Water Services Training Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Water Services Training Group

Description:

IHDR ... 3333f3 33 3 33 3f 3 3 3 3f3fff ff f3f33ff3f 3f3f 3fff3fffff ffff ... 3 33 f3 3 3 3 f 3f ff f f f 3 f 3 f 3 f 3f 3 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: wsn8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Water Services Training Group


1
Water Services Training Group
  • WRc FOG Project
  • Engineering/Operations Issues

2
Engineering/Operations Issues
  • Andy Drinkwater/Frank Moy
  • FOG Team
  • WRc

3
WRc FOG Project
  • Work Package 1 Legal
  • Work Package 2 Sociological
  • Work Package 3 Biological/chemical
  • Work Package 4a Engineering designing FOG out
    (sewers/ pumping stations, grease separators)
  • Work Package 4b Operations cleaning techniques
    etc (sewers/ pumping stations)

4
Engineering/Operations Issues
  • Grease separator selection
  • Products database
  • Jetting and cleaning of FOG from sewers
  • Sewer design
  • Pumping station design

5
FOG Work Package 4 - Deliverables
  • Reports
  • Operational Problems caused by FOG
  • Guidance document on Sewer Cleaning and Blockage
    Removal Techniques
  • Factors that Influence FOG Accumulation on Sewer
    Pipes
  • Design to Minimise FOG Deposition and Associated
    Operational Disruption
  • Review of Use of Grease Separators
  • Grease Separator Advice

6
FOG Work Package 4 - Deliverables
  • FOG Strategy various advice sheets and
    leaflets, including
  • Grease separator advice
  • Operational guidance improved cleaning
    procedures
  • Design guidance for sewers and pumping stations
  • Guidance for improving existing sewer systems and
    pumping stations

7
Grease separator selection
  • Large number of different types of separator are
    now commercially available
  • Many are not of the traditional design and, as
    such, are not covered, by a standard
  • However, many of the new designs show promise and
    deserve further investigation

8
Grease separator selection (2)
  • When considering new types of separator, look at
  • Their practicality - ease to install, where to
    install, ease to maintain/clean etc
  • Their overall effectiveness
  • Guidance given by manufacturers/ suppliers etc
    size/installation etc

9
Grease separator standard
  • The standard (EN 1825)
  • Difficult to understand (information spread
    between Part 1 and Part 2)
  • Only considers conventional large underground
    separators Not practical for most town centre
    catering outlets
  • No consideration of more recent separator
    designs, including skimmers.

10
Grease separator standard (2)
  • The standard (EN 1825)
  • Does not consider hybrids Dosing and separators
  • Most separator suppliers dont understand EN 1825
  • Suppliers have a variety of sizing methods
  • Seems to be little standardisation but plenty of
    confusion
  • Often, sizing is only for the food trap part
    ofthe separator

11
EN 1825 separator
12
Active separator (skimmer)
13
Grease separator selection
  • Three main issues to consider
  • Location/access
  • Size
  • Maintenance
  • Each property is unique
  • Selection is an iterative process
  • may need combination of separator/ biological
    solution

14
Grease separator selection
  • Location
  • Close to source connect all sources
    (dishwashers issue)
  • Far enough away for effluent cooling
  • Upstream of other inputs (rainwater and foul
    water)
  • Outside units preferable - Consider internal
    units at properties with no external space
  • Enable access for cleaning/maintenance

15
Grease separator selection
  • Size
  • To provide adequate retention time for separation
    to take place - determined by
  • Flow rate to the separator
  • Volume of FOG in discharge
  • Maintenance frequency v size

16
Grease separator selection
  • Maintenance
  • By whom
  • Staff small separators, easy access, cleaning
    record, storage of wastes
  • Contractor for larger underground separators,
    less frequent visits, vactor units remove wastes
    from site
  • Frequency determined by storage capacity of the
    separator

17
Inadequate grease separators
  • Examples of two small and poorly maintained
    separators

18
Products database
  • Database including details of
  • Grease separators and Biological treatments
  • Product/company name
  • Contact details for products
  • Basic product information
  • Guidance on appropriate applications
  • Available to contributors and their agents
    through password access

19
Jetting and cleaning
  • The most frequent symptom of FOG in the sewer
    system is a blockage
  • Sewer blockages may occur at any point on the
    sewer system, from the point of source to the
    wastewater treatment works
  • Sewer blockages can be categorised as a primary
    or secondary blockage

20
Jetting and cleaning
  • Primary FOG related blockages are due to natural
    deposition of FOG at a specific location as a
    result of the combination of
  • a source and appropriate type of FOG,
  • concentration of FOG in the flow,
  • the natural processes of separation, and
  • hydraulic conditions

21
Jetting and cleaning
  • Secondary FOG blockages are those that occur as a
    direct result of a previous blockage or severe
    flow restriction.
  • Flow velocity upstream of the original blockage
    will reduce - FOG that would otherwise remain in
    the flow will separate out.
  • FOG will be high on the pipe wall or in the crown
    of the upstream pipe, due to the increased depth
    of flow
  • Sewer debris, (sanitary towels and other sewage
    debris) then sticks to the FOG on the crown of
    small pipes, a secondary blockage subsequently
    develops

