Linux Adoption in the Public Sector An Economic Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Linux Adoption in the Public Sector An Economic Analysis

Description:

Title: Outline Author: Hal Varian Last modified by: Hal Varian Created Date: 6/17/1995 11:31:02 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: halva
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Linux Adoption in the Public Sector An Economic Analysis


1
Linux Adoption in the Public Sector An Economic
Analysis
  • Hal R. Varian
  • Carl Shapiro
  • UC Berkeley
  • http//www.sims.berkeley.edu/hal

2
Definitions
  • Open source v commercial software
  • Source code freely available
  • Open interface v proprietary interface
  • Interface completely documented and freely usable
  • Programmer interface, user interface, document
    interface
  • Generally open source software has open
    interfaces proprietary software may or may not
    have open interfaces

3
Economics of open source
  • Many motivations to write
  • Scratching an itch, demonstrating skill,
    generosity, throw it over the fence, etc.
  • Money to be made by
  • Consulting, support and related services,
    creating distributions, providers of complements
  • Biggest danger
  • Splintering a la Unix
  • Examples GNU Emacs, Xemacs

4
Examples of open source
  • Linux and BSD
  • 18 million Linux users?
  • 4 of desktop for Linux?
  • Amazon, Google, Yahoo
  • All use Linux or BSD as servers
  • Apache web server
  • Netcraft 60 market share

5
Factors influencing OSS adoption
  • Total cost of ownership
  • Most studies find 10-15 difference
  • Purchase price system administrators
  • In LDCs, former may dominate latter
  • Switching costs
  • Much higher with proprietary interfaces
  • Vendors will try to exploit switching costs

6
Switching costs and hold up
  • Vendors always want to promise openness, but then
    not deliver
  • Give away version n, charge what market will bear
    for version n1
  • How can a software vendor commit not to exploit
    customer in future?
  • Answer true open interface and/or open source

7
Microsofts dilemma
  • Why should the Chinese government allow users to
    take the first shot of a very expensive drug?
  • Now network effects are relatively small, so why
    not choose the system with low switching costs
    and build your own network?
  • How can Microsoft commit to refraining from
    future exploitation?
  • Possible strategies
  • Tolerate/encourage piracy
  • EU mandated open interfaces
  • Problems spill over to existing markets

8
OSS software quality
  • Reliability
  • higher stability is very important
  • Maintainability
  • Linux ASCII files v Microsoft registry
  • Usability
  • User testing is expensive, but interfaces can be
    copied
  • Security
  • Hardened Linux
  • Flexibility
  • Smaller, larger, harder, secure, localized

9
Open source licenses
  • Many different licenses (BSD, Netscape, etc.)
  • GNU Public License
  • Copyleft provision
  • If you modify and distribute open source software
    outside your organization, you must include the
    source code
  • Only applies under these narrow conditions

10
Economic development
  • Building a network
  • Watch out for lock-in
  • Favor open interfaces when possible
  • Educating a workforce
  • Open source important in education
  • Imagine trying to train mechanics if they
    couldnt see real engines

11
Economic effects
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com