Information about protein conformation is important for determining biological function - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Information about protein conformation is important for determining biological function

Description:

One method of probing higher order protein structure is chemical tagging of the ... (Uhrinova et.al., Biochemistry (2000) 39,3565) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: demeta
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Information about protein conformation is important for determining biological function


1
Protein Surface Mapping by Mass Spectrometry to
Monitor pH-Dependent Structural Transitions in
Beta-lactoglobulin A Robert L. Hettich 1 Demet
Ataman1,2 Joshua Sharp 3 1Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, Oak Ridge ,TN 2 ORNL-UTK Genome
Science and Technology Graduate School, Oak
Ridge, TN, 3 NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC
OVERVIEW
  • Information about protein conformation is
    important for determining biological function
  • One method of probing higher order protein
    structure is chemical tagging of the solvent
    accessible residues using oxidation as a labeling
    technique (Maleknia and Chance, Anal. Chem.
    (1999) 71, 3965)
  • We have demonstrated a protein surface mapping
    technique based on hydroxyl radical attachment
    with high-resolution mass spectrometry
    identification to probe the solvent accessibility
    of the proteins native conformation (Sharp,
    et.al. Anal. Biochem. (2003) 313, 216)
  • This surface mapping technique was used to
    investigate the pH-dependent conformational
    changes of ß-lactoglobulin A, providing specific
    details of the opening of the hydrophobic cavity

RESULTS FOR ß-LACTOGLOBULIN A OXIDATION AFTER
TRYPTIC DIGESTION
RESULTS FOR ß-LACTOGLOBULIN A OXIDATION AT PH 7.5
AFTER PEPSIN DIGESTION

EXPERIMENTAL
DISCUSSION
  • In this study, high-resolution mass spectrometry
    and tandem mass spectrometry were used to confirm
    the previous NMR data on the conformational
    changes of ß-lactoglobulin A at different pH
    ranges.
  • At pH 2, there were only a few oxidized residues,
    primarily Trp 19 and Tyr 20 located near the
    N-terminus, and Met 145 and Cys 160 located at
    the C-terminus. None of the residues in the
    hydrophobic cavity or the residues in the a-helix
    were solvent accessible and oxidized. This is
    consistent with fact that ß-lactoglobulin A at
    this pH is in its monomer and closed
    conformation.
  • At pH 4, the protein goes through reversible
    association forming oligomeric structures. The
    protein is still in its closed conformation.
    Therefore the amount of labeling does not change
    dramatically compared to pH 2.
  • At pH 6, the protein is in its closed
    conformation but the E-F loop starts to expose
    the opening of the cavity. In addition to the
    oxidation of residues at N and C terminus, one
    other residue (Ile 71) in the hydrophobic cavity
    is oxidized.
  • At pH 8 (Tanford transition), the solvent
    accessibility and therefore the exposure of
    residues to oxidation increases dramatically with
    the opening of the hydrophobic cavity. Apart from
    residues which are oxidized at the N and C
    termini, Trp61, Ile 71, Ile 72, and Ile 78
    located inside the hydrophobic cavity, and
    residues in the a-helix (Leu 133, Phe 136, Leu
    140) are now oxidized.
  • In the urea-denatured sample, residues located at
    different strands are oxidized in addition to all
    of the oxidized residues seen at different pH
    ranges, which is consistent with the fact that
    ß-lactoglobulin A is now in its extended,
    non-native form.

