Magnetic Resonance Imaging III - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging III

Description:

Slight motion can cause a change in the recorded phase variation across the FOV ... Ringing artifacts. Occurs near sharp boundaries and high-contrast ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: michae354
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Magnetic Resonance Imaging III


1
Magnetic Resonance Imaging III
  • 3D FT image acquisition
  • Image characteristics
  • Artifacts

2
3D FT image acquisition
  • 3D image acquisition (volume imaging) requires
    the use of a broadband, nonselective RF pulse to
    excite a large volume of spins simultaneously
  • Two phase gradients are applied in the slice
    select and phase encode directions, prior to the
    frequency encode (readout) gradient

3
(No Transcript)
4
3D FT acquisition (cont.)
  • Image acquisition time equal to
  • A three-dimensional Fourier transform (three 1-D
    Fourier transforms) is applied for each column,
    row, and depth axis in the image matrix cube
  • Volumes obtained may be isotropic or anisotropic

5
3D FT acquisition (cont.)
  • Using a standard TR of 600 msec with one average
    for a T1-weighted exam, a 128 x 128 x 128 cube
    requires 163 minutes
  • GRE pulse sequences with TR of 50 msec acquire
    same image in about 15 minutes
  • High SNR is achieved compared to similar 2D
    image, allowing reconstruction of very thin
    slices with good detail (less partial volume
    averaging)
  • Downside is increased probability of motion
    artifacts and increased computer hardware
    requirements

6
Image characteristics
  • Basis for evaluating MR image characteristics
    formed by
  • Spatial resolution
  • Contrast sensitivity
  • SNR parameters

7
Spatial resolution
  • Spatial resolution dependent on
  • FOV, which determines pixel size
  • Gradient field strength, which determines FOV
  • Receiver coil characteristics (head coil, body
    coil, various surface coil designs)
  • Sampling bandwidth
  • Image matrix

8
Spatial resolution (cont.)
  • Common image matrix sizes are 128 x 128, 256 x
    128, 256 x 192, and 256 x 256
  • In general, MR provides spatial resolution
    approximately equivalent to that of CT
  • Pixel dimensions on order of 0.5 to 1.0 mm for
    high-contrast object and reasonably large FOV
    (gt25 cm)
  • Small FOV acquisitions with high gradient
    strengths and surface coils, effective pixel size
    may be smaller than 0.1 to 0.2 mm
  • Slice thickness usually 5 to 10 mm
  • Dimension producing most partial volume averaging

9
Spatial resolution (cont.)
  • Higher field strength magnet generates larger SNR
  • Allows thinner slice acquisition for same SNR
  • Improves resolution by reducing partial volume
    effects
  • Increased RF absorption (heating) occurs
  • Increased artifact production and lengthening of
    T1 relaxation
  • Decreases T1 contrast sensitivity because of
    increased saturation of longitudinal magnetization

10
Contrast sensitivity
  • Contrast sensitivity of MR allows discrimination
    of soft tissues and contrast due to blood flow
  • Arises due to differences in the T1, T2, spin
    density, and flow velocity characteristics
  • Contrast dependent upon these parameters achieved
    through proper application of pulse sequences
  • MR contrast agents becoming important for
    differentiation of normal and diseased tissues
  • Absolute contrast sensitivity ultimately limited
    by SNR and presence of image artifacts

11
Signal-to-noise ratio
12
SNR (cont.)
  • Image acquisition and reconstruction methods in
    order of increasing SNR
  • Point acquisition methods
  • Line acquisition methods
  • Two-dimensional Fourier transform methods
  • Three-dimensional Fourier transform methods
  • In each of these techniques, the volume of tissue
    that is excited is the major contributing factor
    to improving the SNR and image quality

13
Artifacts
  • Artifacts show up as positive or negative signal
    intensities that do not accurately represent the
    imaged anatomy
  • Some relatively insignificant and easily
    identified others obscure or mimic pathologic
    processes or anatomy
  • Classified into three broad areas those based
    on the machine, on the patient, and on signal
    processing

14
Machine-dependent artifacts
  • Magnetic field inhomogeneities are either global
    or local field perturbations that lead to
    mismapping of tissues within the image, and cause
    more rapid T2 relaxation
  • Proper site planning, self-shielded magnets,
    automatic shimming, and preventative maintenance
    procedures help to reduce inhomogeneities
  • Use of gradient refocused echo acquisition places
    increased demands on field uniformity

15
Local field inhomogeneities
  • Ferromagnetic objects in or on the patient (e.g.,
    makeup, metallic implants, prostheses, surgical
    clips, dentures) produce field distortions
  • Incorrect proton mapping, displacement, and
    appearance as a signal void are common findings
  • Nonferromagnetic conducting materials (e.g.,
    aluminum) produce field distortions that disturb
    the local magnetic environment

16
Susceptibility artifacts
  • Drastic changes in the magnetic susceptibility
    will distort the magnetic field
  • Most common changes occur at tissue-air
    interfaces (e.g., lungs and sinuses), which cause
    a signal loss due to more rapid dephasing (T2)
    at the tissue-air interface

17
Gradient field artifacts
  • Reconstruction algorithm assumes ideal, linear
    gradients
  • Any deviation or temporal instability will be
    represented as a distortion
  • Tendency of lower strength occurs at periphery of
    FOV
  • Anatomic compression occurs
  • Especially pronounced on coronal or sagittal
    images with large FOV (typically gt35 cm)

