise healthy
  • Non-smoker
  • No family history of cancer or cardiovascular
    disease
  • Mother and aunty have osteoporosis

4
Clinical Scenario 2
  • 72 years old woman has been taking estrogen daily
    for 24 years asks you whether she should continue
    or not.
  • HRT initially used for hot flashes when she
    underwent hysterectomy and oophorectomy
  • She continued to use it as she had heard it was
    good for heart and bones
  • Hx of increased cholesterol, and Diabetes
    controlled by oral hypoglycemics
  • Complains of chronic low back pain

5
Clinical Scenario 3
  • 55 years old woman who has been receiving HRT for
    5 years since natural menopause.
  • Seeks your opinion regarding continuation as her
    64 years old sister was just diagnosed with
    breast cancer. They also tell you that one aunt
    and a cousin died of breast cancer.
  • Annual mammograms have been normal.

6
Clinical Scenario 4
  • 62 years old woman receiving HRT since menopause
    had her first heart attack.
  • Cardiac catheterization revealed 2 vessel disease
    and patient treated medically.
  • Should she continue to get HRT?

7
Landmark studies to date
  • Nurses Health Study (Goodstein et al. NEJM 1997)
  • 17 year follow-up of 91,523 women
  • Current HRT users had a 37 lower risk of death
    than women who had never taken HRT
  • In those using HRT for gt 10 years, risk of death
    was 20 lower.
  • Among women with a first degree relative with
    breast cancer, the risk of death was 35 lower in
    HRT users than in non users.

8
Landmark studies to date
  • Post menopausal Estrogen/Progestin Intervention
    (PEPI) trial
  • 3 year multicentered randomized, double blind
    placebo controlled trial
  • 875 healthy post menopausal women aged 45-64
    years
  • Randomized to placebo, CEE,
    CEE cyclic MPA , CEE continuous MPA,
  • All HRT arms lowered LDL-C significantly compared
    to placebo
  • Modest increase in HDL-C

9
Landmark studies to date
  • Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study
    (HERS), Hullley et al. JAMA 1998
  • Randomized, blinded, placebo controlled trial
    (2763) of the effect of combined HRT on coronary
    heart disease event risk among 2763
    postmenopausal women with documented CHD
  • Overall, during 4.1 years of follow-up, there
    were no significant differences between the HRT
    and placebo groups in the primary outcome of CHD
    events (nonfatal MI CHD related death).
  • Post-hoc analysis showed a significant trend with
    more CHD events in the HRT group than placebo
    during first year of treatment

10
Landmark studies to date
  • Womens Health Initiative, JAMA 2002
  • Multicenter trial of 16,608 women randomized to
    combined HRT or placebo for women with intact
    uterus, and to Estrogen or placebo for women
    without a uterus
  • The study began in 1991, and was expected to go
    on till 2006, however, the combined HRT was
    stopped early after a mean follow-up of 5.2 years
    because of increased rates of CAD (HR 1.29),
    Breast Cancer (1.26), Stroke (1.41), PE (2.1).
  • Risk of colon cancer, and hip fracture were
    significantly reduced in the HRT group.
  • Overall, there was no increase in cancer deaths
    or total mortality

11
Landmark studies to date
  • Scientific review for recommendations for USPSTF,
    Nelson et al. JAMA 2002.
  • No Coronary Heart Disease Protective effect
  • No mortality reduction
  • Increased incidence of Stroke (RR, 1.12), and
    thromboembolic stroke (RR, 1.20)
  • Increased risk for DVT and PE (RR, 2.14), During
    first year (3.49), and after first year (1.91)

12
Landmark studies to date
  • Scientific review for recommendations for USPSTF,
    Nelson et al. JAMA 2002.
  • Reduction of hip fracture risk (RR, 0.64), and
    vertebral fractures (RR, 0.60)
  • Increased risk of breast cancer (RR, 1.21 1.40)
  • Risk of breast cancer increases with increasing
    duration
  • No effect on breast cancer mortality
  • Increased risk of endometrial cancer for
    unopposed estrogen users (RR, 2.3)
  • Increased risk with increasing duration and
    remained elevated 5 or more years after
    discontinuation of RX.
  • Combined HRT decreased risk of endometrial CA
    (RR, 0.8)

