Does Openness to Trade Make Countries More Vulnerable to Sudden Stops, or Less? Using Gravity to Establish Causality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Does Openness to Trade Make Countries More Vulnerable to Sudden Stops, or Less? Using Gravity to Establish Causality

Description:

Textbook Result: Countries that trade a smaller share of GDP are prone to larger ... (1) What is the effect of trade openness on the vulnerability to sudden stops ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: edu158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Does Openness to Trade Make Countries More Vulnerable to Sudden Stops, or Less? Using Gravity to Establish Causality


1
Does Openness to Trade Make Countries More
Vulnerable to Sudden Stops, or Less? Using
Gravity to Establish Causality
  • Eduardo A. Cavallo
    Jeffrey A. Frankel
  • CID and KSG Harvard University
    NBER and KSG Harvard
    University
  • Second Workshop of the Latin American Finance
    Network
  • Cartagena, Colombia, December 3-4 2004

2
Motivation
  • Textbook Result Countries that trade a smaller
    share of GDP are prone to larger swings in the
    real exchange rate in the aftermath of external
    shocks (expenditure-switching) and/or to larger
    reductions in spending (expenditure-reduction).
  • One type of external shock is sudden stops in
    capital flows large and unexpected fall in
    capital inflows Calvo (1998).
  • An equal-sized shock triggers, ceteris paribus, a
    larger real exchange rate depreciation and/or
    more expenditure reduction in a country that
    trades a smaller share of GDP than in an
    otherwise identical country Calvo et al. (2003),
    Cavallo (2004).

3
Motivation (Cont.)
  • Real exchange rate depreciations are costly in
    terms of output-loss in countries with balance
    sheets problems Balance Sheet Literature
    Krugman (1999).... Sharp reductions in spending
    are also painful.
  • In more open economies sudden stops are less
    costly (i.e. less contractionary ex-post)
    Sachs (1985), Guidotti et. al. (2003).
  • Butdoes this make sudden stops more or less
    likely?
  • There is no reason, a priori, why something
    (openness) that makes the consequences of sudden
    stops better (less contractionary) should also
    necessarily make them less frequent.

4
The Questions
  • (1) What is the effect of trade openness on the
    vulnerability to sudden stops implemented by a
    probit model measuring the probability of a
    sudden reduction in the magnitude of net capital
    inflows Calvo et. al. (2003).
  • (2) What is the effect of trade openness on the
    vulnerability to currency crashes implemented by
    a probit model measuring the probability of a
    sudden devaluation Frankel and Rose (1996).

5
The Problem
  • Potential identification problem the endogeneity
    of trade.
  • Possible channels of endogeneity of trade
  • Via income richer countries tend to liberalize
    Frankel and Romer (1999).
  • Via Washington Consensus forces.
  • Experience with crises might itself cause
    liberalization.
  • Feedbacks between trade and financial openness
    Aizenman and Noy (2004).

6
Proposed Solution
  • Use of gravity estimates as instrumental
    variables for trade quantities.
  • Gravity estimates are the predicted trade to
    GDP ratios, where the prediction is based on
    geographical characteristics of the countries.
  • Being based on geography, gravity estimates are
    quite plausibly exogenous, yet they are highly
    correlated to the true trade to GDP ratios.

7
Empirical Investigation
  • We test whether countries that trade more are
    (all else equal) more or less prone to sudden
    stops in capital flows or to currency crises.
  • SSi,t c f(Trade Openness)i,t ?1(Foreign
    Debt/GDP)i,t-1 ?2(Liability Dollarization)i,t-1
    ? (CA/GDP) i,t-1 ? Z µi,t
  • Given that the dependent variable is binary (0,1)
    and endogenous explanatory variables the method
    of estimation is IV probit Newey (1987).
  • Dataset is a stacked cross-section (141
    countries, 1970-2002).

8
Main Variables
  • Sudden Stops binary (0,1). A sudden stop occurs
    during the year in which there is a noticeable
    reduction in the current account deficit that is
    accompanied by a disruptive (i.e., recessionary)
    reduction in foreign capital inflows. Data
    IMF-IFS.
  • Currency Crashes binary (0,1). Foreign Market
    Pressure Index fall in reserves fall in
    the value of the currency. The index measures the
    fall in demand for the countrys currency. A
    crisis episode is defined when there is an
    increase in the index of at least 10 over the
    preceding period with an exclusion window of 3
    years. Data Frankel and Rose (1996) updated in
    Frankel and Wei (2004).

9
Main Variables (cont.)
  • Trade Openness
  • Instrumented variable Trade to GDP ratio (XM /
    Y).
    Data WB-WDI.
  • Instrument aggregate of bilateral gravity
    estimates.
    Data Andrew Rose website.
  • Liability Dollarization
  • Foreign Liabilities / Money.
    Data IMF-IFS (Line 26C/Line
    34).
  • Foreign Currency Deposits / Total Deposits.
    Data Arteta (2003).

10
Sudden Stops and Currency Crashes are less
frequent in open economies
11
...and the pattern is even more marked with the
instrument
12
Results (Dependent variable Sudden Stops)
Probit IV Probit IV Linear IV-GLS RE (linear)
Openness t -0.53 (0.259) -2.451 (0.813) -0.066 (0.022) -0.066 (0.026)
Foreign Debt / GDP t-1 -0.080 (0.217) 0.196 (0.275) 0.0066 (0.0182) -0.006 (0.0155)
Liability Dollarization t-1 0.316 (0.195) 0.591 (0.256) 0.027 (0.0169) 0.027 (0.0149)
Current Account / GDP t-1 -4.068 (1.297) -7.386 (2.06) -0.317 (0.10) -0.317 (0.095)
Obs. 778 1062 1040 1040
Statistically significant at 10, 5, and
1
Additional Controls Constant term, Year FE,
Regional Dummies, International Reserves / Months
of Imports, Institutional Quality, GDP per
capita, Short Term Debt, FDI/GDP, Dummy for
Nominal Exchange Rate Rigidity.
13
Results (Dependent variable Currency Crashes)
Probit IV Probit
Openness t -0.57 (0.269) -1.73 (0.918)
Foreign Debt / GDP t-1 0.23 (0.231) 0.59 (0.373)
Liability Dollarization t-1 0.027 (0.249) 0.18 (0.234)
Exchange Rate Rigidity Index t-1 0.13 (0.094) 0.22 (0.113)
Ln Reserves in Months of Imports t-1 -0.26 (0.082) -0.37 (0.099)
Obs. 557 841
Additional Controls Constant term, Year FE,
Regional Dummies, CA/GDP, Institutional Quality,
GDP per capita, Short Term Debt, FDI/GDP.
14
Conclusions
  • Countries that trade less are, ceteris paribus,
    more prone to sudden stops and to currency
    crashes.
  • Raising the Trade / GDP by 10 percentage points
    (Argentina to Australia) reduces the probability
    of a sudden stop by approximately 32.
  • At good times closed economies can borrow, but
    at bad times investors seem to anticipitate
    that closed economies will suffer more in the
    aftermath of a shock and thereby are more likely
    to attack them (self-fulfilling pessimism).
  • To be safer remain open to trade.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com