22
Jetting and cleaning practice
  • The following may seem obvious BUT experience
    often shows otherwise !
  • All FOG related blockages must be effectively
    cleared and the upstream pipe effectively cleaned
    to prevent repeat incidents
  • A recommended procedure has been proposed to
    ensure effective cleansing

23
Jetting and cleaning practice (2)
  • General purpose jets are a compromise
  • Removal of FOG from a sewer should be carried out
    as a staged and incremental process
  • General purpose jet to remove soft debris
  • Plough to remove hard sediments,
  • Spinning jet to remove FOG
  • Survey with a camera

24
Jetting heads
25
Jetting heads
26
Jetting and cleaning practice (3)
  • Analysis shows that the correct cleaning practice
    will be beneficial in terms of
  • Reducing the number of operational disruptions
  • Improving customer satisfaction
  • Cost effectiveness

27
Jetting and cleaning
  • Before and after using recommended procedure

28
Jetting and cleaning practice (4)
  • Should the dislodged FOG be
  • Removed at the manhole
  • or
  • Passed forward ?
  • No evidence of significant problems if

29
Jetting and cleaning practice (5)
  • Break fragments into small pieces, remove large
    fragments
  • Remove large quantities
  • Remove if FOG is mixed with sediment

30
Jetting and cleaning practice (6)
  • Remove if downstream problems may occur
  • Notify operators of pumping stations and works of
    the possibility of dislodged FOG being passed
    downstream

31
Jetting and cleaning practice
32
Sewer design
  • Greater likelihood of FOG deposition/ adherence
  • Higher concentration of FOG
  • Lower the temperatures of the pipe surfaces
  • Slower the velocity of flow/movement of effluent

33
Existing sewer improvements (1)
  • First option control FOG at source
  • Good kitchen practice
  • Install grease separators and/or
  • Biological treatment systems
  • Modest improvements to drainage system to reduce
    areas with low velocity
  • Other measures
  • Improve sewer cleaning/blockage practice
  • Consider off line, as opposed to on-line tanks

34
Existing sewer improvements (2)
  • Modest improvements to drainage system to reduce
    areas with low velocity
  • Removal of Buchan traps
  • Relay pipes with sags, to enable positive
    gradient
  • Removal of tree roots
  • Make good intruding laterals (use of saddle
    connections etc)
  • Improve benching/pipe layout in manholes
  • Install drop pipes to high level connections

35
Existing sewer improvements (3)
  • Where existing systems need to be altered to
    reduce CSO spills etc, ensure that the
    improvement will not result in areas of low
    velocity/tranquil flow where serious FOG
    deposition could occur.
  • Similarly, where storage needs to be added to
    reduce sewer flooding
  • (These may seem obvious, but they have happened)

36
New sewer design to avoid FOG
  • The following should be done as good practice, to
    ensure there are no areas with very low velocity
  • Pipe velocity, 0.6 m/s or greater
  • Use minimum number of pipe joints (joints
    dissipate energy in small flows)
  • Use easier to clean pipe materials
  • Good detailing of connections (saddles etc)
  • Good detailing in manholes

37
New sewer design to avoid FOG
  • Also
  • Avoid flow control devices
  • If tanks are necessary, use off-line systems

38
Pumping station design
  • Greater likelihood of FOG build up with
  • Higher concentration of FOG
  • Low velocity/movement in the wet well
  • More tranquil the effluent in the wet well
  • If there are dead zones in the wet well

39
Existing pumping station improvements (1)
  • Where possible, remove dead zones
  • Remove redundant/non essential equipment
  • Remove baffles from incoming flows
  • Consider re-profiling wet well floor
  • Ensure effluent is mixed at start of pump down

40
Existing pumping station improvements (2)
  • Refit with easy clean materials
  • Replace fouled float switches with ultrasonics
    (located clear of the effluent)
  • Use varying pump on/off levels , to avoid FOG
    shelves at pump on level
  • Improve access to wet wells, for cleaning
    purposes
  • Review pump regimes to reduce FOG deposition in
    rising mains

41
Problem pumping station
42
Problem pumping station
43
Problem pumping station
44
Problem pumping station
45
New pumping station design (1)
  • Greater likelihood of FOG build up
  • Higher concentration of FOG
  • Low velocity/movement in the wet well
  • Ensure wet well does not have dead zones

46
New pumping station design (2)
  • Avoid dead zones
  • Use circular wet wells
  • Use deep/small diameter wet wells better mixing
  • Avoid excessive use of equipment in the wet well
  • Minimise use of dividing walls
  • Make use of energy/turbulence caused by incoming
    flow
  • Use of non stick materials

47
FOG Work Package 4 - Deliverables
  • Reports
  • Operational problems caused by FOG
  • Guidance document on Sewer Cleaning and Blockage
    Removal Techniques
  • Factors that Influence FOG Accumulation on Sewer
    Pipes
  • Design to Minimise FOG Deposition and Associated
    Operational disruption
  • Review of Use of Grease Separators
  • Grease Separator Advice

48
FOG Work Package 4 - Deliverables
  • FOG Strategy various advice sheets and
    leaflets, including
  • Grease separator advice
  • Operational guidance improved cleaning
    procedures
  • Design guidance for sewers and pumping stations
  • Guidance for improving existing sewer systems and
    pumping stations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com