pH 2 pH 4 pH 6 pH 8 Urea-denatured
Met 7 O (N-terminus) O,2O (N-terminus) O,2O (N-terminus) O(N-terminus) O(N-terminus)
Leu 10 O (N-terminus) O(N-terminus)
Trp 19 O (Strand A ) O (Strand A )
Tyr 20 O (Strand A )
Met 24 O (Strand A ) O (Strand A ) O (Strand A ) O (Strand A ) O (Strand A )
Ile 29 O (A-B loop)
Leu 54 O (Strand C)
Leu 57 O (Strand C)
Trp 61 O (Strand C) O (Strand C)
Cys 66 3O (C-D loop) 3O (C-D loop) 3O (C-D loop) 3O (C-D loop)
Ile 71 O (Strand D) O (Strand D) O (Strand D)
Ile 72 O (Strand D) O (Strand D) O (Strand D)
Ile 78 O (Strand D)
Phe 82 O(D-E loop)
Cys 106 O (Strand G)
Met 107 O (Strand G) O (Strand G) O (Strand G) O (Strand G) O (Strand G)
Leu 117 O (G-H loop)
Cys 121 3O (Strand H) 3O (Strand H) 3O (Strand H) 3O (Strand H) 3O (Strand H)
Leu 122 O (Strand H)
Pro 126 O (H- a-helix)
Leu 133 O (a-helix) O (a-helix)
Phe 136 O (a-helix) O (a-helix)
Leu 140 O (a-helix)
Met 145 O (a-strand I) O (a-strand I) O (a-strand I) O,2O (a-strand I) O,2O (a-strand I)
Phe 151 O (strand I) O (strand I) O (strand I)
Leu 156 O (strand I) O (strand I)
Cys 160 2O,3O (310 helical) 2O,3O(310 helical) 3O(310 helical) 3O (310 helical) 3O (310 helical)
  • Stock solutions of 0.5 mg/ml ß-lactoglobulin A
    were prepared in 10 mM NaCl.
  • Sample solutions were prepared by adjusting the
    pH of the stock solution with HCl or NaOH to 2,
    4, 6 or 8, respectively, in order to obtain
    different structural states of ß-lactoglobulin A.
  • A urea-denaturation sample was prepared by
    adding urea to the pH7.5 sample solution.
  • Each sample had hydrogen peroxide added (15),
    and then was exposed to UV irradiation in a
    Stratalinker 2400 for 5 minutes to generate
    hydroxyl radicals (Sharp, Anal. Chem. 2004, 76,
    672)
  • The intact oxidized protein samples were analyzed
    by ES-FTMS in order to determine the extent of
    oxidation.
  • The oxidized samples were digested with either
    trypsin or pepsin and analyzed by LC-MS/MS
    (quadrupole ion trap, QIT) in order to determine
    the site(s) of the oxidized residues.
  • Turbo SEQUEST was used to determine the putative
    sites of oxidation, which were verified manually.

ESI-FTMS
INTRODUCTION
  • ß-lactoglobulin is a major whey protein found in
    ruminants. In addition to its nutritional
    function, it also is thought to have a
    transportation function due to the pH-dependent
    conformational changes of its structure, as shown
    below.
  • During the transport of the hydrophobic molecules
    in the acidic environment of the stomach, the
    cavity of ß-lactoglobulin A is in its closed
    conformation. In the basic environment of the
    intestine, this protein adjusts its conformation
    to an open position, thereby releasing its cargo.
  • In this study, a surface mapping technique
    involving high resolution mass spectrometry is
    demonstrated for probing the conformational
    changes of native ß-lactoglobulin A in the pH
    range of 2-8. A urea-denaturated sample of the
    protein was used as a control to provide the most
    extended conformation and investigate the most
    oxidized version of this protein.
  • The solvent accessibility, and therefore the
    extent of oxidation, should increase as
    ß-lactoglobulin A adopts to its open conformation
    in response to the pH increase.

Electrospray-Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron
Resonance Mass Spectrometry (9.4 T)
  • As seen in the above table, the level of
    oxidation is pH dependent, and increases with pH.
  • The urea denatured sample was used as a control
    to observe the most extensive labeling.
  • There were residues (Met 7, Met 24, Met 107, Met
    145,Cys 121 and Cys 160) which were oxidized
    regardless of the pH.
  • The residues in the a-helix region were solvent
    accessible and labeled at pH 8 and urea
    denaturation, whereas these residues were buried
    and not oxidized at lower pHs.
  • The degree of residue labeling appears to
    correlate with the different structural changes
    ß-lactoglobulin A goes through at different pHs.

