Title: A Comparative Study of Higher Education Expansion Policy in China
1A Comparative Study of Higher Education
Expansion Policy in China India Theory
Practice
- SHREEPARNA ROY
- Dept. of East Asian Studies,
- University of Delhi, India
2The presentation is divided into 4 parts
- I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY HIGHER
EDUCATION - II AN OUTLINE OF HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF
HIGHER EDUCATION IN CHINA INDIA - III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY QUALITY
OF EDUCATION - IV THEORY PRACTICE
3Some clarifications at the outset
- Why compare China India?
- Why not rely on statistics?
- Why policy analysis as methodology?
4Some clarifications at the outset (1 of 3) Why
compare China India?
- Typical similarities Big countries, long
history, foreign rule, most populous countries
similar social problems - Importance in regional global affairs
- Spectacular economic growth rate
- Potential to become large forces in the world
economy - Both have essential strengths cheap labor,
large internal markets, high industrialization - Human capital required in the era of knowledge
economy in the 21st century
5Some clarifications at the outset (2 of 3) Why
not rely on statistics?
- Definition of terms are different
- UNESCO definition one who can with
understanding both read and write a short simple
statement relevant to his everyday life Chinas
definition one who can read and write 450 (In
interior, 150) characters. which characters?
Which words? - Quantifying method of statistics is dissimilar
- A large no of Indian Muslims study in Madrasa.
India is bound by law to accept them as literate.
But, UNESCO does not recognize - Official net enrolment rate in China
overestimates students actually attending classes
because it only records enrolment at the
beginning of the school year - Data collection technique is different
- Before 1992, the official net enrolment rate is
defined as the share of children between 7 and 11
enrolled in school. After 1992, no uniform
definition is adopted. It varies across
provinces (Tsui Kai-yuen, Economic Reform and
Attainment in Basic Education in China, The
China Quarterly, no. 149, march 1997) - Statistics on China manifold
6Some clarifications at the outset (3 of 3) Why
policy analysis as methodology?
- Policies are not formed in the vacuum, but are
linked to each other - They reflect socio-economic-political-cultural
situation - Importance of policies vary according to
perception of policymakers - In most developing countries, it is linked with
emerging trend of development - Policies change with economic development goals
7PART I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY HIGHER
EDUCATION
- Changed Perception of Development its Linkage
with Education - Viable Options for Developing Countries
- Development Higher Education
8PART I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
HIGHER EDUCATION (1of 7) 1. Changed Perception
of Development its Linkage with Education (1of
3)
- In the Enlightenment period it was realized that
human beings can reshape their future influence
the environment around them through knowledge - But objective orientation of education in
development kept changing with emergence of new
development theories after the World War II - In immediate post World War II period development
meant economic prosperity - Non-economic factors were analyzed for their
contribution to economic growth - Education, though regarded as residual, was
more important than other factors of production,
such as land, labour and capital - Income generation through economic growth was
overstressed whereas equitable distributions of
that income other social aspects of development
were grossly neglected. The result was some
achievement coupled with various social problems
9PART I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
HIGHER EDUCATION (2 of7)1. Changed Perception of
Development its Linkage with Education (2 of 3)
- Since the 2nd half of the 20th century, the focus
shifted towards non-economic aspects of
development, especially Theodore Schultzs work
on investment on human being, later developed
into human capital theory - High returns from investment in education and
skill training in comparison to investment in
physical capital increased importance of
education skill training - By last decades of the 20th century, theorists in
general acknowledged that the real motive force
of economic progress is people - Some experts opine that the key to productivity
growth is increase in human capital in general - Some argue that it is research and development
- Both models affect development both depend
heavily on expanding human capabilities
10PART I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
HIGHER EDUCATION (3of 7)1. Changed Perception of
Development its Linkage with Education (3 of 3)
- Education supplies educated workforceboth people
with higher skills to carry out research those
with more basic skills to put the results into
practice - The UN advocates human developmentputting
overall development of individuals at the centre
of all developmentdevelopment of the people,
for the people by the people - UN suggests 4 ways to create a desirable link
between economic and human development.
