CPR: Push Hard(er), Push Fast(er) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

CPR: Push Hard(er), Push Fast(er)

Description:

Created in Adobe Photoshop ... Push Hard(er), Push Fast(er) Mike McEvoy, PhD, NRP, RN, CCRN EMS Coordinator Saratoga County, NY – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:177
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: Davi469
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CPR: Push Hard(er), Push Fast(er)


1
CPRPush Hard(er), Push Fast(er)
  • Mike McEvoy, PhD, NRP, RN, CCRN
  • EMS Coordinator Saratoga County, NY
  • EMS Editor Fire Engineering magazine
  • Chair Resuscitation Committee Albany Medical
    Center Hospital Albany, New York
  • www.mikemcevoy.com

2
Disclosures
  • I am on the Physio-Control Speakers Bureau
  • I dont know how to play golf or ski

3
(No Transcript)
4
www.mikemcevoy.com
5
Outline
  • CPR 2010 that was then, this is now
  • Show me the money is there proof?
  • What matters?
  • Why measure?
  • How to assessquality CPR
  • Unique hospitalissues
  • Future solutions

6
Adult Chain of Survival 2010
  1. Immediate recognition and activation of emergency
    response system
  2. Early CPR with emphasis onchest compressions
  3. Rapid defibrillation
  4. Effective ALS
  5. Integrated post-cardiac arrest care

7
CPR Sequence
  • Change
  • A-B-C to C-A-B
  • Initiate chest compressions before ventilations
  • Why?
  • Reduce delay to compressions
  • Can be started immediately
  • Emphasizes importance of chest compressions

8
So, What Matters in CPR?
  • And how should we assess effectiveness?

9
Chest Compressions
  • 2010
  • 2005
  • gt 50 mm ( gt 2)
  • At least 100 per minute
  • 38 51 mm (1.5 2)
  • 100 per minute
  • Most Common Errors
  • Too slow
  • Not deep enough
  • Prolonged interruptions
  • Leaning

10
Chest Compressions
  • ROC survival associated with ? depth
  • Abella et al 100-120/min ? survival
  • Recommendations are both Class I, LOE C (just do
    it, because we like it)
  • In truth
  • Ideal actual depth of CPR unknown
  • Probably lies near 50 mm
  • Best rate for CPR unknown
  • Is likely about 100/min

11
CPR Rate vs. ROSC
p lt 0.0083
Abella et al. Circulation. 2005111428-434
12
Probability of ROSC
  • Stiell et al. Crit Care Med 2012 401192-1198

13
One Day Survival
  • Stiell et al. Crit Care Med 2012 401192-1198

14
Survival to Discharge
  • Stiell et al. Crit Care Med 2012 401192-1198

15
Effective CPR?
  • How do you measure the effectiveness of CPR?
  • End tidal carbon dioxide
  • Feedback devices
  • Measurement of CPR effectiveness is a proposed
    TJC future standard

16
Waveform Capnography
  • Attaches to ET tube, measures CO2

17
Physiology of Metabolism
Oxygen ? Lungs ? alveoli ? blood
Oxygen
Breath
CO2
Muscles Organs
Lungs
Oxygen
CO2
Cells
ENERGY
Blood
Oxygen Glucose
CO2
18
SpO2 versus EtCO2
19
Oxygenation and Ventilation
  • Oxygenation (Pulse Ox)
  • O2 for metabolism
  • SpO2 measures of O2 in RBCs
  • Reflects changes in oxygenation within 5 minutes
  • Ventilation (Capnography)
  • CO2 from metabolism
  • EtCO2 measures exhaled CO2 at point of exit
  • Reflects changes in ventilation within 10 seconds

20
Measuring Exhaled CO2
Colorimetric Capnometry Capnography
21
Measuring Exhaled CO2
Colorimetric Capnometry Capnography
22
Measuring Exhaled CO2
Colorimetric Capnometry Capnography
23
Capnography Waveforms
Normal
45
0
Hyperventilation
45
0
Hypoventilation
45
0
24
What about the Pulse Ox?
Sp02
98
25
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Production
26
What If
27
But, with High-Quality CPR
28
Meet Howard Snitzer
  • 54-years old, collapsed Jan 5, 2011 outside Dons
    Foods in Goodhue, MN (pop. 900)
  • 2 dozens rescuers took turns providing CPR for 96
    minutes
  • 6 shocks with first responder AED, 6 more shocks
    by Mayo Clinic Air Flight Medics
  • Transported to Mayo Clinic Cardiac Cath Lab

