Fairassociated E' coli O157 Outbreaks and Risk Reduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Fairassociated E' coli O157 Outbreaks and Risk Reduction

Description:

Fairassociated E' coli O157 Outbreaks and Risk Reduction – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: isdh1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fairassociated E' coli O157 Outbreaks and Risk Reduction


1
(No Transcript)
2
Fair-associated E. coli O157 Outbreaks and Risk
Reduction
  • James F. Howell, D.V.M., M.P.H.
  • Diplomate, ACVPH
  • Deputy for Operations
  • Public Health Preparedness and Emergency Response
  • Indiana State Department of Health

3
Zoonotic InfectionsTransmission Routes
  • Zoonoses Diseases shared by animals and humans
  • Animal-to-human transmission
  • Human-to-animal
  • Human-to-human by the same pathogens
  • Transmission routes
  • Direct contact
  • Indirect contact
  • Food
  • Water
  • Air
  • Other environmental media and routes

4
Some Zoonotic Viral Pathogens
Viruses Animals?_____ Hepatitis E virus
swine, rats, etc. Reoviruses mice, others
(type 3) Rotaviruses probably
(bovine) Adenoviruses maybe? Caliciviruses p
robably (bovine swine) Orthomyxoviruses
(influenza) yes (swine, avian,
etc.) Coronavirus SARS yes (civets,
others) __________________________________________
____________________ Prions - spongiform
encephalopathogens Yes (bovine,
others) __________________________________________
____________________ An international
problem Avian (or other animal) swine ? human
pandemic influenza Bird flu avian ? human
5
Some Zoonotic Parasitic Pathogens
  • Parasite________________________________________
  • Protozoan
  • Cryptosporidium parvum yes
  • Giardia lamblia yes
  • Entamoeba histolytica rare
  • Balantidium coli yes (pigs)
  • Toxoplasma gondii yes
  • Helminths
  • Trichuris trichiura pigs
  • Ascaris suum yes (pigs)
  • Strongyloides stercoralis yes (dogs others)
  • Taenia spp. cattle pigs
  • Echinococcus spp. Dogs others

6
Some Zoonotic Bacterial Pathogens
  • Bacterium/Group Animal Other sources
  • Salmonella spp. yes no
  • (except S. typhi) no no
  • Campylobacter spp. yes yes
  • Escherichia coli yes no
  • Aeromonas hydrophila yes yes
  • Yersinia enterocolitica yes yes
  • Vibrio cholerae other Vibrio spp. yes yes
  • Brucella yes no
  • Leptospira yes no
  • Mycobacteria spp. (non-tubercular)rare
    (rising?) yes

7
State and county fairs
  • Millions of visitors
  • Children
  • Farm animal contact
  • Outbreaks of E. coli O157

8
How common is E. coli O157 at US fairs?
  • Summer 02
  • USDA State and county fair survey
  • Goal Estimate the prevalence of enteric
    pathogens in livestock at fairs

9
Various species sampled
Cattle
10
Prevalence at US agricultural fairs
  • E. coli O157
  • 32 (100) of 32 fairs
  • 233/2914 8.0 of livestock
  • Persistence gt 9 months

Keen JE et al, VTEC 2003, Edinburgh, Scotland
11
Recent outbreaks- E. coli O157
  • Fair Year Ill
  • Medina county (OH) 2000 27
  • Lorain county (OH) 2001 111
  • Ozaukee county (WI) 2001 59
  • Wyandot county (OH) 2001 88
  • Lane county (OR) 2002 60
  • Calaveras county (CA) 2002 4
  • Fort Bend county (TX) 2003 25
  • North Carolina State Fair 2004 108
  • Florida (multiple fairs) 2005 gt30
  • Indiana (county fair) 2006 5

12
Transmission routes
Waterborne Direct contact with animals Indirect
contact
13
Direct animal contact
14
Indirect contact
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
  • gt800,000 visitors between October 15-24, 2004
  • Confirmed and probable E. coli O157H7
    infections
  • 108 cases, 15 HUS
  • Median age 5 years (range 1-61)
  • 43 culture-confirmed or HUS
  • Predominant PFGE pattern (Pattern A)

20
  • Case-control study risk factors
  • Attending Petting Zoo B
  • Contact with feces and bedding

21
Animals and farm environment
  • Fecal samples
  • Sheep, goats, and large animal species
  • Hide swabs from sheep and goats
  • Environmental samples

22
Culture results
  • Fecal samples
  • 12 (60) of 20 sheep and goats
  • Camel
  • 0 of 20 hide swabs
  • 10 (63) of 16 environmental samples
  • All 22 isolates indistinguishable from
    predominant outbreak subtype

23
Mitigation Steps
  • Hand washing facilities
  • Increased emphasis on keeping barns clean
  • Signage to indicate risk
  • Control visitor flow thru petting zoos

24
Petting Zoos
25
Observational Study ConnecticutSeptember,
2006Yale Emerging Infections Program
  • 10 fairs with animal contact areas
  • 28 had risk info signage (but 93 dealt with
    rabies)
  • 52 had hand hygiene instruction signs
  • 60 had hand hygiene facilities
  • 5.6 of visitors per hour performed some sort of
    hand hygiene

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
Resources
  • http//www.nasphv.org/documentsCompendiaAnimals.ht
    ml
  • Outbreak of Escherichia coli 0157H7 and
    Campylobacter Among Attendees of the Washington
    County Fair New York, 1999 - Brief Article,
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Sept 17,
    1999
  • WWW.cdc.gov/healthypets

38
Contact Information
James F. Howell, D.V.M., M.P.H. Indiana State
Department of Health (317) 233-7272 jhowell_at_isdh
.in.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com