Diversity Initiatives in Higher Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Diversity Initiatives in Higher Education

Description:

... status in employment, educational programs and activities, and admissions. ... who gain access to their first choice of College two years after admission. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: texastechu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diversity Initiatives in Higher Education


1
Diversity Initiatives in Higher Education
  • Texas Tech University
  • Office of the President
  • Office of Institutional Diversity

2
Overview of Presentation
  • What is equity?
  • What is the Equity Scorecard?
  • How it works.
  • Some salient examples
  • Washington State University
  • UW campuses
  • Next Steps

3
What is Equity?
  • Equity is achieved when students of color
    succeed in a variety of measures relative to
    their representation (including access and
    excellence) on campus.
  • Why Equity Matters Implications for a
    Democracy
  • Diversity Scorecard Project, Center for Urban
    Education
  • University of Southern California

4
What is Equity?
  • Sustaining a respectful and inclusive
    environment that ensures equal opportunity for
    all persons regardless of race, sex, color,
    religion, creed, national origin, or ancestry,
    age, marital status, sexual orientation,
    disability, or Vietnam-era veteran status in
    employment, educational programs and activities,
    and admissions.
  • University of Michigan
  • Office of Institutional Diversity

5
Equity Scorecard
  • Provides a process by which equity, for all, can
    be achieved through data driven decision making.
    By using existing disaggregated data,
    institutions are able to locate the most critical
    gaps in the academic performances of students of
    color and other underrepresented students to
    mitigate some of the inequities.

6
Equity Scorecard How it works
  • Awareness- Engage in institutional self-
    assessment to provide a clear and unambiguous
    picture of inequities.
  • Interpretation- Analyze and integrate the meaning
    of the inequities.
  • Action- Develop strategic actions to achieve
    equity in educational outcomes based on data, not
    assumptions.

7
An illustration of the EqS Framework
8
Some Observations
  • The selection of evidence teams is critical
  • Regularly meet to overcome obstacles to goal
    obtainment
  • Analyze data and vital signs
  • Develop Timetable for projects
  • Present to the senior administration and campus
    community

9
Case Studies
  • Washington State University (WSU) rigorously
    began its equity scorecard in 2005 after
    reorganizing its Office of Equity and Diversity.
    Under the four areas of the framework (access,
    retention, excellence, and institutional climate)
    the evidence team focused on two objectives.

10
Case Study (WSU)
  • Framework Objectives
  • Access
  • To enroll students at WSU at rates equitable with
    their share of the traditionally college-aged
    population in the state.
  • To improve yield among admitted students of color
    from within the State of Washington.
  • Retention
  • Achieve equitable graduation rates across gender
    ad ethnicity at WSU.
  • Achieve equitable graduation rates in key
    programs across gender, race, and ethnicity for
    all students at WSU.

11
Case Study (WSU)
  • Excellence
  • To achieve equitable rates of representation on
    the Honor Roll.
  • To enroll and graduate students of color in WSUs
    Honors College at rates equitable with their
    share of the student body.
  • Institutional Climate
  • Improve the quality of data regarding race and
    ethnicity of faculty
  • Establish an institutional climate of equity for
    all students

12
Case Study (UW-Whitewater)
  • University of Wisconsin- Whitewater examined
    equity across the four areas of the framework.
    The institutional objectives are incorporated in
    the measures of what is considered equitable.

13
Case Study (UW-Whitewater)
  • Equity (access)- UW-W should measure its
    populations of multicultural students and compare
    the proportionate enrollment of each ethnic group
    to the proportions of High School graduates in
    the 13-county region surrounding UW-W. Equity is
    achieved when the proportions in the UW-W
    population are equal to the proportion of High
    school graduates in the region.
  • Equity (access)- UW-W should measure the
    proportions of multicultural students who gain
    access to their first choice of College two years
    after admission. Equity is achieved when the
    proportions of multicultural students gaining
    access to their choice of College is equal to the
    proportion of White students gaining access.

14
Case Study (UW-W)
  • Equity (retention)- UW-W should measure the
    first-to-second year retention rate for
    multicultural students. Equity is achieved when
    the retention rate is equal to the retention rate
    for White students.
  • Equity (retention)- UW-W should measure the
    six-year graduation rate for each multicultural
    group. Equity is achieved when the graduation
    rate for each group is equal to the graduation
    rate for White students.
  • Equity (excellence)- UW-W should measure the rate
    at which multicultural students achieve
    university honors GPA of 3.4 or higher. Equity is
    achieved multicultural students achieve
    University honors at the same rate of White
    students.

15
WSU Enrollment 2001-2005
16
UW-W Enrollment rates
17
WSU 6-yr Graduation rates
18
UW-W 6-yr. Graduation Rates (1996-1999)
19
Similarities
  • Both evidence teams met once a month and analyzed
    data and interpreted vital signs of their
    respective institutions.
  • Both teams included timelines and focused
    objectives
  • Both teams were committed to meeting the
    objectives under the framework

20
Some Contrasts
  • WSUs evidence team made up of 13 members across
    the university system (including Vice Provost,
    Associate Dean, and program coordinators)
  • UW-Ws evidence team consisting of 8 members
    (Assistant/Associate Vice-Chancellors)
  • Included equity assessment/objective in the
    improvement target (no specific action or
    timetable with regards to reaching the objective)

21
  • Discussion (Q A)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com