The echo-enabled harmonic generation (EEHG) options for FLASH II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The echo-enabled harmonic generation (EEHG) options for FLASH II

Description:

Free Electron Laser Beam Dynamics Meeting The echo-enabled harmonic generation (EEHG) options for FLASH II Haixiao Deng, Winfried Decking, Bart Faatz – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: Den130
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The echo-enabled harmonic generation (EEHG) options for FLASH II


1
The echo-enabled harmonic generation (EEHG)
options for FLASH II
Free Electron Laser Beam Dynamics Meeting
  • Haixiao Deng, Winfried Decking, Bart Faatz
  • FEL division, Shanghai Institute of Applied
    Physics (SINAP)
  • Hasylab, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
  • DESY, Hamburg, Dec 06, 2010
  • denghaixiao_at_sinap.ac.cn

2
Contents
  • Introduction
  • EEHG options for FLASH II
  • Numerical modeling
  • Beam energy chirp CSR effects
  • FEL properties Discussions
  • Summary Outlook
  • Acknowledgments

3
Introduction
Echo-enabled harmonic generation (EEHG)
4
Why EEHG ?
G. Stupakov, EEHG for seeded FEL-theory and
experiment, KEK, Nov, 2010
5
Current status of EEHG
  • Works in the theoretical frame
  • G. Stupakov., PRL, 102, 074801 (2009)
  • D. Xiang et al., PR-ST AB, 12, 030702 (2009)
  • D. Xiang et al., PR-ST AB, 12, 080701 (2009)
  • Z. Huang et al., FEL09, MOPC45
  • D. Xiang et al., PR-ST AB, 12, 060701 (2009)
  • G. Pen et al., NIMA, 612, 254 (2010)
  • J. Yan et al., NIMA, 621, 97 (2010)
  • Experimental demonstration of the EEHG signal at
    SDUV-FEL NLCTA, independently.
  • Z. T. Zhao et al., IPAC10, FEL10
  • D. Xiang et al., PRL, 105, 114801 (2010)
  • FERMI, Swiss-FEL, FLASH II, LCLS II/III etc.

6
EEHG options for FLASH II
7
EEHG options for FLASH II
8
EEHG optimization for FLASH II
EEHG theory
EEHG simulation steady-state
9
Main parameters
10
The ideal projected bunching
60th harmonic
20th harmonic
40th harmonic
11
Numerical modeling
Macro-particles generator (GENESIS ASTRA )
3D laser-beam interaction in Modulator1 (MATLAB
program)
Particle tracking in Chicane1 (ELEGANT CSRtrack)
3D laser-beam interaction in Modulator2 Chicane
2 (MATLAB program)
Self-consistent FEL simulation in the main
radiator (GENESIS)
The dynamics of Chicane 2 (small R56) is just
linear optics
12
Numerical modeling
All procedures are controlled by MATLAB scripts
13
Laser-beam interaction algorithm
  • No FEL equation induced, capable for fs seed
    laser
  • Beam dynamics under field maps (Electric
    magnetic)
  • Radiations from the electron beam are ignored

Detuning of LCLS laser-heater
CEP effects of a fs laser
Haixiao Deng et al, Chinese Physics C, 2011, in
press
14
Self-consistent FEL simulation
  • The problem in the conventional s2e simulation
  • Self-consistent s2e FEL simulation
  • SASE start-up, fluctuation and noise propagation
  • 1pC, single-spike mode for SXFEL, 6M
    macro-particles

Jun Yan, Meng Zhang and Haixiao Deng, NIMA 615,
249 (2010)
15
Beam energy chirp CSR effects
Flash 1nC s2e results
Z. Huang et al., FEL09, MOPC45
16
Energy chirp effects
20th harmonic
60th harmonic
40th harmonic
17
The CSR-induced emittance growth
60th harmonic EEHG for FLASH II, 2.5kA peak
current case 10 growth of the projected emittance
18
CSR effects on EEHG microbunching
20th harmonic EEHG for FLASH II
Without CSR
2.5kA, with CSR
1.25kA, with CSR
19
CSR effects on EEHG microbunching
40th harmonic EEHG for FLASH II
Without CSR
2.5kA, with CSR
1.25kA, with CSR
20
CSR effects on EEHG microbunching
60th harmonic EEHG for FLASH II
Without CSR
2.5kA, with CSR
1.25kA, with CSR
21
How CSR induces degradation ?
  • Firstly, the electron beam radiates significant
    CSR filed in the chicane.
  • Secondly, CSR-beam interaction introduces the
    energy modulation. Since the longitudinal
    variation of the CSR field, it results different
    energy chirp in different part of the beam.
  • Thirdly, different parts of the electron beam
    shift to different microbunching wavelength.
  • Thus, the projected microbunching bandwidth is
    broadened and the bunching factor is degraded.

