Improving the culture and sport offer to our communities' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Improving the culture and sport offer to our communities'

Description:

Been through a difficult spending review. Have new relationships between central and local government based on. ... where there is little or no evidence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: mario209
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving the culture and sport offer to our communities'


1
Improving the culture and sport offer to our
communities.
  • Nottinghamshire Chief Officers Group.
  • 20th October 2009

2
Work Opportunity come hand in hand but dont
miss the big picture.
  • Gordon Ramsay.

3
and
People
Places
Culture Sport
An authority that fails to value the power of -
and need for - cultural services, is one which
will struggle to meet the needs and aspirations
of its local communities. Derrick
Anderson Chief Executive London Borough of
Lambeth
4
We all have a passion for what we do?
  • Participation helps people to
  • belong in communities
  • Participation helps people
  • stay healthy and feel good
  • Participation teaches
  • tolerance, bonding, and
  • reduces anti social behaviour

5
Other people are sharing our passion!
  • At the end of LAA process
  • 104 of 150 LAAs have a sport and
  • culture specific indicator as an
  • improvement or local target
  • Only 9 LSPs have no culture and
  • sport related improvement target or local
    indicator in their LAA

6
But our impact is patchy!
7
But not everyone is satisfied ?
Aggregate scores for single and upper tier
authorities
2008 place survey
2003
2006
satisfied
Parks
Sports leisure
Libraries
Museums
Theatres
8
And we are not yet performing well enough?
  • For the second year in a row, overall culture
    service assessment scores improved in 2008.
  • In total, 44 councils improved their culture
    score between 2007 and 2008.
  • However, 22 councils also received a lower
    culture score in 2008 than in 2007.

  • 2008 CPA

9
Looking ahead
  • By April 2011we will-
  • Have had an election
  • Been through a difficult spending review
  • Have new relationships between central and local
    government based on..
  • Increased localism
  • Greater focus on efficiency VFM
  • Evidencing contribution to priorities
  • New ways of working and innovation

10
The commissioning opportunity
  • If we attracted just 0.5 of the 284 billion
    spent locally on health, childrens services and
    adult care through commissioning we would
    increase the spend on culture and sport by
    councils by 45.
  • Wigan Leisure has been commissioned over many
    years to run a wide range of programmes and
    services on behalf of the PCT, with commissioning
    contracts now totalling over 2 million per
    annum.
  • Blackburn with Darwen working with the local
    primary care trust has committed 6 million of
    additional funding to its Healthy Living
    programme to get more people more active more
    often.
  • Sefton Leisure Services now has over 2 million
    of external funding for services commissioned by
    the Sefton primary care trust.

11
Culture and Sport improvement Toolkit.
12
Key principles
  • the key benefit comes from identifying areas for
    improvement and producing a clear improvement
    plan to focus on agreed priorities
  • the process enables you to identify areas for
    improvement as you assess and provides guidance
    on turning these into a final improvement plan

13
Key principles
  • judgements must be supported by evidence
  • a schedule of evidence and probes is provided
  • 360 degree uses a benchmark for partners and the
    corporate centre to assess the organisations
    positioning in corporate and LSP priorities
  • (optional but important element of the single
    tool)

14
The Themes
  • The benchmark measures performance against 8
    themes
  • Leadership and corporate governance
  • Policy and Strategy
  • Community Engagement
  • Partnership Working
  • Use of Resource
  • People Management
  • Customer service
  • Performance, achievement and Learning
  • It measures these using 32 criteria which are
    described by a range of key features

15
The levels.
  • The criteria and key features are measured at one
    of
  • four levels
  • Poor
  • An organisation where there is little or no
    evidence
  • against the pertinent criteria, or no awareness
    or
  • commitment to create or develop the criteria
  • Fair
  • An organisation where there is evidence that the
  • processes of planning and developing the criteria
  • has begun and is progressing
  • Good
  • An organisation where there is evidence that
  • demonstrates the key criteria are in place
  • Excellent
  • An organisation where the key criteria have

16
Validation and peer challenge
  • You are encouraged to seek a critical friend who
    can challenge the process while you are carrying
    it out
  • The existing process of validation is available
    for use with the toolkit
  • Peer challenge is also available an alternative
    to validation

17
The self- assessment process
18
Scoping the self-assessment
  • who and what is the organisation - who is
    responsible for delivering your strategy and
    services?
  • should the scope include others who support you,
    internally, external trusts / contractors, vol
    orgs, on whom you are dependent for delivery of
    service?
  • who are the leaders community in the
    organisation, managerially and politically?

19
Completing the self assessment
  • Be open and honest about your current position
  • The assessment can then be used to
  • Identify areas of strength and of weakness
  • Identify, and explain, different interpretations
    of the services position in each element and in
    the eight themes

20
Carrying out 360 feedback
  • The purpose of the 360 review is to
  • Raise awareness and engage the corporate centre
    and LSP in the assessment
  • Triangulate your view of the position of
    cultural services with the view of partners and
    stakeholders

21
Scoring.
22
Improvement planning
  • It is important that
  • Improvements are prioritised, focusing on those
    that will make the biggest impact
  • The improvements are measurable and actions can
    be monitored against the desired effects
  • The plan must be SMART specific tasks that are
    realistic, resourced, with clear accountability
    and deadlines for delivery
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com