Internal Forced Displacement: IDP and the Collaborative Response Legal Concepts and International Me - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Internal Forced Displacement: IDP and the Collaborative Response Legal Concepts and International Me

Description:

No legal or internally agreed definition of Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) ... for alerting the UN Emergency Relief Coordinator (OCHA) of any new or changing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: diak1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Internal Forced Displacement: IDP and the Collaborative Response Legal Concepts and International Me


1
Internal Forced DisplacementIDP and the
Collaborative ResponseLegal Concepts and
International Mechanism
  • Definitions and Distinctions.
  • International Response The Collaborative and
    Cluster Approach.
  • Applicability of the Collaborative Response to
    the Palestinian Case.
  • BADIL and Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre
    (IDMC) Pilot Study on Forced Displacement as a
    Result of the Wall.

2
Who is an IDP?
  • No legal or internally agreed definition of
    Internally Displaced Persons (IDP).
  • The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement
    in 1998 (Deng Principles) defines IDP as persons
    or groups of persons who have been forced or
    obliged to flee or to leave their homes or
    places of habitual residence, in particular as a
    result of or in order to avoid the effects of
    armed conflict, situations of generalized
    violence, violations of human rights or natural
    or human-made disasters, and who have not crossed
    an internationally recognized State border.

3
What is the Difference between an IDP and a
Refugee?
  • The main criteria for qualifying as an internally
    displaced person (IDP) are thus involuntary
    movement and remaining within one's national
    borders.
  • Refugees are persons fleeing persecution, who
    have crossed an international border and who
    either fall within Article 1A or 1D of the 1951
    Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.
    Refugees as persons who owing to well-founded
    fear of being persecuted for reasons of race,
    religion, nationality, membership of a particular
    social group or political opinion, is outside the
    country of his nationality and is unable or,
    owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself
    of the protection of that country or who, not
    having a nationality and being outside the
    country of his former habitual residence as a
    result of such events, is unable or, owing to
    such fear, is unwilling to return to it.

4
Internal Displacement and International Law
  • The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement
    (Deng Principles) states that displacement is
    prohibited when it is based on policies of
    apartheid, ethnic cleansing or similar practices
    aimed at/or resulting in altering the ethnic,
    religious or racial composition of the affected
    population.

5
Responsibility to Assist and Protect
  • Responsibility to assist and protect IDPs lies
    first and foremost with national authorities in
    our case, the occupying power (Israel).
  • In case where the authorities are
    unwilling/unable to meet their responsibilities,
    international humanitarian and development
    organizations have the right to offer their
    services based on protection needs and human
    rights of the displaced.
  • National authorities should grant rapid and
    unimpeded access to the IDP.

6
International Response to IDP
  • No single UN Agency is responsible to assist and
    protect IDPs today.
  • Instead, the international community opted for a
    Collaborative Response to internal displacement
    based on coordination of all UN and other
    humanitarian agencies.
  • The UN Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible
    for alerting the UN Emergency Relief Coordinator
    (OCHA) of any new or changing internal
    displacement situation and coordinating an
    inter-agency response to internal displacement at
    the field level.
  • Mitigated results of the Collaborative Response.

7
International Response to IDP
  • In 2005, the 'Cluster Lead' Approach was created
    allocating clear leadership roles to lead UN
    Agency for each of the sectors or clusters of the
    Collaborative Response.
  • For instance, WFP is in charged of food and
    logistics WHO of health UNICEF of education and
    nutrition, water hygiene and sanitation UNDP of
    early recovery UNHCR emergency shelter and
    protection.
  • There is room for flexibility in the cluster
    leadership approach it will depend of
    resources/capacity on the ground.

8
IDP Category to the OPT?
  • IDP have not yet been recognised as a special
    category of concern in the occupied Palestinian
    territories.
  • No UN Response to IDPs although UNRWA provides
    assistance to displaced refugees.
  • New UN Humanitarian Coordinator to the OPT
    mandated to ensure a coordinated response to
    internal displacement.
  • Need monitoring, studies, profiling and advocacy.

9
Who is an IDP in the OPT?
  • In the OPT, people displaced during the 1967 war
    and subsequently in the course of military
    incursions can be considered IDP provided that
    they remain within the OPT. IDPs include people
    displaced as a result of
  • house demolitions (e.g. Gaza Strip)
  • land confiscations
  • the Wall and its associated regime
  • permit systems (e.g. Jordan Valley)
  • Israeli settler violence/harassment

10
Pilot Study on Internal Displacement as a Result
of the Wall and its Regime
  • The Wall and its Regime do generate forced
    displacement and population transfer 17 of
    persons who moved since 2002 did so as a result
    of the Wall and regime.
  • Increased vulnerability to displacement 64 of
    households are thinking to change their place of
    residence.
  • Affect the fabric of Palestinian society 21
    separated from relatives, 69 say the Wall an
    obstacle to the choice of spouse.
  • Unsustainable coping mechanisms 79 of women and
    68 children have reduced their movement.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com