Japanese Mora-Timing and Speech Processing: The Case of Devoiced Vowels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Japanese Mora-Timing and Speech Processing: The Case of Devoiced Vowels

Description:

Background on Mora-Timing. Japanese moras are often said to be of ... tookyoo/ /karaoke/ 'Vowel devoicing' is one influence against regular timing: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: natasha9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Japanese Mora-Timing and Speech Processing: The Case of Devoiced Vowels


1
Japanese Mora-Timing and Speech Processing The
Case of Devoiced Vowels
  • Natasha Warner and
  • Naomi Ogasawara
  • University of Arizona

2
Background on Mora-Timing
  • Japanese moras are often said to be of
    approximately equal duration
  • /tookyoo/ /karaoke/
  • µµ µ µ µ µµ µ
  • Vowel devoicing is one influence against
    regular timing devoiced vowels are shorter.
  • /kita/ ki8ta North /kusa/ ku8sa grass
  • /mita/ mita saw /kuma/ kuma bear

3
Perception and processing
  • Most devoicing and mora-timing literature is on
    production.
  • Kato duration changes, even compensatory ones,
    make speech less acceptable to listeners.
  • If regular timing of moras is very important,
    listeners may use it in processing speech.
  • When moras are not regular because of devoicing,
    this could make processing difficult.
  • But if listeners use the phonology, they may
    expect devoicing exactly where it happens.

4
Processing of devoiced vowels
  • Phoneme monitoring (non-words), with voiced and
    devoiced vowels both in appropriate and
    inappropriate environments
  • Listeners hear hoki8to or hokito
    tadZiga or tadZi8ga
  • Press the button as fast as you can whenever you
    hear i as in i, ki, Si,
  • Lexical decision real words, press the button
    if the thing you hear is a real word
  • Example words aki?kan or akikan empty
    can gend?itsu or gend?i?tsureality

5
Examples of stimuli
  • Phon. monitoring Lex. decision
  • hoki8to gend?i?tsu
  • hokito gend?itsu

Does target mora duration differ in the stimuli?
6
Yes, devoicing shortens stimuli
  • Target mora duration and total item duration are
    significantly shorter for devoiced vowels

mora dur. (ms)
(non-)word dur. (ms)
Lex. Decision

aki?kan akikan gend?i?tsu gend?itsu
aki?kan akikan gend?i?tsu gend?itsu
Phon. Monit.
hoki?to hokito tad?i?ga tad?iga
hoki?to hokito tad?i?ga tad?iga
7
Effect on processing words
  • Are devoiced stimuli harder to process because
    they diverge from mora-timing?
  • Reaction Times (ms)
    Error Rates ()

aki?kan akikan gend?i?tsu gend?itsu
aki?kan akikan gend?i?tsu gend?itsu
No. Phonologically appropriate word forms are
easier to process (Lexical decision task).
8
Effect on processing sounds
  • Phoneme monitoring task Reaction times (ms)

Voicing env. appropriate form is easier to
process.
Devoicing env. No effect. Devoiced i8 is
often deleted, making the phoneme hard to
recognize. In the devoicing environment, this
balances out the preference for the
phonologically appropriate form.
hoki?to hokito tad?i?ga tad?iga
9
Intermediate summary
  • Vowels that are appropriately voiced or
    appropriately devoiced are easier to process than
    those that are inappropriate.
  • Listeners prefer phonologically appropriate
    forms, even if that means a vowel is devoiced,
    and a mora is shorter.
  • ? Phonology outweighs any preference for moras to
    be regularly timed.

10
A second test splicing
  • Control perception experiments target mora
    spliced into surrounding (non-)word stimulus, so
    that the only thing that differs between
    conditions is the /i/-mora itself.

h o k j t o
h o k i t
o
Devoiced moras are significantly shorter.
11
Splicing hypothesis
  • Meant as a control, but provides an interesting
    test of processing of timing compensation.
  • Port et al. if one mora is short, others in the
    word lengthen to compensate. Duration of word
    remains predictable.
  • Splicing disturbs any compensation relationship.
  • If there is word-level compensation, spliced
    stimuli should be harder to process, because they
    violate timing patterns.

12
Splicing perception results
Reaction Times (ms) Error
Rates ()
Lex. Decision Phon. Monit.
Spliced stimuli are no harder to process.
13
Conclusions
  • Listeners find it easier to process forms with
    phonologically appropriate (de)voicing, even
    though moras diverge from regular timing.
  • Altering the compensation relationship within the
    word does not hinder processing.
  • Listeners are sensitive to the phonological
    patterns in their language, and use them more
    than any expectation of regular timing in
    processing.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com