investing in education and skill training is one
of them - Development is now viewed as a harmonious
combination of material (economic) and
non-material (social) aspects - Development is also viewed as indigenous, with
people as subject of it. So, development is not
possible with somebody elses knowledge and
thinking. Everybody has to develop his or her
creativity and capability through education,
formal or non-formal - The Millennium Development Goals reinforces
importance of education in development
11PART I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
HIGHER EDUCATION (4of 7) 2. Viable Options for
Developing Countries (1 of 2)
- SIX CRITICAL AREAS OF CHOICE F. Harbison
- The choice between levels basic or higher
education - Literate workforce is necessary for sustained
level of economic growth, but the effect of
secondary and higher levels of education on
economic growth has much shorter time lag than
primary education -
- Science and technology or liberal art education
- Manpower planning requires stress on sc tech
education as realistic education but liberal art
education fosters intelligence human values -
- Formal or non-formal education
- Span of educationwhether it starts ends with
formal schooling or is a lifelong process? Since
the 1970s basic aim of education is to impart
knowledge, not formal schooling. So, it can take
place at home, at educational institutions or at
workplace
12PART I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
HIGHER EDUCATION (5of 7) 2. Viable Options for
Developing Countries (2 of 2)
- Choice between quality and quantity of educated
persons - Increase enrollment to raise more low-skilled
manpower quickly at the cost of quality or check
expansion of enrollments to raise high quality
manpower - Purpose of education satisfy individual needs or
the states needs - Should education be an investment (economic
implications of education), directed towards
obtaining direct immediate results through
vocational training or consumption (social
welfare), aimed predominantly to enrich the
individual - Choice of incentives free play of market or
provide incentive manipulate - In the era of economic globalization, states have
discarded the system of state controlled economy
in favour of open market system as development
strategy, including education. Should governments
regulate education or allow market to play a free
role?
13PART I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
HIGHER EDUCATION (6 of 7) 3. Development Higher
Education (1 of 2)
- IMPORTANCE OF HIGHER EDUCATION
- is backbone of development programmes plays
vital role in development process - fast economic growth requires high level trained
manpower - receptiveness to change capacity for
development depend upon level of learning
training - economic globalization poses new challenges to
established higher education systems
14 PART I INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
HIGHER EDUCATION (7 of 7) 3. Development
Higher Education (2 of 2)
- factors hindering higher educations contribution
to development - higher education products dont match development
requirement - quality and efficiency have deteriorated
- higher educations cost is extraordinarily high
- financing was socially inequitable and
economically inefficient - to acquire a competitive edge, higher education
systems need to be reformed - suggestions to governments
- enhance quality, improve efficiency, share cost
with beneficiaries contain educational output
(WB) - effective policy measures efficient
implementation (UN)
15PART II AN OUTLINE OF HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF
HIGHER EDUCATION IN CHINA INDIA
- Traditional Education
- Higher Education since the Second Half of the
20th Century - Contemporary Economic Reform and Higher Education
Policy
16PART II AN OUTLINE (1 of 8) 1. Traditional
Education (1 of 3)
- Necessity
- Education without broad clear cultural
consciousness remains a limited craft - The history of education is also history of
culture - Education reform is linked closely to a countrys
cultural transformation - Must know the socio-political-cultural-economic
situation in which it is to function
17PART II AN OUTLINE (2 of 8) 1. Traditional
Education (2 of 3)
- HISTORICAL SIMILARITIES
- High respect for education, but elitist
confined to a handful of people - Hierarchical education system with importance to
birth social class - China
- By the Tang dynasty, schools were divided into
three levels by imperial order to cater to
children of high, middle low ranking officials
- India
- Hindu education in Gurukul was tailored to the
needs of Brahmin boys who were taught by Brahmin
teachers - Muslim education was similarly elitist, although
its orientation reflected economic factors rather
than those of caste background
18PART II AN OUTLINE (3 of 8) 1. Traditional
Education (3 of 3)
- POINT OF DEPARTURE (early 20th C with Republican
era in China) - China
- Experimentation with various foreign models of
education - Succeeded to break free from 3000 year old
traditional Confucian education - Broke the direct link between learning and
bureaucratic power - Education reached commoners through Communist
mass literacy campaigns - India
- Followed the British system under British rule
(1757-1947) with no other option - British education policies reinforced elitist
tendencies by tying entrance advancement in
government service to academic education - India strengthened the link between learning and
bureaucratic power - Formal education concentrated into the hands of
Bhramins because of tradition of learning few
other powerful cultivator castes
19PART II AN OUTLINE (4 of 8) 2. Higher Education
since the Second Half of the 20th Century (1 of 2)
- China
- Education ministry split into MoE MoHE under
two ministers (1952) - Main objective of higher education train experts
for economic growth - To elevate educational level of the masses was
secondary task Suzanne Pepper, Radicalism and
Education Reform in 20th Century China p. 181 - Since 2nd FYP period policies of walking on 2
legs, 2 kinds of labour 2 kinds of education
system were implemented to improve quality - This education policy did not conform to the
nationalistic, scientific popular
character of education, Mao opposed by creating
his own set of education policy implemented
them during GLF, SEM CR - Faced serious contradiction between political
ideology practical need (red-expert debate)
over educations role with disastrous effect on
higher education
20PART II AN OUTLINE (5 of 8) 2. Higher Education
since the Second Half of the 20th Century (2 of
2)
- India
- continued with same education policies as under
the British rule (stress on formal higher
education in humanities and natural sc.), because - inherited its socio-political system from the
British, systems need remained the same - partition of India, ensuing communal violence,
large number of refugees internally displaced
people and other social problems warranted
immediate attention - high status of bureaucracy govt. service pulled
youth towards formal education. Vocational
technical education grew slowly, but growth was
more in formal high level technical education
due to tradition - non-formal education system was implemented as
late as in 1979 - India lagged behind China in training mid-level
technicians for economic growth - education is a social cause, to enrich
individuals overall development - no contradiction over the political and economic
role of education
21PART II AN OUTLINE (6 of 8) 3. Contemporary
Economic Reform and Higher Education Policy(1 of
3)
- China opted for market economy in 1978.