22
FEL performances Discussions
Initial sliced bunching factor at the radiator
entrance
20th harmonic
60th harmonic
40th harmonic
Blue 1.25kA peak current case Red 2.50kA peak
current case
23
Peak power pulse energy
24
Radiation power radiation phase
25
D1. benchmark with CSRtrack
Hereafter, several interested issues are
stressed, we use the 20th harmonic EEHG option of
FLASH II, 2.5kA peak current case in the
following discussions.
Elegant results
CSRtrack results
26
D1. benchmark with CSRtrack
With the presence of the projected type CSR
force, the bandwidth of the projected bunching
factor is broadened and the amplitude of the
projected bunching factor degraded. It is
reasonably agree with the ELEGANT results.
Meanwhile, some differences are observed, which
may be attributed by the numerical errors.
Elegant results
CSRtrack results
27
D2. sensitivity on the 2nd chicane
Microbunching wavelength .vs. R56(2) With chirp
without CSR effects
Microbunching factor .vs. R56(2) Without chirp
with CSR effects
A stability of 1 of the R56 in the 2nd chicane
is required.
28
D3. dependence on macro-particles
Peak power growth
Pulse energy growth
29
D3. dependence on macro-particles
Initial sliced bunching
Saturated radiation pulse
30
D4. longitudinal coherence
TBP0.5, close to FTL
TBP1,close to FTL
31
D4. longitudinal coherence
6 times larger bandwidth than FTL
TBP1,close to FTL
32
D5. EEHG fine structures
The EEHG story was preserved at each local region
of the electron beam
33
D6. MBI in the large chicane
Z. Huang et al., SLAC-PUB 9538 (2002).
34
D7. issues on the seed laser noise
1 RMS amplitude noise and 1 degree RMS phase
noise are introduced
35
D7. issues on the seed laser noise
Only 1 RMS amplitude noise of 262nm seed laser,
no shot noise, no CSR
36
D7. issues on the seed laser noise
Electron beam shot noise is not included, we use
200 slices flat-top beam
37
Summary Outlook
  • Robust numerical model for EEHG is developed by
    combining the existing well-benchmarked code. It
    is capable for linear energy chirp, CSR and the
    seed laser noise simulation.
  • Energy chirp induces beam modulation frequency
    shift.
  • CSR degrades the projected bunching a lot, but it
    has a limited effects on the sliced bunching,
    especially when the seed laser is under 100fs, or
    even shorter.
  • EEHG options for FLASH II was studied for the
    first time. From the simulation, at even 60th
    high harmonic case, the strong coherent harmonic
    generation and longitudinal coherence can be
    preserved in EEHG. However, we should start from
    the 20th harmonic EEHG case.

38
Summary Outlook
  • Future suggestions on EEHG simulation
  • How to preserve the noise level of a Gaussian
    bunch ?
  • Do we need a new CSR model for EEHG modulated
    micro-structures ?
  • As the energy modulation induced by a
    laser-heater, can the beam shot noise damp the
    seed laser noise effects to some extent ?
  • Start2end simulation. i.e., including bunch
    compressor of FLASH LINAC and the extraction arc
    of FLASH II.
  • The pulse edge of the 262nm seed laser would
    attribute the bandwidth broadening in EEHG.
  • More tolerance studies, time jitter effects.
  • Alternative Chicane parameters.
  • CSR effects in Chicane 2, etc.

39
Acknowledgments
Jianhui Chen, Meng Zhang, Bo Liu, Qiang Gu, Dong
Wang and Zhimin Dai from SINAP, Matthias Scholz,
Igor Zagorodnov, Torsten Limberg and Martin
Dohlus from DESY, Yuhui Li from European XFEL,
Yuantao Ding, Juhao Wu and Zhirong Huang from
SLAC, Jun Yan from DUKE University. Special
thanks to Dong Wang, Winfried Decking and Bart
Faatz for organization and operation of such a
collaboration.
Thanks for your attentions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com