Emerging Technology for Communication - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Emerging Technology for Communication

Description:

Emerging Technology for Communication – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: michaelb92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Emerging Technology for Communication


1
  • Emerging Technology for Communication
  • Multi-Hazard Information

2
Flood Map Modernization
  • Flood Map Modernization has brought FEMAs maps
    and mapping process into the 21st century.
  • The digital technologies advanced through Map
    Modernization have opened doors that allow more
    informed, sophisticated, and effective ways for
    local and state governments to assess,
    communicate, and reduce flood risk.

3
FIRM to DFIRM
  • FEMA undertook the in-progress, multi-year Map
    Modernization Program to provide a
    technology-based, cost-effective, long-term
    process for updating, maintaining, storing, and
    distributing the flood hazard and risk
    information portrayed on the flood maps.

4
Flood Map Modernization
  • Create countywide FIRMs Flood Insurance Study
    Texts
  • Perform new engineering studies
  • Convert vertical datum (NGVD 29 to NAVD 88)
  • Upgrade FIRMs to Digital format (DFIRMs)
  • Use local basemap imagery, if available
  • Make the data publicly available

5
DFIRM Development
  • Current maps are
  • Difficult to maintain reproduce
  • Difficult to make accurate flood zone
    determinations

6
What is a DFIRM?


Topography
Flood Data
Basemap

Digital FIRM
7
DFIRM Production Tools
  • Accessed on-line via Citrix login
  • Built on ESRIs ArcMap and Production Line Tool
    Set (PLTS)
  • 2 PLTS components implemented
  • Job Tracking Extension
  • GIS Data Reviewer
  • Additional ArcObjects based tools were developed

8
Customized Applications/Extensions
9
DFIRM Development
DFIRM GIS Database Creation (GeoPop Pro)
  • Create standards-based GIS data
  • Pre-defined file names, formats, domains
    attributes
  • Facilitates easy update and maintenance of the
    data and maps
  • Multi-user editing and job tracking

10
DFIRM Development
  • Before Map Mod
  • After Map Mod

11
FEMA MapMod
  • MultiHazard Information Platform (MIP)

http//hazards.fema.gov
12
Community Interaction
  • SCOPING
  • Indentify needs and basemap
  • PRELIMINARY
  • Digitize flood hazard layer from paper FIRMs
  • Update the horizontal and vertical reference
    datum
  • Refit the floodplain floodway data to more
    current/complete base-map
  • Incorporate Letters of Map Revisions (LOMRs)
  • Create 1 seamless countywide FIS report and DFIRM
  • Outreach to communities and incorporate feedback
  • EFFECTIVE
  • Post preliminary processing
  • Map Adoption
  • Outreach Activities
  • Make the effective DFIRM data available on-line

13
Outreach
14
NFHL - Google Maps
15
NFHL Virtual Earth
16
NFHL Google Earth
17
NFHL - DAPPLE
18
National Flood Layer (NFL)
  • Seamless flood hazard data

WMS
SHP, E00, MIF
KML
3D Fly through?
19
Building a National Levee Database
  • Interest around levees began gathering in 2004
  • Post-Katrina, dramatic increase in interest
  • National-level Levee initiatives
  • US Army Corp of Engineers has the lead in
    developing the levee inventory for all federal
    levees in the nation
  • FEMA has the need to respond to congressional
    inquiries about levees
  • Local interests (DWR, communities)

20
Building a National Levee Database
  • Challenges
  • The nation does not have a single comprehensive
    levee database
  • Solutions
  • Work with FEMA and the Army Corps of Engineers to
    develop a national levee database model.
  • Fast track the inventory through collection of a
    simplified dataset

21
Universe of Corps of Engineer Levees
22
Levee Features Important to FEMA
  • levee_centerline
  • floodwall_line
  • closure_structure
  • FC_SEGMENT
  • ORGANIZATION
  • POINT_OF_CONTACT
  • ADDRESS
  • MEDIA
  • FC_SYSTEM
  • protected_area

floodwall_line
closure_structure
levee_centerline
protected_area
23
Focusing in on FEMA Needs
24
Determining Impact
25
Incorporating Levee Information
Levee protecting against 1 annual Chance flood
26
Capturing Feedback(Outreach, Phone Calls,
Meetings, etc.)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Data Sources
DFIRM
MLI
NED
Flood Information Tool
flood surface analysis boundary
levee centerline
ground surface
HAZUS
29
Natomas Basin, California
Natomas East Main Drainage Canal
Natomas Basin
Sacramento River
American River
30
HAZUS Default Settings
HAZUS MLI data
Sacramento River
Breach location
Est. direct losses 175 Million
Natomas East Main Drainage Canal
American River
31
DFIRM Flood Information Tool
DFIRM MLI data
Sacramento River
Breach location
Est. direct losses 3299 Million
Natomas East Main Drainage Canal
American River
32
Geospatial Process for Catastrophic Damage
Assessment
  • The provides estimated residential damage data
    through geospatial analysis as an alternative to
    physical inspections in areas suffering extensive
    damage as a result of a natural disaster.
  • Transition from on-ground inspection to
    geospatial analysis

33
Katrina AnalysisInputs Outputs
  • Inputs
  • Aerial Photography NOAA, USACOE
  • Land base Commercial
  • Surge (slosh model) NOAA
  • Water elevation gauge elevations USACOE or
    local
  • Elevation data (DEM) State, USACOE, local
  • Zip-code polygons, Zip 4 points Commercial
  • Damage assessment polygons NGA and internally
    developed
  • Wind models NOAA
  • Tax roll local assessor, First American
  • Parcels local assessor
  • Outputs
  • Damage classifications
  • Flood depth values
  • Zip code level aggregation

34
Katrina AnalysisSummary of Products
  • Damage classifications
  • Storm surge
  • Wind damage
  • Inland flooding (levee break, riverine)
  • Totally destroyed residences
  • Roof missing
  • Moved off foundation
  • Long-term flood ponding greater than 2 ft.
  • Summation of analyses
  • area damaged within zip code (five digit)
  • Damage source
  • Level of inundation (flood areas)
  • Assignment to zip 4 area if 100 destroyed
  • Tax assessor information

35
LiDAR Data Set
36
New Best Practice
  • Katrina (139,000 Applications for Assistance
    processed in 3 weeks) vs. Charlie (160,000
    Applications for Assistance processed in 18
    months)

37
  • Keep the Nations flood maps credible, enhance
    their quality, and maintain ease of data
    availability
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com