How We Learn ' ' ' and Why We Dont - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

How We Learn ' ' ' and Why We Dont

Description:

Cognitive Profile Model. The state of the art in learning ... To build understanding and competence in content areas to the top level of Bloom's Taxonomy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: drloisbre
Category:
Tags: dont | learn

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How We Learn ' ' ' and Why We Dont


1
How We Learn . . . and Why We Dont
  • The Cognitive Profile Model

2
Background and Perspective
  • Jungian psychology, personality type theory
  • 4 Bipolar descriptors
  • Introvert/Extravert I or E
  • Sensor/iNtuitive S or N
  • Thinker/Feeler T or F
  • Judger/Perceiver J or P
  • Myers-Briggs Type Inventory
  • Large research base
  • 16 possible types

3
Learning styles
  • Dunn and Dunn
  • Modalities auditory, visual, tactile-kinesthetic
  • Environmental preferences
  • Wide variety of others
  • Some good, some poor
  • Lots of dubious research and opinion based models

4
Gardners Multiple Intelligences
  • Linguistic verbal ability
  • Logical-Mathematical Scientific - problem
    solving ability , non-verbal
  • Spatial ability to form mental models of a
    spatial world
  • Musical ability in composing and performing
  • Bodily kinesthetic ability in athletics, dance,
    fine and applied arts
  • Interpersonal ability to understand and get
    along with others
  • Intrapersonal ability to know yourself
  • Emotional ability to discern and handle emotions

5
Cognitive Profile Model
  • Abbreviated Jungian
  • 2 Bipolar descriptors
  • Sensor/iNtuitive
  • Thinker/Feeler
  • 4 possible types ST, SF, NT, NF
  • Each learner has a profile, some area in each
    quadrant
  • Students focus on their strengths, not their
    weaknesses
  • Manageable in the classroom for teachers
  • www.cognitiveprofile.com

6
Cognitive Profile Model
  • The state of the art in learning styles for
    todays learners
  • The only model to show statistically significant
    improvement in grades
  • Gives teachers new tools to reach the hard to
    teach
  • Gives students the tools to take responsibility
    for their own learning, regardless of teaching
    methods they encounter

7
The Inventory
  • Simple to do, appropriate for middle school
    through adult
  • Takes about 20 minutes
  • Self scoring
  • Consistent, changes generally limited to about 3
  • Readily available in the How We Learn and Why We
    Dont Student Survival Guide from Thomson
    Learning, ISBN 0324-03574-8

8
The Cognitive Profile Model
Major Descriptors
  • Layout of the diagram encourages the learner to
    see the full profile, not just the dominant
    quadrant.

9
Vertical / Perceiving Axis
Sensor
iNtuitive
10
Sensor
  • Concrete learner
  • Small pieces, build to concept,
  • i.e.part to whole
  • Learns through senses of touch, sight, sound,
    taste or smell
  • includes auditory, visual, and tactile
    kinesthetic of Dunn and Dunn
  • Works sequentially
  • Needs repetition and drill

11
Intuitive
  • Abstract learner, Mental images
  • Thinks in pictures, often dreams in color
  • Learns concept first, then fits details in
  • I.e. whole to part
  • Global orientation
  • Opposite of most early educational experiences
  • Frequently considered to be Late Bloomers

12
Horizontal / Judging Axis
Feeler
Thinker
13
Thinker
  • Decisions based on
  • Information
  • Facts
  • Data and analysis
  • Numbers
  • Evident in language I think that . . .

14
Feeler
  • Decisions based on
  • Personal and cultural values
  • Emotions
  • Personal relationships
  • Need to fit in or to rebel
  • Evident in language I feel that . . .

15
Quadrants
  • Sensor Thinker ST
  • Sensor Feeler SF
  • Intuitive Thinker NT
  • Intuitive Feeler NF

Sensor
SF
ST
Thinker
Feeler
NT
NF
iNtuitive
16
Sensor Thinker
  • Concrete
  • Build to concept part to whole
  • Decisions based on facts and information
  • Organized, methodical
  • Detail oriented
  • Needs repetitive drill
  • Prefers to memorize
  • What questions

17
Sensor Feeler
  • Concrete learner
  • Build to concept part to whole
  • Decisions based on emotions, personal values and
    relationships
  • Needs to talk things through
  • Needs to relate to content on a personal level
  • Who questions

18
Intuitive Thinker
  • Abstract reasoning, logical
  • Decisions based on information and analysis
  • Profound need to understand concept
  • Needs overall concept first, then details fit
    into framework i.e. whole to part
  • May learn exceptionally quickly
  • Why questions

19
Intuitive Feeler
  • Abstract
  • Needs overall concept first- whole to part
  • Decisions based on emotions, personal values and
    relationships
  • Creative
  • Metaphorical reasoning makes leaps between
    current material and other concepts seemingly
    unrelated.
  • What if questions

20
Evaluating a PROFILE
  • Instrument seeks preferences, not abilities
  • Describes how we think, learn, and process
    information
  • Everyone has some proportion in each quadrant,
    with one or two quadrants dominant
  • Individual balance of style is the key
  • Thus, a PROFILE

21
Teaching and Learning Strategies by Cognitive
Profiles
  • OK, now that I know theyre all different,
  • what do I do about it?