CONCLUSIONS
  • Surface mapping is a useful tool for probing
    pH-dependent conformational changes of
    ß-lactoglobulin A.
  • Consistent with the published NMR and XRC
    results, as the pH increases, the number of
    solvent accessible residues and therefore the
    oxidation level increases as the hydrophobic
    cavity opens.
  • At pH 8, as the E-F loop exposes the hydrophobic
    cavity, the residues within the cavity were
    oxidized.
  • The highest level of oxidation was seen in
    urea-denatured sample as a control, and the
    lowest level of oxidation was seen at pH 2
    (closed conformation).
  • In order to better validate and detect more
    oxidized residues in the peptides which are
    created, both pepsin and trypsin were used for
    digestion of this protein. The protease pepsin
    gave smaller peptides because of its non-specific
    cleavage. The verification of the spectra with
    more peptides will be useful in determining the
    other residues which were not observable with the
    trypsin digestion.

pH-dependent structural states of ß-lactoglobulin
A
ß-lactoglobulin A structure N-terminus (310
helical turn) (residues 1-15) Strand A (residues
16-27) A-B loop (310 helical turn) (residues
28-45) Strand B (residues 46-49) B-C loop
(residues 50-52) Strand C (residues 53-63) C-D
loop (residues 64-69) Strand D (residues
70-78) D-E loop (residues 79-83) Strand E
(residues 84-85) E-F loop (residues 86-89) Strand
F (residues 90-98) F-G loop (residues
99-100) Strand G (residues 101-109) G-H loop (310
helical turn) (residues 110-118) Strand H
(residues 119-124) H-a helix loop (residues
125-130) a helix (residues 131-142 ) a-strand I
(residues 143-150) Strand I (residues
151-157) 310 helical turn (residues 158-162)
Red font indicates regions where oxidized
residues were found
LC-MS/MS (QIT) Base peak
chromatogram of oxidized ß-lactoglobulin A at pH
6.65
  • pH 2 monomer- closed conformation ?hydrophobic
    cavity is closed
  • pH 3.5(monomer?dimer equilibrium)
  • pH gt 3.5(shift to dimer conformation)
  • pH 4 - 5.2 (dimer?octamer)
  • association into aggregates starts around pH 4.6
    (octamer)
  • Maximal association is at the pH range of
    4.40-4.65
  • pH 5.2(octamer?dimer)
  • pH 5.2 - 6 (N-to-Q (Native to Acidic)
    transition)
  • pH 6dimer ?hydrophobic cavity begins to open
  • pH gt 7 (Tanford Transition? N-to-R (Native to
    New conformation)
  • dimer conformation-open conformation?hydrophobic
    cavity is completely exposed
  • pH 10irreversible base-induced unfolding

ß-lactoglobulin A sequence (Urea-denaturation
oxidation coverage)
LIVTQTMKGLDIQKVAGTWYSLAMAASDISLLDAQSAPLRVYVEELKPTP
EGDLEILLQKWENDECAQKKIIAEKTKIPAVFKIDALNENKVLVLDTDY
K KYLLFCMENSAEPEQSLVCQCLVRTPEVDDEALEKFDKALKALPMHIR
LS FNPTQLEEQCHI Blue label - Verified
residues Red label - Unverified residues
Verified residues 4/5 Cysteine 4/4
Methionine 0/2 Histidine 0/4 Tyrosine
1/2 Tryptophan 2/4 Phenylalanine 6/22
Leucine 3/10 Isoleucine 1/8 Proline
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Oxidized Peptides Identified by Pepsin
Digestion Measured Mass Residues
Peptide Sequence 943.442 Da
20-28 YSLAMAASD
(strand A) 699.704
46-51 LKPTPE
(strand B) 756.288
94-99 VLDTDY
(strand F) 1233.658
1-11 LIVTQTMKGLD (N-terminus) 1755.052
137-151 KALKALPMHIRLSF (alpha
strand I)
  • Every color-coded residue is a potentially
    taggable amino acid.
  • Most of the highly-reactive residues (C, M,
    aromatics) were found to be oxidized.
  • The ability to detect and identify the labeled
    residues depends on the efficiency of the
    chemical reaction, sample digestion and
    purification, and the mass spectrometry
    detection.
  • DA acknowledge support from the ORNL-UTK Genome
    Science and Technology Graduate Program
  • Nathan VerBerkmoes and David L. Tabb are
    acknowledged for their technical input.
  • Research was sponsored by the U.S. Department of
    Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental
    Research. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is
    managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U.S.
    Department of Energy under Contract No.
    DE-AC05-00OR22725.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com