13
Landmark studies to date
  • Scientific review for recommendations for USPSTF,
    Nelson et al. JAMA 2002.
  • 20 reduction in colon cancer risk in ever users
  • 34 reduction in colon cancer risk in current
    users
  • HRT was found to be associated with decreased
    risk of dementia (RR, 0.66)
  • Increased risk of cholecystitis (RR, 1.8)
  • Risk increased after 5 years of use

14
Potential benefits of HRT
  • Short term benefits
  • alleviate perimenopausal symptoms
  • hot flashes
  • urogenital atrophy
  • Depressed mood
  • Insomnia
  • Improve or maintain bone density (short term use
    does not prevent fractures in the future)

15
Potential benefits of HRT
  • Reduction in vertebral and hip fracture rate, and
    increase in Bone Mineral Density
  • Prevention of colon cancer

16
Potential benefits/Harms of HRT
  • Does HRT help cognition? Or Not?
  • (Shumaker et al. JAMA, 2003, May 28 2892651-62)
  • Womens Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS)
  • 4532 women (age gt65) were tested annually with
    the Modified Mini Mental State Examination
  • Probable dementia was diagnosed in 40 women who
    received HRT and in 21 women on placebo (HR,
    2.05) after average 4 years of follow-up

17
Potential benefits/Harms of HRT
  • Does HRT help cognition? Or Not?
  • (Rapp et al. JAMA, 2003, May 28 2892663-72)
  • Womens Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS)
  • 6.7 of women who took HRT had decrease of more
    than 2 standard deviations in their Mental Status
    Scores after a mean of 4 years as compared to
    4.8 of women on placebo.

18
Potential benefits/Harms of HRT
  • More about stroke!
  • (Wassertheil-Smoller et al. JAMA, 2003, May 28
    2892673-84)
  • Womens Health Initiative (N 16,608)
  • 151 women who took HRT (1.8) and 107 on placebo
    (1.3) suffered strokes within mean 5.2 years
    follow-up.
  • 31 increased stroke risk for HRT group.

19
Potential Harms of HRT
  • Stroke
  • Increased incidence of Coronary Heart Disease
    events
  • Thromboembolic events
  • Increased risk of Breast Cancer
  • Cholecystitis
  • Increased risk of endometrial cancer

20
Clinical Scenario 1
  • 52 years old woman asks you regarding HRT.
  • Irregular menstrual periods for one year
  • Hot flashes
  • Sleep disturbance
  • Emotional lability
  • Otherwise healthy
  • Non-smoker
  • No family history of cancer or cardiovascular
    disease
  • Mother and aunty have osteoporosis

21
Clinical Scenario 1
  • 52 years old woman asks you regarding HRT.
  • Improvement of menopausal symptoms
  • 1.8 fold increased risk for cholecystitis
  • 3.5 fold increased risk for thromboembolic event
    in the first year
  • Increased risk for stroke and MI

22
Clinical Scenario 2
  • 72 years old woman has been taking estrogen daily
    for 24 years asks you whether she should continue
    or not.
  • HRT initially used for hot flashes when she
    underwent hysterectomy and oophorectomy
  • She continued to use it as she had heard it was
    good for heart and bones
  • Hx of increased cholesterol, and Diabetes
    controlled by oral hypoglycemics
  • Complains of chronic low back pain

23
Clinical Scenario 2
  • 72 years old woman has been taking estrogen daily
    for 24 years asks you whether she should continue
    or not.
  • High risk for stroke due to risk factors like
    Diabetes, increased cholesterol and continued
    estrogen use
  • Estrogen should be discontinued
  • Bone mineral density should be obtained to assess
    severity of osteoporosis
  • Allendronate or other treatments can be used if
    osteoporosis is present

24
Clinical Scenario 3
  • 55 years old woman who has been receiving HRT for
    5 years since natural menopause.
  • Seeks your opinion regarding continuation as her
    64 years old sister was just diagnosed with
    breast cancer. They also tell you that one aunt
    and a cousin died of breast cancer.
  • Annual mammograms have been normal.
  • Her breast cancer risk is 2.2 compared to 1.4
    for a woman with no risk factors

25
Clinical Scenario 4
  • 62 years old woman receiving HRT since menopause
    had her first heart attack.
  • Cardiac catheterization revealed 2 vessel disease
    and patient treated medically
  • Should she continue to get HRT?
  • American Heart Association recommends
    discontinuation after an acute event
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com