Installations 2020

1
Installations 2020
MARINE CORPS
2
Purpose

• Report on status of efforts since Aug IAB
  meeting
• Decision on I-2020 Vision
• Future Steps

3
Process for Today

• Process to Date
• POAM Update
• Progress since Aug IAB
• Vision Discussion
• What is Next

4
Process to Date Timeline
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 1
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
5
Process to Date Aug to Dec
2 0 0 0
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
6
Process for Today

• Process to Date
• Vision Discussion
• Basing Strategy
• Training and Ranges
• Encroachment
• Base Management
• Quality of Service
• What is Next

• Enduring themes
• Vision
• Diverging perspectives
• Implications

7
Umbrella Themes

• Marine warrior ethos culture
• Naval character
• Primacy of MAGTF
• Ability to deploy
• Continuous, uninterrupted access to
  training areas and airspace
• Flexibility and control
• Ownership not required
• Control is
• Link to communities
• Environmental stewardship

8
Forward Presence

• Pacific Basing Study ongoing
• Will incorporate into I-2020
• Forward presence ? Forward basing
• Forward presence demands access to foreign
  ranges and training areas

9
Basing Strategy Enduring Themes

• MEF centered
• Full service
• Proximity to training areas, ranges and
  airspace
• Surge capability
• Explore Joint Basing opportunities
• Reserve activities dispersed throughout the
  United States
• Demographics and politics drive location
  of Reserve units

10
Basing Strategy Vision

• Installations sized for current mission
  with capacity to surge
• F/W Joint Based driven by proximity to
  GCE, ranges and airspace
• R/W and Tilt-Rotor single-sited by
  platform in close proximity to GCE
• USMC enclaves at joint bases
• West Coast Reserve aviation collocated on
  active aviation bases
• Reserves own no real property tenant at
  all locations

11
Basing Strategy Implications

• Costs
• MCON
• Enclaves at joint bases
• Land acquisition/disposal
• Reserves relocation 4th MAW
• JSF Bed-down
• Single-siting
• OM
• Reserve relocation
• Single-siting efficiencies
• Commit to planning studies
• Culture
• Joint basing
• Reserve relocation

12
Basing Strategy Summary

• Summary of Vision

13
Training Ranges Enduring Themes

• MAGTF training
• Small to large unit
• Naval expeditionary character
• Leverage technology to make ranges work
  with future weapons
• Simulation
• Sub-caliber munitions
• Range instrumentation
• Simulation will NOT replace live fire
• Acquire land
• Expand range capability
• Protect from further land loss

14
Training Ranges Enduring Themes

• Encourage joint range use
• USMC
• Other Services
• Partnerships
• Federal, state, local agencies
• National Guard
• Environmental groups

15
Training Ranges Vision

• Expanded range capability
• Marine Corps ownership
• Training enhancements
• Resist further encroachment
• Enhanced simulation
• Fully instrumented ranges
• Create new training areas through
  innovative Master Planning
• Partner with other Services, Federal,
  State and Local agencies, and private
  organizations to maximize range usage and
  protect against loss

16
Training Ranges Implications

• Must determine range requirements
• Must commit to DoD-wide involvement to
  avoid Divide and Conquer
• Costs
• MCON Land acquisition
• OM - Range instrumentation, master plans
• RD Simulation, sub-caliber munitions
• Political
• Land acquisition
• FAA partnerships on SUA/NAR

17
Training Ranges Summary

• Summary of Vision

18
Encroachment Enduring Themes

• Need overall DoD encroachment defense
  strategy to provide a DoD focus
• Marines best articulate Marine
  requirements
• CMC/HQMC provide
• National perspective
• Address national issues
• Interface with Federal agencies
• Local Commanders best positioned to
  address encroachment issues
• Must maintain Regional outlook

19
Encroachment Vision

• USMC engages at ALL levels to protect
  assets and flexibility
• Local Commanders retain Lead
• HQMC coordinates across USMC, with other
  Federal agenciesAggressive media campaign
  plan
• Partner with other agencies and private
  organizations
• Showcase environmental stewardship
• Master Plans and land use studies focus
  on encroachment and compatible land use
  strategies

20
Encroachment Implications

• NOT just a Supporting Establishment role,
  need Operator input
• RRBs play increased role
• HQMC encroachment program fully staffed
  and funded
• Develop media campaign plan
• Active engagement of agencies and private
  organizations
• Fund Master Plans, more than a MCON
  planmust focus on encroachment and land
  use issues

21
Encroachment Summary

• Summary of Vision

22
Base Management Enduring Themes

• Commanded by a Marine
• Assisted by a City Manager
• Maintain open Base access
• Ability to lock down (FP)
• Base unique
• Layered security measures (AT)
• Privatize/Outsource Non-Core functions -
  non-core is base specific
• Privatize IT and infrastructure
• Participate in non-traditional revenue
  generating activities

23
Base Management Vision

• Commanded by Marines
• Professional base manager
• Privatize, Outsource and Regionalize
  where it makes sense
• Flexibility to engage in business
  ventures
• IT is an outsourced commodity
• Open bases with layered security, ability
  to lock down
• FP/AT measures are base specific

24
Base Management Implications

• USMC commitment to staff command billets
• Base Manager
• Recruitment/hiring
• Professional development
• Privatization/Outsourcing
• Must - pay bills
• Loss of flexibility/control
• Legislation to allow revenue generation
• CO/CG accepts responsibility for
  acceptable security risks

25
Base Management Summary

• Summary of Vision

26
Quality of Service Enduring Themes

• QOS QOL QOWL
• Equity of service and equity to access
• Increased expectations
• Marine communities are of value
• Shared ethos, security, support
• Unit integrity in barracks
• Privatized housing and barracks
• Extend tour lengths to promote family
  stability
• Recognize Geo-bachelor, but no financial
  incentive

27
Quality of Service Vision

• All housing is privatized
• Bachelor housing on base, private rooms
• CO/CG controls assignment and conduct
  standards, unit integrity is maintained
• Consistent with USMC needs, longer
  tour lengths promote family stability
• Market conditions determine how MCCS
  services are delivered
• USMC promotes Quality of Worklife
• Modern spaces
• Safe working conditions
• Fully support future missions

28
Quality of Service Implications

• Market conditions may not support 100
  privatization
• Costs
• BOS/MCON - Sustained increases
• BAH
• Full funding of BAH
• Must pay bill
• Construction - Cost of single rooms
• Culture - Private room for all Marines

29
Quality of Service Summary

• Summary of Vision

30
Process for Today

• Process to Date
• Key Drivers
• What is Next
• POAM
• Integration into IAB

31
What is next?
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 1
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Kick-off

• Document the Vision
• ACMC Committee
• CMC Approval

Field interviews/Data Gathering
IAB Brief (Aug 00)
Alternatives Dev, Eval RRB
Develop Draft Vision
IAB Brief (Dec 00)
Approval Process
Final Vision
32
What is next?

• Institutionalize the Process
• Assessment lens for all actions
• Develop implementation plans
• HQMC/IAB Installation Campaign Plan
• RRB Regionalization plans
• Installations
• Master plans
• Business plans

33
Implementation Process
DPG

• Develop Installation Campaign Plan
• Develop policy
• Develop legislative initiatives
• Develop program plans (housing, MILCON, env,
  etc)
• - Advocate funding requirements
• - Interface with stakeholders

34
Questions?
Vision