ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP for the BOARD OF DIRECTORS MISSOURI ASSESSMENT PROGRAM End of Course, Adequate Y

1
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOPfor the BOARD OF
DIRECTORSMISSOURI ASSESSMENT PROGRAMEnd of
Course, Adequate Yearly Progress DISAGGREGATE
REPORTA Race to the Top

• Submitted by
• Curriculum Instruction
• Dr. Beverly Phillips,
• Chief Administrative Officer
• Dr. Janice M. Cade,
• Coordinator of Research Evaluation
• October 13, 2009

2
Education is no longer just a pathway to
opportunity and success-its a prerequisite for
success.

• Barack Obama
• President of the United States of America

The purpose of public education is to prepare
our children for a future filled with options.
The promise of public education is to educate
alleveryone of them.
Department of Elementary and Secondary
Education Commissioner Chris Nicastro
3
The Agenda

• Brief Overview of MAP, End of Course (EOC)
  Assessments and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
• Panel Discussion on MAP, EOC and AYP
• Teachers
• Students
• Disaggregate Information
• School Reports
• Closing

4
Missouri Assessment Program(MAP)

• Evaluates student performance by
• Show Me Standards
• Grade Level Expectation strands for Elementary
  and Middle (GLES)
• Content Level Expectations strands for High
  Schools (CLES)
• Has a Terra Nova component that
• is standardized
• provides a national percentile score
• allows comparisons to students in national sample
• Provides a Lexile Score
• Common scale matching reader ability and text
  difficulty
• Reader must comprehend at least 75 of specified
  material on a certain reading level
• Offers a list of suggested literature titles for
  readers

5
The MAP

• The achievement levels
• Advanced
• Proficient
• Basic
• Below Basic
• Assesses students in
• Grades 3-8 in Communication Arts
• Grades 3-8 in Mathematics
• Grades 5 and 8 in Science
• New High School Assessments Replace Grade 10 11
  tests
• End of Course (EOC)
• Given in Algebra I, Biology and English II
• American Government will be added this year

6
MAP Achievement Level ReportDistrict Totals -
Index Scores

• MAP Index (MPI) score gains in Com Arts
• All grades except grade 6 improved
• In English 2, 56.1 scored advanced and
  proficient
• MAP Index (MPI) score gains in Science
• Grades 5 8 improved
• In Biology, 36.2 scored advanced and proficient

• MAP Index (MPI) score gains in Mathematics
• Four (4) out of six (6) grades improved
• In Algebra 1, 25.1 scored advanced and
  proficient

7
MAP and EOC Results

• EOC
• English II 757.5
• Algebra I 709.5
• Biology I 733.3

MAP score increases from 2008 to 2009
8
MAP Scores District vs. StatePercent Proficient
and AdvancedCom Arts, Math, Science
Legend State District
9
The MAP

• MAP data determines Annual Yearly Progress (AYP)
  targets for NCLB legislation in
• Communication Arts
• Mathematics
• District AYP Results in 2008
• In 2008
• 1 out of 8 for Com Arts (Asian)
• 2 out of 8 for Math (Asian, White)
• In 2009
• Com Arts 4 out of 8 groups (Asian, Hispanic,
  White, LEP)
• Math 1 out of 8 groups (Asian)

10
Schools That Achieved AYP
CELEBRATE!!

• Warford Elementary
• Hickman Mills High School
• Partial AYP
• Santa Fe Elementary
• Ruskin High School

11
Meeting AYP Requirements

• Proficiency Target (2009- CA 59.2, MA 54.1)
• Attendance/Graduation Rate
• Participation Rate
• Confidence Interval
• A way to account for errors in classification
• Safe Harbor
• Participation, additional indicators and decrease
  numbers scoring below by 10
• Growth Index

12
DISTRICTAYP DISAGGREGATE
13
Panel Discussion

• Heather Reilly, Ruskin
• Antonyesha Adams Harvey. student,
  Ruskin
• Richard Bellotti, HMHS
• Michael Warren, student, Hickman Mills High

• Tiffany Welsh, Warford
• Jodi McHenry, Warford
• Annalise Thurber, Santa Fe

14
Disaggregate Data
MISSOURI ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

• ARE WE CLOSING THE GAP?

15
District Achievement GapProficient and Advanced
Scores okin Communication Arts
Are We Closing the Gap?
16
District Achievement Gap ok
Are We Closing the Gap?
17
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
18
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
19
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
20
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
21
Special Programs

• Limited English Proficiency (LEP/ELL)
• Individual Education Plan (IEP-SPED)
• Free or Reduced Lunch (FL/RDL)
• Gender (Females/Males)

Not everything that is faced can be changed,
but nothing can be changed until it is
faced! James Baldwin
22
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
Com Arts Grade 3
23
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
Math Grade 3
24
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
Com Arts Grade 7
25
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
Mathematics Grade 7
26
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
Com Arts Grade 4
27
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
Mathematics Grade 4
28
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
Com Arts Grade 8
29
Achievement LevelsBy Index Scores for Sub-groups
ok
Mathematics Grade 8
30
Team Breakout Groups

• Administrators will be divided into six teams to
  discuss specific MAP school results.
• Board Members will visit all teams, ten minutes
  at a time, making sure to visit all teams.
• The team members will discuss MAP data, what
  strategies are working and share what they are
  going to do differently in their schools to
  improve the data.
• Principals will take Board Member questions.

31
Teams Represented

• Elementary
• Dr. Everlyn Williams, Warford
• Dr. Rodney Watson
• Lisa Smith
• Middle School
• Jan Davis
• Dr. Lannie Milon
• Angie Mc Conico
• Bernice Dixon
• Special Programs
• Stephanie Hill
• Phillena Layne

• Elementary
• Dr. Diana Swezy, Santa Fe
• Casey Klapmeyer
• Dr. Roger Williams
• Elementary
• Shaunda Fowler
• Gail White
• Teresa Tanner
• High School
• James Tinsley
• Bill Scully
• Dr. Terita McCauley

32
Recommendations for Improvement

• Communication Arts
• Focused staff development
• Improved lesson planning
• Increased monitoring
• Focus on reading and writing
• Teach aligned curriculum
• Emphasis on instructional rigor and DOK
• Enroll more students in AP curriculum classes
• Improve use of instructional strategies and
  instructional methods
• Increase the use of technology for instruction
• Provide interventions and progress monitoring

• Mathematics
• Continue Benchmarking using Common Assessments
  Pre and Post Testing
• Focused staff development
• Improved lesson planning and staff collaboration
• Increased monitoring
• Emphasis on rigor and DOK
• Enroll more students in AP curriculum classes
• Teach basic skills at all levels in mini sessions
• Increase the use of technology for instruction
• Provide interventions and progress monitoring

FOCUS ON THE MAP TEST!!!
33
THE END