18
(No Transcript)
19
Gradient field artifacts (cont.)
  • Minimizing spatial distortion
  • Reduce FOV by lowering gradient field strength,
    or
  • Hold gradient field strength and number of
    samples constant while decreasing frequency
    bandwidth

20
Radiofrequency coil artifacts
  • Surface coils produce variations in uniformity
    across the image caused by RF attenuation, RF
    mismatching, and sensitivity falloff with
    distance
  • Intense image signal close to surface coil
    attenuation with increased distance results in
    shading and loss of image brightness
  • Imbalance in amplifiers use with RF quadrature
    coils results in bright spot in center of image
  • Variations in gain with quadrature coils can
    cause ghosting of objects diagonally in the image

21
Radiofrequency artifacts
  • Stray RF signals that propagate to the MRI
    antenna can produce various artifacts in the
    image
  • Narrow-band noise creates noise patterns
    perpendicular to the phase encoding direction
  • Broadband RF noise disrupts the image over a
    larger area with diffuse, contrast-reducing
    herringbone artifacts
  • Site planning and RF shielding materials reduce
    stray RF interference to an acceptably low level

22
RF artifacts (cont.)
  • RF energy received by adjacent slices during a
    multislice acquisition due to nonrectangular RF
    pulses excite and saturate protons in adjacent
    slices
  • On T2-weighted images, the slice-to-slice
    interference degrades the SNR
  • On T1-weighted images, the extra spin saturation
    reduces image contrast by reducing longitudinal
    relaxation during the TR interval
  • Slice interleaving can mitigate cross-excitation
    by reordering slices into two groups with gaps

23
(No Transcript)
24
K-space errors
  • Errors in k-space encoding affect the
    reconstructed image, and cause the artifactual
    superimposition of wave patterns across the FOV
  • A single bad pixel introduces a significant
    artifact
  • If the bad pixels in the k-space are identified,
    simple averaging of signals in adjacent pixels
    can significantly reduce the artifacts

25
(No Transcript)
26
Motion artifacts
  • Most ubiquitous and noticeable artifacts in MRI
  • Arise from voluntary and involuntary movement,
    and flow (blood, CSF)
  • Mostly occur along the phase encode direction,
    since adjacent lines of phase-encoded protons are
    separated by a TR interval that can last 3,000
    msec or longer
  • Slight motion can cause a change in the recorded
    phase variation across the FOV throughout the MR
    acquisition sequence

27
(No Transcript)
28
Motion artifacts (cont.)
  • Some methods of motion compensation
  • Cardiac and respiratory gating
  • Respiratory ordering of the phase encoding
    projections based on location in respiratory
    cycle
  • Signal averaging to reduce artifacts of random
    motion
  • Short TE spin echo sequences (limited to spin
    density, T1-weighted scans). Long TE scans (T2
    weighting) are more susceptible to motion

29
(No Transcript)
30
Chemical shift artifacts
  • Refers to resonance frequency variations
    resulting from intrinsic magnetic shielding of
    anatomic structures
  • Produced by molecular structure and electron
    orbital characteristics
  • Data acquisition methods cannot directly
    discriminate a frequency shift due to the
    application of a frequency encode gradient or to
    a chemical shift artifact
  • Water and fat differences cannot be distinguished
    by frequency difference induced by the gradient

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Chemical shift artifacts (cont.)
  • Large gradient strength confines chemical shift
    within the pixel boundaries
  • Significant SNR penalty due to broad RF bandwidth
    required for given slice thickness
  • STIR parameters can be selected to eliminate
    signals due to fat at the bounce point
  • Swapping the phase and frequency encode gradient
    can displace chemical shift artifacts from a
    specific image region

34
Ringing artifacts
  • Occurs near sharp boundaries and high-contrast
    transitions in the image
  • Appears as multiple, regularly spaced parallel
    bands of alternating bright and dark signal that
    slowly fades with distance
  • Cause is insufficient sampling of high
    frequencies inherent at sharp discontinuities in
    the signal
  • More likely for smaller digital matrix sizes
  • Commonly occurs at skull/brain interfaces, where
    there is a large transition in signal amplitude

35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
Wraparound artifacts
  • Result of mismapping of anatomy that lies outside
    the FOV but within the slice volume
  • Usually displaced to opposite side of image
  • Caused by nonlinear gradients or by undersampling
    of the frequencies contained in the returned
    signal envelope
  • Sampling rate must be twice the maximal frequency
    that occurs in the object (the Nyquist sampling
    limit)

38
(No Transcript)
39
Wraparound artifacts (cont.)
  • In the frequency encode direction a low-pass
    filter can be applied to the acquired time domain
    signal to eliminate frequencies beyond the
    Nyquist frequency
  • In the phase encode direction aliasing artifacts
    can be reduced by increasing the number of phase
    encode steps
  • Trade-off is increased image time

40
Partial volume artifacts
  • Arise from the finite size of the voxel over
    which the signal is averaged
  • Results in a loss of detail and spatial
    resolution
  • Reduction of partial-volume artifacts is done by
    using a smaller pixel size and/or a smaller slice
    thickness
  • SNR for smaller voxel is reduced for similar
    imaging time, resulting in noisier signal with
    less low-contrast sensitivity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com