- Centered higher education reforms towards
achieving the goal of socialist modernization
based on economic reform in 1985 - India adopted the National Policy on Education in
1986 initiated a long-term series of programs
aimed at improving education system. The policies
put more stress on basic education - Indias economic reform started only in 1991
22PART II AN OUTLINE (7 of 8) 3. Contemporary
Economic Reform and Higher Education Policy (2
of 3)
- Chinas Education reform policies broadly consist
of reform of five sectors Higher Education in
China (Beijing, Government Handbook, 1999), p. 3 - Education provision bifurcate expand
enrolment, but promote key institutes for quality
education - Management system reform decentralization of
decision making, joint establishment, adjustment,
cooperation merger - Investment finance share cost with
beneficiaries (tuition fee), decentralization
of investment to include provincial government,
fund raising by individual institutions - Recruitment job-placement abolish job
security allow market role - The inner-institute management
23PART II AN OUTLINE (8 of 8) 3. Contemporary
Economic Reform and Higher Education Policy (3
of 3)
- India Focus of the Ninth Plan (1997-2002)
- Measures for quality improvement modernization
of syllabi - Extra-budgetary resource mobilization
- Greater attention to issues in governance
- Special focus on issues of educational access
relevance - Conferment of grater autonomy to deserving
colleges - Professional upgradation of teachers
- Consolidation and optimal utilization of the
existing infrastructure through institutional
networking, restructuring expansion
24PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY OF EDUCATION
- Scale of Expansion of Higher Education in China
India - Strategies for Quality Improvement Achievement
25PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY (1 of 8) 1. Scale of Expansion of Higher
Education in China India (1 of 3)
- Development in institutions enrolments in
Regular Institutions of Higher Education China
1990-2005
Source China Statistical Yearbook, 2006, pp.
799-801
26PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY (2 of 8) 1. Scale of Expansion of Higher
Education in China India (2 of 3)
- All India Growth of Student Enrolment (1990 to
2005)
Source University Grants Commission Source
Government of India, 2007, Selected Educational
Statistics 2004-2005
27PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY (3 of 8) 1. Scale of Expansion of Higher
Education in China India (3 of 3)
- India basic statistics at the beginning of
2006-07 academic yr - 369 Universities (222 State Universities, 20
Central Universities, 109 Deemed Universities, 5
Institutions established under state legislations
13 Institutes of National Importance
established by Central Legislation) - 18,064 colleges
- total number of students enrolled more than 11
million - 13 enrolled in University Departments the rest
in affiliated colleges - Source MHRD, 2007
28PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY (4 of 8) 2. Strategies for Quality
Improvement Achievement (1 of 5)
- Two broad areas that deal with the issue of
higher educations quality restructuring the
education system enhancing the quality of both
students and faculty - China and India have adopted a number of policies
towards this end bifurcation of higher
education, management reform, admission and
evaluation system reform, curriculum reform,
teachers training, international cooperation
etc. - Though similar, content scale are sometimes
very different
29PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY (5 of 8) 2. Strategies for Quality
Improvement Achievement (2 of 5)
- in China education is becoming an industry, in
India, is social cause - in China privatization is encouraged, India
restricts role of private players - in China high tuition is serious problem, in
India it is almost free - in China non-formal education is well
established, in India started off in 1979, high
prestige for formal higher education - in China mid level vocational-technical education
is stressed, in India high-tech education is
among the best in the world China world
factory, India world laboratory - in China one entrance exam decides the fate of
students, in India one can apply in as many
colleges one wishes to. In few cases of all India
entrance exam candidates get minimum 3 chances - Indias people friendly policy adherence to
social justice makes it lag far behind China in
educational achievements also in human
development
30PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY (6 of 8) 2. Strategies for Quality
Improvement Achievement (3 of 5)
- Table 3 A comparison of China and Indias
achievement
31PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY (7 of 8) 2. Strategies for Quality
Improvement Achievement (4 of 5)
- Chinas weak points success at high social cost
