Registered Pension Switch Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Registered Pension Switch Issues

Description:

Suitability Letter ... This route is not suitable if an 'ordinary' PP is recommended (Regulatory Update ... Suitability Letter. Illustration and KFD: Reference ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: nicoleh7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Registered Pension Switch Issues


1
Registered Pension Switch Issues Guidance
  • This training is aimed at advisers who are
    recommending the movement of funds from
    PP/SIPP/Stakeholder to PP/SIPP/Stakeholder.
  • It DOES NOT cover any transfer from occupational
    schemes (e.g.EPP/SSAS/CIMP/COMP) or Final
    Salary/Defined Benefit. Transfers from Section 32
    buyout or non-profit bulk buy-outs are also
    classed as occupational scheme transfers in this
    context

2
Registered Pension Switch Issues Guidance
  • Triggers for Switching
  • There can be many reasons why the switching of an
    existing PPP is being considered these should
    be shown clearly in the Suitability Letter on
    the Factfind. The driving factors MUST be
    clearly identified, quantified and recorded
    before the suitability report is constructed

3
Triggers for Switching
  • Fund performance (evidence that the funds of the
    existing provider were considered first)
  • Fund selection (ditto as above)
  • Restricted Fund selection to Risk Profile
    mismatch
  • High charges
  • Small value and consolidation with other funds
    for discount on charges
  • Pre retirement positioning
  • Poor service levels
  • Policyholder fallen out with Provider
  • The drivers for the recommended transfer MUST be
    clearly identified based on the clients real
    needs. Not based on a pre-determined course
    devised by the adviser.

4
Research on existing PPP
  • Data to be collected and summarised in SL
  • Current Fund Value if no Fund Value offered,
    likely to be a With Profit Deferred Annuity or
    Pure Endowment contract see below.
  • Transfer Value - Any penalty should be shown in
    SL as xxxx and percentage of the current full
    fund.
  • With Profits needs DETAILED comment on the
    history of the fund, current annual and terminal
    bonuses, MVA and an annualised historical
    achieved yield (should be available in the w/p
    guide of the provider). Also asset allocation of
    the fund and the guaranteed growth inherent in
    any guaranteed sum assured plus bonuses already
    paid.

5
Research on existing PPP
  • Data to be collected and summarised in SL
  • Projected Value at NRD
  • Reduction in Yield - if available from old data
  • Funds used and other funds available fund
    switching costs
  • Charge structure
  • Death benefits (return of fund or return of
    contributions etc)
  • Additional benefits waiver if contribution
    ongoing
  • Any guarantee these do appear as Guaranteed
    Annuity Rates (including the basis on which these
    are provided such as NRD, spouses benefit,
    escalation, etc.), Guaranteed Growth Rates,
    Guaranteed Fund Values at NRD, and Guaranteed
    Annuity at NRD.

6
Suitability Letter
  • This is best issued to client pre-sale rather
    than post sale to allow fully informed
    investment decision to be made. This will cover
    usual main areas of any SL in terms of Advice
    Process (ToB, IDD, Purpose of SL, Current
    Situation, Risk Profile etc)
  • Relevant areas from above then appear if No
    Guarantees then state this is SL.
  • Options open to client need covering do
    nothing, amend existing plan, move to any other
    pension plan held, move to new plan, along with a
    full side by side comparison of charges,
    available funds, RIY etc. If the new plan is
    more expensive then a full justification will be
    required before the case can proceed. 
  • If independent research engines are used (Aequos,
    etc.) then these must not be manipulated in
    favour of a specific provider.
  • New provider is introduced with initial fund
    proposals with comments why selected on both.
    Match latter to Risk Profile. Match NRD to
    clients Selected Retirement Age.

7
Comparison of charges
  • These can be tabular or simply compare projected
    values at common growth rate to common age. Care
    should be taken that illustration used for new
    plan is based on funds selected as AMC will
    affect figures. Highest projection shows best
    costs. Care some providers show Protected Rights
    fund to age 65 unless requested otherwise.
  • Transferring to a plan with higher charges may be
    suitable for a client seeking potential for
    better growth via wider fund selection.
  • However, ALL cases must include a comparison to
    stakeholder and reasons why. This route is not
    suitable if an ordinary PP is recommended
    (Regulatory Update 64).

8
Suitability Letter
  • Illustration and KFD
  • Reference to enclosure and commission disclosure.
  • Warnings
  • Standard warnings for Pension and investment
    funds (future values not guaranteed etc) plus
    out of the market during transfer warning as
    for ISA transfers. Also comment that these cases
    can take considerable time for the funds to be
    finalised and passed over.

9
Suitability Letter
  • Conclusion
  • Added value to client needs to be demonstrated
    from proposed transfer based on aims/risk
    profile/recommendations made.
  • Requirement for ongoing annual reviews to
    re-balance fund selections etc. must be
    discussed. If a portfolio approach is used based
    on asset classes then this is particularly
    important.
  • IF IN DOUBT ASK THE NETWORK PENSIONS
  • TEAM!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com