22
ST strategies
  • Build from details to concept
  • Organize material, use lists
  • Stepwise problem set-ups Chunking
  • Number steps
  • Provide repetitive drill
  • Memorization
  • What questions

23
SF strategies
  • Cooperative groups
  • Encourage them to talk
  • Personalize/personify content
  • Include sensory clues to build strong memories
  • Provide opportunity for practice
  • Role play
  • Who questions

24
NT Strategies
  • Begin with an overview of the concept
  • Or just state lesson objective
  • Build framework into which students fit details
    as they come.
  • Show logical patterns in problem solving
  • Emphasize understanding Why?
  • Use wait time for translation of mental
    pictures into words
  • Why questions

25
NF Strategies
  • Recommend external structure and schedule
  • Begin with an overview of the concept
  • Use metaphorical descriptions
  • Encourage students to share and explain their own
    metaphors
  • Encourage creative methods, intuitive leaps
  • Use wait time
  • What if questions and class discussion

26
Blooms Taxonomy
  • Describes the levels of understanding of material
  • Knowledge recall
  • Comprehension restate, interpret, and apply as
    shown
  • Application Correctly apply without being
    specifically shown
  • Analysis Break into parts and find relationships
  • Synthesis Put pieces together with other content
  • Evaluation Judge applicability of criteria

27
Goal
  • To build understanding and competence in content
    areas to the top level of Blooms Taxonomy

28
Emphasize the Profile
  • Every student has some area in each quadrant
  • Teach to the dominant
  • Build skills in the other quadrants

29
ST Study Strategies
  • Build from details to concept
  • Organize material, use lists
  • Stepwise problem set-ups
  • Do lots of problems for practice
  • Use memorization, but work to build understanding
  • What questions

30
SF Study Strategies
  • Study in a group or with a buddy who is also an
    SF
  • Talk about the content
  • Personalize/personify content
  • Practice
  • Role play
  • Who questions

31
NT Study Strategies
  • Begin with the concept
  • Read the chapter summary first
  • Find the overall patterns to fit details in as
    they come
  • Show logical patterns in problem solving
  • Emphasize understanding Why? as a way to tie
    details together
  • Think and reason through solutions
  • Why questions

32
NF Study Strategies
  • Begin with the concept
  • Read the chapter summary first
  • Use metaphorical descriptions
  • Use your creative methods, intuitive leaps
  • Find active study activities
  • Keep the pencil moving, diagram, doodle, build,
    model
  • Compare and contrast
  • What if questions lead to understanding

33
Career Planning
  • Each quadrant has special skills which should be
    considered in choices of major and career
  • Consider Gardners MI, what special skills does
    the student bring? What is the students overall
    intelligence?
  • Consider the whole profile
  • Which quadrant is subdominant
  • Degree of differences between dominant and
    non-dominant quadrants

34
ST Career Considerations
  • Attention to detail
  • Accurate repetition of complex tasks
  • Recommendations
  • Accounting, bookkeeping
  • Medicine physician, PA, nursing, med. tech
  • Laboratory technician
  • Law
  • Military career
  • Business
  • Teaching upper elementary or secondary

35
SF Career Considerations
  • Nurturing
  • Strong interpersonal skills
  • Attention to detail
  • Recommendations
  • Teaching, especially elementary, early childhood,
    special education
  • Medicine, Psychology, Nursing, patient care
  • Office management
  • Social programs

36
NT Career Considerations
  • Logical, Global orientation
  • Intuitive, able to see all sides
  • Mathematical and spatial skills likely
  • Recommendations
  • Science and Engineering
  • Consider subdominant to suggest type of
    engineering or science
  • Architecture
  • Teaching secondary or higher ed.
  • Business management
  • Negotiator, mediator, facilitator

37
NF Career Considerations
  • Abstract, Creative
  • Often not a strong sense of schedule or linear
    issues
  • Recommendations be very aware of individual
    students talents and concerns
  • Design areas engineering, research sciences,
    architecture
  • Environmental sciences
  • Marketing, advertising
  • Music, fine arts, drama
  • Teaching areas of personal interest and talent

38
The ADD connection
  • Coincidence or correlation?
  • Students presenting a letter of disability status
    with ADD/ADHD were all NF dominant learners
  • Study performed with Clemsons Office of
    Disability Services showed gt99 CL correlation
    between diagnosis of ADD and NF dominance
  • Conclusion rampant misdiagnosis of ADD due to
    lack of understanding/recognition of NF dominant
    learners

39
AD/HD Diagnostic behaviors
  • Problems with sustaining attention in
    conversations, lectures, reading
  • Difficulty persisting with and completing
    projects
  • Easily overwhelmed with tasks of daily living
    such as managing money, paying bills
  • Trouble maintaining an organized living/working
    space
  • Inconsistent performance
  • Lacks attention to detail
  • Impulsive, doesnt adequately anticipate
    consequences
  • Restless, fidgety
  • Impatient, easily frustrated

40
Diagnostic Difficulties
  • Diagnosis depends on degree of problem behavior
    as rated by parents and teachers
  • Highly subjective
  • May depend more on individual expectations of the
    parents and teachers.
  • Public schools receive additional funding for
    classified students.
  • Students on Ritalin, etc. are easier to control

41
What can you do?
  • Every student needs to know their profile
  • Every student needs to know the study techniques
    that will work best for them
  • Every student needs to know their strengths
  • Every student needs to know their goals and
    responsibilities

42
How???
  • How We Learn and Why We Dont Student Survival
    Guide using the Cognitive Profile Model from
    Thomson Learning
  • Second edition due out this summer
  • Orientation Put a copy in the hands of every
    student
  • Have students do the inventory and record their
    profile
  • Counsel students on appropriate study techniques
    and career choices
  • Involve FACULTY with workshops and student
    information

43
Contact information
  • Dr. Lois Breur Krause
  • Clemson University
  • Krause_at_clemson.edu
  • or
  • Krause_at_cognitiveprofile.com
  • http//www.cognitiveprofile.com
  • http//www.cognitiveprofile.com/cpi
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com