ANESTHESIA FOR A GERIATRIC PATIENT WITH HEART DISEASE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ANESTHESIA FOR A GERIATRIC PATIENT WITH HEART DISEASE

Description:

anesthesia for a geriatric patient with heart disease dr.balavenkat,dr.kalyanasundaram, dr.sudarshan,dr.venkatachellam,dr.mahesh * * * * * * * * * * * * * a 83-year ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: isakanyak
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ANESTHESIA FOR A GERIATRIC PATIENT WITH HEART DISEASE


1
ANESTHESIA FOR A GERIATRIC PATIENT WITH HEART
DISEASE
  • DR.BALAVENKAT,DR.KALYANASUNDARAM,
  • DR.SUDARSHAN,DR.VENKATACHELLAM,DR.MAHESH

2
  • A 83-year-old, 65 kg man fell down in his yard
    and was diagnosed as left femoral neck fracture.
    The patients medical history includes coronary
    artery disease, for which he had undergone
    4-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting nine
    years prior to this admission hypertension, a
    history of stroke one year earlier
    insulin-dependent diabetes and benign prostatic
    hypertrophy. His medications at home included
    Nitroglycerin 0.4 mg daily, Metoprolol 25 mg
    twice daily, Lisinopril 20 mg daily, Aspirin with
    Clopidogrel daily, Insulin injection 20 units
    daily, Metformin 400 mg twice daily, Finasteride
    5 mg daily.

3
  • His ECG has ST depression in Lead I and aVL. He
    has Q waves in II, III and aVF. He has occasional
    ventricular ectopics. His chest X-ray showed
    cardiomegaly and pulmonary plethora. A
    transthoracic echocardiogram showed a decrease in
    ejection fraction . EF is 25-30 as compared to
    his baseline EF of 40-45. His S.Creatinine is
    1.8mg/dl. His random Bld sugar is 225mg/dl. His
    coagulation is normal. He is posted for early
    fracture repair and arthroplasty.

4
  • Dr.Sudarshan/Dr.Venkatachellam
  • 1.What is the risk involved in this case? High
    or moderate ?
  • 2.How do we stratify the risk in old age? Do they
    have an increased risk than their younger
    counterparts with same risk factors?

5
  • Dr.Kalyanasundaram/Dr.Balavenkat
  • 3.Should we have to optimize him before taking
    him up for surgery?
  • 4.What more information is needed? What should be
    done for optimization of his risk?

6
  • Dr.Sudarshan/Dr.Venkatachellam
  • 5.How do we manage his medications?
  • 6.What are the anesthetic concerns in this case?

7
  • Dr.Balavenkat/Dr.Venkatachellam
  • 7.What kind of anesthetic is preferred? Regional
    or General? Does the type of anesthesia influence
    the outcomes?
  • 8.Does the degree of monitoring influence the
    outcomes in this patient

8
  • Dr.Sudarshan/Dr.Kalyanasundaram
  • 9.What postop complications can be expected in
    this patient?
  • 10.How should we manage postop pain in this
    patient?

9
Panel discussion
10
  • A 83-year-old, 65 kg man fell down in his yard
    and was diagnosed as left femoral neck fracture.
    The patients medical history includes coronary
    artery disease, for which he had undergone
    4-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting nine
    years prior to this admission hypertension, a
    history of stroke one year earlier
    insulin-dependent diabetes and benign prostatic
    hypertrophy.
  • His medications at home included Nitroglycerin
    0.4 mg daily, Metoprolol 25 mg twice daily,
    Lisinopril 20 mg daily, Aspirin with Clopidogrel
    daily, Insulin injection 20 units daily,
    Metformin 400 mg twice daily, Finasteride 5 mg
    daily.
  • His ECG has ST depression in Lead I and aVL. He
    has Q waves in II, III and aVF. He has occasional
    ventricular ectopics. His chest X-ray showed
    cardiomegaly and pulmonary plethora. A
    transthoracic echocardiogram showed a decrease in
    ejection fraction (EF) of 25-30 as compared to
    his baseline EF of 40-45. His S.Creatinine is
    1.8mg/dl. His random Bld sugar  is 225mg/dl. His
    coagulation is normal. He is posted for early
    fracture repair and arthroplasty

11
  • ASA Grading
  • ACC/ AHA Guidelines 2007
  • Goldman Risk index
  • Lees modification

12
ASA GRADING
  • Grade I A normal healthy patient
  • Grade II A patient with mild systemic illness
  • Grade III A patient with severe systemic disease,
    that limits function, but is not
    incapacitating.
  • Grade IV A patient with severe systemic disease
    that is a constant threat to life.
  • Grade V A moribund patient who is not expected to
    survive without the operation.
  • Grade VI A declared brain dead patient whose
    organs are being removed for donor purposes.

