What is Alternative Dispute Resolution? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

What is Alternative Dispute Resolution?

Description:

Alternative Dispute Resolution Seminar What is Alternative Dispute Resolution? Raichel Hopkinson, Partner, Dispute Resolution, Denton Wilde Sapte raichel.hopkinson_at_ ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: DentonWi4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is Alternative Dispute Resolution?


1
What is Alternative Dispute Resolution?
The British-Turkish Lawyers Association and The
Law Society of England and WalesAlternative
Dispute Resolution Seminar
  • Raichel Hopkinson, Partner, Dispute Resolution,
    Denton Wilde Sapte raichel.hopkinson_at_dentonwildesa
    pte.com
  • 18 March 2009

2
Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • What is it?
  • Not court proceedings
  • Is used to mean almost any other form of dispute
    resolution, including (in some jurisdictions)
    arbitration
  • Different interpretations internationally
  • Increasingly common and popular
  • Particularly attractive in jurisdictions where
    the court system may be problematic
  • Often cheaper, quicker and more practical than
    litigation

3
Common forms of ADR
  • Arbitration
  • Expert Determination
  • Mediation

4
Arbitration the basics
  • Hearings held in private
  • Flexible to extent parties can decide on
    applicable rules, location, procedure,
    arbitrators
  • Tribunal makes an award which may be final and
    binding
  • Awards widely enforceable in New York Convention,
    therefore suits international disputes

5
Expert Determination the basics
  • Dispute referred to independent third party for
    resolution
  • Generally used for specific technical disputes
  • Choice and appointment of expert provided for in
    detailed contractual clause
  • Decision may be final and binding
  • Quick and confidential

6
Mediation
  • Form of structured negotiation assisted by a
    third party (mediator)
  • Mediator is neutral, does not seek to give
    opinion or decision on issues
  • Consensual, informal, flexible and non-binding
    process
  • Intended to result in binding settlement
    agreement
  • Confidential (or as agreed by parties)
  • Without prejudice exchanges between parties
    cannot be used outside mediation process
  • Increasingly common internationally

7
Routes to ADR?
  • By agreement contractual clause or subsequent
    agreement
  • Agreement may be in the form of an "escalation
    clause" a multi-tiered approach to ADR ending
    with litigation/arbitration
  • In the absence of a contractual provision, as a
    result of pressure from the courts, for example
  • Parties may attempt ADR before or during court
    proceedings

8
Comparison of key features of Arbitration, Expert
Determination and Mediation
  • When to use?
  • Control
  • Speed
  • Cost
  • Confidentiality
  • Finality

9
Comparison of key features contd.When to use?
  • Arbitration
  • International disputes
  • Need to enforce
  • Expert determination
  • Specific technical issues
  • Long-term projects
  • Mediation
  • Scope for commercial compromise
  • No need for a precedent

10
Comparison of key features contd.Control
  • Arbitration
  • Complete control based on arbitration clause
  • Flexible - rules chosen by parties
  • Expert determination
  • Control based on contractual clause
  • Parties decide issues to be determined
  • Mediation
  • Parties choose to participate
  • Parties determine details of mediation or
    procedure

11
Comparison of key features contd.Speed
  • Arbitration
  • Relatively slow, can take over a year and often
    longer
  • Depends on rules chosen and conduct of parties
  • Expert determination
  • Quicker than arbitration, slower than mediation
  • Depends on parties' agreement, the issues and the
    conduct of expert and parties
  • Mediation
  • Very quick

12
Comparison of key features contd.Costs
  • Arbitration
  • May be costly and lengthy
  • "losing" party generally pays costs
  • Expert determination
  • Cheaper, mainly experts fees
  • Parties pay own costs
  • Mediation
  • Legal and mediator fees
  • Terms of settlement

13
Comparison of key features contd. Confidentiality
  • Arbitration
  • Principle of "privacy"
  • Varied approach of jurisdictions/institutions
  • Subject to applicable court procedures
  • Expert determination
  • Private and confidential
  • Mediation
  • Private
  • Information is exchanged "without prejudice"
  • Enforcement of settlement (if necessary) may lead
    to some disclosure

14
Comparison of key features contd. Finality
  • Arbitration
  • Depends on the parties' agreement
  • Limited rights of appeal may be waived
  • Expert determination
  • Depends on the parties' agreement
  • Often a final and binding decision
  • Generally very limited right of appeal
  • Mediation
  • Only if settlement achieved
  • Only once settlement agreement signed

15
Enforcement
  • Arbitration
  • New York Convention
  • Domestic court procedures
  • Expert determination
  • Limited rights of enforcement
  • Possibly summary judgment
  • Mediation
  • Settlement agreement
  • Breach of contract

16
What are other ADR options?
  • MedArb or ArbMed
  • Early Neutral Evaluation
  • Conciliation
  • Dispute Review Boards

17
Conclusion
  • ADR potentially offers cheaper, quicker
    resolution
  • Many different forms, important to choose correct
    one
  • Key is in drafting of dispute resolution clause
  • Evidence suggests that ADR is likely to become
    more popular

18
And finally
  • Thank you
  • raichel.hopkinson_at_dentonwildesapte.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com