29
Why Not Quit?
  • Thrombectomy, stent to LAD
  • 10 days inpatient
  • The capnography told us not to give up
  • EtCO2 averaged 35 (range 32 37)

30
So Whats the Goal During CPR?
  • Try to maintain a minimum EtCO2 of 10
  • Push
  • HARD (gt 2)
  • FAST (at least 100)
  • Change rescuer
  • Every 2 minutes

31
Guidelines 2010
  • Continuous quantitative waveform capnography
    recommended for intubated patients throughout
    peri-arrest period. In adults
  • Confirm ETT placement
  • Monitor CPR quality
  • Detect ROSC with EtCO2 values

32
Guidelines 2005
  • EtCO2 recommended to confirm ET tube placement

33
EtCO2 detects ROSC
  • 90 pre-hospital intubated arrest patients
  • 16 survivors
  • 13 survivors rapid rise in exhaled CO2 was the
    earliest indicator of ROSC
  • Before pulse or blood pressure were palpable

Wayne MA, Levine RL, Miller CC. Use of End-tidal
Carbon Dioxide to Predict Outcome in Prehospital
Cardiac Arrest . Annals of Emergency Medicine.
1995 25(6)762-767. Levine RL., Wayne MA.,
Miller CC. End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome
of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. New England
Journal of Medicine. 1997337(5)301-306.
34
Capnography Results, not process
35
Guidelines 2010 Evidence
  • Capnography Classes Levels of Evidence
  • Confirm ETT placement Class I, LOE A
  • Monitor CPR quality Class IIb, LOE C
  • Detect ROSC with EtCO2 Class IIa, LOE B

36
Classes of Evidence
  • I Standard of care just do it!
  • II Conflicting evidence maybe or not
  • IIa evidence favors benefit do it
  • IIb evidence not so favorable think
    first
  • III Not useful, maybe harmful dont do it

37
Levels of Evidence Proof
  • A A whole lotta proof best!
  • B Some proof better than nothing
  • C No proof but some like the idea

38
Guidelines 2010 Evidence
  • Capnography Classes Levels of Evidence
  • Confirm ETT placement Class I, LOE A
  • Just do it, best proof
  • Monitor CPR quality Class IIb, LOE C
  • Think first, some like the idea
  • Detect ROSC with EtCO2 Class IIa, LOE B
  • Do it, better than nothin

39
CPR is Complicated!
40
Hospital Issues
  • Bed Height
  • Optimal bed at knee level of person
    administering chest compressions Cho et al,
    Emerg Med J. 200926807-810
  • Air Mattresses
  • No need to deflate mattress for CPR Perkins et
    al, Inten Care Med. 2003292330-2335
  • Backboards
  • No evidence of benefit with backboard Perkins
    et al, Inten Care Med. 2003292330-2335

41
What About Quality?
In-Hospital Arrests, Dec 2004 Dec 2005
42
Audiovisual CPR Feedback
  • Incorporated into monitor/defibrillator
  • Real time
  • Accelerometer-based

43
Handheld Feedback Device
  • Handheld accelerometer-based audiovisual device

44
Generation of Feedback
45
Post Code Reviews
(Code Stat )
46
EMS Feedback ROSC
  • FDNY uses audio-visual feedback
  • Deactivated audio feedback for 1 week
  • ROSC ? 20
  • NY State EMS Council Report Jan 2012

47
But Hospitals ? EMS
  • How effective are feedback systems?

48
We have a problem
49
Accelerometer CPR Depth
  • Perkins et al. Resuscitation 20098079-82

50
The Mattress Issue
  • Mattress compression 35 40 of total
    compression depth
  • Accelerometer feedback devices fail to account
    for mattress compression
  • Use of a backboard fails to compensate for
    mattress compression

Perkins et al. Resuscitation 20098079-82
51
The Solution
  • Directly measurethe true compression depth.

52
Triaxial Field Induction
1
2
  • Two end points
  • Direct measurement of distance (magnetic)
  • Discrimination of X, Y, Z
  • Accommodation of Roll, Pitch and Yaw

53
TFI versus ACC
Banville et al. Circulation 2011 124A217
54
Summary
  • Compressions are key to outcomes
  • Most common errors depth and speed
  • Need to assess effectiveness of CPR
  • It improves survival
  • Future TJC requirement
  • Current tools EtCO2 and ACC
  • CO2 delayed
  • ACC inaccurate
  • Future TFI
  • Very promising
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com