13
GOLDMANs Risk Index
  • Third heart sound (S3) 11  Elevated
    jugulovenous pressure 11  Myocardial
    infarction in past 6 months 10  ECG
    premature arterial contractions or any rhythm
    other than sinus 7  ECG shows gt5 premature
    ventricular contractions per minute 7  Age gt70
    years 5  Emergency procedure
    4  Intra-thoracic, intra-abdominal or
    aortic surgery 3
  • Poor general status, metabolic or bedridden
    3

gt25 56 Death,22 severe complications lt26
4 Death, 17 severe complications lt6 0.2
Death, 0.7 severe complications
14
Lees Revised Goldman cardiac risk index
  • Six independent predictors of major cardiac
    complications
  • High risk type of surgery
  • H/o. IHD
  • History of HF
  • History of cerebrovascular disease
  • Diabetes mellitus requiring treatment with
    insulin
  • Preoperative serum creatinine gt2.0 mg/dL

15
Rate of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial
infarction, andnonfatal cardiac arrest according
to the number of predictors
  • No risk factors - 0.4 percent (95 CI 0.1-0.8
    percent)
  • One risk factor - 1.0 percent (95 CI 0.5-1.4
    percent)
  • Two risk factors - 2.4 percent (95 CI 1.3-3.5
    percent)
  • Three or more risk factors - 5.4 percent

Rate of cardiac death nonfatal MI, cardiac
arrest or ventricularfibrillation, pulmonary
edema, and/or complete heart blockaccording to
the No.of predictors and use nonuse or of beta
blockers
  • No risk factors - 0.4 to 1.0 percent versus lt1
    percent with beta blockers
  • One to two risk factors - 2.2 to 6.6 percent
    versus 0.8 to 1.6 percent with beta blockers
  • Three or more risk factors - gt9 percent versus gt3
    percent with beta blockers

16
Detsky and Goldman calculators
  • http//www.vasgbi.com/riskdetsky.htm

17
ACC/ AHA Guidelines 2007
18
Cardiac Predictors
  • MAJOR
  • Predictors
  • Unstable coronary syndromes
  • Decompensated CHF
  • Significant Arrhythmias
  • Severe valvular disease
  • MINOR
  • Predictors
  • Age
  • Abnormal ECG
  • Systemic hypertension
  • Stroke
  • INTERMEDIATE Predictors
  • Mild angina
  • Prior MI
  • Compensated or prior CHF
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Renal disease

19
TYPE OF SURGERY
  • Low risk lt 1
  • Endoscopic procedures
  • Superficial procedure
  • Cataract
  • Breast
  • HIGH RISK gt 5
  • Emergeny major operations, especially in elderly
  • Aortic and other major vascular procedures
  • Peripheral vascular procedures
  • Anticipated prolonged procedure with large fluid
    shift/blood loss
  • INTERMEDIATE Risk lt 5
  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Head and neck
  • Intraperitoneal intrathoracic
  • Orthopedic
  • Prostate

20
Functional Capacity
21
Step I
Perioperative surveillance post op risk
stratification and management
Need for emergency non cardiac surgery
OT
Yes
NO
Step 2
Evaluate and treat as per AHA guidelines
Consider OT
Yes
Active Cardiac condition
NO
Step 3
Proceed with planned surgery
Yes
Low risk surgery
NO
Active Cardiac condition
Step 4
Proceed with planned surgery
1.Unstable coronary syndromes 2. Decompensated HF
(NYHA functional class IV 3. Significant
arrhythmias 4. Severe valvular disease
Functional capacity gt or 4 METs without
symptoms
Yes
NO or Unknown
Step 5
22
History of CAD, or CVA Pulmonary Diabetes
mellitus Renal impairment Hematologic disorders
STEP 5
3 or more risk factors
1 or 2 risk factors
No risk factors
Vascular
Intermediate risk
Intermediate risk
Vascular
Proceed with the planned surgery
Consider testing if it will change management
Proceed with planned surgery with HR Control or
consider non invasive testing if it will change
the management
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com