- improving quality in some universities only
- contributed to large scale disparity in all
segments of education system - access to quality education limited upon locale
financial status -
- citizens are denied constitutional right to equal
treatment - media often report suicides by parents unable to
afford education cost of their children high
suicide rate among youth - politically and morally it is probably hard to
justify the outcome - As a socialist country that came into existent
fighting the socio-economic disparity promised
its citizens equality on every aspect of life,
now does the same itself
32PART III HIGHER EDUCATION EXPANSION POLICY
QUALITY (8 of 8) 2. Strategies for Quality
Improvement Achievement (5 of 5)
- Indias weak points
- India produces world class high level
professional experts without discriminating
against any citizen - But except these (7.5 of all higher education
graduates), quality of higher education is much
below the international standard - Indias higher education policy and measures
actually hinder improvement of quality - Elitism, regional disparity, unequal distribution
of fruits of education low quality remain
common problem in both countries
33PART IV THEORY PRACTICE (1 of 7)
- International theory Vs practice in developing
countries - several changes in theoretical conceptions of
development, theoretical conceptions of education
their linkage during last 6 decades - no single strategy successful in solving problems
of the developing countries till date - some experts allege large gap between theory and
implementation of policies - some argue no strategy without one weak point
- some opine alien ideas are imposed upon people,
so they do not respond to them, so similar
policies have different impact on different
countries. Socio-political-cultural background
plays a very important role - some stress on effective implementation measures
34PART IV THEORY PRACTICE (2 of 7)
- international recommendation on higher education
policy choices Vs practice in China and India - Out of 4 WB suggestions (quality, efficiency,
cost sharing containment of output) - China on theory does not implement containment of
output (in practice it does), implements the
other three through decentralization and free
market - India does not implement containment and cost
sharing, implements the other two through
government control and allowing limited market
intervention
35PART IV THEORY PRACTICE (3 of 7)
- Government policy Vs practice in China India
36PART IV THEORY PRACTICE (4 of 7)
- Other Factors Influencing Education Policy
Formulation Implementation that Influence
Higher Education Quality - state ideology political system
socio-cultural reality - state ideology
- The communist ideology guarantees equality of
conditions, unlike in a democracy, where equality
of opportunity is stressed. Socialism with
Chinese characteristics is a different story - Indian state ideology is socialism, is a welfare
state
37PART IV THEORY PRACTICE (5 of 7)
- political system
- China
- Being a single-party system, the CPC led govt can
take implement any decision in the absence of
opposition parties - The govt is authoritarian (we remember Tiananmen
crackdown, 1989) - India
- Multi party liberal democracy system requires
debate on each decision with the opposition
parties before approval for implementation - India is ruled by coalition govt. Govt. decisions
must satisfy coalition partners before debating
in the parliament. Often leads to compromise. - Soft rule freedom of speech freedom of
expression of citizens are never violated - Legal interventions through PIL sometimes lead to
policy withdrawal
38PART IV THEORY PRACTICE (6 of 7)
- socio-cultural reality
- population policy
- China Implemented in 1979, fertility rate
dropped from 5.81 in 1970 to 1.82 in 2001 - India initiates in 1952, National Population
Policy of India formulated in 2000 with the long
term objective of achieving a stable population
by 2045, fertility rate above 4 - internal migration/mobility
- China strict control over movement of citizens
- India free mobility draws good students to good
institution, while regional institutions teach
leftovers, deteriorating students quality - Reservation policy based on religion caste in
India - Religion and minority run institutions in India
39PART IV THEORY PRACTICE (7 of 7)
- Suggestions
- China too dictatorial, India too liberallittle
change in attitude will bring good result - Future Indian govt. will continue with popular
policies over remedial measures for political
survival - China can implement Taiwan style multi-channel
admission policy to reduce unequal access to
education other disparities - China thus will be much ahead than India in
producing high quality human capital
universalizing education at all levels
40- Thank you
- SHREEPARNA ROY
- Dept. of East Asian Studies,
- University of Delhi, India